Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Nurs ; 110(9): 66-9, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20736716

RESUMO

The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority Reporting System is a confidential, statewide Internet reporting system to which all Pennsylvania hospitals, outpatient-surgery facilities, and birthing centers, as well as some abortion facilities, must file information on medical errors. Safety Monitor is a column from the authority that informs nurses on issues that can affect patient safety and presents strategies they can easily integrate into practice. For more information on the authority, visit www.patientsafetyauthority.org. For the original article discussed in this column or for other articles on patient safety, click on "Patient Safety Advisories" and then "Advisory Library" in the left-hand navigation menu.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Alta do Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Gestão da Segurança , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Pennsylvania , Gestão da Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
AORN J ; 90(2): 215-8, 221-2, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19664413

RESUMO

Under coordination by the Patient Safety Authority, staff members in facilities across Pennsylvania analyzed 97 wrong site surgery near misses and 44 actual occurrences using a common analysis form from August 2007 to August 2008. These assessments were aggregated and compared by the Patient Safety Authority. Assessments in which near misses were identified that did not advance to actual wrong site occurrences were significantly more likely to report compliance with patient identification and preoperative reconciliation protocols, accurate scheduling, notation of the surgical site on the consent form, participation of the surgeon in preoperative verification, participation of all surgical team members in the time out, time outs performed with the site marking visible after draping, and the surgeon explicitly empowering team members to speak up if concerned and acknowledging concerns when expressed.


Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos , Pennsylvania , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos/métodos
3.
Am J Nurs ; 109(2): 54-5, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19300003

RESUMO

The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS, pronounced PAY-sirs) is a confidential, statewide reporting system on the Internet to which all Pennsylvania hospitals, outpatient-surgery facilities, and birthing centers, as well as some abortion facilities, were required to file information on medical errors beginning in June 2004.Safety Monitor, this column in AJN from PA-PSRS, informs nurses on issues that can affect patient safety and presents strategies they can integrate easily into practice.For more information on PA-PSRS, visit the Web site of Pennsylvania's Patient Safety Authority, at www.psa.state.pa.us. For the original articles discussed in this column or for other articles on patient safety, click on "Advisories and Related Resources" in the left-hand navigation menu.This is a periodic column from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System.

4.
Adv Surg ; 42: 13-31, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18953807

RESUMO

Wrong-site surgery happens frequently enough that it is a significant risk for many surgeons during their professional careers. But it is an event that should never happen. Most wrong-site surgery is wrong-side surgery, followed by wrong-digit and wrong-vertebral-level surgery. Wrong-site surgery results from misinformation or misperception of the patient's orientation. The key to preventing wrong-site surgery is to have multiple independent checks of critical information. Discrepancies among the operative record, consent, and the surgeon's record of the history and physical examination should ideally be resolved prior to the day of surgery to avoid time-consuming reconciliations. We noted that the preoperative verification was the most effective of the three steps of the Universal Protocol and that the patient was a more reliable source of accurate information than the documents. Marking the operative site gives patients a voice after they are sedated or anesthesia is induced. Wrong-site surgery has involved local or regional anesthesia at the wrong site when anesthesiologists did not adhere to formal time-outs for their procedures. Surgeons need to have access to all relevant information and to be engaged in the processes to prevent wrong-site surgery, particularly in the final time-out. Junior members of the operating room team must be made comfortable about speaking up if concerned. During spinal surgery, the vertebral level needs to be confirmed radiographically. Wrong-site surgical problems can occur after an operation if accurate information is not provided to accompany the specimen or if leftover labels from a previous patient are used to identify the specimen.


Assuntos
Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA