Grado de satisfacción y conocimiento de pacientes positivos para HIV ante el cambio de tenofovir a tenofovir-alafenamida en tratamientos con emtricitabina y rilpivirina / Satisfaction and knowledge among patients with HIV after switching from tenofovir to tenofovir alafenamide in regimens containing emtricitabine and rilpivirine

Introducción. La satisfacción y el conocimiento del cambio de tenofovir por tenofovir- alafenamida en pacientes con HIV no se han estudiado aún. Estos dos parámetros se relacionan con mejores resultados en salud y, por lo tanto, es importante medirlos durante la práctica clínica habitual. Objetivo. Evaluar el grado de conocimiento y satisfacción de los pacientes positivos para HIV ante el cambio de tratamiento antirretroviral con rilpivirina, emtricitabina y tenofovir (RPV-FTC-TDF) por rilpivirina, emtricitabina y tenofovir-alafenamida (RPV-FTC-TAF). Materiales y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo en un hospital de tercer nivel entre los meses de septiembre y noviembre de 2018. Se incluyeron pacientes previamente tratados con RPV-FTC-TDF que acudían por segunda vez a consulta para recibir el tratamiento con RPV-FTC-TAF. La satisfacción y el grado de conocimiento se analizaron mediante nueve preguntas, usando una escala de tipo Likert de 5 puntos para evaluar el grado de acuerdo. Resultados. Se incluyeron 116 pacientes en el estudio. El 75 % de ellos se mostró satisfecho con el cambio y se consideró que el 64 % conocía lo que implicaba. Los pacientes jóvenes se mostraron menos satisfechos con el modo en que se les explicó el cambio (p=0,0487). Los pacientes estaban mejor informados sobre las ventajas renales (85 % de conocimiento) y óseas (82 %) de la nueva medicación, que sobre sus inconvenientes para el perfil lipídico (40 %). Conclusiones. En general, los pacientes se mostraron satisfechos con el cambio de medicación y conocían la posología del medicamento y las ventajas de la tenofovir- alafenamida frente al tenofovir, pero no sus posibles efectos adversos.

Introduction: Satisfaction and knowledge among patients with HIV after switching from tenofovir to tenofovir/alafenamide remain unexplored. Given that both parameters are associated with better health outcomes it is relevant to measure them in patients during routine clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate the degree of knowledge and satisfaction in patients who had their antiretroviral regimen switched from rilpivirine (RPV)/emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective study in a third-level hospital between September, 2018, and November, 2018. We included patients who had previously been treated with RPV/FTC/TDF and collected their RPV/FTC/TAF treatment in the second visit. A 5-point Likert-type agreement/disagreement scale was used to assess satisfaction and knowledge regarding the medication switch. Results: We included 116 patients in the study of whom 75% were satisfied and 64% had a high-level of knowledge. Young patients were less satisfied with the way in which the change was explained (p=0.0487). Concerning the new medication, the patients were better informed about its renal (85% of them) and bone benefits (82%) than about its adverse effects on the lipid profile (40%). Conclusions: The patients were generally satisfied with the change in medication and well informed about the dosage and advantages of TAF over TDF, but less well informed about the possible adverse effects of TAF.

Chemotherapy Near the End of Life in Onco-Hematological Adult Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The use of chemotherapy near the end of life is not advisable. There are scarce data in Europe but shows signs of aggressiveness. We designed this study to analyze the proportion of onco-hematological patients receiving chemotherapy within their last 2 weeks of life as well as starting a new chemotherapy regimen in the 30 days prior to death. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Adults who died of an onco-hematological neoplasia while hospitalized between April 2017 and March 2018 were included. We assessed the use of chemotherapy over the course of the last 14 days of life, defined as the administration of at least one dose of chemotherapy. We also examined the proportion of patients starting a new chemotherapy regimen in the last 30 days of life. RESULTS: A total of 298 inpatients died in the Hematology and Oncology units. During the last 14 days, 28.2% (n = 11) of hematological and 26.3% (n = 68) of oncological patients received chemotherapy; the overall rate was 26.5% (n = 79). Furthermore, the proportion of patients starting a new chemotherapy regimen in the last 30 days of life was high (20.5% and 20.8%, respectively). Female gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-3.35) and age <45 (OR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.05-6.88) were associated with higher rates of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life was high, as well as the proportion of patients starting a new regimen in their last 30 days. This was indicative of excessive aggressiveness at the end-of-life care.

Grading the potential safety risk of medications used in hospital care.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to stratify medications used in hospital  care according to their potential risk. METHOD: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical subgroups were classified according to their potential risk. A literature search, bulletins, and alerts issued by patient safety organizations were used to identify the potential safety risk of  these subgroups. Nine experts in patient/medication safety were selected to score the subgroups for their appropriateness in the classification. Two evaluation rounds were conducted: the first by email and the second by a  panel meeting. RESULTS: A total of 298 Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical subgroups were  evaluated. They were classified into three scenarios (low, medium, and high  risk). In the first round, 266 subgroups were classified as appropriate to the  assigned scenario, 32 were classified as uncertain, and none were classified as  inappropriate. In the second round, all subgroups were classified as appropriate.  The most frequent subgroups in the low-risk scenario belonged to  group A "Alimentary tract and metabolism" (44%); the most frequent in the  medium-risk scenario belonged to group J "Antiinfectives for systemic use"  (32%); and the most frequent in the high-risk scenario belonged to group L  "Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents" (29%) and group N "Nervous  system" (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, Anatomical  Therapeutic Chemical subgroups used in hospital care were classified according  to their potential risk (low, medium, or high). These lists can be incorporated  into a risk-scoring tool for future patient/medication safety studies.

Objetivo: Estratificar los medicamentos utilizados en el ámbito hospitalario según el riesgo de provocar daño al paciente.Método: Se utilizó la metodología RAND/UCLA para clasificar los subgrupos terapéuticos del código Anatómica, Terapéutica, Química según el  riesgo de provocar daño al paciente. Para ello se realizó una revisión de la  evidencia disponible en publicaciones, boletines y alertas de organismos de  seguridad del paciente. A continuación se seleccionaron nueve expertos en  seguridad del paciente/medicamento para evaluar la clasificación de los  subgrupos terapéuticos: una primera ronda de evaluación por vía telemática y  una segunda ronda en una reunión presencial en la que se presentaron y  discutieron los resultados de la primera.Resultados: Se evaluaron 298 subgrupos terapéuticos. Se clasificaron en tres  escenarios (riesgo bajo, medio y alto). En la primera ronda se clasificaron 266  subgrupos como adecuados al escenario asignado, 32 subgrupos fueron  clasificados como inciertos y ninguno fue clasificado como inapropiado. En la  segunda ronda, todos los subgrupos fueron clasificados como adecuados. Los  subgrupos más frecuentes en el escenario de riesgo bajo pertenecieron al Grupo  A: "Tracto alimentario y metabolismo" (44%), en el de riesgo medio al Grupo J:  "Antiinfecciosos para uso sistémico" (32%), y en el de riesgo alto al Grupo L:  "Agentes antineoplásicos e inmunomoduladores" (29%) y al Grupo N: "Sistema  nervioso" (26%).Conclusiones: La metodología RAND/UCLA ha permitido estratificar los  subgrupos utilizados en el ámbito hospitalario según el riesgo potencial de  provocar daño al paciente. Esta estratificación puede servir como herramienta  para futuros estudios de seguridad en la utilización de medicamentos.

Technology-induced errors associated with computerized provider order entry software for older patients.

Background The introduction of new technologies in the prescribing process has seen the emergence of new types of medication errors. Objective To determine the prevalence and consequences of technology-induced prescription errors associated with a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system in hospitalized older patients. Setting Patients 65 years or older admitted to the Departments of Internal Medicine, General Surgery, and Vascular Surgery of a tertiary hospital. Method Prospective observational 6-month study. Technology-induced errors were classified according to various taxonomies. Interrater reliability was measured. Consequences were assessed by interviewing patients and healthcare providers and classified according to their severity. Main outcome measure Prevalence of technology-induced errors. Results A total of 117 patients were included and 107 technology-induced errors were recorded. The prevalence of these errors was 3.65%. Half of the errors were clinical errors (n = 54) and the majority of these were classified as wrong dose, wrong strength, or wrong formulation. Clinical errors were 9 times more likely to be more severe than procedural errors (14.8 vs 1.9%; OR 9.04, 95% CI 1.09-75.07). Most of the errors did not reach the patient. Almost all errors were related to human-machine interactions due to wrong (n = 61) or partial (n = 41) entries. Conclusion Technology-induced errors are common and intrinsic to the implementation of new technologies such as CPOE. The majority of errors appear to be related to human-machine interactions and are of low severity. Prospective trials should be conducted to analyse in detail the way these errors occur and to establish strategies to solve them and increase patient safety.

Prevalence and risk factors for medication reconciliation errors during hospital admission in elderly patients.

Background Care transitions are risk points for medication discrepancies, especially in the elderly. Objective This study was undertaken to assess prevalence and describe medication reconciliation errors during admission in elderly patients and to analyze associated risk factors. We also evaluate the effect of these errors on the length of hospital stay. Setting General surgery, orthopedics, internal medicines and infectious diseases departments of a 1070-bed Spanish teaching hospital. Method This is a prospective observational study. Patients >65 years and taking ≥5 medications were randomly selected from those admitted to hospital. The pharmacist obtained the best possible medication history based on medical records, medical notes from patients' previous admissions to hospital, "brown bag" review, community care prescriptions, and comprehensive patient interviews. It was compared to current inpatient prescription to detect unintentional discrepancies (discrepancy with no apparent clinical explanation), which were reported to the physician. When the physician accepted the discrepancy by changing the medication order, it was recorded as a medication reconciliation error and classified by type of error. Several variables were analyzed as possible risk/protective factors. Main outcome measure Is prevalence of medication reconciliation errors at admission. Results Reconciliation was performed on 206 patients. Medication reconciliation errors occurred in 49.5 % (102/206) of patients. 1996 medications were recorded, and 359 had unintentional discrepancies (56.0 % (201/359) medication reconciliation errors). The most common was omission (65.1 %). Identified risk factors were as follows: physician experience, number of pre-admission prescribed medications, and previous surgeries. Computerized order entry system was a protective factor. Conclusion Medication reconciliation errors occur in almost half of the elderly patients at admission, especially omissions. Risk factors were a larger number of previous medications, less physician years of experience, and more previous surgeries. Having a computerized order entry system in the hospital protected against some errors.

[Anticholinergic burden and delirium in elderly patients during acute hospital admission]. / Carga anticolinérgica y delirium en pacientes mayores durante la hospitalización en una unidad de agudos de geriatría.

BACKGROUND: The use of anticholinergic drugs in the elderly has been associated to an increased frequency of delirium. There are different scales for estimating the anticholinergic burden, such as the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB). The aim of the study is to establish the relationship between anticholinergic burden measured by ADS, ARS, and ACB scales and incident or prevalent delirium. METHODS: An ambispective observational study was conducted for 76 days in the acute geriatric unit of a tertiary hospital. All patients over 80 years-old were included, except re-admissions or those subjected to palliative care. The data collected included sex, age, chronic medication and any recent changes, recent drugs prescribed prior to an episode of delirium, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, dementia, visual and auditory impairment, and their combination as sensory impairment, previous falls, stroke, brain tumour, and incident and prevalent delirium. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included. Incident delirium was detected in 8.1% of the patients, and prevalent delirium in 40.9%. A statistically significant association was established between anticholinergic drugs and the incident delirium measured by the ARS scale (P=.017). None of the scales was able to establish a significant association with prevalent delirium. CONCLUSION: The ARS scale was related to new episodes of delirium. All scales were insufficient when it came to establishing an association with prevalent delirium.

Potential future risk of errors in medication administration recording.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to adapt and assess the interrater reliability of a potential future risk matrix for medication errors in medication administration recording (ME-MAR). METHODS: The study was carried out in a teaching hospital. It was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a consensus method was used in order to adapt the potential future risk matrix published by the National Patient Safety and Otero et al. to the ME-MAR. The consensus method consisted in a nominal group formed by four pharmacists. In the second phase, a multidisciplinary group of experts in patient safety assessed the reliability of the adapted matrix. Five raters evaluated 100 ME-MAR. Its reliability was evaluated using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: In the first phase, two meetings were necessary until consensus was reached to adapt the potential future risk matrix to the ME-MAR. For this purpose, the two following categories were defined: likelihood of ME-MAR's recurrence and most likely consequences of ME-MAR. The definition of each grade of likelihood of recurrence was based on the incidence of ME-MAR from an unpublished study carried out in our hospital. In order to determine the most likely consequences of ME-MAR, a two-dimensional matrix was designed, with severity per type of ME-MAR on one axis and the class of medication on the other. In the second phase, the reliability of the matrix was tested. The overall interrater agreement for the five raters was substantial at 0.68 (Confidence interval 95% 0.60-0.76). CONCLUSION: The adapted matrix of potential future risk to ME-MAR is reliable and can serve as a guide for future studies.

[Designing a software for drug management in special situations at a hospital's drug administration service]. / Diseño de un programa informático para la gestión de medicamentos en situaciones especiales en un servicio de farmacia hospitalaria.

OBJECTIVE: to describe the features of a computer program for management of drugs in special situations (off-label and compassionate use) in a Department of Hospital Pharmacy (PD). To describe the methodology followed for its implementation in the Medical Services. To evaluate their use after 2 years of practice. METHOD: the design was carried out by pharmacists of the PD. The stages of the process were: selection of a software development company, establishment of a working group, selection of a development platform, design of an interactive Viewer, definition of functionality and data processing, creation of databases, connection, installation and configuration, application testing and improvements development. A directed sequential strategy was used for implementation in the Medical Services. The program's utility and experience of use were evaluated after 2 years. RESULTS: a multidisciplinary working group was formed and developed Pk_Usos®. The program works in web environment with a common viewer for all users enabling real time checking of the request files' status and that adapts to the management of medications in special situations procedure. Pk_Usos® was introduced first in the Oncology Department, with 15 oncologists as users of the program. 343 patients had 384 treatment requests managed, of which 363 are authorized throughout two years. CONCLUSIONS: PK_Usos® is the first software designed for the management of drugs in special situations in the PD. It is a dynamic and efficient tool for all professionals involved in the process by optimization of times.

Objetivo: describir las funcionalidades de un programa informático para gestión de medicamentos en situaciones especiales en un Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SFH). Describir la metodología seguida para su implantación en los Servicios Médicos. Evaluar su uso tras 2 años de utilización. Método: el diseño se realizó por farmacéuticos del SFH. Las etapas del proceso fueron: selección de una empresa de desarrollo informático, constitución de un grupo de trabajo, selección de una plataforma de desarrollo, diseño de un visor interactivo, definición de funcionalidades y de datos a procesar, creación de las bases de datos, conexión, instalación y configuración, pilotaje de la aplicación y realización de mejoras. Para la implantación en los servicios médicos se empleó una estrategia secuencial dirigida. Se evaluó la utilidad y experiencia de la aplicación tras 2 años. Resultados: se constituyó un grupo de trabajo multidisciplinar y se desarrolló Pk_Usos®. El programa trabaja en entorno web con un visor común para todos los usuarios que permite consultar la situación del expediente en tiempo real y se adapta al procedimiento de la CFT de gestión de medicamentos en situaciones especiales. Pk_Usos® se implantó en primer lugar en el Servicio de Oncología Médica, con 15 oncólogos como usuarios del programa. En dos años se realizaron 384 solicitudes en 343 pacientes, de las cuales se autorizaron 363. Conclusiones: PK_Usos® es el primer software diseñado para la gestión de los medicamentos en situaciones especiales en el SFH. Es una herramienta eficiente y dinámica, que permite la optimización de tiempos a todos los profesionales implicados en el proceso.