Sequential hypothermic and normothermic perfusion preservation and transplantation of expanded criteria donor livers.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of sequential hypothermic oxygenated perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion and the potential benefits of graft viability preservation and assessment before liver transplantation. METHODS: With the Food and Drug Administration and institutional review board approval, 17 expanded criteria donor livers underwent sequential hypothermic oxygenated perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion using our institutionally developed perfusion device. RESULTS: Expanded criteria donor livers were from older donors, donors after cardiac death, with steatosis, hypertransaminasemia, or calcified arteries. Perfusion duration ranged between 1 and 2 hours for the hypothermic oxygenated perfusion phase and between 4 and 9 hours for the normothermic machine perfusion phase. Three livers were judged to be untransplantable during normothermic machine perfusion based on perfusate lactate, bile production, and macro-appearance. One liver was not transplanted because of recipient issue after anesthesia induction and failed reallocation. Thirteen livers were transplanted, including 9 donors after cardiac death livers (donor warm ischemia time 16-25 minutes) and 4 from donors after brain death. All livers had the standardized lactate clearance >60% (perfusate lactate cleared to <4.0 mmol/L) within 3 hours of normothermic machine perfusion. Bile production rate was 0.2 to 10.7 mL/h for donors after brain death livers and 0.3 to 6.1 mL/h for donors after cardiac death livers. After transplantation, 5 cases had early allograft dysfunction (3 donors after cardiac death and 2 donors after brain death livers). No graft failure or patient death has occurred during follow-up time of 6 to 13 months. Two livers developed ischemic cholangiopathy. Compared with our previous normothermic machine perfusion study, the bile duct had fewer inflammatory cells in histology, but the post-transplant outcomes had no difference. CONCLUSION: Sequential hypothermic oxygenated perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion preservation is safe and feasible and has the potential benefits of preserving and evaluating expanded criteria donor livers.

Transplantation of declined livers after normothermic perfusion.

BACKGROUND: The persistent shortage of liver allografts contributes to significant waitlist mortality despite efforts to increase organ donation. Normothermic machine perfusion holds the potential to enhance graft preservation, extend viability, and allow liver function evaluation in organs previously discarded because considered too high-risk for transplant. METHODS: Discarded livers from other transplant centers were transplanted after assessment and reconditioning with our institutionally developed normothermic machine perfusion device. We report here our preliminary data. RESULTS: Twenty-one human livers declined for transplantation were enrolled for assessment with normothermic machine perfusion. Six livers (28.5%) were ultimately discarded after normothermic machine perfusion because of insufficient lactate clearance (>4.1 mmol/L after 4 hours), limited bile production (<0.5 mI/h), or moderate macrosteatosis, whereas 15 (71.5%) were considered suitable for transplantation. Normothermic machine perfusion duration was from 3 hours, 49 minutes to 10 hours, 29 minutes without technical problems or adverse events. No intraoperative or major early postoperative complications occurred in all transplanted recipients. No primary nonfunction occurred after transplantation. Seven livers had early allograft dysfunction with fast recovery, and 1 patient developed ischemic cholangiopathy after 4 months treated with biliary stents. All other patients had good liver function with a follow-up time of 8 weeks to 14 months. CONCLUSION: In total, 71.5% of discarded livers subjected to ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion were successfully transplanted after organ perfusion and assessment using an institutionally built device. This study challenges the current viability criteria reported in the literature and calls for a standardization of viability markers collection, an essential condition for the advancement of the field.