Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 238(5): 1315-1331, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31814047

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Prolonged use of cannabis, the most widely used illicit drug worldwide, has been consistently associated with impairment in memory and verbal learning. Although the neurophysiological underpinnings of these impairments have been investigated previously using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), while performing memory tasks, the results of these studies have been inconsistent and no clear picture has emerged yet. Furthermore, no previous studies have investigated trial-by-trial learning. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the neural underpinnings of impaired verbal learning in cannabis users as estimated over repeated learning trials. METHODS: We studied 21 adolescent-onset regular cannabis users and 21 non-users using fMRI performed at least 12 h after last cannabis use, while they performed a paired associate verbal learning task that allowed us to examine trial-by-trial learning. Brain activation during repeated verbal encoding and recall conditions of the task was indexed using the blood oxygen level-dependent haemodynamic response fMRI signal. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in recall score over repeated trials indicating learning occurring across the two groups of participants. However, learning was significantly slower in cannabis users compared to non-users (p = 0.032, partial eta-squared = 0.108). While learning verbal stimuli over repeated encoding blocks, non-users displayed progressive increase in recruitment of the midbrain, parahippocampal gyrus and thalamus (p = 0.00939, partial eta-squared = 0.180). In contrast, cannabis users displayed a greater but disrupted activation pattern in these regions, which showed a stronger correlation with new word-pairs learnt over the same blocks in cannabis users than in non-users. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that disrupted medial temporal and midbrain function underlie slower learning in adolescent-onset cannabis users.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Fumar Maconha/psicologia , Aprendizagem Verbal/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Aprendizagem/fisiologia , Masculino , Memória/fisiologia , Rememoração Mental/fisiologia , Mesencéfalo/fisiopatologia , Giro Para-Hipocampal/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 41(15): 4386-4396, 2020 10 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687254

RESUMO

Around half of patients with early psychosis have a history of cannabis use. We aimed to determine if there are neurobiological differences in these the subgroups of persons with psychosis with and without a history of cannabis use. We expected to see regional deflations in hippocampus as a neurotoxic effect and regional inflations in striatal regions implicated in addictive processes. Volumetric, T1w MRIs were acquired from people with a diagnosis psychosis with (PwP + C = 28) or without (PwP - C = 26) a history of cannabis use; and Controls with (C + C = 16) or without (C - C = 22) cannabis use. We undertook vertex-based shape analysis of the brainstem, amygdala, hippocampus, globus pallidus, nucleus accumbens, caudate, putamen, thalamus using FSL FIRST. Clusters were defined through Threshold Free Cluster Enhancement and Family Wise Error was set at p < .05. We adjusted analyses for age, sex, tobacco and alcohol use. The putamen (bilaterally) and the right thalamus showed regional enlargement in PwP + C versus PwP - C. There were no areas of regional deflation. There were no significant differences between C + C and C - C. Cannabis use in participants with psychosis is associated with morphological alterations in subcortical structures. Putamen and thalamic enlargement may be related to compulsivity in patients with a history of cannabis use.


Assuntos
Uso da Maconha/patologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/patologia , Putamen/fisiologia , Tálamo/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Putamen/diagnóstico por imagem , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem
4.
Transl Psychiatry ; 10(1): 111, 2020 04 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32317625

RESUMO

The associative striatum, an established substrate in psychosis, receives widespread glutamatergic projections. We sought to see if glutamatergic indices are altered between early psychosis patients with and without a history of cannabis use and characterise the relationship to grey matter. 92 participants were scanned: Early Psychosis with a history of cannabis use (EPC = 29); Early Psychosis with minimal cannabis use (EPMC = 25); Controls with a history of cannabis use (HCC = 16) and Controls with minimal use (HCMC = 22). Whole brain T1 weighted MR images and localised proton MR spectra were acquired from head of caudate, anterior cingulate and hippocampus. We examined relationships in regions with known high cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) expression (grey matter, cortex, hippocampus, amygdala) and low expression (white matter, ventricles, brainstem) to caudate Glutamine+Glutamate (Glx). Patients were well matched in symptoms, function and medication. There was no significant group difference in Glx in any region. In EPC grey matter volume explained 31.9% of the variance of caudate Glx (p = 0.003) and amygdala volume explained 36.9% (p = 0.001) of caudate Glx. There was no significant relationship in EPMC. The EPC vs EPMC interaction was significant (p = 0.042). There was no such relationship in control regions. These results are the first to demonstrate association of grey matter volume and striatal glutamate in the EPC group. This may suggest a history of cannabis use leads to a conformational change in distal CB1 rich grey matter regions to influence striatal glutamatergic levels or that such connectivity predisposes to heavy cannabis use.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Transtornos Psicóticos , Ácido Glutâmico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico por imagem
5.
Mol Cell Neurosci ; 103: 103463, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917333

RESUMO

Endocannabinoids regulate different aspects of neurodevelopment. In utero exposure to the exogenous psychoactive cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), has been linked with abnormal cortical development in animal models. However, much less is known about the actions of endocannabinoids in human neurons. Here we investigated the effect of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2AG) and Δ9-THC on the development of neuronal morphology and activation of signaling kinases, in cortical neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Our data indicate that the cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1R), but not the cannabinoid 2 receptor (CB2R), GPR55 or TRPV1 receptors, is expressed in young, immature hiPSC-derived cortical neurons. Consistent with previous reports, 2AG and Δ9-THC negatively regulated neurite outgrowth. Interestingly, acute exposure to both 2AG and Δ9-THC inhibited phosphorylation of serine/threonine kinase extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERK1/2), whereas Δ9-THC also reduced phosphorylation of Akt (aka PKB). Moreover, the CB1R inverse agonist SR 141716A attenuated the decrease in neurite outgrowth and ERK1/2 phosphorylation induced by 2AG and Δ9-THC. Taken together, our data suggest that hiPSC-derived cortical neurons express CB1Rs and are responsive to exogenous cannabinoids. Thus, hiPSC-neurons may represent a good cellular model for investigating the role of the endocannabinoid system in regulating cellular processes in developing human neurons.


Assuntos
Células-Tronco Pluripotentes Induzidas/efeitos dos fármacos , Crescimento Neuronal/efeitos dos fármacos , Neurônios/efeitos dos fármacos , Rimonabanto/farmacologia , Agonistas de Receptores de Canabinoides/farmacologia , Canabinoides/farmacologia , Dronabinol/metabolismo , Dronabinol/farmacologia , Humanos , Células-Tronco Pluripotentes Induzidas/metabolismo , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP Quinases/efeitos dos fármacos , Neurônios/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/metabolismo
6.
Psychiatry Res ; 280: 112523, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31450032

RESUMO

Whilst the effects of cannabis preceding psychosis onset are well established, an effect post-onset is less clear. Emerging evidence suggests that cannabis use is associated with increased relapse outcomes possibly because of determinants, antipsychotic treatment failure and medication adherence, that are not mutually exclusive. Due to the paucity of literature on antipsychotic treatment failure an association with cannabis remains conjectural. This review sought to summarise current evidence regarding the effect of cannabis use on antipsychotic treatment failure among users and non-users with psychosis. Ovid databases (Embase, Journals@Ovid Full Text, OvidMEDLINE® In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations and PsycINFO) were searched to identify relevant articles. Seven articles met eligibility criteria. Cannabis use was associated with the following deleterious outcomes increased: odds of non-remission, prescription of unique antipsychotic medications, cumulative prescription of Clozapine and poor treatment trajectories. One study reported similar life-time, but lower past-year, rates of cannabis use in those prescribed Clozapine. Another study reported differences between groups for chlorpromazine equivalent doses for long-term Olanzapine prescription. Improved methodologies are warranted due to a lack of well-designed prospective studies and heterogeneity of key variables. There remains, despite research paucity, the need to encourage early cannabis cessation and higher-quality research to inform clinical practice.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Fumar Maconha/tratamento farmacológico , Fumar Maconha/psicologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Abuso de Maconha/tratamento farmacológico , Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Abuso de Maconha/psicologia , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Adesão à Medicação , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Falha de Tratamento
7.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol ; 26(6): 582-598, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30138003

RESUMO

Cannabis can induce transient psychotic and anxiety symptoms and long-lasting disorders. The acute psychoactive effects of its main active ingredient, (-)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), may be modulated by previous cannabis exposure. Secondary data analyses tested whether modest previous cannabis exposure modulated the acute effects of Δ9-THC on attentional salience and emotional processing and their neurophysiological substrates. Twenty-four healthy men participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures, within-subject, Δ9-THC challenge study using fMRI. Compared with nonusers (NUs; n = 12; <5 lifetime cannabis joints smoked), abstinent-modest cannabis users (CUs; n = 12; 24.5 ± 9 lifetime cannabis joints smoked) showed less efficient attentional salience processing and recruited different/additional brain areas to process attentional salient and emotional stimuli (all ps ≤ .01). The Δ9-THC challenge disrupted attentional salience and emotional-processing-related brain activity and induced transient anxiety and psychotic symptoms (all ps ≤ .02). However, Δ9-THC-induced psychotic symptoms and attentional salience behavioral impairment were more pronounced in NUs compared with CUs (all ps ≤ .04). Also, NUs under Δ9-THC shifted toward recruitment of other brain areas to perform the tasks. Conversely, CUs were less affected by the acute challenge in an exposure-dependent manner, showing a neurophysiological pattern similar to that of NUs under placebo. Only in NUs, Δ9-THC-induced psychotic symptom and cognitive impairment severity was associated with a more pronounced neurophysiological alteration (all ps ≤ .048). In conclusion, CUs displayed residual effects of cannabis exposure but more blunted responses to the acute symptomatic, behavioral, and neurophysiological effects of Δ9-THC, which were more marked in NUs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Atenção/efeitos dos fármacos , Dronabinol/administração & dosagem , Medo/efeitos dos fármacos , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Adulto , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Emoções , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
8.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 28(7): 850-862, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935939

RESUMO

Cannabis use has been associated with psychosis and cognitive dysfunction. Some evidence suggests that the acute behavioral and neurocognitive effects of the main active ingredient in cannabis, (-)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC), might be modulated by previous cannabis exposure. However, this has not been investigated either using a control group of non-users, or following abstinence in modest cannabis users, who represent the majority of recreational users. Twenty-four healthy men participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures, within-subject, ∆9-THC challenge study. Compared to non-users (N=12; <5 lifetime cannabis joints smoked), abstinent modest cannabis users (N=12; 24.5±9 lifetime cannabis joints smoked) showed worse performance and stronger right hemispheric activation during cognitive processing, independent of the acute challenge (all P≤0.047). Acute ∆9-THC administration produced transient anxiety and psychotomimetic symptoms (all P≤0.02), the latter being greater in non-users compared to users (P=0.040). Non-users under placebo (control group) activated specific brain areas to perform the tasks, while deactivating others. An opposite pattern was found under acute (∆9-THC challenge in non-users) as well as residual (cannabis users under placebo) effect of ∆9-THC. Under ∆9-THC, cannabis users showed brain activity patterns intermediate between those in non-users under placebo (control group), and non-users under ∆9-THC (acute effect) and cannabis users under placebo (residual effect). In non-users, the more severe the ∆9-THC-induced psychotomimetic symptoms and cognitive impairments, the more pronounced was the neurophysiological alteration (all P≤0.036). Previous modest cannabis use blunts the acute behavioral and neurophysiological effects of ∆9-THC, which are more marked in people who have never used cannabis.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiologia , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Dronabinol/farmacologia , Fumar Maconha/psicologia , Psicoses Induzidas por Substâncias/psicologia , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Neuroimagem Funcional , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Psychopharmacol ; 32(8): 825-849, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29591635

RESUMO

A substantial body of credible evidence has accumulated that suggest that cannabis use is an important potentially preventable risk factor for the development of psychotic illness and its worse prognosis following the onset of psychosis. Here we summarize the relevant evidence to argue that the time has come to investigate the neurobiological effects of cannabis in patients with psychotic disorders. In the first section we summarize evidence from longitudinal studies that controlled for a range of potential confounders of the association of cannabis use with increased risk of developing psychotic disorders, increased risk of hospitalization, frequent and longer hospital stays, and failure of treatment with medications for psychosis in those with established illness. Although some evidence has emerged that cannabis-using and non-using patients with psychotic disorders may have distinct patterns of neurocognitive and neurodevelopmental impairments, the biological underpinnings of the effects of cannabis remain to be fully elucidated. In the second and third sections we undertake a systematic review of 70 studies, including over 3000 patients with psychotic disorders or at increased risk of psychotic disorder, in order to delineate potential neurobiological and neurochemical mechanisms that may underlie the effects of cannabis in psychotic disorders and suggest avenues for future research.


Assuntos
Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Psicóticos/etiologia , Animais , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Abuso de Maconha/complicações , Fumar Maconha/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações
10.
Acta Neuropsychiatr ; 30(1): 43-57, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27866486

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between cannabis use and the onset of psychosis is well established. Aberrant salience processing is widely thought to underpin many of these symptoms. Literature explicitly investigating the relationship between aberrant salience processing and cannabis use is scarce; with those few studies finding that acute tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) administration (the main psychoactive component of cannabis) can result in abnormal salience processing in healthy cohorts, mirroring that observed in psychosis. Nevertheless, the extent of and mechanisms through which cannabis has a modulatory effect on aberrant salience, following both acute and chronic use, remain unclear. METHODS: Here, we systematically review recent findings on the effects of cannabis use - either through acute THC administration or in chronic users - on brain regions associated with salience processing (through functional MRI data); and performance in cognitive tasks that could be used as either direct or indirect measures of salience processing. We identified 13 studies either directly or indirectly exploring salience processing. Three types of salience were identified and discussed - incentive/motivational, emotional/affective, and attentional salience. RESULTS: The results demonstrated an impairment of immediate salience processing, following acute THC administration. Amongst the long-term cannabis users, normal salience performance appeared to be underpinned by abnormal neural processes. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the lack of research specifically exploring the effects of cannabis use on salience processing, weaken any conclusions drawn. Additional research explicitly focussed on salience processing and cannabis use is required to advance our understanding of the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the association between cannabis use and development of psychosis.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Dronabinol/administração & dosagem , Afeto/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Atenção/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Mapeamento Encefálico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Motivação/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes Neuropsicológicos
11.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 4(8): 627-633, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705600

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use following the onset of first-episode psychosis has been linked to both increased risk of relapse and non-adherence with antipsychotic medication. Whether poor outcome associated with cannabis use is mediated through an adverse effect of cannabis on medication adherence is unclear. METHODS: In a prospective analysis of data acquired from four different adult inpatient and outpatient units of the South London and Maudsley Mental Health National Health Service Foundation Trust in London, UK, 245 patients were followed up for 2 years from the onset of first-episode psychosis. Cannabis use after onset of psychosis was assessed by self-reports in face-to-face follow-up interviews. Relapse data were collected from clinical notes using the WHO Life Chart Schedule. This measure was also used to assess medication adherence on the basis of both face-to-face interviews and clinical notes. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of first-episode non-organic or affective psychosis according to ICD-10 criteria, and were aged between 18 and 65 years when referred to local psychiatric services. We used structural equation modelling analysis to estimate whether medication adherence partly mediated the effects of continued cannabis use on risk of relapse. The primary outcome variable was relapse, defined as admission to a psychiatric inpatient unit after exacerbation of symptoms within 2 years of first presentation to psychiatric services. Information on cannabis use over the first 2 years after onset of psychosis was investigated as a predictor variable for relapse. Medication adherence was assessed as a mediator variable on the basis of clinical records and self-report data. Study researchers (TS, NP, EK, and EF) rated the adherence. FINDINGS: 397 patients who presented with their first episode of psychosis between April 12, 2002, and July 26, 2013 had a follow-up assessment until September, 2015. Of the 397 patients approached for followed up, 133 refused to take part in this study and 19 could not be included because of missing data. 91 (37%) of 245 patients with first-episode psychosis had a relapse over the 2 years of follow-up. Continued cannabis use predicted poor outcome, including risk of relapse, number of relapses, length of relapse, and care intensity at follow-up. In controlled structural equation modelling analyses, medication adherence partly mediated the effect of continued cannabis use on outcome, including risk of relapse (proportion mediated=26%, ßindirect effects=0·08, 95% CI 0·004 to 0·16), number of relapses (36%, ßindirect effects=0·07, 0·003 to 0·14), time until relapse (28%, ßindirect effects=-0·26, -0·53 to 0·001) and care intensity (20%, ßindirect effects=0·06, 0·004 to 0·11) but not length of relapse (6%, ßindirect effects=0·03, -0·03 to 0·09). The adjusted models explained moderate amounts of variance for outcomes defined as risk of relapse (R2=0·25), number of relapses (R2=0·21), length of relapse (R2=0·07), time until relapse (R2=0·08), and care intensity index (R2=0·15). INTERPRETATION: Between 20% and 36% of the adverse effects of continued cannabis use on outcome in psychosis might be mediated through the effects of cannabis use on medication adherence. Interventions directed at medication adherence could partly help mitigate the harm from cannabis use in psychosis. FUNDING: This study is funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinician Scientist award.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
12.
Psychiatry Res ; 255: 36-41, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28521146

RESUMO

Uncertainty exists whether the use of non-prescription psychoactive substances following onset of a first episode of psychosis (FEP), in particular cannabis use, affects medication adherence. Data from FEP patients (N=233) obtained through prospective assessments measured medication adherence and pattern of cannabis and other substance use in the first two years following onset of psychosis. Multiple logistic regression analyses were employed to compare the different substance use groups with regard to risk of medication non-adherence, while controlling for confounders. The proportion of non-adherent patients was higher in those who continued using high-potency forms of cannabis (skunk-like) following the onset (83%) when compared to never regular users (51%), corresponding to an Odds Ratio (OR) of 5.26[95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.91-15.68]. No significant increases in risk were present in those who used cannabis more sporadically or used milder forms of cannabis (hash-like). Other substances did not make an independent contribution in this model, including cigarette use ([OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.41-1.89]), alcohol use ([OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.27-1.64]) or regular use of other illicit drugs ([OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.34-3.15]) following the onset. These results suggest that continued use of high-potency cannabis following the onset of psychosis may adversely affect medication adherence.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Cannabis , Abuso de Maconha/psicologia , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Fatores de Tempo
13.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 3(10): 947-953, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27567467

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although cannabis use after a first episode of psychosis has been associated with relapse, little is known about the determinants of this most preventable risk factor for relapse of psychosis. Here we aimed to study whether the effects on outcome vary depending on the type of cannabis consumed and usage pattern. METHODS: In this observational study, we prospectively recruited and followed up patients aged 18-65 years who presented with their first episode of psychosis to psychiatric services in south London, London, UK. Relapse of psychosis within 2 years after onset of psychosis was defined as risk of subsequent admission to hospital. We classified patients into different patterns of cannabis use based on continuity of use after onset of psychosis, potency of cannabis consumed, and frequency of use after the onset of their illness. We used multiple regression analyses (logistic or binominal) to compare the different cannabis use groups and propensity score analysis to validate the results. FINDINGS: Between April 12, 2002, and July 26, 2013, 256 patients presented with a first episode of psychosis. We did follow-up assessments for these patients until September, 2015. Simple analyses showed that former regular users of cannabis who stopped after the onset of psychosis had the most favourable illness course with regards to relapse. In multiple analysis, continued high-frequency users (ie, daily use in all 24 months) of high-potency (skunk-like) cannabis had the worst outcome, indexed as an increased risk for a subsequent relapse (odds ratio [OR] 3·28; 95% CI 1·22-9·18), more relapses (incidence rate ratio 1·77; 95% CI 0·96-3·25), fewer months until a relapse occurred (b -0·22; 95% CI -0·40 to -0·04), and more intense psychiatric care (OR 3·16; 95% CI 1·26-8·09) after the onset of psychosis. INTERPRETATION: Adverse effects associated with continued use of cannabis after the onset of a first episode of psychosis depend on the specific patterns of use. Possible interventions could focus on persuading cannabis-using patients with psychosis to reduce use or shift to less potent forms of cannabis. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).


Assuntos
Fumar Maconha/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
14.
BMJ Open ; 6(3): e009888, 2016 Mar 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26940105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether cannabis use is associated with increased risk of relapse, as indexed by number of hospital admissions, and whether antipsychotic treatment failure, as indexed by number of unique antipsychotics prescribed, may mediate this effect in a large data set of patients with first episode psychosis (FEP). DESIGN: Observational study with exploratory mediation analysis. SETTING: Anonymised electronic mental health record data from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. PARTICIPANTS: 2026 people presenting to early intervention services with FEP. EXPOSURE: Cannabis use at presentation, identified using natural language processing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: admission to psychiatric hospital and clozapine prescription up to 5 years following presentation. MEDIATOR: Number of unique antipsychotics prescribed. RESULTS: Cannabis use was present in 46.3% of the sample at first presentation and was particularly common in patients who were 16-25, male and single. It was associated with increased frequency of hospital admission (incidence rate ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.80), increased likelihood of compulsory admission (OR 1.55, 1.16 to 2.08) and greater number of days spent in hospital (ß coefficient 35.1 days, 12.1 to 58.1). The number of unique antipsychotics prescribed, mediated increased frequency of hospital admission (natural indirect effect 1.09, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18; total effect 1.50, 1.21 to 1.87), increased likelihood of compulsory admission (natural indirect effect (NIE) 1.27, 1.03 to 1.58; total effect (TE) 1.76, 0.81 to 3.84) and greater number of days spent in hospital (NIE 17.9, 2.4 to 33.4; TE 34.8, 11.6 to 58.1). CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis use in patients with FEP was associated with an increased likelihood of hospital admission. This was linked to the prescription of several different antipsychotic drugs, indicating clinical judgement of antipsychotic treatment failure. Together, this suggests that cannabis use might be associated with worse clinical outcomes in psychosis by contributing towards failure of antipsychotic treatment.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Londres , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Sistema de Registros , Falha de Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
15.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 3(3): 215-25, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26777297

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the link between cannabis use and development of psychosis is well established, less is known about the effect of continued versus discontinued cannabis use after the onset of psychosis. We aimed to summarise available evidence focusing on the relationship between continued and discontinued cannabis use after onset of psychosis and its relapse. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE for articles published in any language from the database inception date up until April 21, 2015 that included a sample of patients with a pre-existing psychotic disorder with a follow-up duration of at least 6 months. We used a combination of search terms for describing cannabis, the outcome of interest (relapse of psychosis), and the study population. We excluded studies if continued cannabis use or discontinued cannabis use could not be established. We compared relapse outcomes between those who continued (CC) or discontinued (DC) cannabis use or were non-users (NC). We used summary data (individual patient data were not sought out) to estimate Cohen's d, which was entered into random effects models (REM) to compare CC with NC, CC with DC, and DC with NC. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to address the issue of heterogeneity. FINDINGS: Of 1903 citations identified, 24 studies (16 565 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Independent of the stage of illness, continued cannabis users had a greater increase in relapse of psychosis than did both non-users (dCC-NC=0·36, 95% CI 0·22-0·50, p<0·0001) and discontinued users (dCC-DC=0·28, 0·12-0·44, p=0·0005), as well as longer hospital admissions than non-users (dCC-NC=0·36, 0·13 to 0·58, p=0·02). By contrast, cannabis discontinuation was not associated with relapse (dDC-NC=0·02, -0·12 to 0·15; p=0·82). Meta-regression suggested greater effects of continued cannabis use than discontinued use on relapse (dCC-NC=0·36 vs dDC-NC=0·02, p=0·04), positive symptoms (dCC-NC=0·15 vs dDC-NC=-0·30, p=0·05) and level of functioning (dCC-NC=0·04 vs dDC-NC=-0·49, p=0·008) but not on negative symptoms (dCC-NC=-0·09 vs dDC-NC=-0·31, p=0·41). INTERPRETATION: Continued cannabis use after onset of psychosis predicts adverse outcome, including higher relapse rates, longer hospital admissions, and more severe positive symptoms than for individuals who discontinue cannabis use and those who are non-users. These findings point to reductions in cannabis use as a crucial interventional target to improve outcome in patients with psychosis. FUNDING: UK National Institute of Health Research.


Assuntos
Fumar Maconha/psicologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Humanos , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Recidiva
16.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 40(6): 1343-52, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25249057

RESUMO

There is now considerable evidence to support the hypothesis that psychotic symptoms are the result of abnormal salience attribution, and that the attribution of salience is largely mediated through the prefrontal cortex, the striatum, and the hippocampus. Although these areas show differential activation under the influence of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), the two major derivatives of cannabis sativa, little is known about the effects of these cannabinoids on the functional connectivity between these regions. We investigated this in healthy occasional cannabis users by employing event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) following oral administration of delta-9-THC, CBD, or a placebo capsule. Employing a seed cluster-based functional connectivity analysis that involved using the average time series from each seed cluster for a whole-brain correlational analysis, we investigated the effect of drug condition on functional connectivity between the seed clusters and the rest of the brain during an oddball salience processing task. Relative to the placebo condition, delta-9-THC and CBD had opposite effects on the functional connectivity between the dorsal striatum, the prefrontal cortex, and the hippocampus. Delta-9-THC reduced fronto-striatal connectivity, which was related to its effect on task performance, whereas this connection was enhanced by CBD. Conversely, mediotemporal-prefrontal connectivity was enhanced by delta-9-THC and reduced by CBD. Our results suggest that the functional integration of brain regions involved in salience processing is differentially modulated by single doses of delta-9-THC and CBD and that this relates to the processing of salient stimuli.


Assuntos
Atenção/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Canabidiol/farmacologia , Dronabinol/farmacologia , Psicotrópicos/farmacologia , Adulto , Atenção/fisiologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Mapeamento Encefálico , Cannabis , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Fumar Maconha/fisiopatologia , Vias Neurais/efeitos dos fármacos , Vias Neurais/fisiopatologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos
17.
Curr Pharm Des ; 20(13): 2114-25, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23829369

RESUMO

Smoking cannabis produces a diverse range of effects, including impairments in learning and memory. These effects are exerted through action on the endocannabinoid system, which suggests involvement of this system in human cognition. Learning and memory deficits are core symptoms of psychiatric and neurological disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease, and may also be related to endocannabinoid dysfunction in these disorders. However, before new research can focus on potential treatments that work by manipulating the endocannabinoid system, it needs to be elucidated how this system is involved in symptoms of psychiatric disorders. Here we review neuroimaging studies that investigated acute and non-acute effects of cannabis on human learning and memory function, both in adults and in adolescents. Overall, results of these studies show that cannabis use is associated with a pattern of increased activity and a higher level of deactivation in different memory-related areas. This could reflect either increased neural effort ('neurophysiological inefficiency') or a change in strategy to maintain good task performance. However, the interpretation of these findings is significantly hampered by large differences between study populations in cannabis use in terms of frequency, age of onset, and time that subjects were abstinent from cannabis. Future neuroimaging studies should take these limitations into account, and should focus on the potential of cannabinoid compounds for treatment of cognitive symptoms in psychiatric disorders.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Cannabis/toxicidade , Memória/efeitos dos fármacos , Neuroimagem/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
18.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 22(2): 114-22, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21741803

RESUMO

Individuals with an at risk mental state (ARMS) are at greatly increased risk of developing a psychotic illness. Risk of transition to psychosis is associated with regionally reduced cortical gray matter volume. There has been considerable interest in the interaction between psychosis risk and substance use. In this study we investigate the relationship between alcohol, cannabis and nicotine use with gray matter volume in ARMS subjects and healthy volunteers. Twenty seven ARMS subjects and 27 healthy volunteers took part in the study. All subjects underwent volumetric MRI imaging. The relationship between regional gray matter volume and cannabis use, smoking, and alcohol use in controls and ARMS subjects was analysed using voxel-based morphometry. In any region where a significant relationship with drug was present, data were analysed to determine if there was any group difference in this relationship. Alcohol intake was inversely correlated with gray matter volume in cerebellum, cannabis intake was use was inversely correlated with gray matter volume in prefrontal cortex and tobacco intake was inversely correlated with gray matter volume in left temporal cortex. There were no significant interactions by group in any region. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis of increased susceptibility to harmful effects of drugs and alcohol on regional gray matter in ARMS subjects. However, alcohol, tobacco and cannabis at low to moderate intake may be associated with lower gray matter in both ARMS subjects and healthy volunteers-possibly representing low-level cortical damage or change in neural plasticity.


Assuntos
Mapeamento Encefálico , Encéfalo/patologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/patologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/patologia , Adulto , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Análise de Regressão , Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA