The pandemic's unseen wounds: COVID-19's profound effects on mental health.

Objective: This review aims to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, with a focus on the physiological and psychological consequences, including comorbidities. The goal is to understand the direct and indirect populations affected by mental distress and identify potential interventions. Methodology: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using various databases, including Google Scholar, ResearchGate, ScienceDirect, PubMed, PLoS One, and Web of Science. The search utilized relevant keywords to investigate the direct and indirect impacts of COVID-19 on mental health. The selected articles were critically evaluated and analyzed to identify key findings and insights. Main findings: Mental health, being an intrinsic component of overall well-being, plays a vital role in physiological functioning. The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the emergence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, has had a devastating global impact. Beyond the respiratory symptoms, individuals recovering from COVID-19 commonly experience additional ailments, such as arrhythmia, depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Healthcare professionals on the frontlines face an elevated risk of mental illness. However, it is crucial to recognize that the general population also grapples with comparable levels of mental distress. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the significance of addressing mental health concerns. Various strategies can help mitigate the impact, including counselling, fostering open lines of communication, providing mental support, ensuring comprehensive patient care, and administering appropriate medications. In severe cases, treatment may involve the supplementation of essential vitamins and antidepressant therapy. By understanding the direct and indirect impacts of COVID-19 on mental health, healthcare providers and policymakers can develop targeted interventions to support individuals and communities affected by the pandemic. Continued research and collaborative efforts are essential to address this pervasive issue effectively.

Interrelated Oncogenic Viruses and Breast Cancer.

Breast Cancer is a multifactorial disease and recent evidence that viruses have a greater role in its aetiology and pathophysiology than previously hypothesized, has garnered a lot of attention in the past couple of years. After the role of Mouse Mammary Tumour Virus (MMTV) in the oncogenesis of breast cancer has been proved in mice, search for similar viruses found quite a plausible relation of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and Bovine Leukaemia Virus (BLV) with breast cancer. However, despite practical efforts to provide some clarity in this issue, the evidence that viruses cause breast cancer still remains inconclusive. Therefore, this article aims to clarify some ambiguity and elucidate the correlation of breast cancer and those particular viruses which are found to bring about the development of tumorigenesis by a previous infection or by their own oncogenic ability to manipulate the molecular mechanisms and bypass the immune system of the human body. Although many studies have reported, both, the individual and co-existing presence of HPV, EBV, MMTV, and BLV in patient sample tissues, particularly in Western women, and proposed oncogenic mechanisms, majority of the collective survey of literature fails to provide a delineated and strong conclusive evidence that viruses do, in fact, cause breast cancer. Measures to prevent these viral infections may curb breast cancer cases, especially in the West. More studies are needed to provide a definite conclusion.

The Role of Early Subspeciality Consultation in the Timing of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Diagnosis and Management.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between timing of subspeciality consult and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) consideration, immunosuppression initiation, and in-hospital mortality in patients with HLH. METHODS: We conducted a medical records review study of patients 18 years or older with definite or probable HLH at Montefiore Medical Center between 2006 and 2019. Earlier subspeciality consultation (rheumatology, hematology, and infectious disease) was defined as consultation in less than or equal to 18 hours from time of admission. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared between patients with early and later subspecialty consultation. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included. The median age was 40 years, and 61% of patients were male. Infection was identified as a cause of HLH in 13 patients (46%). Fifteen patients (54%) were classified as having an earlier subspeciality consultation with a median time (interquartile range) to HLH consideration of 1.0 day (0.3-4.2 days) compared with 7.9 days (3.1-9.9 days) for the later consultation group (p = 0.002). The median time (interquartile range) to immunosuppression initiation was 4.6 days (1.7-7.8 days) versus 10.9 days (5.1-13.4 days) (p = 0.01), respectively. Five patients (33%) had in-hospital deaths in the early consultation group compared with 7 patients (54%) in later consultation group (p = 0.27). Among the subset of patients who survived to discharge, the 90-day readmission rate was higher in the later consultation group (83% vs 30%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HLH, earlier subspeciality consultation may play a role in earlier HLH consideration and treatment initiation.