Docetaxel monotherapy in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, community-based feasibility trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in heavily pretreated and anthracycline-resistant patients with metastatic breast cancer in an outpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1996 and June 1998, 98 consecutive patients who had progressed during or relapsed following prior anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were enrolled into the trial. Docetaxel was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The administration of colony-stimulating factors was at the discretion of the attending physician. Premedication with dexamethasone was mandatory for all patients. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients, 93 were evaluable for toxicity and response. Patients had received two palliative regimens (median, range 1-5) prior to docetaxel treatment. The most frequent toxicity observed was leukopenia grade III and IV (WHO grading system) which occurred in 47% of patients (grade IV only in 14%). Except for alopecia grade III (64% of patients), nonhematologic side effects grade III-IV were rare (1-7% of patients) and included nausea, stomatitis, diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, fluid retention and pulmonary toxicities. There were no treatment-related deaths. Objective responses occurred in 40% of patients (CR 6%, PR 34%), and stable disease in 38% of patients. The median duration of response was 5.3 months (range 0.7-18.1 months) while the median survival was 15 months (range 2 36 months). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is a highly active agent in patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer, even in heavily pretreated patients, with moderate toxicity.

Prognostic significance of the time of developing motor deficits before radiation therapy in metastatic spinal cord compression: one-year results of a prospective trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate prospectively the prognostic value of the time of developing motor deficits before radiation therapy (RT) for post-treatment functional outcome in metastatic spinal cord compression. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From November 1998 until October 1999, 57 patients were included. Two subgroups were formed according to the time of developing motor deficits before RT: 1-14 days (n = 29) and > 14 days (n = 28). Therapeutic effect on motor function was evaluated by an 8-point scale directly, 6, 12, and 24 weeks after RT. Patients with rapid deterioration of motor function within 48 h before RT (n = 14) were evaluated separately. RESULTS: Directly after RT, 26/28 patients (93%) of the group developing motor deficits > 14 days showed improvement of motor function, in comparison to 3/29 patients (10%) of the group 1-14 days (p < 0.001). Deterioration rates were 0% (> 14 days) and 45% (1-14 days). In patients with rapid deterioration of motor function within 48 h before RT, prognosis was poor (improvement 0%, no change 43%, deterioration 57%). Results were comparable 6, 12, and 24 weeks after RT. CONCLUSION: A slower development of motor deficits before RT predicts a better post-treatment functional outcome. In patients with rapid deterioration of motor function within 48 h before RT, prognosis was extraordinarily poor. These results support the findings of our preceding retrospective analysis.

Metastatic spinal cord compression. Influence of time between onset of motoric deficits and start of irradiation on therapeutic effect.

BACKGROUND: In a retrospective analysis we investigated the prognostic significance of the interval between first appearance of motoric deficits and the beginning of radiation therapy (RT) with regard to posttreatment motoric function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of more than 400 consecutive patients being irradiated at our department between 1994 and 1997 because of vertebral metastases were reviewed. Ninety-six patients fulfilled selection criteria including motoric deficits, no preceding surgical or radiotherapeutic treatment of the spine, minimum total dose of 24 Gy referred to spinal cord, and additional treatment with dexamethasone. Two subgroups with a similar number of patients for better comparability were formed according to the time of developing motoric deficits: 1 to 13 days (49 patients) and > or = 14 days (47 patients). Effect of irradiation on motoric function was evaluated 2 weeks and about 3 months after radiotherapy. Patients with severe deterioration of motoric function within 48 hours before radiation therapy (31 patients) were looked at separately. RESULTS: Two weeks after radiotherapy 42/47 patients (89%) developing motoric deficits > or = 14 days showed improvement of motoric function in comparison to 6/49 patients (12%) of the other group. Deterioration occurred in 1/47 patients (2%) of the first and in 24/49 patients (49%) of the latter group. In case of severe deterioration of motoric function within 48 hours before radiation therapy only 2/31 patients (6%) showed improvement, but 20/31 (65%) deterioration. About 3 months after radiotherapy comparable results were observed. Median survival time was 4 months. CONCLUSION: A slower development of motoric deficits before beginning of radiotherapy means a better therapeutic effect and a more favorable functional outcome after treatment. The prognosis is extraordinarily poor if severe deterioration of motoric function occurs within 48 hours before radiotherapy.

Effectiveness of hypofractionated radiotherapy in painful bone metastases. Two prospective studies with 1 x 4 Gy and 4 x 4 Gy.

BACKGROUND: Although effectiveness of fractionated radiotherapy for painful bone metastases is well documented, there are unanswered questions regarding the adequacy of low-dose short radiation schedules for long-term pain control which give maximum benefit in patients with a short life expectancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two consecutive non-randomized prospective follow-up studies were performed at a single institution to analyze pain response and duration of response in patients with a variety of primary tumors. Included were only patients with symptomatic nonvertebral bone metastases and without impending pathologic fracture. Forty-five patients received 1 x 4 Gy to 50 different sites (group I) while 86 patients received 4 x 4 Gy to 96 sites (group II). Pain relief to irradiation was evaluated according to patient interviews using a 4-point categorical scale. Follow-up was performed 7 and 90 days after radiotherapy. RESULTS: Pain relief after 4 x 4 Gy was significantly superior to 1 x 4 Gy with pain control rates being 86.5% vs 48% at day 7 (after end of treatment) and 80% vs 55% at day 90, respectively. A subgroup analysis of patients treated with 4 x 4 Gy demonstrated a more favorable outcome for breast cancer patients in comparison to patients with other primaries concerning pain relief (96% vs 81%), pain control after 90 days (93% vs 72%), median time to pain progression (9 vs 3 months), and median overall survival (14 vs 5.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: In this study 4 x 4 Gy proved to be clearly superior to 1 x 4 Gy in relieving pain from symptomatic nonvertebral bone metastases without impending pathologic fracture. Even if radiotherapy with 1 single fraction seems to be applicable in specific cases doses higher than 4 Gy should be chosen. In breast cancer patients pain control seems to be better compared to other primaries.