An international, expert-based, Delphi consensus document on controversial issues in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: As a result of conflicting, inadequate or controversial data in the literature, several issues concerning the management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain unanswered. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to provide some guidance for clinicians on these controversial topics. METHODS: A three-round Delphi consensus document was produced with 44 experts on 6 prespecified topics regarding the management of AAAs. All answers were provided anonymously. The response rate for each round was 100%. RESULTS: Most participants (42 of 44 [95.4%]) agreed that a minimum case volume per year is essential (or probably essential) for a center to offer open or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Furthermore, 33 of 44 (75.0%) believed that AAA screening programs are (probably) still clinically effective and cost effective. Additionally, most panelists (36 of 44 [81.9%]) voted that surveillance after EVAR should be (or should probably be) lifelong. Finally, 35 of 44 participants (79.7%) thought that women smokers should (or should probably/possibly) be considered for screening at 65 years of age, similar to men. No consensus was achieved regarding lowering the threshold for AAA repair and the need for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: This expert-based Delphi consensus document provides guidance for clinicians regarding specific unresolved issues. Consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting the need for further research in those areas.

Endovascular Treatment of a Forty-Year-Old Post-Traumatic Knee Arteriovenous Fistula.

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) of the lower extremity are uncommon. The main causes are traumatic or iatrogenic, with 15% of traumatic AVFs occurring in the popliteal vessels. Herein, we present a 60-year-old female with a traumatic AVF caused after a car accident 40 years ago. The patient presented with right leg venous claudication and symptoms of congestive heart failure. Duplex ultrasound of lower limb vessels revealed an AVF at the distal part of the tibiofibular trunk. The patient was successfully managed with an endovascular approach using a coil-assisted covered endovascular repair technique of the tibiofibular bifurcation (CERTIFIB) with excellent results and distal vessels patency. At 3 months follow-up, patient presented with an impressive regression of 3 cm of the lower extremity oedema and improvement of both claudication and heart failure.

Outcomes After Open Surgical, Hybrid, and Endovascular Revascularization for Acute Limb Ischemia.

PURPOSE: To report the performance of surgical treatment (ST), hybrid treatment (HT), and endovascular treatment (ET) for patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI). METHODS: This is a retrospective, comparative study of all consecutive patients with ALI treated in 2 tertiary centers between April 2010 and April 2020. Amputation and/or death (amputation-free survival; AFS) was the primary composite endpoint. Mortality, major amputation, and reintervention during follow-up were additionally analyzed. Proportional hazards modeling was used to identify confounders, results are presented as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In total, 395 patients (mean age=71.1±13.6 years; 51.1% female) were treated during the study period. Surgical treatment was preferred in 150 patients (38%), while 98 were treated by HT (24.8%) and 147 by ET (37.2%). Rutherford class IIa was the most common clinical presentation in the ET group (50.3%), whereas Rutherford IIb was most common in the ST (54%) and HT (48%) groups (p<0.001). Significantly, more patients presented with a de novo lesion in the ST and HT groups (79.3% and 64.3%, respectively) compared with ET (53.7%; p<0.001). Median follow-up was 20 months (range=0-111 months). In the multivariate analysis, ET showed significantly better AFS during follow-up compared with ST (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.2-2.9, p<0.001) and HT (HR=1.73, 95% CI=1.1-3.1, p<0.001). Mortality during follow-up was also significantly lower after ET compared with ST (HR=2.21, 95% CI=1.31-3.74, p=0.003) and HT (HR=2.04, 95% CI=1.17-3.56, p=0.012). Endovascular treatment was associated with lower amputation rate compared with ST (HR=2.27, 95% CI=1.19-4.35, p=0.013) but was comparable with HT (HR=2.00, 95% CI=0.98-4.06, p=0.055). Reintervention rates did not differ significantly between the groups (ET vs ST: HR=1.52, 95% CI=0.99-2.31, p=0.053; ET vs HT: HR=1.3, 95% CI=0.81-2.07, p=0.27). CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for ALI was associated with improved AFS and comparable reintervention rates compared with open surgical and hybrid therapy. CLINICAL IMPACT: Treatment of acute lower limb ischemia remains a challenge for clinicians with high morbidity and mortality rates. Endovascular revascularization is considered first line treatment for many and hybrid treatments are becoming more common, however data is limited to either old trials, small series or with short follow-up. We present herein our 10-year experience with all available devices and techniques for open surgical, endovascular and hybrid acute limb ischemia treatments and compare their outcomes.

Hybrid and open repair for patients with acute limb ischemia of the lower extremities.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid revascularization procedures for acute limb ischemia (ALI) are becoming increasingly common, bibliographic data on outcomes is however sparse. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients with ALI that underwent either surgical treatment (ST) or hybrid treatment (HT) between January 2015 and December 2021. The composite outcome of amputation-free survival (AFS) was the primary endpoint. Technical success, overall survival, amputation, and re-intervention rates were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: During the study period 266 patients (mean age 70.2±14.5 years; 49.6% males) were treated for ALI, 67.3% undergoing ST and 32.7% HT. HT was more frequently used in patients with a previous vascular intervention in the index limb (38/87; 43.7% HT vs. 40/179; 22.3% ST, P=0.001), a stent- or stent graft-occlusion (16/87; 18.4% HT vs. 10/179; 5.6% ST, P=0.002) and/or a bypass occlusion (16/87; 18.4% HT vs. 16/179; 8.9% ST, P=0.043). Technical success was higher in the OR group (75/87; 86.2% HT vs. 173/179; 96.6% ST, P=0.003). Amputation-free survival rate during follow-up (43/87; 49.4% HT vs. 94/179; 52.5% ST, HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.18, P=0.22) and overall survival (32/87; 36.8% HT vs. 84/179; 46.9% ST, HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.34, P=0.41) were comparable between the two groups. No statistical differences were observed between the groups regarding major amputation (19/87; 21.8% HT vs. 15/179; 8.4% ST, HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.33 to 2.23, P=0.74) or reintervention during follow-up (45/87; 51.7% HT vs. 65/179; 36.3% ST, HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.51, P=0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid and open surgical treatments showed comparable results in our cohort, even though significantly more patients undergoing HT presented with stent and bypass occlusions rather than de-novo lesions.

Intravascular Lithotripsy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Severely Calcified Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) followed by drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty might be a valuable alternative to surgery for calcified common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic disease. Nonetheless, the 12 months performance of this treatment strategy remains unknown. This study reports on the 12 months outcomes of IVL with adjunctive DCB angioplasty for calcified CFA lesions. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center, single-arm study. Consecutive patients treated by IVL and DCB for calcified CFA disease between February 2017 and September 2020 were evaluated. The primary measure outcome of this analysis was primary patency. Procedural technical success (<30% stenosis), freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), secondary patency, and overall mortality were additionally analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-three (n=33) patients were included in this study. The majority presented with lifestyle limiting claudication (n=20, 61%), 52% (n=17) of the patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 33% (n=11) had diabetes. The procedural technical success was 97% (n=32). A flow-limiting dissection post IVL was observed in 2 patients (6%) and a peripheral embolization in a single patient (3%), while the bail-out stenting rate amounted to 12% (n=4). No perforation was observed. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (interquartile range 2-3). At 12 months, the primary patency was 72%. The freedom from TLR and the secondary patency rates were 94% and 88%, respectively. The 12-month survival amounted to 100% and 75% (n=25) of the patients were asymptomatic or presented with mild claudication. The presence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; confidence interval (CI); 0.18-4.8, p=0.7) or CKD (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.29-5.8; p=0.72), as well as the use of a 7 mm IVL catheter (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.13-2.63; p=0.49) or of high-dose DCB (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.13-3.53; p=0.65) did not influence the primary patency. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the combination of IVL and DCB angioplasty for calcified CFA disease was associated with low risk for periprocedural complications, acceptable 12 months clinical outcomes, and low rates of reinterventions. CLINICAL IMPACT: Intravascular lithotripsy in combination with DCB angioplasty can be an alternative to surgery in highly selected patients with CFA atherosclerotic disease. In this Cohort the combination therapy lead to acceptable clinical results and low reintervention rates at 12 months.

The optimal operative protocol to accomplish CO2-EVAR resulting from a prospective interventional multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography for endovascular aortic repair (CO2-EVAR) is used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), especially in patients with chronic kidney disease or allergy to iodinated contrast medium (ICM). However, some technical issues regarding the visualization of the lowest renal artery (LoRA) and the best quality image through angiographies performed from pigtail or introducer sheath are still unsolved. The aim of this study was to analyze different steps of CO2-EVAR to create an operative standardized protocol. METHODS: Patients undergoing CO2-EVAR were prospectively enrolled in five European centers from 2019 to 2021. CO2-EVAR was performed using an automated injector (pressure, 600 mmHg; volume, 100 cc); a small amount of ICM was injected in case of difficulty in LoRA visualization. LoRA visualization and image quality (1 = low, 2 = sufficient, 3 = good, 4 = excellent) were analyzed at different procedure steps: preoperative CO2 angiography from pigtail and femoral introducer sheath (first step), angiographies from pigtail at 0%, 50%, and 100% of proximal main body deployment (second step), contralateral hypogastric artery (CHA) visualization with CO2 injection from femoral introducer sheath (third step), and completion angiogram from pigtail and femoral introducer sheath (fourth step). Intraoperative and postoperative CO2-related adverse events were also evaluated. χ2 and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In the considered period, 65 patients undergoing CO2-EVAR were enrolled (55/65 [84.5%] male; median age, 75 years [interquartile range (IQR), 11.5 years]). The median ICM injected was 17 cc (IQR, 51 cc); 19 (29.2%) of 65 procedures were performed with 0 cc ICM. Fifty-five (84.2%) of 65 patients underwent general anesthesia. In the first step, median image quality was significantly higher with CO2 injected from femoral introducer (pigtail, 2 [IQR, 3] vs introducer, 3 [IQR, 3]; P = .008). In the second step, LoRA was more frequently detected at 50% (93% vs 73.2%; P = .002) and 100% (94.1% vs 78.4%; P = .01) of proximal main body deployment compared with first angiography from pigtail; similarly, image quality was significantly higher at 50% (3 [IQR, 3] vs 2 [IQR, 3]; P ≤ .001) and 100% (4 [IQR, 3] vs 2 [IQR, 3]; P = .001) of proximal main body deployment. CHA was detected in 93% cases (third step). The mean image quality was significantly higher when final angiogram (fourth step) was performed from introducer (pigtail, 2.6 ± 1.1 vs introducer, 3.1 ± 0.9; P ≤ .001). The intraoperative (7.7%) and postoperative (12.5%) adverse events (pain, vomiting, diarrhea) were all transient and clinically mild. CONCLUSIONS: Preimplant CO2 angiography should be performed from femoral introducer sheath. Gas flow impediment created by proximal main body deployment can improve image quality and LoRA visualization with CO2. CHA can be satisfactorily visualized with CO2 alone. Completion CO2 angiogram should be performed from femoral introducer sheath. This operative protocol allows performance of CO2-EVAR with 0 cc or minimal ICM, with a low rate of mild temporary complications.

Re-entry catheters in subintimal lower limb recanalization: up to date.

In their daily practice, vascular specialists face the challenge of treating peripheral artery disease (PAD) of the lower limbs. During the last decade, there has been an increasing adoption of endovascular techniques worldwide and a simultaneous expansion of the endovascular instrument portfolio to improve technical results during PAD treatment. The proper use of dedicated endovascular devices is essential to achieve technical success. To know indication, mechanism of action, and possible complications of different devices is of paramount importance to achieve immediate procedural success in the shortest time possible and long-term patency of the treated vessels. All the re-entry catheters on the market are presented with their own unique characteristics. The pros and cons of the use of these devices is also discussed and compared to other possible recanalization strategies. The re-entry devices have been demonstrated to be effective in increasing the procedural success rate, in limiting the dissection of distal healthy vessel segments and shortening the procedural time. They should therefore be considered part of essential tools in the treatment of lower limb chronic total occlusions especially for clinicians who do not feel comfortable in performing retrograde access.

Editor's Choice - Covered vs. Bare Metal Stents in the Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation: Early and Midterm Outcomes from the COBRA European Multicentre Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes following endovascular revascularisation for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) using covered (CS) or bare metal (BMS) stent(s). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent treatment with CS or BMS for AIOD between November 2012 and March 2020 in 12 European centres. Outcome measures included death, freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR), major amputation, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Overall, 252 patients (53% males; mean age 65 ± 10 years) were included (102 with a bare metal and 150 with a covered aortic stent); 122 (48%) presented with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Severe arterial calcification was noted in > 65% of patients, 70% presented with Trans-Atlantic Societies Consensus (TASC) D lesions, 32% and 46% had aortic or iliac chronic total occlusion (CTO), respectively. Median follow up was 17 months (range 6 - 40; none lost to follow up). Median inpatient stay was two days (range two to four). During the first 30 days, two patients died (both with covered aortic stents, because of cardiovascular events), none required TLR, two (1%) patients had a major amputation (all presented with CLTI), and three (1%) had a MACCE. At 17 months, mortality (BMS 14% vs. CS 7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 - 2.26, p = .94, log rank test) and TLR (11% vs. 10%, HR 1.98, 95% CI 0.89 - 4.43, p = .095) did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups; only three patients had a major limb amputation during late follow up (all with a covered stent). In a multivariable model, the use of an aortic CS did not influence TLR. In a conditional Cox regression, however, the concomitant use of aortic and iliac CSs was associated with improved freedom from TLR. CONCLUSION: Endovascular reconstruction with aortic CSs or BMSs for severe AIOD showed comparable midterm performance. The use of both aortic and iliac CSs seems to be associated with reduced TLR.

Editor's Choice - Risk of Major Amputation Following Application of Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in the Lower Limb Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: There have been concerns about the long term safety of paclitaxel coated devices in the lower limbs. A formal systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to examine the long term risk of major amputation using paclitaxel coated balloons in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHOD: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (ID 227761). A broad bibliographic search was performed for RCTs investigating paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries (femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal) for treatment of intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The literature search was last updated on 20 February 2021 without any restrictions on publication language, date, or status. Major amputations were analysed with time to event methods employing one and two stage models. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, combinatorial meta-analysis, and a multivariable dose response meta-analysis to examine presence of a biological gradient were also performed. RESULTS: In all, 21 RCTs with 3 760 lower limbs were analysed (52% intermittent claudication and 48% CLI; median follow up two years). There were 87 major amputations of 2 216 limbs in the paclitaxel arms (4.0% crude risk) compared with 41 major amputations in 1 544 limbs in the control arms (2.7% crude risk). The risk of major amputation was significantly higher for paclitaxel coated balloons with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.66 (95% CI 1.14 - 2.42; p = .008, one stage stratified Cox model). The prediction interval was 95% CI 1.10 - 2.46 (two stage model). The observed amputation risk was consistent for both femoropopliteal (p = .055) and infrapopliteal (p = .055) vessels. Number needed to harm was 35 for CLI. There was good evidence of a significant non-linear dose response relationship with accelerated risk per cumulative paclitaxel dose (chi square model p = .007). There was no evidence of publication bias (p = .80) and no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%, p = .77). Results were stable across sensitivity analyses (different models and subgroups based on anatomy and clinical indication and excluding unpublished trials). There were no influential single trials. Level of certainty in evidence was downrated from high to moderate because of sparse events in some studies. CONCLUSION: There appears to be heightened risk of major amputation after use of paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries. Further investigations are warranted urgently.

Dataset of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (EL-COVID) survey.

This dataset supports the findings of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic survey (the EL-COVID survey). The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union was taken into consideration in all steps of data handling. The survey was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Primary Investigator and an online English survey consisting of 18 questions was developed ad-hoc. A bilingual English-Mandarin version of the questionnaire was developed according to the instructions of the Chinese Medical Association in order to be used in mainland People's Republic of China. Differences between the two questionnaires were minor and did affect the process of data collection. Both questionnaires were hosted online. The EL-COVID survey was advertised through major social media. All national and regional contributors contacted their respective colleagues through direct messaging on social media or by email. Eight national societies or groups supported the dissemination of the EL-COVID survey. The data provided demographics information of the EL-COVID participants and an insight on the level of difficulty in accessing or citing previously attended online activities and whether participants were keen on citing these activities in their Curricula Vitae. A categorization of additional comments made by the participants are also based on the data. The survey responses were filtered, anonymized and submitted to descriptive analysis of percentage.

Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The EL-COVID Survey.

BACKGROUND: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2-4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery.

The Association of Spondylitis and Aortic Aneurysm Disease.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess any relation between spondylitis and aortic aneurysmal disease by reviewing the current literature. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases till May 2019, for articles reporting on patients suffering from spondylitis and aortic aneurysm. RESULTS: The most involved aortic segment was infrarenal aorta (56.9%). The lumbar vertebrae were more frequently affected (79.7%). Commonest symptoms were back pain (79.1%), fever (33.7%) and lower limb pain (29.1%). 55.8% of cases were diagnosed using computed tomography. The pathology was attributed to infectious causes in 25.1% of cases. 53.4% of patients were treated only for the aneurysm, 27.9% for both pathologies, while two patients solely for the vertebral disease. Endovascular aneurysm repair was chosen in 12.8% of cases. The 30-day mortality was 8.1% (7/86); mostly from vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: A synchronous spondylitis and aortic aneurysm may share common etiopathology, when an infectious or inflammatory cause is presented. The lumbar vertebrae are more frequently affected. Low quality data do not allow safe conclusion to suggest the best treatment option.

Isolated femoral artery revascularisation with or without iliac inflow improvement - a less invasive surgical option in critical limb ischemia.

Background: Isolated femoral artery revascularisation (iFAR) represents a well-established surgical method in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving common femoral artery disease. Data for iFAR in multilevel PAD are inconsistent, particularly in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of iFAR in CLI regarding major amputation and reintervention and to identify associated risk factors for this outcome. Patients and methods: The data used have been derived from the German Registry of Firstline Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia (CRITISCH). A total of 1200 patients were enrolled in 27 vascular centres. This sub-analysis included patients, which were treated with iFAR with/without concomitant iliac intervention. For detection of risk factors for the combined endpoint of major amputation and/or reintervention, selection of variables for multiple regression was conducted using stepwise forward/backward selection by Akaike's information criterion. Results: 95 patients were included (mean age: 72 years ± 10.82; 64.2% male). Of those, 32 (33.7%) participants reached the combined endpoint. Risk factor analysis revealed continued tobacco use (odds ratio [OR] 2.316, confidence interval [CI] 0.832-6.674), TASC D-lesion (OR: 2.293, CI: 0.869-6.261) and previous vascular intervention in the trial leg (OR: 2.720, CI: 1.037-7.381) to be associated with reaching the combined endpoint. Conclusions: iFAR provides a reasonable, surgical option to treat CLI. Lesion length (TASC D) seems to have a negative impact on outcome. Further research is required to better define the future role of iFAR for combined femoro-popliteal lesions in CLI - best in terms of a randomised controlled trial.

Revascularization Outcomes in Patients With Acute Limb Ischemia and Active Neoplastic Disease.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of surgical (ST), endovascular (ET), and hybrid (HT) treatment in cancer patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective registry collected 139 patients (mean age 72.3±12.4 years; 73 men) with ALI and active malignancy treated by ET (41, 29%), ST (70, 51%), or HT (28, 20%) in 7 European centers between July 2007 and February 2019. In 22 cases (16%) ALI was the first manifestation of the malignancy. Lung cancer was the most common diagnosis (38, 27%). The primary composite outcome was amputation-free survival (AFS). Overall survival, amputation-free time (AFT), and reintervention-free time (RFT) were also assessed. Cox regression analysis was applied to identify independent risk factors for the primary and secondary outcomes. Results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: ET was associated with improved 12-month AFS compared with both ST (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.28, p=0.002) and HT (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.18, p=0.008). ST (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.53, p=0.003) and HT (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.45 to 6.65, p<0.001) were related to an increased risk for mortality compared with ET. At 12 months, the AFT was similar between the 3 groups (ET vs ST: HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.51 to 4.53, p=0.45 and ET vs HT: HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.36 to 4.11, p=0.73). The 12-month RFT also did not differ significantly between the 3 treatment options (ET vs ST: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.46, p=0.79 and ET vs HT: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.17, p=0.19). ST and/or HT increased the risk for the major amputation and/or death (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.05, p=0.03), while Rutherford class I ischemia (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.90, p=0.04) and previous vascular interventions on the index limb (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.97, p=0.04) showed a protective effect. CONCLUSION: In patients with ALI and active malignant disease, ET was associated with increased AFS and overall survival compared with both ST and HT, while the limb salvage and reintervention rates were comparable among the 3 groups.

Early outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease after revascularization for critical limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report early outcomes of patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) after revascularization for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: Perioperative data of patients from the CRITISCH (critical limb ischemia) Registry, who also had NDD-CKD (stages 3 and 4), were compared to their counterparts with normal renal function (NRF) or mild renal insufficiency (stages 1 and 2). Patient characteristics and type of first-line treatment were assessed. Amputation-free survival was the primary composite endpoint. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) and hemodynamic failure of revascularization. Multivariable logistic regression determined risk factors for the endpoints. RESULTS: 424 patients with NDD-CKD were identified. Endovascular revascularization (ER) was performed in 251 patients (59.2%). Eighty-six patients (20.3%) underwent bypass surgery (BS) and 29 patients (6.8%) femoral artery patchplasty (FAP). Conservative treatment (CT) was offered to 46 patients (10.9%); 12 patients (2.8%) underwent primary major amputation (PMA). Logistic regression analysis showed an increased early risk for amputation/death (OR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.09-3.40), death (OR=5.53, 95% CI: 1.92-15.90) and hemodynamic failure of the revascularization (OR=1.80, 95% CI: 1.19-2.72) compared to patients with NRF. Patients with NDD-CKD also seem to carry a higher risk for MACCE (OR=1.82, 95% CI: 0.99-3.36). NDD-CKD was not a risk factor for limb loss alone (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.49-2.22). CONCLUSIONS: NDD-CKD was an independent risk factor for early postoperative mortality, morbidity and reduced patency, but not for limb loss. Robust follow-up is necessary to monitor for such events, as well as to prevent readmission.

Longer bridging stent-grafts in iliac branch endografting does not worsen outcome and expands its applicability, even in concomitant diseased hypogastric arteries.

BACKGROUND: The iliac side branch device (IBD) is a valid method for the treatment of abdominal aorto-iliac aneurysms. However there is still a lack of evidence regarding the optimal length of the bridging stent graft (BSG) since aneurysmal degeneration of the hypogastric artery (HA) is an exclusion criterion. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of longer BSG compared to the widely used 38mm stent-grafts in terms of reintervention rate and primary patency. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent an endovascular aneurysm repair using an IBD in our center between April 2005 and May 2015. The used BSGs were divided into 2 groups. In group A, the BSG was ≤38 mm, and group B>38 mm. The primary endpoint was BSG-related events, including stenosis, occlusion or endoleak. Secondary endpoints were technical success, primary patency and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty IBDs were implanted in 215 consecutive patients. Ninetyseven (37%) in group A and 163 (63%) in group B. The technical success rate was 100%. The 30-day mortality was 1% (N.=1) and 1.2% (N.=2) respectively for group A and B (P=0.8). The freedom from BSG-related events amounted to 84% at 60 months for the total cohort. The comparison between the two groups shows no significant difference, while a slight favorable trend for group B (75% vs. 91% at 60 months, P=0.081) was observed. No differences were found as to primary patency (96% and 99% at 60 months respectively for group A and B, P=0.237). CONCLUSIONS: The use of longer stent-grafts (>38 mm) seems not to affect the performance of BSG even in the long run, expanding the indication for IBD also for aneurysms of the hypogastric artery.