[How does the Regional Psychiatry Budget (RPB) work in an area with initially low capacity of psychiatric hospital beds?]. / Wie wirkt das Regionale Psychiatriebudget (RPB) in einer Region mit initial niedriger Bettenmessziffer?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of a capitated multi-sector-financing model for psychiatric care (RPB) in the model region Rendsburg-Eckernförde on costs and effectiveness of care. METHODS: In a prospective controlled cohort study 244 patients with a diagnosis according to ICD-10: F10, F2 or F3 were interviewed in the model region (MR) and compared to 244 patients from a control region (CR) financed according to the fee-for-service principle. At baseline, 1.5 years and 3.5 years follow-up patients were interviewed using measures of psychopathology (CGI-S, HONOS, SCL-90 R/GSI, PANSS, BRMAS/BRMES), functioning (GAF, SOFAS), quality of life (EQ-5 D) and service use/costs (CSSRI). RESULTS: Subjective symptom severity (GSI) and functioning (GAF) developed more favourably in the MR than in the CR, the HONOS score developed slightly worse in the MR. The latter effect occurred mainly in ICD-10: F10 patients, while patients with F2/3 rather did benefit under RPB conditions. The development of total costs of care was not different between MR and CR. The potential to reduce costs of in-patient care was low due to the initially low capacity of inpatient beds. CONCLUSIONS: The RPB did not reduce the total costs of mental health care, but certain diagnosis groups may benefit from improved trans-sectoral treatment flexibility.

[The regional psychiatry budget (RPB): a model for a new payment system of hospital based mental health care services]. / Das Regionale Psychiatriebudget (RPB): Ein Modell für das neue pauschalierende Entgeltsystem psychiatrischer Krankenhausleistungen?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of a capitated multi-sector-financing model for psychiatric care (RPB) on costs and effectiveness of care. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis according to ICD-10 F10, F2 or F3 were interviewed in the model region (MR, n = 258) and a control region (CR, n = 244) financed according to the fee-for-service principle. At baseline, 1.5 years and 3.5 years follow-up patients were interviewed using measures of psychopathology (CGI-S, HoNOS, SCL-90R, PANSS, BRMAS / BRMES), functioning (GAF, SOFAS) and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF, EQ-5D). Use of care was determined semi-annually. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the development of psychopathology and quality of life between MR and CR. In the MR, functioning of patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders improved significantly more strongly. The development of total mental health care costs was not different between MR and CR. However, the costs of office based mental health care increased slightly more strongly in the MR, indicating a small cost-shift from the RPB to extrabudgetary financed services. CONCLUSIONS: The RPB showed slight advantages regarding the effectiveness of care and did not significantly change the total mental health care costs.

[The regional psychiatry budget: costs and effects of a new multisector financing model for psychiatric care]. / Das Regionale Psychiatriebudget: Kosten und Effekte eines neuen sektorübergreifenden Finanzierungsmodells für die psychiatrische Versorgung.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new multi-sector financing model for psychiatric care based on the capitation principle (Regional Psychiatry Budget, RPB). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis according to ICD-10 F10, F2, and F3 were interviewed in the model region (MR, N=258) and a control region (CR, N=244) financed according to the fee-for-service principle. Effectiveness of care was assessed before RPB-introduction and after 1.5 years. Use of care was determined semi-annually. RESULTS: Costs of inpatient psychiatric treatment decreased more strongly in the MR, while hospital based outpatient care and day clinic treatment were intensified in comparison to the CR. Quality of life, severity of illness and illness-specific symptoms in patients improved similarly in MR and CR. The functional level improved more in the MR than in the CR, which was especially evident in schizophrenia patients. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient psychiatric care costs can be reduced with the RPB without compromising the quality of care.

[The regional budget for mental health care: a new approach to combine inpatient and outpatient care]. / Das Regionale Psychiatriebudget: Ein neuer Ansatz zur effizienten Verknüpfung stationärer und ambulanter Versorgungsleistungen.

OBJECTIVE: Due to increasing health care expenditures the discussion about advantages and disadvantages of new methods for resource allocation in mental health care has been intensified. A promising model is the Regional Budget for Mental Health Care, which is currently being examined in Schleswig-Holstein. The present paper describes first experiences with the new resource allocation model. BASIC CONDITIONS: An annual budget, provided for the treatment of a fixed number of patients, makes it possible to reduce inpatient capacity in favour of improved community-integrated approaches for the treatment of acute psychiatric illness. RESULTS: In a first step inpatient capacity will be reduced by 8 percent. By the end of 2007 capacity for hospital day care shall be increased by 87 percent and a home treatment will be implemented. The previous working method, orientated to treatment setting, will be replaced by an approach specialized in diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Regional Budget could improve the continuity and flexibility of patient care. Service providers become motivated to treat in a way, which with little resource consumption achieves a long lasting health status improvement. For health insurances the Regional Budget is an opportunity to limit cost increases.