Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 93(4): 329-339, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38036720

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Eftozanermin alfa is a second-generation tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor agonist that enhances death receptor 4/5 clustering on tumor cells to induce apoptosis. We report the pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of eftozanermin alfa administered intravenously to 153 adults with previously-treated solid tumors or hematologic malignancies from the first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-optimization study. METHODS: Dose escalation evaluated eftozanermin alfa monotherapy 2.5-15 mg/kg on Day 1 or Days 1/8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose optimization evaluated eftozanermin alfa monotherapy or combination therapy with either oral venetoclax 400-800 mg daily (eftozanermin alfa 1.25-7.5 mg/kg Days 1/8/15 of a 21-day cycle) or chemotherapy (eftozanermin alfa 3.75 or 7.5 mg/kg Days 1/8/15/22 of a 28-day cycle and FOLFIRI regimen [leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan] with/without bevacizumab on Days 1/15 of a 28-day cycle). RESULTS: Systemic exposures (maximum observed concentration [Cmax] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) of eftozanermin alfa were approximately dose-proportional across the entire dose escalation range with minimal to no accumulation in Cycle 3 versus Cycle 1 exposures. Comparable exposures and harmonic mean half-lives (35.1 h [solid tumors], 31.3 h [hematologic malignancies]) were observed between malignancy types. Exposures (dose-normalized Cmax and AUC) in Japanese subjects were similar to non-Japanese subjects. Furthermore, eftozanermin alfa/venetoclax combination therapy did not have an impact on the exposures of either agent. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies were observed in 9.4% (13/138) of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The study results, including a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with weekly dosing and low incidence of immunogenicity, support further investigation of eftozanermin alfa. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: NCT03082209.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Compostos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos com Pontes , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patologia , Sulfonamidas , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Blood ; 141(17): 2114-2126, 2023 Apr 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36720090

RESUMO

Activation of apoptosis in malignant cells is an established strategy for controlling cancer and is potentially curative. To assess the impact of concurrently inducing the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis-signaling pathways in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we evaluated activity of the TRAIL receptor agonistic fusion protein eftozanermin alfa (eftoza; ABBV-621) in combination with the B-cell lymphoma protein-2 selective inhibitor venetoclax in preclinical models and human patients. Simultaneously stimulating intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis-signaling pathways with venetoclax and eftoza, respectively, enhanced their activities in AML cell lines and patient-derived ex vivo/in vivo models. Eftoza activity alone or plus venetoclax required death receptor 4/5 (DR4/DR5) expression on the plasma membrane but was independent of TP53 or FLT3-ITD status. The safety/tolerability of eftoza as monotherapy and in combination with venetoclax was demonstrated in patients with relapsed/refractory AML in a phase 1 clinical trial. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 2 of 4 (50%) patients treated with eftoza monotherapy and 18 of 23 (78%) treated with eftoza plus venetoclax. An overall response rate of 30% (7/23; 4 complete responses [CRs], 2 CRs with incomplete hematologic recovery, and 1 morphologic leukemia-free state) was reported in patients who received treatment with eftoza plus venetoclax and 67% (4/6) in patients with myoblasts positive for DR4/DR5 expression; no tumor responses were observed with eftoza monotherapy. These data indicate that combination therapy with eftoza plus venetoclax to simultaneously activate the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis-signaling pathways may improve clinical benefit compared with venetoclax monotherapy in relapsed/refractory AML with an acceptable toxicity profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03082209.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patologia , Compostos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos com Pontes , Sulfonamidas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico
3.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 60 Suppl 1: S132-S146, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33205425

RESUMO

Antibody therapeutics continue to represent a significant portion of the biotherapeutic pipeline, with growing promise for bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). BsAbs can target 2 different antigens at the same time, such as simultaneously binding tumor-cell receptors and recruiting cytotoxic immune cells. This simultaneous engagement of 2 targets can be potentially advantageous, as it may overcome disadvantages posed by a monotherapy approach, like the development of resistance to treatment. Combination therapy approaches that modulate 2 targets simultaneously offer similar advantages, but BsAbs are more efficient to develop. Unlike combination approaches, BsAbs can facilitate spatial proximity of targets that may be necessary to induce the desired effect. Successful development of BsAbs requires understanding antibody formatting and optimizing activity for both targets prior to clinical trials. To realize maximal efficacy, special attention is required to fully define pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships enabling selection of dose and regimen. The application of physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) has been evolving to inform the development of novel treatment modalities such as bispecifics owing to the increase in our understanding of pharmacology, utility of multiscale models, and emerging clinical data. In this review, we discuss components of PBPK models to describe the PK characteristics of BsAbs and expand the discussion to integration of PBPK and PD models to inform development of BsAbs. A framework that can be adopted to build PBPK-PD models to inform the development of BsAbs is also proposed. We conclude with examples that highlight the application of PBPK-PD and share perspectives on future opportunities for this emerging quantitative tool.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos/farmacologia , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/farmacocinética , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Fatores Imunológicos/farmacologia , Fatores Imunológicos/farmacocinética , Modelos Biológicos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA