The impact of cancer metastases on COVID-19 outcomes: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium registry-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 can have a particularly detrimental effect on patients with cancer, but no studies to date have examined if the presence, or site, of metastatic cancer is related to COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS: Using the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry, the authors identified 10,065 patients with COVID-19 and cancer (2325 with and 7740 without metastasis at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis). The primary ordinal outcome was COVID-19 severity: not hospitalized, hospitalized but did not receive supplemental O2, hospitalized and received supplemental O2, admitted to an intensive care unit, received mechanical ventilation, or died from any cause. The authors used ordinal logistic regression models to compare COVID-19 severity by presence and specific site of metastatic cancer. They used logistic regression models to assess 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Compared to patients without metastasis, patients with metastases have increased hospitalization rates (59% vs. 49%) and higher 30 day mortality (18% vs. 9%). Patients with metastasis to bone, lung, liver, lymph nodes, and brain have significantly higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], 1.38, 1.59, 1.38, 1.00, and 2.21) compared to patients without metastases at those sites. Patients with metastasis to the lung have significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00) when adjusting for COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic cancer, especially with metastasis to the brain, are more likely to have severe outcomes after COVID-19 whereas patients with metastasis to the lung, compared to patients with cancer metastasis to other sites, have the highest 30-day mortality after COVID-19.

Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections among patients with cancer following two and three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a retrospective observational study from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium.

Background: Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections following vaccination against COVID-19 are of international concern. Patients with cancer have been observed to have worse outcomes associated with COVID-19 during the pandemic. We sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer who developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after 2 or 3 doses of mRNA vaccines. Methods: We evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients with cancer who developed breakthrough infections using data from the multi-institutional COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19; NCT04354701). Analysis was restricted to patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed in 2021 or 2022, to allow for a contemporary unvaccinated control population; potential differences were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model after inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for potential baseline confounding variables. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, with key secondary endpoints of hospitalization and ICU and/or mechanical ventilation (ICU/MV). Findings: The analysis included 2486 patients, of which 564 and 385 had received 2 or 3 doses of an mRNA vaccine prior to infection, respectively. Hematologic malignancies and recent receipt of systemic anti-neoplastic therapy were more frequent among vaccinated patients. Vaccination was associated with improved outcomes: in the primary analysis, 2 doses (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.88) and 3 doses (aOR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.36) were associated with decreased 30-day mortality. There were similar findings for the key secondary endpoints of ICU/MV (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.82 and 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24-0.58) and hospitalization (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75 and 0.35, 95% CI: 0.26-0.46) for 2 and 3 doses, respectively. Importantly, Black patients had higher rates of hospitalization (aOR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12-1.92), and Hispanic patients presented with higher rates of ICU/MV (aOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.06-2.44). Interpretation: Vaccination against COVID-19, especially with additional doses, is a fundamental strategy in the prevention of adverse outcomes including death, among patients with cancer. Funding: This study was partly supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to C-YH, YS, SM, JLW; T32-CA236621 and P30-CA046592 to C.R.F; CTSA 2UL1TR001425-05A1 to TMW-D; ACS/FHI Real-World Data Impact Award, P50 MD017341-01, R21 CA242044-01A1, Susan G. Komen Leadership Grant Hunt to MKA. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH).

[Lung cancer in never smokers: a French national cohort (BioCAST/IFCT-1002)]. / BioCAST: le Bio-observatoire national du cancer bronchiques chez les patients non fumeurs (IFCT1002).

Around 5 to 25% of lung cancer worldwide occurs in lifelong non-smokers (less than 100 cigarettes in lifetime). Lung cancer in never smokers (LCINS) shows many clinical, epidemiological and molecular differences compared to those related to tobacco. It is therefore often considered as a separate entity. LCINS is also a good model for the study of lung cancer risk factors and tumoral mutation profiles (usually more common and specific). However, most data has come from retrospective studies and/or from Asian populations, although this disease shows high geographic lability. The BioCAST/IFCT-1002 is a national, multicentric, prospective study promoted by the French intergroup IFCT. The first objective is to describe the clinical and molecular epidemiology of LCINS in a French population. Detailed data (including exposure to many risk factors) are collected directly from the patient through a standardized questionnaire completed during a telephone interview. All patients also undergo blood sampling for the analysis of genomic polymorphisms and the characterization of epigenetic anomalies. BioCAST hopes to provide concrete answers for clinicians and patients about this entity.

A candidate gene approach to searching for low-penetrance breast and prostate cancer genes.

Most cases of breast and prostate cancer are not associated with mutations in known high-penetrance genes, indicating the involvement of multiple low-penetrance risk alleles. Studies that have attempted to identify these genes have met with limited success. The National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium--a pooled analysis of multiple large cohort studies with a total of more than 5,000 cases of breast cancer and 8,000 cases of prostate cancer--was therefore initiated. The goal of this consortium is to characterize variations in approximately 50 genes that mediate two pathways that are associated with these cancers--the steroid-hormone metabolism pathway and the insulin-like growth factor signalling pathway--and to associate these variations with cancer risk.

Novel therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

New therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are moving away from non-specific cytotoxic to more targeted approaches. The monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab induces responses in 33% to 43% of patients with relapsed or refractory disease, with 2-5% CR. Side effects include infusional reactions as well as immunosuppressive effects. Rituximab has limited activity in relapsed refractory patients, but response rates are comparable to follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in untreated patients. Other antibodies in early phases of development include anti-CD23 [IDEC-152], anti-CD22 [epratuzumab], Hu1D10 [apolizumab], and anti-CD80 [anti-B7, IDEC-114]. Other agents that are being studied include denileukin diftitox fusion protein (Ontak), and bcl-2 antisense [G3139, Genasense]. The mechanism of action of the new drugs and their role in CLL, as well as the emergence of new prognostic markers are discussed.

Pre- and post-treatment evaluation of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Once the diagnosis of a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has been established three critical steps in patient management must follow. The first is the pre-treatment evaluation and staging to identify prognostic factors (the subject of another chapter in this volume), impending problems, such as ureteral obstruction, spinal cord compression, biliary or vena caval obstruction. This assessment directs the best therapeutic approach, and also provides a baseline against which to assess response. The second step is the treatment itself. Third, conscientious follow-up after completion of therapy to monitor for disease recurrence as well as for long-term sequelae of therapy. A careful history and physical examination are the most important components of patient evaluation. Whereas some evaluation procedures have become standard practice (e.g. chest radiographs, CT scans, gallium scan, blood chemistry and assessment of hepatic and renal function), the role of other studies is still being defined (e.g. PET scan). The increased use of systemic therapies has somewhat reduced the requirement for precise staging to determine treatment strategies, but will become more critical to identify early patients with resistant disease and those with minimal residual disease following treatment so that novel therapies can be introduced at that point.

New polymorphisms in the human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 coding sequence: lack of association with longevity or with increased cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) encoded by the PARP-1 gene, is a ubiquitous and abundant DNA-binding protein involved in the cellular response to various genotoxic agents. In a previous study we showed that maximal oligonucleotide-stimulated poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation was significantly higher in permeabilised lymphoblastoid cell lines from a French population of centenarians compared with controls aged 20-70 years, supporting the notion that longevity is associated with a genetically determined, high poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity. Here, we describe four new genetic polymorphisms, three of which represent silent nucleotide variants (C402T, T1011C, G1215A), and one of which leads to a valine762-to-alanine exchange (T2444C). We undertook an association study between two of these polymorphisms and human longevity or poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity in permeabilised lymphoblastoid cells. By analysing 648 DNA samples from a French population (324 centenarians and 324 controls) by fluorescent-allele-specific PCR, we showed the absence of any significant enrichment of any of the genotypes in the study of centenarians versus controls. Furthermore, we studied genotype distributions from individuals who had previously been tested for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity. None of the genotype combinations at any polymorphic site studied could be related to a high or low level of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity. Together, these results strongly suggest that the longevity-related differences in the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity of human lymphoblastoid cell lines cannot be explained by genetic polymorphisms in the PARP-1 coding sequence and that other mechanisms have to be considered as potential regulators of specific poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity.

Specific insulin and proinsulin secretion in glucokinase-deficient individuals

Glucokinase (GCK) is an enzyme that regulates insulin secretion, keeping glucose levels within a narrow range. Mutations in the glucokinase gene cause a rare form of diabetes called maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). An early onset (less than 25 years), autosomal dominant inheritance and low insulin secretion stimulated by glucose characterize MODY patients. Specific insulin and proinsulin were measured in serum by immunofluorimetric assays (IFMA) during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Two kindreds (SA and LZ) were studied and compared to non-diabetic unrelated individuals (control group 1) matched for age and body mass index (BMI). In one kindred, some of these subjects were also obese (BMI>26 kg/m2), and other family members also presented with obesity and/or late-onset NIDDM. The MODY patients were also compared to a group of five of their first-degree relatives with obesity and/or late-onset NIDDM. The proinsulin profile was different in members of the two MODY kindreds. Fasting proinsulin and the proinsulin/insulin ratio were similar in MODY members of kindred LZ and subjects from control group 1, but were significantly lower than in MODY members of kindred SA (P<0.02 and P<0.01, for proinsulin and proinsulin/insulin ratio, respectively). Moreover, MODY members of family SA had higher levels of proinsulin and proinsulin/insulin ratio, although not significantly different, when compared to their first-degree relatives and to subjects from control group 2. In conclusion, we observed variable degrees of proinsulin levels and proinsulin/insulin ratio in MODY members of two different kindreds. The higher values of these parameters found in MODY and non-MODY members of kindred SA is probably related to the obesity and late-onset NIDDM background present in this family.

Predisposing gene for early-onset prostate cancer, localized on chromosome 1q42.2-43.

There is genetic predisposition associated with >=10% of all cancer of the prostate (CaP). By means of a genomewide search on a selection of 47 French and German families, parametric and nonparametric linkage (NPL) analysis allowed identification of a locus, on chromosome 1q42.2-43, carrying a putative predisposing gene for CaP (PCaP). The primary localization was confirmed with several markers, by use of three different genetic models. We obtained a maximum two-point LOD score of 2.7 with marker D1S2785. Multipoint parametric and NPL analysis yielded maximum HLOD and NPL scores of 2.2 and 3.1, respectively, with an associated P value of . 001. Homogeneity analysis with multipoint LOD scores gave an estimate of the proportion of families with linkage to this locus of 50%, with a likelihood ratio of 157/1 in favor of heterogeneity. Furthermore, the 9/47 families with early-onset CaP at age <60 years gave multipoint LOD and NPL scores of 3.31 and 3.32, respectively, with P = .001.

[The PROGENE study, the French project of genetic analysis of familial prostatic cancer: recruitment and analysis]. / Etude PROGENE, project français d'analyse génétique du cancer de la prostate familial: recrutement et analyse.

OBJECTIVES: To initiate a genetic linkage study in order to localize one or several predisposition gene(s) for hereditary prostatic cancer (PC), as various epidemiological studies have demonstrated a possible family aggregation in about 25% of cases. A family segregation study [14] has also shown that a genetic predisposition, with autosomal dominant transmission and high penetrance (88% at 85 years) could be responsible for 9% of all PC. METHODS: A national collection of families with at least 2 cases of PC allowed: 1) identification of families with hereditary forms of PC, 2) creation of a constitutional DNA bank after collecting blood samples from subjects belonging to these families, and 3) a simulation study of genetic linkage analysis prior to microsatellite genotyping. RESULTS: From July 1994 to September 1995, we included 67 families (180 cases of PC). Another 45 families are currently being included. 24 of these 67 families (89 PC, 54 survivors) satisfied at least one of the criteria defined in the study by CARTER et al. for hereditary forms of familial PC. Two families were also included as the 3 patients with PC were second degree relatives. A total of 26 families therefore presented a hereditary form, 18 of which (73 PC, 46 survivors) were considered to be informative for a genetic linkage study (lod score = 4 for theta = 0.001 with an 8 allele marker). The constitutional DNA of 271 individuals of these informative families was extracted from circulating cells obtained from blood samples, immortalized lymphocytes, and the genotyping was initiated for 216 microsatellite markers distributed throughout the genome, an average of every 20 cM. CONCLUSION: Although the recruitment allowed us to identify many informative families for an inherited risk of PC, the predictive study suggested a high probability for localization of a predisposition gene by genetic linkage analysis. It would therefore be possible to identify, within the families concerned, the subjects carrying the genetic anomaly and consequently at high-risk of PC. Finally, the demonstration of the locus would allow cloning and identification of the gene (s) involved.