Ultra-low dose - new approaches in menopausal hormone therapy.

Despite increasing life expectancy, the age of onset of natural menopause has not significantly changed in recent decades. Thus, women spend about one-third of their lives in an estrogen-deficient state if untreated. There is a need for appropriate treatment of acute symptoms and prevention of the sequelae of chronic estrogen deficiency. International guidelines call for the use of the lowest effective hormone dosage for vasomotor symptom relief, the major indication for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). In 2011, an oral continuous combined ultra-low-dose MHT was approved in Switzerland. This publication was elaborated by eight national menopause specialists and intends to review the advantages and disadvantages of ultra-low-dose MHT after the first years of its general use in Switzerland. It concludes that, for many women, ultra-low-dose MHT may be sufficient to decrease vasomotor symptoms, but not necessarily to guarantee fracture prevention.

Recommendations for raloxifene use in daily clinical practice in the Swiss setting.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Raloxifene is the first selective estrogen receptor modulator that has been approved for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in Europe and in the US. Although raloxifene reduces the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in postmenopausal women at high risk for invasive breast cancer, it is approved in that indication in the US but not in the EU. The aim was to characterize the clinical profiles of postmenopausal women expected to benefit most from therapy with raloxifene based on published scientific evidence to date. METHODS: Key individual patient characteristics relevant to the prescription of raloxifene in daily practice were defined by a board of Swiss experts in the fields of menopause and metabolic bone diseases and linked to published scientific evidence. Consensus was reached about translating these insights into daily practice. RESULTS: Through estrogen agonistic effects on bone, raloxifene reduces biochemical markers of bone turnover to premenopausal levels, increases bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and total body, and reduces vertebral fracture risk in women with osteopenia or osteoporosis with and without prevalent vertebral fracture. Through estrogen antagonistic effects on breast tissue, raloxifene reduces the risk of invasive estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in postmenopausal women at high risk for invasive breast cancer. Finally, raloxifene increases the incidence of hot flushes, the risk of venous thromboembolic events, and the risk of fatal stroke in postmenopausal women at increased risk for coronary heart disease. Postmenopausal women in whom the use of raloxifene is considered can be categorized in a 2 × 2 matrix reflecting their bone status (osteopenic or osteoporotic based on their BMD T-score by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and their breast cancer risk (low or high based on the modified Gail model). Women at high risk of breast cancer should be considered for treatment with raloxifene. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women between 50 and 70 years of age without climacteric symptoms with either osteopenia or osteoporosis should be evaluated with regard to their breast cancer risk and considered for treatment with raloxifene within the framework of its contraindications and precautions.

Serum leptin and C-reactive protein levels in the physiological spontaneous menstrual cycle in reproductive age women.

OBJECTIVE: Only a few studies have investigated variations of different markers for inflammatory processes during the physiological menstrual cycle. The results are conflicting, particularly concerning the correlation between the marker leptin and steroid hormones. The aim of the study was to investigate the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and leptin in the serum of healthy, normally ovulating women and to correlate these with each other and with the hormones of the gonadal axis. A cycle-dependence of the markers studied would imply an exact timing of the blood sampling for clinical needs. DESIGN: Observational study investigating the two inflammatory markers CRP and leptin in relation to the hormonal pattern of the gonadal axis during the normal cycle. METHODS: Ovulatory cycles of 36 healthy, young, normo-androgenic women, having a normal body mass index were evaluated. Serum concentrations of leptin and CRP, as well as of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone, 17beta-oestradiol, progesterone, prolactin (PRL) and free testosterone were measured every 1-2 days during one full cycle. RESULTS: Serum levels of leptin and CRP behaved differently during ovulatory cycles, with higher concentrations for leptin only during certain phases. Significant correlations were found in the follicular phase between leptin and PRL and leptin and free testosterone. CONCLUSIONS: Leptin levels change during the menstrual cycle. Leptin levels are more stable on cycle days 1-5 than later in the cycle. For precise cycle-independent measurements, these fluctuations have to be taken into account. There is no similar cyclic pattern for CRP.

Maternal serum levels of placental proteins after in vitro fertilisation and their implications for prenatal screening.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), pregnancy-specific beta(1)-glycoprotein (SP1), placental lactogen (hPL) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) are different in pregnancies obtained after in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) in comparison to spontaneous pregnancies. Assessment of the need to establish normal medians for biochemical trisomy screening in IVF pregnancies. METHODS: The population comprised 96 IVF-ET pregnancies, of which 79 came from fresh gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles and 17 from embryo transfers without gonadotrophin stimulation (natural cycle IVF, frozen embryo transfers), and 156 spontaneous pregnancies. A single blood sample was obtained between 7 + 0 and 16 + 3 weeks. PAPP-A, SP1, hPL and hCG were quantified and the levels compared between gonadotrophin-stimulated IVF, steroid-only- or non-stimulated IVF, and controls with respect to gestational age using non-parametric statistical analysis. RESULTS: PAPP-A and hPL levels were reduced after stimulated IVF in early gestation (before 10 pregnancy weeks); SP1 followed the same trend without reaching statistical significance. hCG tended to be increased after IVF treatment including non-gonadotrophin-stimulation cycles, and also beyond 10 pregnancy weeks. CONCLUSION: Reduced PAPP-A with increased hCG yields an increased risk in screening for foetal trisomy 21. We confirm recently published observations but do not recommend the establishment of normal medians for IVF pregnancies since the extent of the deviations is varying according to the different stimulation protocols and dosages of gonadotrophins used.

[Hormone replacement and breast carcinoma]. / Hormonsubstitution und Mammakarzinom.

This review discusses the effect of Oestrogens, Progestagens, Tibolone, Raloxifene and Phytooestrogens in postmenopausal women on the breast. Epidemiological statisticians are only speaking of a clinical significance if the relative risk is half (< 0.05) or doubled (> 2.0). All published data from observational studies or from important meta- and reanalyses concerning the relative risk of breast cancer in women using postmenopausal hormone therapy are within these limits and clearly below the risk observed in young smokers. The relative risk for breast cancer observed in the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) stays within these limits too, in women treated by a fix Oestrogen-Progestagen combination. However, in the WHI, there was no increase of the relative risk for breast cancer in women using oestrogens alone. The risk for breast cancer rises in parallel to the duration of the hormone treatment. The risk for hormone users to suffer from breast cancer does not increase earlier than 4-5 years after the start of the therapy. An important reanalysis reports, that after 5 years of hormone use, a breast cancer is diagnosed in 2 additional women out of 1000 (47 instead of 45 women). The absolute risk should be indicated in addition to the relative risk because, for non-specialists, the exclusive indication of the relative risk might be misleading. Following the results from the WHI and from some other, older studies, the relative risk for breast cancer might be higher in women taking an oestrogen-progestagen combination than in women using oestrogens alone. Experimental and preliminary clinical data on Tibolone and Raloxifene do not show a negative effect on breast tissue. However, if Tibolone and Raloxifene as well as Phytooestrogens possess a protective activity remains open because prospective randomized long-term clinical studies are still missing.

[Indications for hormone replacement therapy]. / Indikationen zur Hormon-Ersatz-Therapie.

Postmenopausal primary ovarian insufficiency may lead to the clinical picture of the climacteric syndrome and to metabolic changes inducing specific diseases due to oestrogen deficiency. In symptomatic states of oestrogen deficiency, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is indicated for therapeutic reasons. If there is an increased risk for osteoporosis, for cardiovascular diseases or for Alzheimer's Disease, the preventive administration of HRT has to be discussed. In the combined presence of an increased metabolic risk and of subjective symptoms, HRT is still the best choice. Recent alternatives to classical HRT are Tibolone and, in the later postmenopause, Raloxifene. Incorrect media reports lead to insecurity and to concerns about the use of sexual steroids after menopause. HRT can be accompanied by a small weight increase of 200-500 g. However, more important in most women is the normal trend to weight gain in the 40s and 50s. HRT does not increase blood pressure. If there are some hints for an abnormal coagulation system in the personal or family history of a patient, thrombophilia should be excluded before the begin of HRT. The risk to have an endometrial carcinoma during HRT is not increased, but endometrial cancers are more frequent with unopposed estrogen administration. The incidence of breast cancer increases continuously with ageing. If 1000 women start HRT at the age of 50 and continue for five years, two more cases of breast cancer are diagnosed within the next 20 years. This small increase of morbidity is not accompanied by an increased mortality due to breast cancer: mortality does not change. The data available today show a clear decrease of total mortality up to the age of 75 years in women using oestrogens and speak in favour of HRT. If HRT is used for less than five years, cancer risk is not increased. The gain in Life Quality primes significantly. For the indication of long term HRT, the risks and benefits have to be evaluated individually.

Oestrogens and Alzheimer's disease.

In the last decade, several reports suggest that oestrogen replacement therapy (ORT=ERT=estrogen replacement therapy) might prevent or delay Alzheimer's disease. Oestrogens influence and modulate brain structure and brain function. There are substantial arguments that the postmenopausal oestrogen loss might, together with other factors, accelerate the appearance of Alzheimer's disease. The evidence is suggestive, but not compelling, that ORT can reduce the relative risk to suffer from Alzheimer's disease. Furthermore, recent findings are consistent with the hypothesis that oestrogens might ameliorate the symptomatology in early stages of Alzheimer's disease. However, it has to be remembered that in most clinical trials the number of oestrogen users was quite small, and, usually, oestrogen use was not randomised. The aim of the present review is to discuss the data available today in view of their clinical relevance.

[Screening for gynecologic-endocrinologic problems before menopause]. / Screening bei gynäkologisch-endokrinologischen Problemen vor der Menopause.

Family and personal history as well as clinical examination are the basic data to be known before laboratory examinations should be started. To obtain results that can be correctly interpreted, the blood sampling has to be done in the early morning hours between day 1 and 5 of the cycle, and for some hormones on an empty stomach. Depending on the clinical data, the hormonal screening can be selective and well directed, or it has to be broader. The presence or absence of galactorrhea, of hot flushes and of androgenization or virilization play an important role for the decision about the hormones to be determined. Furthermore, an eventual desire infertility will influence the selection of the hormonal tests to be done. The present review intends to propose some simple recommendations to the non-specialist how a gynaecological-endocrinological screening for the most important clinical questions should be organized.