Comparison of the Hypoxia PET Tracer (18)F-EF5 to Immunohistochemical Marker EF5 in 3 Different Human Tumor Xenograft Models.

UNLABELLED: The availability of (18)F-labeled and unlabeled 2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide (EF5) allows for a comparative assessment of tumor hypoxia by PET and immunohistochemistry; however, the combined use of these 2 approaches has not been fully assessed in vivo. The aim of this study was to evaluate (18)F-EF5 tumor uptake versus EF5 binding and hypoxia as determined from immunohistochemistry at both macroscopic and microregional levels. METHODS: Three tumor models-PC3, HCT116, and H460-were evaluated. Tumor-bearing animals were coinjected with (18)F-EF5 and EF5 (30 mg/kg), and PET imaging was performed at 2.5 h after injection. After PET imaging and 2 min after Hoechst 33342 injection, the tumors were excised and evaluated for (18)F-EF5 distribution by autoradiography and EF5 binding by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, the effects of nonradioactive EF5 (30 mg/kg) on the hypoxia-imaging characteristics of (18)F-EF5 were evaluated by comparing the PET data for H460 tumors with those from animals injected with (18)F-EF5 alone. RESULTS: The uptake of (18)F-EF5 in hypoxic tumor regions and the spatial relationship between (18)F-EF5 uptake and EF5 binding varied among tumors. H460 tumors showed higher tumor-to-muscle contrast in PET imaging; however, the distribution and uptake of the tracer was less specific for hypoxia in H460 than in HCT116 and PC3 tumors. Correlation analyses revealed that the highest spatial correlation between (18)F-EF5 uptake and EF5 binding was in PC3 tumors (r = 0.73 ± 0.02) followed by HCT116 (r = 0.60 ± 0.06) and H460 (r = 0.53 ± 0.10). Uptake and binding of (18)F-EF5 and EF5 correlated negatively with Hoechst 33342 perfusion marker distribution in the 3 tumor models. Image contrast and heterogeneous uptake of (18)F-EF5 in H460 tumors was significantly higher when the radiotracer was used alone versus in combination with unlabeled EF5 (tumor-to-muscle ratio of 2.51 ± 0.33 vs. 1.71 ± 0.17, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The uptake and hypoxia selectivity of (18)F-EF5 varied among tumor models when animals also received nonradioactive EF5. Combined use of radioactive and nonradioactive EF5 for independent assessment of tumor hypoxia by PET and immunohistochemistry methods is promising; however, the EF5 drug concentrations that are required for immunohistochemistry assays may affect the uptake of (18)F-EF5 in hypoxic cells in certain tumor types as observed in H460 in this study.

18F-EF5 PET imaging as an early response biomarker for the hypoxia-activated prodrug SN30000 combined with radiation treatment in a non-small cell lung cancer xenograft model.

UNLABELLED: Hypoxia is a significant therapeutic problem for solid tumors because hypoxic cells are treatment-resistant and more aggressive. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs such as SN30000 use a mechanism of activation in hypoxic cells similar to that of 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia PET tracers. Therefore, we have evaluated the usefulness of 2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-(18)F-pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide ((18)F-EF5) PET to monitor and predict tumor response to SN30000 plus radiation treatment (RT). METHODS: Human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts (H460) in athymic rats were imaged with (18)F-EF5 PET before and after treatment with SN30000 (90 mg/kg), with or without 15-Gy RT. The feasibility of imaging early changes in hypoxia in response to SN30000 was examined 24 h after treatment, followed by ex vivo γ-counting and immunohistochemical examination to study drug-induced apoptosis. Subsequently, the therapeutic effects of SN30000 with or without RT were evaluated in tumor growth delay studies and compared with early treatment-induced changes observed by (18)F-EF5 PET. Changes in tumor hemoglobin oxygen saturation as a function of time after treatment measured by optical spectroscopy were compared with PET data. RESULTS: The uptake of (18)F-EF5 was significantly lower in SN30000-treated tumors than in saline controls 24 h after treatment (mean standardized uptake value, 0.44 ± 0.08 vs. 0.56 ± 0.08 for control group; P < 0.05). Apoptosis was significantly higher in SN30000-treated tumors than in controls. Early treatment-induced changes in (18)F-EF5 uptake were indicative of tumor response in growth delay studies at the group level. SN30000 plus RT significantly decreased (18)F-EF5 uptake relative to baseline and resulted in complete tumor remission in 5 of 7 animals. SN30000 alone decreased (18)F-EF5 uptake, generally in tumors with high initial standardized uptake values, and showed a minor tumor growth delay effect. The changes induced by SN30000 with or without RT in (18)F-EF5 uptake correlated with baseline hypoxia levels. RT caused significant increases in tumor oxygen concentration and hemoglobin oxygen saturation. CONCLUSION: A hypoxia PET imaging agent can measure changes in tumor hypoxic fraction in response to SN30000. These results suggest the utility of (18)F-EF5 PET for monitoring early response to tumor treatment with SN30000 plus RT in the clinical development of this novel hypoxia-activated prodrug.

A simplified synthesis of the hypoxia imaging agent 2-(2-Nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-[(18)F]pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide ([18F]EF5).

INTRODUCTION: [(18)F]EF5 is a validated marker for PET imaging of tumor hypoxia. It is prepared by reacting a trifluoroallyl precursor with carrier-added [(18)F]F(2) gas in trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) solvent. We report here an improved radiosynthesis and purification of [(18)F]EF5 by utilizing an electroformed nickel (Ni) target for [(18)F]F(2) production, and Oasis® HLB cartridges for on-line solid phase extraction of [(18)F]EF5 prior to HPLC purification. METHODS: [(18)F]F(2) was produced by deuteron bombardment of neon plus F(2) in an Ni target, and bubbled through the radiolabelling precursor solution. Purification was achieved by extracting the contents of the crude reaction mixture onto Oasis HLB cartridges, and subsequently eluted onto a semi-preparative HPLC column for further separation. Purified [(18)F]EF5 was evaluated in small animal PET studies using HCT116 tumor xenografts in nude mice. RESULTS: The electroformed Ni target enabled recovery of >75% of the radioactivity from the cyclotron target, resulting in 16.2 ± 2.2 GBq (438 ± 58 mCi) of [(18)F]F(2) available for the synthesis. Use of Oasis cartridges yielded a less complex mixture for purification. On average, 1140 ± 200 MBq (30.8 ± 5.4 mCi) of [(18)F]EF5 were collected at EOS. Small animal PET imaging studies showed specific retention of [(18)F]EF5 in tumors, with tumor-to-muscle ratios of 2.7 ± 0.3 at about 160 min after injection. CONCLUSION: A simple procedure has been developed for the routine synthesis of [(18)F]EF5 in amounts and purity required for clinical studies. This new method avoids the need for TFA evaporation and also enables facile automation of the synthesis using commercially available radiosynthesis modules.