[Screening, risk stratification and CT imaging for assessment of coronary artery disease]. / Screening, Risikostratifizierung und CT-Bildgebung zur Abklärung der koronaren Herzkrankheit.

BACKGROUND: Early treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and characterization of coronary plaques is essential to collect prognostic information about coronary artery disease (CAD) and prevent cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: Discussion of the most important risk factors of CAD, basic diagnostic of CAD, prevention, and prognostic factors of CAD with focus on cardiac computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prevalence and prognostic impact of CAD risk factors; description of specific assessment of risk profiles; estimation of pretest probability; conventional prevention of CAD; prognostic assessment of CAD using the Calcium Scoring and coronary CT angiography. RESULTS: Assessment of risk profiles and estimation of pretest probability for obstructive coronary stenosis necessitates a thorough evaluation of medical history and laboratory values. The composition and extent of calcified and noncalcified plaques in CT exams based on the criteria of the Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System give important prognostic information about the risk of cardiovascular events, which increases with high plaque burden and vice versa. Initial imaging with CT for evaluation of CAD leads to a reduction of invasive coronary angiographies and catheter-associated complications. CONCLUSIONS: Besides early detection of cardiovascular risk factors, the additional assessment of plaque burden and significant stenosis in CT gives further prognostic information to facilitate effective therapies to prevent cardiovascular events and in the case of low plaque burden avoid invasive coronary angiography. However, systmatic screening using Calcium Scoring is not established yet due to insufficient data, although it could potentially be used for an early risk stratification in patients with multiple risk factors.

Deep Learning Super-Resolution Reconstruction for Fast and Motion-Robust T2-weighted Prostate MRI.

Background Deep learning (DL) reconstructions can enhance image quality while decreasing MRI acquisition time. However, DL reconstruction methods combined with compressed sensing for prostate MRI have not been well studied. Purpose To use an industry-developed DL algorithm to reconstruct low-resolution T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) prostate MRI scans and compare these with standard sequences. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with suspected prostate cancer underwent prostate MRI with a Cartesian standard-resolution T2-weighted TSE sequence (T2C) and non-Cartesian standard-resolution T2-weighted TSE sequence (T2NC) between August and November 2022. Additionally, a low-resolution Cartesian DL-reconstructed T2-weighted TSE sequence (T2DL) with compressed sensing DL denoising and resolution upscaling reconstruction was acquired. Image sharpness was assessed qualitatively by two readers using a five-point Likert scale (from 1 = nondiagnostic to 5 = excellent) and quantitatively by calculating edge rise distance. The Friedman test and one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni and Tukey tests, respectively, were used for group comparisons. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score agreement between sequences was compared by using Cohen κ. Results This study included 109 male participants (mean age, 68 years ± 8 [SD]). Acquisition time of T2DL was 36% and 29% lower compared with that of T2C and T2NC (mean duration, 164 seconds ± 20 vs 257 seconds ± 32 and 230 seconds ± 28; P < .001 for both). T2DL showed improved image sharpness compared with standard sequences using both qualitative (median score, 5 [IQR, 4-5] vs 4 [IQR, 3-4] for T2C and 4 [IQR, 3-4] for T2NC; P < .001 for both) and quantitative (mean edge rise distance, 0.75 mm ± 0.39 vs 1.15 mm ± 0.68 for T2C and 0.98 mm ± 0.65 for T2NC; P < .001 and P = .01) methods. PI-RADS score agreement between T2NC and T2DL was excellent (κ range, 0.92-0.94 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.98]). Conclusion DL reconstruction of low-resolution T2-weighted TSE sequences enabled accelerated acquisition times and improved image quality compared with standard acquisitions while showing excellent agreement with conventional sequences for PI-RADS ratings. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05820113 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Turkbey in this issue.

Free-breathing pseudo-golden-angle bSSFP cine cardiac MRI for biventricular functional assessment in congenital heart disease.

PURPOSE: To compare standard breath-hold (BH) cine imaging to a radial pseudo-golden-angle free-breathing (FB) technique in congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: In this prospective study, short-axis and 4-chamber BH and FB cardiac MRI sequences of 25 participants with CHD acquired at 1.5 Tesla, were quantitatively compared regarding ventricular volumes, function, interventricular septum thickness (IVSD), apparent signal to noise ratio (aSNR), and estimated contrast to noise ratio (eCNR). For qualitative comparison, three image quality criteria (contrast, endocardial edge definition, and artefacts) were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (5: excellent, 1: non-diagnostic). Paired t-Test was used for group comparisons, Bland-Altman analysis for agreement between techniques. Inter-reader agreement was compared using intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: IVSD (BH 7.4 ± 2.1 mm vs FB 7.4 ± 1.9 mm, p =.71), biventricular ejection fraction (left ventricle [LV]: 56.4 ± 10.8% vs 56.1 ± 9.3%, p =.83; right ventricle [RV]: 49.5 ± 8.6% vs 49.7 ± 10.1%, p =.83), and biventricular end diastolic volume (LV: 176.3 ± 63.9 ml vs 173.9 ± 64.9 ml, p =.90; RV: 185.4 ± 63.8 ml vs 189.6 ± 66.6 ml, p =.34) were comparable. Mean measurement time for FB short-axis sequences was 8.1 ± 1.3 compared to 4.4 ± 1.3 min for BH (p <.001). Subjective image quality between sequences was deemed comparable, (4.6 ± 0.6 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.26, for 4-chamber views) with a significant difference regarding short-axis views (4.9 ± 0.3 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.008). aSNR was similar (BH 25.8 ± 11.2 vs FB 22.2 ± 9.5, p =.24), while eCNR was higher for BH (89.1 ± 36.1 vs 68.5 ± 32.1, p =.03). CONCLUSION: FB sequences yielded comparable results to BH regarding image quality, biventricular volumetry, and function, though measurement times were longer. The FB sequence described might be clinically valuable when BHs are insufficiently performed.

T2 Turbo Spin Echo With Compressed Sensing and Propeller Acquisition (Sampling k-Space by Utilizing Rotating Blades) for Fast and Motion Robust Prostate MRI: Comparison With Conventional Acquisition.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare a new compressed sensing (CS) method for T2-weighted propeller acquisitions (T2 CS ) with conventional T2-weighted propeller sequences (T2 conv ) in terms of achieving a higher image quality, while reducing the acquisition time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male participants with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled and underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Axial and sagittal images of the T2 conv sequence and the T2 CS sequence were acquired. Sequences were qualitatively assessed by 2 blinded radiologists concerning artifacts, image-sharpness, lesion conspicuity, capsule delineation, and overall image quality using 5-point Likert items ranging from 1 (nondiagnostic) to 5 (excellent). The apparent signal-to-noise ratio and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio were evaluated. PI-RADS scores were assessed for both sequences. Statistical analysis was performed by using Wilcoxon signed rank test and paired samples t test. Intrarater and interrater reliability of qualitative image evaluation was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates. RESULTS: A total of 29 male participants were included (mean age, 66 ± 8 years). The acquisition time of the T2 CS sequence was respectively 26% (axial plane) and 24% (sagittal plane) shorter compared with the T2 conv sequence (eg, axial: 171 vs 232 seconds; P < 0.001). In the axial plane, the T2 CS sequence had fewer artifacts (4 [4-4.5] vs 4 [3-4]; P < 0.001), better image-sharpness (4 [4-4.5] vs 3 [3-3.5]; P < 0.001), better capsule delineation (4 [3-4] vs 3 [3-3.5]; P < 0.001), and better overall image quality (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P < 0.001) compared with the T2 conv sequence. The ratings of lesion conspicuity were similar (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P = 0.166). In the sagittal plane, the T2 CS sequence outperformed the T2 conv sequence in the categories artifacts (4 [4-4] vs 3 [3-4]; P < 0.001), image sharpness (4 [4-5] vs 4 [3-4]; P < 0.001), lesion conspicuity (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P = 0.002), and overall image quality (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P = 0.002). Capsule delineation was similar between both sequences (3 [3-4] vs 3 [3-3]; P = 0.07). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for qualitative scoring were good (ICC intra: 0.92; ICC inter: 0.86). Quantitative analysis revealed a higher apparent signal-to-noise ratio (eg, axial: 52.2 ± 9.7 vs 22.8 ± 3.6; P < 0.001) and a higher apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (eg, axial: 44.0 ± 9.6 vs 18.6 ± 3.7; P ≤ 0.001) of the T2 CS sequence. PI-RADS scores were the same for both sequences in all participants. CONCLUSIONS: CS-accelerated T2-weighted propeller acquisition had a superior image quality compared with conventional T2-weighted propeller sequences while significantly reducing the acquisition time.