Correction of Brassiere Strap Grooving with Injectable Poly-L-Lactic Acid in Plastic Surgery Resident Filler and Neuromodulator Clinic.

Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a biocompatible synthetic polymer that induces neocollagenesis by fibroblasts after placement into the reticular dermis and subcutaneous plane. We present an innovative use of this product to treat brassiere strap grooves. The size and weight of hypertrophied breasts can cause physical and psychological problems that can be corrected with reduction mammaplasty. However, bra strap grooving remains an unsightly consequence of brassiere use with large and heavy breasts. PLLA provides an innovative way to treat this deformity in a minimally invasive way, while maintaining relatively long-term results of two years or more. We studied 10 patients who presented to resident filler and neuromodulator clinic to help improve the bra strap groove deformity. The average number of clinic visits was 3.1. The average total number of vials injected was 2.58 on the right and 2.92 on the left. There were no complications or side effects, apart from one patient who reported injection site bruising. Patient surveys demonstrated 70% satisfied with the results and 30% very satisfied. We also discuss resident filler and neuromodulator clinic as an opportunity for resident research.

Revising Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

SUMMARY: Prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction continues to gain popularity, largely due to its decreased postoperative pain, animation deformity, and operative time as compared to subpectoral reconstruction. Widespread use has led to opportunities for surgical revisions. While some techniques for submuscular reconstruction revisions, such as implant exchange and fat grafting, also apply to prepectoral revisions, others require modification for the prepectoral space. The prosthesis' unique reliance on the mastectomy flaps and acellular dermal matrix for support leads to a progressive alteration of the breast footprint, conus, envelope, and nipple-areola complex position. To date, revisions of prepectoral reconstructions have not been addressed in the literature. This article presents the senior author's (N.P.B.) techniques for (1) revising prepectoral breast reconstructions, including staged and direct-to-implant reconstructions, with a special focus on nipple-sparing reconstruction, and (2) minimizing undesirable outcomes of prepectoral reconstruction.

From Salvage to Prevention: A Single-Surgeon Experience with Acellular Dermal Matrix and Infection in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Increasing amounts of acellular dermal matrix are being used with the adoption of prepectoral breast reconstruction. Postoperative infection remains a challenge in breast reconstruction, and the contribution of acellular dermal matrix type, processing, and sterility assurance level to risk of complications in prepectoral reconstruction is not well studied. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction from February of 2017 to July of 2020. Because of an increase in the rate of infection, the drain protocol was changed and acellular dermal matrix type was switched from AlloDerm (sterility assurance level, 10-3) to DermACELL (sterility assurance level, 10-6) in January of 2019. Demographic and surgical variables were collected, in addition to details regarding development and management of infection. RESULTS: Despite higher rates of direct-to-implant reconstruction and bilateral procedures and increased implant volumes, the rate of infection was significantly lower in patients who received DermACELL instead of AlloDerm [two of 38 (5.3 percent) versus 11 of 41 (26.8 percent); p = 0.014]. Drain duration was slightly longer in the DermACELL group, consistent with the change in drain protocol. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics remained similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: With increased reliance on large amounts of acellular dermal matrix for prepectoral breast reconstruction, it directly follows that the properties of acellular dermal matrix with respect to incorporation, sterility, and implant support are that much more important to consider. There have been few studies comparing different types of acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction, and further research is required to determine the contribution of acellular dermal matrix type and processing techniques to development of postoperative infection. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Resolution of Thumb Pain following Adoption of Mathieu Needle Holder: An Ergonomic Analysis.

BACKGROUND: As surveys reveal the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among surgeons, it is important to have an appreciation and understanding of surgical ergonomics to protect against long-term injuries and mitigate the symptoms of existing conditions. Surgeons diagnosed with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis, a progressive and debilitating condition, can be especially vulnerable to the pain caused by the repetitive manual tasks of operating. METHODS: In this article, the authors describe a case of occupational thumb CMC arthritis in a right-hand dominant plastic surgeon and provide an ergonomic analysis of the different needle holders. RESULTS: Following diagnosis, the simple switch from the traditional Hegar needle holder to the Mathieu needle driver with its palm grip and rotating ratchet lock mechanism stalled the progression of the disease, allowing the surgeon to continue operating pain free. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of utilization of an alternative needle holder leading to the resolution of thumb pain. In sharing this case, the authors hope to bring awareness to the importance of hand ergonomics in the operating room and offer a practical tip to surgeons with CMC arthritis.

Should We Stick with Surgical Glues? The Incidence of Dermatitis after 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Exposure in 102 Consecutive Breast Cases.

Skin adhesives have become standard in wound closure as alternatives to traditional sutures or as sterile occlusive dressings after surgery of all types. The literature is replete with case reports of contact dermatitis following exposure to cyanoacrylate-based adhesives, such as 2-octyl cyanoacrylate. Nonetheless, it has been the impression of the senior author and others that the incidence of allergic and/or contact dermatitis is much higher than commonly considered. The authors prospectively studied 102 consecutive patients who underwent breast surgery performed by the senior author with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate placed over incisions as an occlusive dressing. Two patients with a known glue allergy did not receive cyanoacrylate at surgery but were scratch tested to confirm the diagnosis. All patients were followed postoperatively. Twelve patients went on to develop significant dermatitis postoperatively after glue placement. Cyanoacrylate was confirmed as the cause of all rashes by allergy scratch testing for a total incidence of 14 percent (14 patients). Given the popularity of cyanoacrylate products across emergency rooms, clinics, and operating rooms, awareness of the true incidence of these reactions may caution against their use in the future. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, IV.

Accurate Nipple Areolar Positioning in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Reconstruction.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy continues to grow in popularity as oncologic indications for preserving the nipple areolar complex have become less stringent and more patients with genetic predispositions to breast cancer seek aesthetically superior prophylactic mastectomy reconstructions. Nonetheless, nipple malposition remains a common and disturbing complication. This article proposes several anatomic variations that predispose to nipple malposition and a strategy to avoid it through a reliable, easily reproducible method of preoperative marking and intraoperative stabilization.

Burn in an Irradiated Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Cautionary Tale.

Burns to breast reconstructions, both autologous and implant-based, are well described in the plastic surgery literature. The mechanism has often been contact; however, burns secondary to sun exposure have also been reported. With the increasing number of prepectoral breast reconstructions, including irradiated prepectoral reconstructions, we would like to highlight the increased susceptibility of these reconstructions to thermal and ultraviolet injury. We present the case of a patient who underwent prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction years after irradiation, who subsequently developed full-thickness injury to her mastectomy flap after minor sun exposure. After weeks of daily wound care and hyperbaric oxygen treatments, the patient eventually reepithelialized over her exposed acellular dermal matrix tissue layer, allowing for implant salvage. Postmastectomy flaps overlying implants in the prepectoral plane are delicate; major burns can develop from minor thermal injury, even months after surgery. Irradiated prepectoral reconstruction patients should be educated about the susceptibility of their breast flaps to even minor burn injury and should maintain vigilance beyond the immediate postoperative period. It remains to be seen whether prepectoral reconstruction in an irradiated breast can be a viable, long-term option.

Soft Tissue Atrophy Related to Corticosteroid Injection: Review of the Literature and Implications for Hand Surgeons.

Corticosteroid injections (CIs) are frequently used by hand surgeons to treat a wide range of pathology including de Quervain tenosynovitis and lateral epicondylitis. Although generally viewed as a benign modality, and a way to potentially avoid or postpone surgical intervention, common complications from CI should be considered and discussed with patients before the procedure. One such complication is local soft tissue atrophy and hypopigmentation after injection. We discuss the incidence of soft tissue-related adverse effects from CI, the pathophysiology and influence of different steroid preparations on soft tissues, and potential treatment options once atrophy has occurred.

Animation Deformity in Postmastectomy Implant-Based Reconstruction.

Despite increasing interest in prepectoral implant-based reconstruction to avoid animation deformity (AD), the prevalence of this deformity and patient attitudes toward it have not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to report on AD in the breast reconstruction population and identify those at highest risk. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for patients at least 6 months postoperative from subpectoral, implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix in the lower pole. Patient age, BMI, and implant size were collected. A questionnaire was distributed to the patients. Returned questionnaires were compiled and data were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-four of 108 patients (77.8%) returned the questionnaire with 62 (75.6%) reporting AD; 75.6% of patients were aware of AD, 14.6% considered it moderate, and 11% considered it severe. No statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, implant size, or athleticism were found between those who noted AD versus those who did not. Forty-one of 79 patients (51.9%) would have been interested in an initial surgical procedure without AD; interest dropped significantly if the alternative surgery involved increased risk, cost, or additional stages of reconstruction. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AD in subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is significantly higher than in subpectoral augmentation. The majority of patients expressed interest in an alternative procedure to avoid AD unless it involved increased risk, cost, or additional surgeries. We found insignificant differences in age, athleticism, BMI, and implant size between patients who note AD and those who do not. Further study is necessary to better define patients at risk for AD to guide patient-centered breast reconstruction.

Reelevating the Mastectomy Flap: A Safe Technique for Improving Nipple-Areolar Complex Malposition after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) malposition is one of the most common complications following nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction. To maximize perfusion to the NAC, traditional methods of correcting NAC malposition limit undermining below the NAC. We demonstrate a series of cases in which improvement of NAC malposition was safely performed by reelevating the NAC and mastectomy flap to allow redraping of the soft tissue envelope over the implant and the overlying capsule. Thirty-four patients were identified in a span over 4 years where 44 NACs were repositioned using this method. There was zero incidence of postoperative ischemia or necrosis of the NAC or mastectomy flaps. There was noticeable improvement in the NAC position on the breast mound. Reelevation of the mastectomy skin flap to correct malposition of the NAC after nipple-sparing mastectomy is a safe and effective option, avoids additional scars, and can be performed more than once to further improve positioning of the NAC.

BFACE: A Framework for Evaluating Breast Aesthetics.

Although much has been written about breast aesthetics, the literature lacks a simple yet systematic and comprehensive approach for preoperative breast assessment. With use of the mnemonic "BFACE," the breast surgeon will analyze the bony skeleton and the breast footprint, areola, conus, and envelope. The authors present a thorough review of the important parameters that define the ideal breast, and several techniques for perceiving asymmetries more clearly. Strategic surgical planning is enabled by accurate perception.

Surgical Delay of the Nipple-Areolar Complex in High-risk Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Reconstruction.

As nipple-sparing mastectomy gains increasing popularity, minimizing the risk of nipple necrosis continues to be of critical importance to patients and surgeons. Patients with large or ptotic breasts, scars from previous cosmetic and/or oncologic breast surgery, or previous irradiation have often been denied nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) because of increased risk of nipple necrosis. A variety of interventions have been suggested to minimize the ischemic insult to the nipple-areolar complex (NAC). This article presents our experience in 26 high-risk patients with surgical delay of the NAC.