Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Obstet Gynecol Surv ; 77(8): 485-494, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35932289

RESUMO

Importance: Leiomyomata, or fibroids, are a common gynecological problem affecting many women of reproductive age. Historically, myomectomy is offered to women with symptomatic fibroids who desire to preserve fertility. More recently, uterine artery embolization (UAE) has been explored as another fertility-sparing option. Objective: This review aims to provide an in-depth summary of the effects on fertility and reproductive outcomes following myomectomy and UAE for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids. Evidence Acquisition: Articles were obtained from PubMed using search terms myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, and fertility, as well as American Society of Reproductive Medicine practice committee reports. References from identified sources were searched to allow for thorough review. Results: While myomectomy and UAE are both fertility-sparing options for women with fibroids, reproductive outcomes following myomectomy are superior to UAE with higher rates of clinical pregnancy and live births and lower rates of spontaneous abortion, abnormal placentation, preterm labor, and malpresentation. Conclusions: Myomectomy should be offered to women with symptomatic submucosal or cavity-distorting fibroids who have a strong desire for a future pregnancy. For women who are not appropriate surgical candidates, UAE can be offered, although detrimental effects on future fertility should be disclosed. Relevance: A thorough understanding of the efficacy of both myomectomy and UAE, as well as their impact on future fertility, allows for improved counseling when deciding the optimal intervention for women with fibroids who desire future fertility.


Assuntos
Leiomioma , Embolização da Artéria Uterina , Miomectomia Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas , Feminino , Fertilidade , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
2.
Menopause ; 27(2): 243-248, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738735

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to review the role of hormone therapy in menopausal patients with breast cancer and gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) using a combination of keywords and database-specific subject headings for the following concepts: menopause, hormone therapy, and cancer. Editorials, letters, case reports, and comments were excluded, as were non-English articles. Additional references were identified by hand-searching bibliographies of included articles. The searches yielded a total of 1,484 citations. All citations were imported into EndNote X9, where they were screened by the authors. RESULTS: In breast cancer survivors, systemic hormone therapy is not recommended, whereas local low-dose estrogen therapy may be considered after discussion with the patient's oncologist. Among endometrial cancer survivors, hormone therapy is considered safe in low-risk cancers but should be avoided in high-risk subtypes. For survivors of epithelial ovarian cancer and cervical cancer, hormone therapy can be considered, but should be avoided in women with estrogen-sensitive histologic subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: The risks of hormone therapy should be assessed on an individual basis, with consideration of age, type of hormone therapy, dose, duration of use, regimen, route, and prior exposure. Systemic hormone therapy is not recommended in breast cancer survivors, whereas vaginal low-dose estrogen appears safe. Hormone therapy may be used by endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer survivors with low-risk, non-estrogen-receptor-positive subtypes. Video Summary: http://links.lww.com/MENO/A516.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/fisiopatologia , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/fisiopatologia , Menopausa/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Contraindicações de Medicamentos , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Obstet Gynecol Surv ; 72(2): 123-135, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218773

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Major congenital abnormalities, or birth defects, carry significant medical, surgical, cosmetic, or lifestyle consequences. Such abnormalities may be syndromic, involving multiple organ systems, or can be isolated. Overall, 2% to 4% of live births involve congenital abnormalities. Risk factors for birth defects are categorized as modifiable and nonmodifiable. Modifiable risk factors require thorough patient education/counseling. The strongest risk factors, such as age, family history, and a previously affected child, are usually nonmodifiable. OBJECTIVE: This review focuses on risk factors for birth defects including alcohol consumption, illicit drug use, smoking, obesity, pregestational diabetes, maternal phenylketonuria, multiple gestation, advanced maternal age, advanced paternal age, family history/consanguinity, folic acid deficiency, medication exposure, and radiation exposure. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature review via PubMed. RESULTS: There is a strong link between alcohol use, folic acid deficiency, obesity, uncontrolled maternal diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled maternal phenylketonuria, and monozygotic twins and an increased risk of congenital anomalies. Advanced maternal age confers an increased risk of aneuploidy, as well as nonchromosomal abnormalities. Some medications, including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, retinoic acid, folic acid antagonists, and certain anticonvulsants, are associated with various birth defects. However, there are few proven links between illicit drug use, smoking, advanced paternal age, radiation exposure, and statins with specific birth defects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Birth defects are associated with multiple modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. Obstetrics providers should work with patients to minimize their risk of birth defects if modifiable risk factors are present and to appropriately counsel patients when nonmodifiable risk factors are present.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Congênitas , Aconselhamento/métodos , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Anormalidades Congênitas/epidemiologia , Anormalidades Congênitas/prevenção & controle , Anormalidades Congênitas/psicologia , Modificador do Efeito Epidemiológico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
4.
Obstet Gynecol Surv ; 72(1): 54-61, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28134395

RESUMO

Congenital heart disease (CHD) occurs in 4-13 per 1000 births in the United States. While many risk factors for CHD have been identified, more than 90% of cases occur in low-risk patients. Guidelines for fetal cardiac screening during the second trimester anatomy ultrasound have been developed by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) in order to improve antenatal detection rates and to standardize the fetal cardiac screening examination. Patients found to be at increased risk of CHD because of risk factors or an abnormal screening examination should be referred for second trimester fetal echocardiography. Recently, 3D and 4D ultrasound techniques are being utilized to enhance detection rates and to better characterize cardiac lesions, and several first trimester ultrasound screening markers have been proposed to identify patients at increased risk of CHD. However, detection rates have not improved significantly due to limitations such as cost, access, and training that are associated with new technologies and screening methods. The most cost effective way to improve detection rates of CHD may be to standardize screening protocols across practices according to established guidelines and to have a low threshold for referral for fetal echocardiography.


Assuntos
Coração Fetal , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Feminino , Coração Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Coração Fetal/fisiopatologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias Congênitas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Trimestres da Gravidez/fisiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco
5.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 30(1): 123-127, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27639749

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare ovarian conservation rates and surgical approach in benign adnexal surgeries performed by surgeons vs gynecologists at a tertiary care institution. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort review. SETTING: Children's and adult tertiary care university-based hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 21 years of age and younger who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass from January 2003 through December 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Patient age, demographic characteristics, menarchal status, clinical symptoms, radiologic imaging, timing of surgery, surgeon specialty, mode of surgery, rate of ovarian conservation, and pathology were recorded. Patients were excluded if they had a uterine anomaly or pathology-proven malignancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of ovarian conservation relative to surgical specialty; secondary outcome was surgical approach relative to surgical specialty. RESULTS: Of 310 potential cases, 194 met inclusion criteria. Gynecologists were more likely than surgeons to conserve the ovary (80% vs 63%; odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-4.48). After adjusting for age, body mass index, mass size, and urgency of surgery, the difference was attenuated (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-3.84). Surgeons and gynecologists performed minimally invasive surgery at similar rates (62% vs 50%; P = .11). A patient was more likely to receive surgery by a gynecologist if she was older (P < .001) and postmenarchal (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Results of our study suggest that gynecologists are more likely to perform ovarian-conserving surgery. However, our sample size precluded precise estimates in our multivariable model. Educational efforts among all pediatric and gynecologic surgeons should emphasize ovarian conservation and fertility preservation whenever possible.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Anexos/cirurgia , Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Feminino , Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Ovariectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Diagn Pathol ; 10: 81, 2015 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26122082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ciliated hepatic foregut cyst (CHFC) is a rare cystic lesion most commonly identified in segment 4 of the liver that arises from the embryonic foregut. The classic histologic pattern is comprised of 4 distinct layers (inner ciliated epithelial lining, smooth muscle, loose connective tissue, fibrous capsule). Although rare, cases of metaplastic and malignant epithelial lining have been described in CHFC. METHODS: We report 6 additional cases of CHFC, one of which had gastric metaplasia of the cyst lining, and review all reported cases of CHFC in the English literature. We describe the clinicopathologic analysis of 6 cases, with selective immunohistochemical analysis on 1 case with gastric metaplasia. RESULTS: Cases occurred in 4 women and 2 men (average age 55 years, range 42 to 67 years). Cysts ranged in size from 0.7 to 17 cm (average 7.2 cm) and were grossly tan-pink to white with blood-filled contents. The majority were located in segment 4 of the liver, however 2 were located in the porta hepatis. Tumor serologies (CA19-9 and/or CEA) were performed in 3 cases; 1 case demonstrated elevated CA19-9, and 2 cases had laboratory values within normal limits. All cases showed the classic histologic findings, however one case additionally had extensive gastric metaplasia. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, CHFC is a rare diagnostic entity that should be considered in the differential diagnosis for cystic hepatic lesions, particularly those located in segment 4 of the liver. Metaplasia and squamous carcinoma can occur, therefore complete surgical excision is the recommended treatment.


Assuntos
Cistos/patologia , Hepatopatias/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biópsia , Antígeno CA-19-9/sangue , Antígeno Carcinoembrionário/sangue , Cílios/patologia , Cistos/sangue , Cistos/química , Cistos/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Hepatopatias/sangue , Hepatopatias/cirurgia , Masculino , Metaplasia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Testes Sorológicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA