Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Surg ; 52(5): 747-755, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37080898

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if closed glove exchange (CGE) increases hand contamination. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical teams participating in 65 individual surgical procedures were included, resulting in 200 individual enrollments. METHODS: At the completion of surgery, gloves were removed and hands were swabbed. The inside of the gown cuff was swabbed. Each participant regloved, using a closed gloving technique. The new gloves were removed, and hands were swabbed for culture a second time. Swabs underwent standard bacterial culture. RESULTS: Before glove exchange, or baseline, contamination was found on 17/200 dominant hands and 13/200 nondominant hands. After performing CGE, contamination was found on 14/200 and 15/200 dominant and nondominant hands, respectively. No difference was detected between the number of CFUs cultured from a surgeon's hands before CGE and the number of CFUs cultured from a surgeon's hands post-CGE (one sided sign test, p = .61). Twelve (12) different bacterial species were identified, the most common were Staphylococcus spp. (97/154; 63%). CONCLUSION: Closed glove exchange did not increase bacterial hand contamination over baseline levels. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: We found no evidence to support discontinuing CGE.


Assuntos
Luvas Cirúrgicas , Staphylococcus , Animais , Luvas Cirúrgicas/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Bactérias
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA