Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 50(12): 108676, 2024 Sep 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39284245

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of intracranial metastatic disease is increasing worldwide. As a valuable treatment modality, stereotactic radiosurgery requires detailed imaging, and this study evaluated the differences between imaging obtained on the day of treatment compared to historical or referral imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed, evaluating all the patients presenting with eligible referral imaging in a 13-month period and comparing this imaging to the imaging taken on the day of treatment. Numbers of additional metastases, volumes and volume differences among the images were compared. RESULTS: There was a median interval of 19 days between the acquisition of the diagnostic or referral scan and the day of treatment imaging. Even the group that had the shortest interval (up to 2 weeks) showed at least one additional deposit in 50 % of the patients. Volume was increased in 75 % of this group. Longer intervals were associated with higher increases in volume. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the increase in the disease burden in patients with intracranial metastatic disease, in relation to number and volume, in the interval between the referral and treatment imaging. This has significant implications for planning pathways, to ensure that metastatic deposits are not missed or undertreated.

2.
J Clin Neurosci ; 105: 122-128, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36182812

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation delivered by the Vivistim® Paired VNS™ System was approved by the FDA in 2021 to improve motor deficits in chronic ischemic stroke survivors with moderate to severe arm and hand impairment. Vagus nerve stimulators have previously been implanted in over 125,000 patients for treatment-resistant epilepsy and the surgical procedure is generally well-tolerated and safe. In this report, we describe the Vivistim implantation procedure, perioperative management, and complications for chronic stroke survivors enrolled in the pivotal trial. METHODS: The pivotal, multisite, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial (VNS-REHAB) enrolled 108 participants. All participants were implanted with the VNS device in an outpatient procedure. Thrombolytic agents were temporarily discontinued during the perioperative period. Participants were discharged within 48 hrs and started rehabilitation therapy approximately 10 days after the Procedure. RESULTS: The rate of surgery-related adverse events was lower than previously reported for VNS implantation for epilepsy and depression. One participant had vocal cord paresis that eventually resolved. There were no serious adverse events related to device stimulation. Over 90% of participants were taking antiplatelet drugs (APD) or anticoagulants and no adverse events or serious adverse events were reported as a result of withholding these medications during the perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest, randomized, controlled trial in which a VNS device was implanted in chronic stroke survivors. Results support the use of the Vivistim System in chronic stroke survivors, with a safety profile similar to VNS implantations for epilepsy and depression.


Assuntos
Epilepsia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Estimulação do Nervo Vago , Anticoagulantes , Epilepsia/etiologia , Epilepsia/cirurgia , Fibrinolíticos , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Nervo Vago , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/métodos
3.
World Neurosurg ; 144: e541-e545, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891853

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Accurate placement of the pedicle screw is requisite for any successful spinal instrumentation procedure. Screw insertion can be achieved using free-hand and fluoroscopic- or navigation-guided techniques. We sought to assess the variation in accuracy between fluoroscopic- and navigation-guided techniques, which are both used in Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, a tertiary spine referral center. METHODS: Using a retrospective study design, we assessed all the pedicle screws placed between 2013 and 2018. Radiographic and clinical assessment of all cases was performed. RESULTS: We studied 176 spinal instrumented cases, with a total of 831 screws implanted, out of which 296 (35.6%) were navigated and 535 (64.4%) were fluoroscopic guided. Pathology treated included spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, tumors, and trauma. Suboptimal screw position was identified in 2.03% (n = 6) of the navigation-guided series and 4.11% (n = 22) of the fluoroscopic-guided series with an overall screw misplacement rate of 3.4%. Evaluating surgeons' individual accuracy rates revealed that suboptimal screw placement registered a higher variation for the fluoroscopy-guided technique, and the misplacement rate was higher for surgeons with a lower volume of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Use of navigation during spinal instrumentation helps lower the rate of screw misplacement for spinal surgeons who are at the beginning of their learning curve or do not frequently perform this kind of procedure. Navigation-guided spinal instrumentation is more accurate compared with fluoroscopic-guided techniques and appears to have a lower complication rate.


Assuntos
Fluoroscopia/métodos , Neuronavegação/métodos , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos
5.
Surg J (N Y) ; 2(2): e51-e58, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28824991

RESUMO

Background The association between spinal cord tumors and hydrocephalus is a rarely reported phenomenon. Diagnosis in this group of patients is difficult as they present with findings of an intracranial pathology and the symptoms of a spinal lesion may be absent. Case Report We report two cases of spinal cord tumors presenting with visual disturbance and findings of increased intracranial pressure. Discussions Mechanisms describing the relationship between spinal cord tumors and increased intracranial pressure have been explained. Most of the literature reported marked regression of these manifestations after tumor excision. Conclusions Spinal cord tumors associated with hydrocephalus and papilledema are rare conditions. The diagnosis of these conditions may be difficult or confusing because the symptoms referable to the spinal lesion may be minimal. Meticulous history taking, examination, and investigations are mandatory to diagnose this entity.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA