Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve: a retrospective comparison to the Magna Ease.

OBJECTIVES: The INSPIRIS aortic valve combines the RESILIA proprietary tissue preservation process and an expandable stent frame to benefit future transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures. As the INSPIRIS valve became commercially available in 2017, mid-term outcome reports are scarce. We aimed to evaluate mid-term safety and echocardiographic performance of the INSPIRIS valve in comparison to its predecessor, the Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease (ME). METHODS: This study was a retrospective single-centre study. Clinical results included early postoperative outcomes, mid-term mortality and readmission for cardiovascular cause or stroke. Echocardiographic follow-up (FU) was performed at discharge and 1-3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical end point analyses were accomplished with a propensity score matching analysis and FU echocardiographic data comparisons using pairwise analyses and linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: We included 953 patients who received an INSPIRIS (n = 488) or ME (n = 463) bioprosthesis between January 2018 and July 2021. In the matched population (n = 217 per group), no significant difference in short-term outcomes was observed, survival was similar at 30 months (INSPIRIS: 94% vs ME: 91%, P = 0.89), but freedom from readmission was higher in the INSPIRIS group (94% vs 86%, P = 0.014). INSPIRIS valves had a lower gradient at discharge (∼10 vs 14 mmHg, P < 0.001), 1-3 months (∼10 vs 12 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 24 months (∼11 vs 17 mmHg, P < 0.001) in paired analyses and significantly lower evolution of mean transvalvular gradients compared to ME. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest comparative evaluation of the INSPIRIS to the ME valves, which demonstrated safe clinical outcomes and favourable haemodynamic performance at 2 years. Long-term FU is underway.

Long-term echocardiographic data, mechanisms of failure, and reintervention outcomes of the Epic valve in mitral position-a large observational cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term echocardiographic reports on mitral valve (MV) porcine xenograft bioprosthesis (Epic) are lacking, and postreintervention outcomes of failed Epic are unknown. We aimed to assess the mechanisms and independent predictors of Epic failures and to compare short- and mid-term outcomes according to reintervention type. METHODS: We included consecutive patients (n = 1397; mean age: 72 ± 8 years; 46% female; mean follow-up: 4.8 years) who received the Epic during mitral valve replacement (MVR) at our institution. Clinical, echocardiographic, reintervention, and outcomes data were retrieved from our prospective institution's database or government statistics. RESULTS: Gradients and effective orifice area of the Epic were stable over 5-years follow-up. A total of 70 (5%) patients had a MV reintervention at median follow-up of 3.0 (0.7-5.4) years due to prosthesis failure, by redo-MVR (n = 38; 54%), valve-in-valve (n = 19; 27%), paravalvular leak (PVL) closure (n = 12; 17%), or thrombectomy (n = 1). Mechanisms of failure were 27 (1.9%) structural valve deterioration (SVD; all leaflet tear); 16 (1.1%) non-SVD (15 PVL, 1 pannus); 24 (1.7%) endocarditis; and 4 (0.3%) thrombosis. Freedom from all-cause and SVD-related MV reintervention at 10 years are 88% and 92%, respectively. Independent predictors of reintervention were age, baseline atrial fibrillation, initial MV etiology, and moderate or greater PVL at discharge (all P ≤ .05). Comparison of redo-MVR and valve-in-valve revealed no significant difference in early outcomes or mid-term mortality (all P ≥ .16). CONCLUSIONS: The Epic Mitral valve has stable hemodynamics through 5 years and is associated with low incidence of SVD and reintervention, mostly due to endocarditis and leaflet tear without calcification. Reintervention type had no influence on early outcomes and mid-term mortality.

Integrating Echocardiography Parameters With Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Data-Driven Clustering of Primary Mitral Regurgitation Phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a heterogeneous clinical disease requiring integration of echocardiographic parameters using guideline-driven recommendations to identify severe disease. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this preliminary study was to explore novel data-driven approaches to delineate phenotypes of MR severity that benefit from surgery. METHODS: The authors used unsupervised and supervised machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (AI) to integrate 24 echocardiographic parameters in 400 primary MR subjects from France (n = 243; development cohort) and Canada (n = 157; validation cohort) followed up during a median time of 3.2 years (IQR: 1.3-5.3 years) and 6.8 (IQR: 4.0-8.5 years), respectively. The authors compared the phenogroups' incremental prognostic value over conventional MR profiles and for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality incorporating time-to-mitral valve repair/replacement surgery as a covariate for survival analysis (time-dependent exposure). RESULTS: High-severity (HS) phenogroups from the French cohort (HS: n = 117; low-severity [LS]: n = 126) and the Canadian cohort (HS: n = 87; LS: n = 70) showed improved event-free survival in surgical HS subjects over nonsurgical subjects (P = 0.047 and P = 0.020, respectively). A similar benefit of surgery was not seen in the LS phenogroup in both cohorts (P = 0.70 and P = 0.50, respectively). Phenogrouping showed incremental prognostic value in conventionally severe or moderate-severe MR subjects (Harrell C statistic improvement; P = 0.480; and categorical net reclassification improvement; P = 0.002). Explainable AI specified how each echocardiographic parameter contributed to phenogroup distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Novel data-driven phenogrouping and explainable AI aided in improved integration of echocardiographic data to identify patients with primary MR and improved event-free survival after mitral valve repair/replacement surgery.

Clinical significance of myocardial contraction fraction in significant primary mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for mitral valve (MV) surgery in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) remains a matter of debate. Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) - the ratio of the left ventricular (LV) stroke volume to that of the myocardial volume - is a volumetric measure of LV myocardial shortening independent of size or geometry. AIM: To assess the relationship between MCF and outcome in patients with significant chronic primary MR due to prolapse managed in contemporary practice. METHODS: Clinical, Doppler-echocardiographic and outcome data prospectively collected in 174 patients (mean age 62 years, 27% women) with significant primary MR and no or mild symptoms were analysed. The impact of MCF< or ≥30% on cardiac events (cardiovascular death, acute heart failure or MV surgery) was studied. RESULTS: During an estimated median follow-up of 49 (22-77) months, cardiac events occurred in 115 (66%) patients. The 4-year estimates of survival free from cardiac events were 21±5% for patients with MCF <30% and 40±6% for those with ≥30% (P<0.001). MCF <30% was associated with a considerable increased risk of cardiac events after adjustment for established clinical risk factors, MR severity and current recommended class I triggers for MV surgery (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-3.58; P<0.001). Moreover, MCF<30% improved the predictive performance of models, with better global fit, reclassification and discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: MCF<30% is strongly associated with occurrence of cardiac events in patients with significant primary MR due to prolapse. Further studies are needed to assess the direct impact of MCF on patient management and outcomes.

Prosthetic choice in mitral valve replacement for severe chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: Long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic choice for mitral valve replacement is generally driven by patient age and patient and surgeon preference, and current guidelines do not discriminate between different etiologies of mitral valve disease. Our objective was to assess and compare short- and long-term outcomes after mitral valve replacement among patients with biological or mechanical prostheses in the setting of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2016, 424 patients underwent mitral valve replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation at our institution, using biological prosthesis in 188 (44%) and mechanical prosthesis in 236 (56%). A 1:1 propensity score match (n = 126 per group) and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to compare groups. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality and other cardiovascular adverse events. Long-term outcomes included survival and hospital readmission for cardiovascular causes, stroke, and major bleeding. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality and early postoperative adverse events were similar between groups in the propensity score match and inverse probability of treatment weighting cohorts. Overall long-term survival was similar at 5 and 9 years, but mechanical prosthesis recipients were more frequently readmitted to hospital for cardiovascular causes, including stroke and non-neurological bleeding in propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses (all P values < .004). Type of prosthesis did not independently influence all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.43; P = .959), but placement of a mechanical prosthesis was associated with increased risk of readmission for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.32; P = .004) among matched patients. CONCLUSIONS: The type of prosthesis has no influence on long-term survival among patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve replacement. There may be an increased risk of neurologic events and serious bleeding associated with mechanical prostheses.

Significance of Left Ventricular Ejection Time in Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

The optimal timing for mitral valve (MV) surgery in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) remains controversial. We aimed at evaluating the relation between left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and outcome in patients with moderate or severe chronic primary MR because of prolapse. Clinical, Doppler echocardiographic, and outcome data prospectively collected from 302 patients (median age 61 [54 to 74] years, 34% women) with moderate or severe primary MR were analyzed. Patients were retrospectively stratified by quartiles of LVET. The primary end point of the study was the composite of need for MV surgery or all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up time of 66 (25th to 75th percentile, 33 to 95) months, 178 patients reached the primary end point. Patients in the lowest quartile of LVET (<260 ms) were at high risk for adverse events compared with those in the other quartiles of LVET (global p = 0.005), whereas the rate of events was similar for the other quartiles (p = NS for all). After adjustment for clinical predictors of outcome, including age, gender, history of atrial fibrillation, MR severity, and current recommended triggers for MV surgery in asymptomatic primary MR, LVET <260 ms was associated with an increased risk of events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.16, p = 0.033). In conclusion, we observed that shorter LVET is associated with increased risk of adverse events in patients with moderate or severe primary MR because of prolapse. Further studies are required to investigate whether shorter LVET has a direct effect on outcomes or is solely a risk marker in primary MR.

Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve.

Background: Transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (Redo-SAVR) for the treatment of failed surgical aortic bioprostheses. However, the benefit of ViV-TAVR compared with Redo-SAVR remains debated with regard to short-term hemodynamic results and short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare short-term hemodynamic performance and long-term clinical outcomes of ViV-TAVR vs. Redo-SAVR in patients treated for surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve failure. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data prospectively collected in 184 patients who underwent Redo-SAVR or ViV-TAVR. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and after the procedure and analyzed in an echocardiography core laboratory using the new Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. An inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to compare the outcomes between both procedures. Results: ViV-TAVR showed lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance (39.2% vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001) at 30 days, which was essentially driven by a higher rate (56.2% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.001) of high residual gradient (mean transvalvular gradient ≥20 mm Hg). Despite a trend for higher 30-day mortality in the Redo-SAVR vs. ViV-TAVR group (8.7% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 3.70 [0.77-17.6]; p = 0.10), the long-term mortality was significantly lower (24.2% vs. 50.1% at 8 years; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.26-0.91]; p = 0.03) in the Redo-SAVR group. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, Redo-SAVR remained significantly associated with reduced long-term mortality compared with ViV-TAVR (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.32 [0.22-0.46]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: ViV-TAVR was associated with a lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance and numerically lower mortality at 30 days but higher rates of long-term mortality compared with Redo-SAVR.

Effect of Regional Upper Septal Hypertrophy on Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass and Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the reference method for evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS), and it is extensively used to quantitate left ventricular (LV) mass and volumes. Regional upper septal hypertrophy (USH) or septal bulge is a frequent finding in patients with AS and may lead to overestimation of LV mass when using linear measurements. The objective of this study was to compare estimates of LV mass obtained by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic LV dimensions measured at different levels of the LV cavity with those obtained by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: One hundred six patients (mean age, 63 ± 15 years; 68% men) with AS were included in this subanalysis of the PROGRESSA study. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of LV dimensions were obtained at the basal level (BL; as recommended in guidelines), immediately below the septal bulge (BSB), and at a midventricular level (ML). Regional USH was defined as a basal interventricular septal thickness ≥ 13 mm and >1.3 times the thickness of the septal wall at the ML. Agreement between transthoracic echocardiographic and CMR measures was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The distribution of AS severity was mild in 23%, moderate in 57%, and severe in 20% of patients. Regional USH was present in 28 patients (26%). In the whole cohort, two-dimensional TTE overestimated LV mass (bias: BL, +60 ± 31 g; BSB, +59 ± 32 g; ML, +54 ± 32 g; P = .02). The biplane Simpson method slightly but significantly underestimated LV end-diastolic volume (bias -10 ± 20 mL, P < .001) compared with CMR. Overestimation of LV mass was more marked in patients with USH when measuring at the BL and was significantly lower when measuring LV dimensions at the ML (P < .025 vs BL and BSB). CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional TTE systematically overestimated LV mass and underestimated LV volumes compared with CMR. However, the bias between TTE and CMR was less important when measuring at the ML. Measurements at the BL as suggested in guidelines should be avoided, and measurements at the ML should be preferred in patients with AS, especially in those with USH.

Inhibitors of c-Jun phosphorylation impede ovine primordial follicle activation.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Is the c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway implicated in primordial follicle activation? STUDY FINDING: Culture of ovine ovarian cortex in the presence of two different c-Jun phosphorylation inhibitors impeded pre-antral follicle activation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite its importance for fertility preservation therapies, the mechanisms of primordial follicle activation are poorly understood. Amongst different signalling pathways potentially involved, the JNK pathway has been previously shown to be essential for cell cycle progression and pre-antral follicle development in mice. STUDY DESIGN, SAMPLES/MATERIALS, METHODS: Ovine ovarian cortex pieces were cultured with varying concentrations of SP600125, JNK inhibitor VIII or anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in the presence of FSH for 9 days. Follicular morphometry and immunohistochemistry for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), apoptosis and follicle activation (Foxo3a) were assessed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Inhibition of primordial follicle activation occurred in the presence of SP600125, JNK inhibitor VIII and AMH when compared with controls (all P < 0.05) after 2 days of culture. However, only in the highest concentrations used was the inhibition of activation associated with induction of follicular apoptosis (P < 0.05). In growing follicles, PCNA antigen expression was reduced when the JNK inhibitors or AMH were used (P < 0.05 versus control), indicating reduced proliferation of the somatic compartment. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although we evaluated the effects of inhibition of c-Jun phosphorylation on primordial follicle development, we did not determine the cellular targets and mechanism of action of the inhibitors. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These results are the first to implicate the JNK pathway in primordial follicle activation and could have significant consequences for the successful development of fertility preservation strategies and our understanding of primordial follicle activation. LARGE SCALE DATA: n/a. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTERESTS: Dr Michael J. Bertoldo and the laboratories involved in the present study were supported by a grant from 'Région Centre' (CRYOVAIRE, Grant number #320000268). There are no conflicts of interest to declare.