The changing treatment paradigm in prolactinoma - a prospective series of 100 consecutive neurosurgical cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patients with prolactinoma treated surgically in a time when elective prolactinoma surgery became routine in our center, using a comprehensive outcome set, focusing on preoperative assessments, surgical outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). METHODS: Cohort of consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing surgery between January 2021 and August 2023. Clinical data were collected during multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings/from medical records at distinct timepoints: (1) pre-surgery, (2) two weeks post-surgery, (3) six months post-surgery, and (4) follow-up (median 15.0 (10.0-24.8 months). HR-QoL was measured using the Leiden Bothers and Needs Pituitary (LBNQ-P) questionnaire. Data were described for all patients, and patients undergoing elective total resection, with additional subgroups of (a) patients undergoing a high-probability-first-total-resection, and (b) reoperations aiming for total resection. RESULTS: One hundred surgically treated patients with prolactinoma were included (72 female). Dopamine agonist intolerance was the most frequent indication (n=68). The surgical goal (debulking/total resection) was achieved in 90% of patients. Long-term complications occurred in 4% of patients. Seventy-eight patients underwent an elective total resection, achieving remission in 91%. The subsets of preoperatively estimated high-probability-first-total-resections (n=52), and reoperations (n=9), achieved remission in 92% and 89%, respectively. LBNQ-P Total Bothers and Total Needs scores improved significantly after surgery (p<0.001, Δ-3.4 (IQR -14.4- -0.9) and p=0.006, Δ-1.8 (IQR -11.9-1.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: High remission rates were achieved, improving HR-QoL, evidencing (repeat) prolactinoma surgery is effective in an experienced pituitary center, as highlighted in the most recent guideline (2023).

Lanreotide versus placebo for tumour reduction in patients with a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive, clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma (GALANT study): a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial with blinded outcome assessment.

Background: No established medical treatment options currently exist for patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma (NFPMA). Somatostatin analogues may prevent tumour growth, but randomised controlled trials are lacking. In vivo somatostatin receptor assessment with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET could help in selecting patients for treatment. We aimed to determine the effect of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide on tumour size in patients with a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive NFPMA. Methods: The GALANT study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial with recruitment at three academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Adult patients with a suprasellar extending NFPMA, either surgery-naïve or postoperative remnant ≥10 mm, were eligible for inclusion. Important exclusion criteria were previous sellar radiotherapy and use of dopamine receptor agonists. Somatostatin receptor expression in the NFPMA was determined through 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, co-registered with MRI. A predefined sample of 44 patients with PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned (1:1) to lanreotide acetate 120 mg or placebo, both administered as deep subcutaneous injections every 28 days for 72 weeks. Primary outcome was the change in cranio-caudal tumour diameter measured on pituitary MRI from baseline to end-of-treatment in the intention-to-treat population. Participants, investigators and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NL5136, and EudraCT, 2015-001234-22. Findings: Between Nov 3, 2015, and Dec 10, 2019, 49 patients were included in the study. Forty-four patients with a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned to lanreotide (22 [50%]) or placebo (22 [50%]). Study treatment was completed in 13 (59%) lanreotide and 19 (86%) placebo participants. The mean (SD) change from baseline in cranio-caudal tumour diameter after treatment was +1·2 (2·5) mm with lanreotide and +1·3 (1·5) mm with placebo; adjusted mean difference versus placebo -0·1 mm (95% CI -1·3 to 1·2, p = 0·93). Adverse events occurred in 22 (100%, 147 events) lanreotide and 21 (95%, 94 events) placebo participants. Gastrointestinal complaints were most common, reported by 18 (82%) lanreotide and 8 (36%) placebo participants. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Interpretation: Compared with placebo, lanreotide treatment did not reduce tumour size or growth in patients with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive NFPMA. Funding: Ipsen Farmaceutica BV.

Clinical use of [18F]fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine PET co-registered with MRI for localizing prolactinoma remnants.

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of [18F]fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine PET co-registered with magnetic resonance imaging ([18F]FET-PET/MRICR) in patients with difficult-to-localize prolactinoma to inform clinical decision-making and (surgical) treatment planning. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 17 consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing [18F]FET-PET/MRICR between October 2020 and September 2022 for either (1) additional information in case of difficult-to-visualize remnants after prior transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), or pharmacological treatment, or (2) radiological diagnosis in absence of a (clear) adenoma on diagnostic/post-treatment conventional MRI. RESULTS: [18F]FET-PET/MRICR identified a lesion in 14/17 patients, yet failed to identify active lesions in 2 patients with negative conventional MRI despite prolactin > 7.5 times upper limit of normal. [18F]FET-PET/MRICR results were inconclusive in 1 patient due to diffuse tracer uptake 10 weeks post-surgery. [18F]FET-PET/MRICR was completely concordant with a suspected lesion on conventional MRI in 10/17 patients, and partially concordant in 3/17 patients. New foci were identified in 4/17 patients. The [18F]FET-PET/MRICR conclusions influenced clinical shared decision-making in 15/17 patients, of whom 7 patients underwent TSS and 8 refrained from TSS. One patient underwent TSS despite negative [18F]FET-PET/MRICR, and one patient underwent additional imaging. Intraoperative findings corresponded with [18F]FET-PET/MRICR in 5/8 patients, and immunohistochemistry was positive in 5/8 patients. The treatment goal was achieved in 7/8 patients, and remission was achieved in 5/7 patients in whom total resection was considered feasible. CONCLUSION: [18F]FET-PET/MRICR can be of added value in the preoperative decision-making process for selected patients with difficult-to-localize prolactinoma (remnants), or patients lacking a substrate on conventional MRI.

18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine PET co-registered with MRI in patients with persisting acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) co-registered with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (FET-PET/MRICR) in the care trajectory for persistent acromegaly. DESIGN: Prospective case series. PATIENTS: Ten patients with insufficiently controlled acromegaly referred to our team to evaluate surgical options. MEASUREMENTS: FET-PET/MRICR was used to support decision-making if MRI alone and multidisciplinary team evaluation did not provide sufficient clarity to proceed to surgery. RESULTS: FET-PET/MRICR showed suspicious (para)sellar tracer uptake in all patients. In five patients FET-PET/MRICR was fully concordant with conventional MRI, and in one patient partially concordant. FET-PET/MRICR identified suggestive new foci in four other patients. Surgical re-exploration was performed in nine patients (aimed at total resection (6), debulking (2), diagnosis (1)), and one patient underwent radiation therapy. In 7 of 9 (78%) operated patients FET-PET/MRICR findings were confirmed intraoperatively, and in six (67%) also histologically. IGF-1 decreased significantly in eight patients (89%). All patients showed clinical improvement. Complete biochemical remission was achieved in three patients (50% of procedures in which total resection was anticipated feasible). Biochemistry improved in five and was unchanged in one patient. No permanent complications occurred. At six months, optimal outcome (preoperative intended goal achieved without permanent complications) was achieved in six (67%) patients and an intermediate outcome (goal not achieved, but no complications) in the other three patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persisting acromegaly without a clear surgical target on MRI, FET-PET/MRICR is a new tracer to provide additional information to aid decision-making by the multidisciplinary pituitary team.

Recovery of Third, Fourth, and Sixth Cranial Nerve Palsies in Pituitary Adenoma and Meningioma Patients.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective, observational cohort study aimed to determine recovery rate and recovery time of ocular motor nerve palsies (OMP) of third (CN III), fourth (CN IV), or sixth cranial nerves (CN VI)-and associated prognostic factors-in meningioma and pituitary adenoma (PA) patients. METHODS: A total of 25 meningioma (28 eyes) and 33 PA patients (36 eyes), treated at the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands from January 1, 1978 to January 31, 2021, were included. OMPs were evaluated according to a newly created recovery scale using on-clinical and orthoptic examinations, which were performed every 3-4 months until palsy recovery, or at 18 months follow-up. RESULTS: Recovery rates of CN III (meningioma 23.5% vs PA 92.3%), CN IV (meningioma 20% vs PA 100%), and CN VI (meningioma 60% vs PA 100%) palsies were observed at 18 months follow-up, with differences between the 2 tumor types being observed in the treated patients only. Median recovery time of all OMPs combined was significantly longer in meningioma patients (37.9 ± 14.3 months vs 3.3 ± 0.1 months; P < 0.001). No significant protective or risk factors for recovery rate or time were identified. CONCLUSIONS: OMP recovery rates in treated patients were more favorable in patients with PA compared with patients with meningiomas, independent of OMP cause. With these new insights in OMP recovery, more accurate prognoses and appropriate follow-up strategies can be determined for meningioma and PA patients with OMPs.

Care trajectories of surgically treated patients with a prolactinoma: why did they opt for surgery?

PURPOSE: To describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing surgery from 2017 to 2019 at the referral center (RC), prior to surgery being considered a viable treatment option (i.e. PRolaCT study). Demographics and clinical data (type and duration of pretreatment and surgical indications, goals, and outcomes) were collected from patient records. Care trajectories were divided into three phases: (1) diagnosis and initial treatment, (2) endocrine treatment at the RC, and (3) surgical treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients were included (31 females (77.5%), median age 26.5 (14-63) years. Indications for surgery were dopamine agonist (DA) intolerance (n = 31, 77.5%), resistance (n = 6, 15.0%), and patient/physician preference (n = 3, 7.5%). Patients were pretreated with DA (n = 39 (97.5%)), and surgery (n = 3 (7.5%)). Median disease duration at surgery was 4 (0-27) years. Primary surgical goal was total resection in 38 patients (95.0%), of which biochemical remission was achieved 6 months postoperatively in 23 patients (62.2%), and clinical remission in 6 patients (16.2%), missing data n = 1. CONCLUSION: Care trajectories were highly individualized based on patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the multidisciplinary team's assessment (need for alternative treatment, surgical chances and risks). Most patients were pretreated pharmacologically and had broad variation in timing of referral, undergoing surgery as last-resort treatment predominantly due to DA intolerance. High quality imaging and multidisciplinary consultations with experienced neurosurgeons and endocrinologists enabling treatment tailored to patients' needs were prerequisites for adequate counseling in treatment of patients with prolactinoma.

Patient-reported outcomes in refractory hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: an unmet need.

PURPOSE: To describe quality and outcomes of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) used in patients with refractory hormone-producing pituitary adenomas, and to provide an overview of PROs in these challenging pituitary adenomas. METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies reporting on refractory pituitary adenomas. For the purpose of this review, refractory adenomas were defined as tumors resistant to primary therapy. General risk of bias was assessed using a component approach and the quality of PROM reporting was assessed using the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) criteria. RESULTS: 20 studies reported on PROMs in refractory pituitary adenomas, using 14 different PROMs, of which 4 were disease specific (median general risk of bias score: 33.5% (range 6-50%) and ISOQOL score: 46% (range 29-62%)). SF-36/RAND-36 and AcroQoL were most frequently used. Health-related quality of life in refractory patients (measured by AcroQoL, SF-36/Rand-36, Tuebingen CD-25, and EQ-5D-5L) varied greatly across studies, and was not always impaired compared to patients in remission. CONCLUSION: There is a scarcity of data on PROs in the subset of pituitary adenomas that is more difficult to treat, e.g., refractory and these patients are difficult to isolate from the total cohort. The patients' perspective on quality of life, therefore, remains largely unknown in refractory patients. Thus, PROs in refractory pituitary adenomas require adequate analysis using properly reported disease specific PROMs in large cohorts to enable appropriate interpretation for use in clinical practice.

Healthcare utilization and costs among intracranial meningioma patients during long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: Few studies have reported on healthcare utilization and costs for intracranial meningioma patients, while the tumor and its treatment profoundly affect patients' functioning and well-being. Here we evaluated healthcare utilization and costs, including their determinants. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study of adult meningioma patients ≥ 5 years after intervention. Patients completed three validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing patients 'functioning and wellbeing (SF-36, EORTC QLQ-BN20, and HADS) and a study-specific questionnaire assessing healthcare utilization over the previous twelve months. Healthcare costs of the twelve months prior were calculated using reported healthcare utilization ≥ 5 years after intervention by the Dutch Manual for Economic Evaluation in Healthcare. Determinants for healthcare utilization and costs were determined with regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 190 patients with WHO grade I or II meningioma after a mean follow-up since intervention of 9.2 years (SD 4.0). The general practitioner (80.5%), physiotherapist (37.9%), and neurologist (25.4%) were visited most often by patients. Median annual healthcare costs were €871 (IQR €262-€1933). Main contributors to these costs were medication (45.8% of total costs, of which anti-seizure medication was utilized most [21.6%]), specialist care (17.7%), and physiotherapy (15.5%). Lower HRQoL was a significant determinant for higher healthcare utilization and costs. CONCLUSION: In patients with meningioma, medication costs constituted the largest expenditure of total healthcare costs, in particular anti-seizure medication. Particularly a lower HRQoL was a determinant for healthcare utilization and costs. A patient-specific approach aimed at improving patients' HRQoL and needs could be beneficial in reducing disease burden and functional recovery.

Unexpected concomitant pituitary adenoma and suprasellar meningioma: a case report and review of the literature.

We report a case of a 75-year-old patient with hypopituitarism, bitemporal visual field deficits and a parasellar mass on pituitary MRI. During surgery, suspicion was raised that a non-functioning pituitary adenoma was accompanied by an abutting diaphragm sellae meningioma, which was confirmed at pathological examination. In retrospect, the initial MRI suggested two separate tumours on the basis of differing densities but this distinction was not seen on the last preoperative MRI.

Starting point for benchmarking outcomes and reporting of pituitary adenoma surgery within the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN): results from a meta-analysis and survey study.

Objective: The European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN) aims to organize high-quality healthcare throughout Europe, including care for pituitary adenoma patients. As surgery is the mainstay of treatment, we aimed to describe the current surgical practice and published surgical outcomes of pituitary adenoma within Endo-ERN. Design and Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting surgical outcomes of pituitary adenoma patients within Endo-ERN MTG6 pituitary reference centers between 2010 and 2019. A survey was completed by reference centers on their current surgical practice. Results: A total of 18 out of 43 (42%) reference centers located in 7 of the 20 (35%) MTG6-represented countries published 48 articles. Remission rates were 50% (95% CI: 42-59) for patients with acromegaly, 68% (95% CI: 60-75) for Cushing's disease, and 53% (95% CI: 39-66%) for prolactinoma. Gross total resection was achieved in 49% (95% CI: 37-61%) of patients and visual improvement in 78% (95% CI: 68-87). Mortality, hemorrhage, and carotid injury occurred in less than 1% of patients. New-onset hypopituitarism occurred in 16% (95% CI: 11-23), transient diabetes insipidus in 12% (95% CI: 6-21), permanent diabetes insipidus in 4% (95% CI: 3-6), syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) in 9% (95% CI: 5-14), severe epistaxis in 2% (95% CI: 0-4), and cerebrospinal fluid leak in 4% (95% CI: 2-6). Thirty-five (81%) centers completed the survey: 54% were operated endoscopically and 57% were together with an ENT surgeon. Conclusion: The results of this study could be used as a first benchmark for the outcomes of pituitary adenoma surgery within Endo-ERN. However, the heterogeneity between studies in the reporting of outcomes hampers comparability and warrants outcome collection through registries.

Evaluating the Impact of Acromegaly on Quality of Life.

Acromegaly has a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This review aims to discuss the impact of acromegaly on QoL from the clinical perspective as well as from the patient perspective. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in acromegaly and how PROMs aid decision-making. The recommendations presented in this review are based on recent clinical evidence on the impact of acromegaly on QoL combined with the authors' own clinical experience treating patients with acromegaly. We recommend that a patient-centered approach should be considered in treatment decisions, integrating conventional biochemical outcomes, tumor control, comorbidities, treatment complications, and PROMs, including QoL measures. This more integrated approach seems effective in treating comorbidities and improving patient-reported outcomes and is critical, as many patients do not achieve biochemical or tumor control and comorbidities, impairment in QoL may not remit even when full biochemical control is achieved.

Costs and Its Determinants in Pituitary Tumour Surgery.

Purpose: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) provides a framework to improve care by improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. To support value-based decision making in clinical practice we evaluated healthcare costs and cost drivers in perioperative care for pituitary tumour patients. Methods: We retrospectively assessed financial and clinical data for surgical treatment up to the first year after surgery of pituitary tumour patients treated between 2015 and 2018 in a Dutch tertiary referral centre. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of higher costs. Results: 271 patients who underwent surgery were included. Mean total costs (SD) were €16339 (13573) per patient, with the following cost determinants: surgery time (€62 per minute; 95% CI: 50, 74), length of stay (€1331 per day; 95% CI 1139, 1523), admission to higher care unit (€12154 in total; 95% CI 6413, 17895), emergency surgery (€10363 higher than elective surgery; 95% CI: 1422, 19305) and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (€14232; 95% CI 9667, 18797). Intradural (€7128; 95% CI 10421, 23836) and combined transsphenoidal/transcranial surgery (B: 38494; 95% CI 29191, 47797) were associated with higher costs than standard. Further, higher costs were found in these baseline conditions: Rathke's cleft cyst (€9201 higher than non-functioning adenoma; 95% CI 1173, 17230), giant adenoma (€19106 higher than microadenoma; 95% CI 12336, 25877), third ventricle invasion (€14613; 95% CI 7613, 21613) and dependent functional status (€12231; 95% CI 3985, 20477). In patients with uncomplicated course, costs were €8879 (3210) and with complications €17551 (14250). Conclusions: Length of hospital stay, and complications are the main drivers of costs in perioperative pituitary tumour healthcare as were some baseline features, e.g. larger tumors, cysts and dependent functional status. Costs analysis may correspond with healthcare resource utilization and guide further individualized care path development and capacity planning.

Implementation of functional imaging using 11C-methionine PET-CT co-registered with MRI for advanced surgical planning and decision making in prolactinoma surgery.

PURPOSE: To report the first experience of our multidisciplinary team with functional imaging using 11C-methionine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (11C-methionine PET-CT) co-registered with MRI (Met-PET/MRICR) in clinical decision making and surgical planning of patients with difficult to treat prolactinoma. METHODS: In eighteen patients with prolactinoma, referred to our tertiary referral centre because of intolerance or resistance for dopamine agonists (DA), Met-PET/MRICR was used to aid decision-making regarding therapy. RESULTS: Met-PET/MRICR was positive in 94% of the patients. MRI and Met-PET/MRICR findings were completely concordant in five patients, partially concordant in nine patients, and non-concordant in four patients. In five patients Met-PET/MRICR identified lesion(s) that were retrospectively also visible on MRI. Met-PET/MRICR was false negative in one patient, with a cystic adenoma on conventional MRI. Thirteen patients underwent transsphenoidal surgery, with nine achieving full biochemical remission, two clinical improvement and near normalized prolactin levels, and one patient clinical improvement with significant tumour reduction. Hence, nearly all patients (94%) were considered to have a positive outcome. Permanent complication rate was low. Three patients continued DA, two patients have a wait and scan policy. CONCLUSION: Met-PET/MRICR can provide additional information to guide multidisciplinary preoperative and intraoperative decision making in selected cases of prolactinoma. This approach resulted in a high remission rate with a low rate of complications in our expert centre.

Impact of patient-reported nasal symptoms on quality of life after endoscopic pituitary surgery: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery causes nasal morbidity and negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Knowledge on actionable symptoms that could improve postoperative HRQoL is therefore important. This study assessed the impact of nasal symptoms on postoperative HRQoL. METHODS: This perioperative cohort study included 103 adult patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary adenoma resection (August 2016-December 2018), with measurements preoperatively, and 5 days, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Nasal symptoms were measured with the Anterior Skull base nasal inventory-12, and HRQoL with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical (PCS) and mental component scores (MCS). Linear regression analysis was used to assess (1) determinants of postoperative nasal morbidity, (2) associations between number of symptoms or (3) individual symptoms and HRQoL, and (4) the percentage of variance of HRQoL explained by nasal symptoms. RESULTS: The number of nasal symptoms transiently increased after surgery. No significant treatment- or disease-related determinants of nasal morbidity were identified. The number of nasal symptoms was significantly associated with a lower PCS (ß = - 1.0; 95%CI - 1.5, - 0.4), but not with MCS at 6 weeks. Similar results were observed at 6 months. Headaches (42.2%), problems with smell (42.0%), and taste (36.0%) were the most prevalent symptoms, while sense of smell and taste, and nasal discharge showed the strongest associations with HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative nasal symptoms, in particular problems with smell and taste, significantly affect pituitary patients' physical HRQoL. Monitoring of these symptoms may aid in determining which patients may benefit from intensified follow-up and treatment, aiming to optimize HRQoL.

Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update.

Cushing's disease requires accurate diagnosis, careful treatment selection, and long-term management to optimise patient outcomes. The Pituitary Society convened a consensus workshop comprising more than 50 academic researchers and clinical experts to discuss the application of recent evidence to clinical practice. In advance of the virtual meeting, data from 2015 to present about screening and diagnosis; surgery, medical, and radiation therapy; and disease-related and treatment-related complications of Cushing's disease summarised in recorded lectures were reviewed by all participants. During the meeting, concise summaries of the recorded lectures were presented, followed by small group breakout discussions. Consensus opinions from each group were collated into a draft document, which was reviewed and approved by all participants. Recommendations regarding use of laboratory tests, imaging, and treatment options are presented, along with algorithms for diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome and management of Cushing's disease. Topics considered most important to address in future research are also identified.

The PRolaCT studies - a study protocol for a combined randomised clinical trial and observational cohort study design in prolactinoma.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment for prolactinomas is a medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs), which effectively control hyperprolactinaemia in most patients, although post-withdrawal remission rates are approximately 34%. Therefore, many patients require prolonged DA treatment, while side effects negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Endoscopic transsphenoidal resection is reserved for patients with severe side effects, or with DA-resistant prolactinoma. Surgery has a good safety profile and high probability of remission and may thus deserve a more prominent place in prolactinoma treatment. The hypothesis for this study is that early or upfront surgical resection is superior to DA treatment both in terms of HRQoL and remission rate in patients with a non-invasive prolactinoma of limited size. METHODS: We present a combined randomised clinical trial and observational cohort study design, which comprises three unblinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs; PRolaCT-1, PRolaCT-2, PRolaCT-3), and an observational study arm (PRolaCT-O) that compare neurosurgical counselling, and potential subsequent endoscopic transsphenoidal adenoma resection, with current standard care. Patients with a non-invasive prolactinoma (< 25 mm) will be eligible for one of three RCTs based on the duration of pre-treatment with DAs: PRolaCT-1: newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients; PRolaCT-2: patients with limited duration of DA treatment (4-6 months); and PRolaCT-3: patients with persisting prolactinoma after DA treatment for > 2 years. PRolaCT-O will include patients who decline randomisation, due to e.g. a clear treatment preference. Primary outcomes are disease remission after 36 months and HRQoL after 12 months. DISCUSSION: Early or upfront surgical resection for patients with a limited-sized prolactinoma may be a reasonable alternative to the current standard practice of DA treatment, which we will investigate in three RCTs and an observational cohort study. Within the three RCTs, patients will be randomised between neurosurgical counselling and standard care. The observational study arm will recruit patients who refuse randomisation and have a pronounced treatment preference. PRolaCT will collect randomised and observational data, which may facilitate a more individually tailored practice of evidence-based medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: US National Library of Medicine registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04107480 . Registered on 27 September 2019, registered retrospectively (by 2 months).

Apoplexy of microprolactinomas during pregnancy: report of five cases and review of the literature.

CONTEXT: Prolactinomas frequently cause amenorrhoea, galactorrhoea and infertility and require dopamine agonist (DA) treatment to normalize prolactin levels and hence, restore ovulation. The vast majority of female patients harbour microprolactinomas in whom DA treatment is usually discontinued at the time of pregnancy diagnosis and surveillance is generally limited as the symptomatic growth is considered very rare. CASE DESCRIPTIONS: We report five cases of women harbouring a microprolactinoma in whom symptomatic pituitary apoplexy occurred during pregnancy. Only one necessitated surgery during pregnancy, while the others were treated conservatively by reintroducing DAs in three. A systematic literature review found reports of four additional cases among 20 cases of prolactinomas (both macro- and micro-prolactinomas) complicated by apoplexy during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: During pregnancy, pituitary apoplexy may occur in pre-existing microprolactinomas, causing tumour enlargement and headache, which may be self-limiting but may require intervention by re-initation of dopamine agonists or surgery. Our literature review confirms that this clinical event is rare; nevertheless, physicians managing pregnant patients with microprolactinomas must be aware that symptomatic pituitary apoplexy may incidentally occur in all trimesters of pregnancy and require prompt radiological, endocrine and ophthalmological assessment and treatment.

Serum Inflammation-based Scores in Endocrine Tumors.

CONTEXT: Serum inflammation-based scores reflect systemic inflammatory response and/or patients' nutritional status, and may predict clinical outcomes in cancer. While these are well-described and increasingly used in different cancers, their clinical usefulness in the management of patients with endocrine tumors is less known. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive PubMed search was performed using the terms "endocrine tumor," "inflammation," "serum inflammation-based score," "inflammatory-based score," "inflammatory response-related scoring," "systemic inflammatory response markers," "neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio," "neutrophil-to-platelet ratio," "lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio," "Glasgow prognostic score," "neutrophil-platelet score," "Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index," and "Prognostic Nutrition Index" in clinical studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are the ones most extensively investigated in patients with endocrine tumors. Other scores have also been considered in some studies. Several studies focused in finding whether serum inflammatory biomarkers may stratify the endocrine tumor patients' risk and detect those at risk for developing more aggressive and/or refractory disease, particularly after endocrine surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the different serum inflammation-based scores and their usefulness in predicting the phenotype, clinical aggressiveness, and disease outcomes and prognosis in patients with endocrine tumors. The value of such serum inflammation-based scores in the management of patients with endocrine tumors has been emerging over the last decade. However, further research is necessary to establish useful markers and their cut-offs for routine clinical practice for individual diseases.