RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing immune mediated disease, which is one of the two major types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Fistulizing CD poses a significant clinical challenge for physicians. Effective management of CD requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving a gastroenterologist and a GI surgeon while tailoring treatment to each patient's unique risk factors, clinical representations, and preferences. AREAS COVERED: This comprehensive review explores the intricacies of fistulizing CD including its manifestations, types, impact on quality of life, management strategies, and novel therapies under investigation. EXPERT OPINION: Antibiotics are often used as first-line therapy to treat symptoms. Biologics that selectively target TNF-α, such infliximab (IFX), have shown high efficacy in randomized controlled trials. However, more than 50% of patients lose response to IFX, prompting them to explore alternative strategies. Current options include adalimumab and certolizumab pegol combination therapies, as well as small-molecule drugs targeting Janus kinases such as Upadacitinib. Furthermore, a promising treatment for complex fistulas is mesenchymal stem cells such as Darvadstrocel (Alofisel), an allogeneic stem cell-based therapy. However, surgical interventions are necessary for complex cases or intra-abdominal complications. Setons and LIFT procedures are the most common surgical options.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/terapia , Fístula Intestinal/etiologia , Fístula Intestinal/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia (CRN). In this review, we aim to provide an up-to-date overview and future perspectives on CRN management in IBD. Advances in endoscopic surveillance and resection techniques have resulted in a shift towards endoscopic management of neoplastic lesions in place of surgery. Endoscopic treatment is recommended for all CRN if complete resection is feasible. Standard (cold snare) polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection should be performed depending on lesion complexity (size, delineation, morphology, surface architecture, submucosal fibrosis/invasion) to maximize the likelihood of complete resection. If complete resection is not feasible, surgical treatment options should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team. While (sub)total and proctocolectomy play an important role in management of endoscopically unresectable CRN, partial colectomy may be considered in a subgroup of patients in endoscopic remission with limited disease extent without other CRN risk factors. High synchronous and metachronous CRN rates warrant careful mucosal visualization with shortened intervals for at least 5 years after treatment of CRN.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving ustekinumab was assessed. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective chart review study of bio-naïve Canadian adult patients with moderately-to-severely active CD treated with ustekinumab was conducted. CD-related HCRU (i.e., surgery, hospitalization, or emergency room [ER] visits) was evaluated at Months 4, 6, and 12 post-ustekinumab initiation, and associated costs were sourced from a provincial database. Proportion of patients with HCRU events and ustekinumab persistence were summarized at each timepoint. Paired analysis compared HCRU events and associated costs incurred by the same patient whilst in remission vs. when not in remission. RESULTS: By Month 12, 11.1 % (17/153) of patients had record(s) of any CD-related HCRU event, with ER visits being the most common (7.7 %; 12/155). Hospitalization had the highest average cost (CAD $436.10; SD $2,089.25) across all patients, accounting for 82.2 % of the mean total annual cost/patient (CAD $530.47; SD $2,229.92). While in remission, ≤5 % of patients experienced some healthcare encounter, compared with 7 % when not in remission (P = 0.289). Finally, 93.5 % of patients persisted on ustekinumab at Month 12. CONCLUSIONS: HCRU rates and associated total annual costs were lower for bio-naïve CD patients receiving ustekinumab, and when patients were in remission. Most patients continued with ustekinumab at Month 12.
RESUMO
Background: Different endoscopic scoring systems for assessing ulcerative colitis (UC) severity are available. However, most of them are not correlated with disease extent. Objectives: Our study aimed to compare the predictive value of the PanMay score versus the endoscopic Mayo (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and Dublin score in predicting long-term outcomes of UC. Design: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive UC patients who underwent colonoscopy before at least a 3-year follow-up. Methods: The PanMayo, MES, UCEIS, and Dublin scores and the baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants were assessed. Endpoints were disease flare that required novel biological therapy, colectomy, and hospitalization. Patients were stratified using baseline clinical activity. Results: Approximately 62.8% of the 250 enrolled patients were in clinical remission. In these patients, the PanMayo, MES, and Dublin scores were positively associated with the risk of clinical flare. The MES score increased with clinical flare. The PanMayo score (>12 points), but not the MES score, was associated with the need for novel biological initiation and biological escalation. Furthermore, the Dublin and UCEIS scores of patients in remission who need novel biological treatment had a similar trend. Colectomy risk was associated with PanMayo and Dublin scores. Conclusion: The combined endoscopic assessment of disease extent and severity can be more accurate in predicting outcomes among patients with UC. PanMayo score can be utilized in addition to the existing scoring systems, thereby leading to a more accurate examination. Summary: UC endoscopic scores do not assess extension. Our study aimed to analyze the predictive value of the PanMayo score. Based on 250 patients, results showed that the long-term disease outcomes of UC could be predicted with the PanMayo score more accurately.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by unpredictable flare-ups and periods of remission. While several therapeutic options, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-integrin, and interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitors, as well as IL-23 and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have been approved for CD treatment, a substantial number of patients fail to respond adequately or experience a loss of response over time. In recent years, the scientific community has been actively investigating novel agents to address these challenges and improve the management of CD. AREAS COVERED: This comprehensive narrative review provides an overview of recent developments in CD treatment, summarizing phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. We delve into the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of emerging therapies, encompassing JAK inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, anti-adhesion molecules, S1P1 receptor modulators, and combined targeted treatments. EXPERT OPINION: The armamentarium of CD therapeutic agents is constantly expanding. We analyze pivotal findings from phase 2 and phase 3 CD treatment trials. We also underscore the existing gaps in therapy and the paramount role of ongoing research and innovation in CD management.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa , Resultado do Tratamento , Interleucina-23 , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of advanced therapies for achieving endoscopic outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to August 2, 2023 to identify phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, etrolizumab, vedolizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)12/23p40, anti-IL23p19, or Janus kinase-1 (JAK1) inhibitors, compared with placebo/active comparator, for induction and/or maintenance of remission and reported endoscopic outcomes. Primary outcome was endoscopic response after induction therapy, and endoscopic remission after maintenance therapy. We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach, and estimated relative risk (RRs), 95% confidence interval (CI) values, and P score for ranking agents. We used GRADE to ascertain certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs (19 placebo-controlled and 1 head-to-head trial; 5592 patients) were included out of which 12 RCTs reported endoscopic outcomes for the induction phase, 5 reported for the maintenance phase, and 3 reported for both induction and maintenance phases. JAK1 inhibitors (RR, 3·49 [95% CI, 1·48-8·26]) and anti-IL23p19 (RR, 2·30 [95% CI, 1·02-5·18]) agents were more efficacious than etrolizumab (moderate certainty of evidence), and JAK1 inhibitors (RR, 2·34 [95% CI, 1·14-4·80]) were more efficacious than anti-IL12/23p40 agents for inducing endoscopic response (moderate certainty of evidence). JAK1 inhibitors and anti-IL23p19 ranked highest for induction of endoscopic response. There was paucity of RCTs of TNF antagonists reporting endoscopic outcomes with induction therapy. On network meta-analysis of 6 RCTs, all agents except vedolizumab (RR, 1.89 [95% CI, 0.61-5.92]) were effective in maintaining endoscopic remission compared with placebo. TNF antagonists, IL12/23p40, and JAK1 inhibitors were ranked highest. CONCLUSIONS: On network meta-analysis, JAK1 inhibitors and anti-IL23p19 agents may be the most effective among non-TNF-targeting advanced therapies for inducing endoscopic response. Future head-to-head trials will further inform positioning of different therapies for the management of Crohn's disease.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Metanálise em Rede , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend ustekinumab as a first-line biological treatment option for moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease (CD). However, there is limited real-world effectiveness and safety data in bio-naïve patients. AIMS: To assess ustekinumab effectiveness and safety in bio-naïve CD patients. METHODS: Medical charts were reviewed retrospectively at seven Canadian centers. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission at Month 6 following ustekinumab initiation. Secondary outcomes included clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic response, and remission at Months 4, 6 and 12. Ustekinumab safety was assessed over the one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: 158 charts were reviewed. Clinical remission was achieved by 50.0% (36/72), 67.7% (105/155), and 73.7% (84/114) of patients at Months 4, 6, and 12, respectively. At these study timepoints, biochemical remission was observed in 65.2% (43/66), 71.6% (63/88), and 73.9% (68/92) of patients. At Months 6 and 12, endoscopic remission was observed in 40.5% (15/37) and 56.3% (27/48) of patients, respectively. Most participants (93.5%; 145/155) persisted on ustekinumab through Month 12. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, ustekinumab presents as an effective first-line biologic for induction and maintenance of remission among bio-naïve Canadian patients with moderately-to-severely active CD.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Ustekinumab/efeitos adversos , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Indução de Remissão , Canadá , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of histological remission on short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not well established. We assessed risk of clinical relapse, hospitalization, and need for surgery in patients achieving histological remission in comparison with active histological disease. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and conference abstracts from inception to November 2022. Our main outcome was the rate of clinical relapse in patients with IBD who reached histological remission vs patients with active histological disease. Secondary outcomes were clinical complications of IBD such as hospitalization and need for surgery. The endpoints were investigated at 2 time points, 6 to 12 months (short term) and >12 months (long term). RESULTS: Short-term outcome analysis showed that the risk of clinical relapse was significantly higher in ulcerative colitis patients with active histological disease in comparison with patients at histological remission (risk ratio [RR], 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-3.44; P < .01). The risk of hospitalization in ulcerative colitis patients was not significant among the 2 groups (RR, 4.22; 95% CI, 0.91-19.62; P = .07). Long-term outcome analysis demonstrated that the risk of clinical relapse (RR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.55-2.76; P < .01), need for surgery (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.53-6.45; P < .01), and hospitalization (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.59-4.00; P < .01) was significantly higher in patients with active histological disease. CONCLUSIONS: Histological remission in IBD represents an important therapeutic goal that is not yet routinely pursued in clinical practice. In our study, patients who achieved histological remission have more favorable outcomes than those with active histological disease in ulcerative colitis.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/cirurgia , Hospitalização , Recidiva , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy, biomarker activity, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), adverse events (AEs), and nocebo effect in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who underwent non-medical biosimilar switching. METHODS: A prospective observational study of consecutive IBD patients who underwent biosimilar switch. Disease activity, biomarkers, TDM, and AEs, including the nocebo effect were captured 8 weeks before switch, at the time of switch (baseline),12 and 24 weeks after the switch. RESULTS: 210 patients were included [81.4% had Crohn's disease (CD), the median age at inclusion: 42 years (IQR 29-61)]. There was no significant difference in the rates of clinical remission at week 8 before switch, baseline, week12, and 24 after switch: 89.0%,93.4%,86.3%,and 90.8%,p = 0.129. The biomarker remission rates were not significantly different; CRP:81.3%,74.7%,81.2%,73.0%,p = 0.343; fecal calprotectin: 78.3%,74.5%,71.7%,76.3%,p = 0.829. The rates of maintaining therapeutic levels (84.7%,83.9%,83.0%,85.3%,p = 0.597) and prevalence of positive anti-drug antibodies remained unchanged. Drug persistence at 12 week of switch was 97.1%, regardless of disease phenotype and originator. The nocebo effect was observed in 13.3%. The discontinuation rate was 4.8%. CONCLUSION: Despite a significant number of early nocebo complaints within the first 6 months after the biosimilar switch, no significant changes were found in clinical efficacy, biomarkers, therapeutic drug level, or anti-drug antibodies.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Efeito Nocebo , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Substituição de Medicamentos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , BiomarcadoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinical and radiologic variables associated with perianal fistula (PAF) outcomes are poorly understood. We developed prediction models for anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment failure in patients with Crohn's disease-related PAF. METHODS: In a multicenter retrospective study between 2005 and 2022 we included biologic-naive adults (>17 years) who initiated their first anti-TNF therapy for PAF after pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Pretreatment MRI studies were prospectively reread centrally by blinded radiologists. We developed and internally validated a prediction model based on clinical and radiologic parameters to predict the likelihood of anti-TNF treatment failure, clinically, at 6 months. We compared our model and a simplified version of MRI parameters alone with existing imaging-based PAF activity indices (MAGNIFI-CD and modified Van Assche MRI scores) by De Long statistical test. RESULTS: We included 221 patients: 32 ± 14 years, 60% males, 76% complex fistulas; 68% treated with infliximab and 32% treated with adalimumab. Treatment failure occurred in 102 (46%) patients. Our prediction model included age at PAF diagnosis, time to initiate anti-TNF treatment, and smoking and 8 MRI characteristics (supra/extrasphincteric anatomy, fistula length >4.3 cm, primary tracts >1, secondary tracts >1, external openings >1, tract hyperintensity on T1-weighted imaging, horseshoe anatomy, and collections >1.3 cm). Our full and simplified MRI models had fair discriminatory capacity for anti-TNF treatment failure (concordance statistic, 0.67 and 0.65, respectively) and outperformed MAGNIFI-CD (P = .002 and < .0005) and modified Van Assche MRI scores (P < .0001 and < .0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our risk prediction models consisting of clinical and/or radiologic variables accurately predict treatment failure in patients with PAF.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Fístula Retal , Falha de Tratamento , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fístula Retal/tratamento farmacológico , Fístula Retal/diagnóstico por imagem , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This systematic review was performed to characterize the landscape of research conducted in patients with intestinal stoma (IS) and highlight unmet needs for clinical research in Crohn's disease (CD) and IS. METHODS: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 25, 2022, to identify clinical trials assessing interventions in patients with an IS, as well as those with an IS and CD. Studies were grouped according to type of intervention. We excluded observational studies with no treatment arm. RESULTS: A total of 253 studies were included in the final analysis. Most studies investigated devices (nâ =â 122 [48.2%]), or surgical procedures (nâ =â 63 [24.9%]), followed by behavioral interventions (nâ =â 30 [11.8%]), drugs (nâ =â 20 [7.9%]), dietary interventions (nâ =â 2 [0.8%]), skin care products (nâ =â 2 0.8%]), and others (nâ =â 14 [5.5%]). A total of 50.9% (nâ =â 129) of studies had completed recruitment, enrolling 11â 116 participants. Only 6 studies (surgery: nâ =â 3; physiological studies: nâ =â 2; drugs: nâ =â 1) exclusively included patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and 16 studies commented that patients with IBD were excluded in their eligibility criteria. No study assessed efficacy of drugs in patients with CD and IS. Approximately one-quarter of studies (n = 65 of 253) included quality of life as an outcome measure. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of research in IBD patients with IS, with the majority focusing on devices and surgical procedures. There have been no drug trials evaluating efficacy in patients with CD and IS. There is an urgent need to identify barriers to enrollment and develop eligibility and outcome measures that enable the inclusion of patients with CD with stoma into clinical trials.
We analyzed registered trials for patients with intestinal stoma with special focus on Crohn's disease patients to explore research and unmet needs. Our results indicate a scarcity of studies in this area with most studies limited to surgical procedures and devices.
RESUMO
Solitary Peutz-Jeghers-type polyp (SPJP) is a rare hamartomatous lesion. It is considered a different entity from Peutz-Jeghers syndrome despite similar histopathological findings. It can be found in the GI tract but rarely in the jejunum. Jejunal SPJP is susceptible to necrosis, ulceration, and intussusception, resulting in GI bleeding or small bowel obstruction. We describe a case of subacute gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to jejunal SPJP to share our approach to this challenging case using therapeutic endoscopy. An 81-year-old male patient with a history of atrial fibrillation on warfarin with stable therapeutic INR levels presented with a 1-week history of melena, generalized fatigue, and shortness of breath on exertion and was found to have profound iron deficiency anemia. Esophageal gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy failed to identify the source of bleeding; however, single-balloon enteroscopy detected a 4 cm polyp with a stalk in the proximal jejunum. Endoscopic polypectomy was performed, and the whole polyp was removed. Histopathological examination was consistent with Peutz-Jeghers polyp. The genetic analysis was negative for STK11 mutation. Follow-up magnetic resonance enterography and video capsule endoscopy did not reveal any other polypoid lesion in the GI tract. The patient's symptoms resolved gradually, and his hemoglobin level returned back to normal levels within 6 months. To our knowledge, this is the first case of endoscopic polypectomy during balloon-assisted enteroscopy for jejunal SPJP.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic assessment of disease activity is integral for evaluating treatment response in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to define appropriate items for evaluating endoscopic activity and conventions for consistent endoscopic scoring rules in CD. METHODS: A 2-round modified RAND/University of California at Los Angeles Appropriateness Method study was conducted. A panel of 15 gastroenterologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of statements pertaining to the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD, Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, and additional items relevant to endoscopy scoring in CD. Each statement was voted as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate based on the median panel rating and presence of disagreement. RESULTS: Panelists voted that it is appropriate for all ulcers to contribute to endoscopic scoring in CD, including aphthous ulcers, ulcerations at a surgical anastomosis, and anal canal ulcers (scored in the rectum). Endoscopic healing should reflect an absence of ulcers. Narrowing should be defined as a clear decrease in luminal diameter; stenosis should be defined by an impassable narrowing, and if occurring at the junction of 2 segments, scored in the distal segment. Scarring and inflammatory polyps were considered inappropriate for including in the affected area score. The optimal method for defining ulcer depth remains uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: We outlined scoring conventions for the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD and Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, noting that both scores have limitations. Therefore, we identified priorities for future research and steps for developing and validating a more representative endoscopic index in CD.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Úlcera , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Endoscopia , Constrição Patológica , Reto , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic healing is a key treatment target in inflammatory bowel disease; few data are available on the clinical and endoscopic efficacy of biological therapy in upper gastrointestinal Crohn's disease. This study aimed to investigate small bowel mucosal healing and clinical efficacy of adalimumab therapy by video capsule endoscopy in patients with endoscopically active upper gastrointestinal Crohn's disease. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm study included Crohn's disease patients with moderate-severe endoscopic proximal small bowel involvement, defined by a Lewis score >790. Patients were treated with adalimumab monotherapy for 24 weeks. Co-primary outcomes were endoscopic healing, defined as Lewis score <350, and endoscopic response, defined as >50% decrease in Lewis score. Secondary outcomes included clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw index <4) and biomarker remission (fecal calprotectin <250 µg/g, and C-reactive protein <5 mg/L). RESULTS: A total of 59 Crohn's disease patients were screened; 17 patients have met eligibility criteria and were enrolled. Endoscopic healing was observed in 8 patients (47.1%) and endoscopic response in additional 5 patients (29.4%) at 24 weeks. Median Lewis score was significantly decreased compared to baseline (1912 vs. 337, P = .0005). Eleven of 13 patients (84.6%) with clinical activity achieved clinical remission (baseline: 13/17 vs. week 24: 2/17, P < .0001). Nine of 10 patients with elevated C-reactive protein achieved normal C-reactive protein after treatment and the median C-reactive protein significantly decreased from 7.4 to 1.6 mg/L, P = .032. In contrast, no change was observed in fecal calprotectin pre- and posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab induced endoscopic healing and clinical remission in patients with active small bowel Crohn's disease, with approximately half of the patients achieving endoscopic healing.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Proteína C-Reativa , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with biologic therapies and small molecules. METHODS: Databases were searched up to July 2022 to identify eligible studies that assessed the risk of MACEs in patients (age≥18 years) with IBD treated with biologic therapies and small molecules. Primary outcome was the rate of MACEs observed in patients receiving biologic or small molecules therapies during induction and maintenance phases of RCTs. RESULTS: In total 64 studies were included in the analysis. 22 RCTs involving 12,196 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) were included and 32 RCTs involving 22,007 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). In patients with CD, risk of MACE was not higher than placebo during induction or maintenance phases, infliximab (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.07-6.14) and ustekinumab (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.03-8.04). In patients with UC, risk of MACE was not higher than placebo, tofacitinib (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.15-11.21) and upadcitinib (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.03-7.97) during induction or maintenance. CONCLUSION: The use of biologic therapies and small molecules among adult patients with IBD had no significant impact on the risk of MACEs during induction and maintenance period of RCTs. Real world data is warranted to assess long-term risks.
Biologic and new small molecule therapies have been shown to be effective in treating patients with moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as heart attack or heart failure, due to taking these medications in patients with IBD is not well established. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to estimate the risk of MACE in patients with IBD on biologic or small molecule therapies during induction and maintenance phases of randomized controlled trials. [Figure: see text].
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Biológica , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of cancer secondary to chronic inflammation and long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. With the aging IBD population, the prevalence of cancer in IBD patients is increasing. As a result, there is increasing concern about the impact of IBD therapy on cancer risk and survival, as well as the effects of cancer therapies on the disease course of IBD. Managing IBD in patients with current or previous cancer is challenging since clinical guidelines are based mainly on expert consensus. Evidence is rare and mainly available from registries or observational studies. In contrast, excluding patients with previous/or active cancer from clinical trials and short-term follow-up can lead to an underestimation of the cancer or cancer recurrence risk of approved medications. The present narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence and provide practical guidance on the management of IBD patients with cancer.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Real-life data on the efficacy of ustekinumab as first-line therapy for the treatment of luminal Crohn's disease (CD) compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are lacking. We compared the clinical response rates at 3 months in 2 cohorts of biologic-naïve patients treated by ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents. METHODS: Biologic-naïve patients starting either ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for luminal CD between 2016 and 2019 in 2 tertiary centers were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was clinical response at 3 months, defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw Index <4 or a 3-point drop in the score without steroids, need for CD-related surgery, or treatment discontinuation owing to failure or intolerance. Patients treated with ustekinumab were matched to patients receiving anti-TNF agents by a propensity score algorithm. RESULTS: We included 156 patients starting anti-TNF agents (95 adalimumab and 61 infliximab) and 50 ustekinumab. After matching, clinical response rates at 3 months were 64% and 86% in the ustekinumab and anti-TNF groups, respectively (Pâ =â .01). At 12 months, in multivariate analysis adjusted for disease duration, location, concomitant immunosuppressant and steroids, and symptoms, clinical remission was independently associated with the biological therapy received (odds ratio, 2.6 for anti-TNF agent vs ustekinumab; Pâ =â .02). With a median follow-up duration of 40 (interquartile range, 23-52) months, no difference was observed in terms of time to drug withdrawal (Pâ =â .29) or safety. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective real-world data suggest that an anti-TNF agent as a first-line biological therapy is associated with higher rates of response at 3 months than ustekinumab in patients with CD.
We conducted a retrospective real-world study to compare the efficacy of biologics in Crohn's disease. Our data suggest that an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent as a first-line biological therapy is associated with higher rates of response at 3 months than ustekinumab in Crohn's disease.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Doença de Crohn , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/patologia , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The medical treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) remains a challenge to clinicians. Over the last 20 years, biologic therapies have been the mainstay of medical treatment of fistulizing CD. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of biologic therapies against an active comparator or placebo for induction of response or remission in adults with fistulizing CD. The proportion of patients with fistula response or remission, as defined by each clinical trial, was our primary study outcome. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to measure treatment effects and results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In our analysis, 10 studies were included, and all were RCTs. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab in inducing response (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.04-2.27). Tumor necrosis factor antagonists were superior to placebo in the induction of response (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.750) and remission (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.58). Infliximab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75) and remission (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87). Ustekinumab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.860) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.13-1.93). When comparing biologic therapies against each other, there was no statistical difference in inducing remission. Vedolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing remission (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.04-2.29). Certolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55) or remission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor necrosis factor antagonists are effective in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission. Ustekinumab is effective in the induction of response but not in the induction of remission. When compared against each other, biologic therapies showed no significant difference in the induction of remission. Based on the available data, infliximab is the preferred first-line treatment. As for other biologics, the limited published data do not allow us to make firm recommendations. This study supports current practice and emphasizes the need for dedicated RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of biologic therapies in fistulizing CD.
Despite the era of biologic therapies, the management of fistulizing Crohn's disease remains challenging. This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease. We found that anti-tumor necrosis factor agents are effective in inducing response and remission. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Adulto , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Metanálise em Rede , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Terapia Biológica , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura [ITP] is an acquired haematological disorder with an incidence of 1-6 per 100 00/year. ITP and inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] comorbidity has been reported in the literature, but insights regarding the course, outcome and optimal management are limited by its rarity. The current study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation and outcome of ITP in patients with IBD. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective case series was performed as part of the ECCO Collaborative Network of Exceptionally Rare case reports [CONFER] project. Cases of patients with ITP and IBD were collected by participating investigators. Clinical data were recorded in a standardized collection form. RESULTS: This report includes 32 patients with concurrent ITP and IBD: ten were females, and the median age was 32.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 20.5-39.5). Fourteen patients had a diagnosis of Crohn's disease [CD] and the other 18 ulcerative colitis [UC]. The diagnosis of IBD preceded the ITP in 26 patients (median time between diagnoses was 7.0 years [IQR, 1.5-9.5]). Among those patients, 17 were in clinical remission at ITP diagnosis. Thirteen patients were treated with mesalamine, four with oral corticosteroids, one with rectal corticosteroids, two with azathioprine and five with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents. The median platelet count was 35 000/microliter [IQR, 10 000-70 000]. Eight patients had rectal bleeding, 13 had skin purpura, three had epistaxis, six had mucosal petechiae and 13 were asymptomatic. Regarding ITP treatment, 19 were treated with corticosteroids, one with anti-RhD immunoglobulin, 12 with intravenous immunoglobulins [IVIGs], four with thrombopoietin, three with rituximab and six patients eventually required splenectomy. Ten patients needed no treatment directed to the ITP. Three patients required colectomy during long-term follow-up, due to IBD or cancer but not to massive bleeding as a complication of ITP. One of eight patients who presented with rectal bleeding required splenectomy, and none required urgent colectomy. Two patients died during the follow-up, one of them due to bleeding complications located in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Median follow-up time was 6.5 years [IQR, 3-10]. With long-term follow-up, all patients had platelet counts above 50 000/microliter, and 24 were in IBD clinical remission. CONCLUSION: Most ITP cases in this series occurred after the IBD diagnosis and responded well to regular ITP treatment. The course of the ITP in the IBD patients followed an expected course, including response to medical therapy and low rates of splenectomy.
Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/complicações , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/diagnóstico , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Background: Chronic inflammatory disorders after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery are common. These include chronic pouchitis (CP), Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch, prepouch ileitis (PI) and rectal cuff inflammation (cuffitis). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of biologic therapies in treating these disorders. Method: Systematic review of all published studies from inception to August 1, 2021 was performed to investigate the efficacy of biologic therapies for post-IPAA chronic inflammatory disorders. The primary outcome was the efficacy of biologic therapies in achieving complete clinical response in patients with IPAA. Results: A total of 26 studies were identified including 741 patients. Using a random-effect model, the efficacy of infliximab in achieving complete clinical response in patients with CP was 51% (95% CI, 36 to 66), whereas the efficacy of adalimumab was 47% (95% CI, 31 to 64). The efficacies of ustekinumab and vedolizumab were 41% (95% CI, 06 to 88) and 63% (95% CI, 35 to 84), respectively. In patients with CD/PI, the efficacy of infliximab in achieving complete clinical response was 52% (95% CI, 33 to 71), whereas the efficacy of adalimumab was 51% (95% CI, 40 to 61). The efficacies of ustekinumab and vedolizumab were 42% (95% CI, 06 to 90) and 67% (95% CI, 38 to 87), respectively. Only one study involved patients with cuffitis. Conclusion: Ustekinumab, infliximab, vedolizumab and adalimumab are effective in achieving complete clinical response in post-IPAA surgery chronic inflammatory disorders. More studies are needed to determine the efficacy of biologics in cuffitis.