How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials.

Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.

A need to simplify informed consent documents in cancer clinical trials. A position paper of the ARCAD Group.

Background: In respect of the principle of autonomy and the right of self-determination, obtaining an informed consent of potential participants before their inclusion in a study is a fundamental ethical obligation. The variations in national laws, regulations, and cultures contribute to complex informed consent documents for patients participating in clinical trials. Currently, only few ethics committees seem willing to address the complexity and the length of these documents and to request investigators and sponsors to revise them in a way to make them understandable for potential participants. The purpose of this work is to focus on the written information in the informed consent documentation for drug development clinical trials and suggests (i) to distinguish between necessary and not essential information, (ii) to define the optimal format allowing the best legibility of those documents. Methods: The Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive (ARCAD) Group, an international scientific committee involving oncologists from all over the world, addressed these issues and developed and uniformly accepted a simplified informed consent documentation for future clinical research. Results: A simplified form of informed consent with the leading part of 1200-1800 words containing all of the key information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements and 'relevant supportive information appendix' of 2000-3000 words is provided. Conclusions: This position paper, on the basis of the ARCAD Group experts discussions, proposes our informed consent model and the rationale for its content.

A phase II randomized study of combined infusional leucovorin sodium and 5- FU versus the leucovorin calcium followed by 5-FU both in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Leucovorin Sodium (LV/Na) has a high solubility, and is stable when given with continuous infusion of 5-FU. It could maintain significant plasma concentration of 5, 10-meTHF during the whole 5-FU perfusion with the potential of increasing 5-FU cytotoxicity. We conducted a randomized phase II clinical trial on leucovorin calcium (LV/Ca) and LV/Na in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC). Main objectives were to assess efficacy and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty seven patients with mCRC and no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized to receive LV/Na or LV/Ca with irinotecan or oxaliplatine combined with infusional 5-FU. LV/Na was defined as warranting further evaluation in phase III if true overall response rate (ORR) > 35% (α=5%, ß=10% in case of true ORR >55%, 51 evaluable patients planned/arm). RESULTS: Results for LV/Ca and LV/Na arm respectively were: observed ORR, 55% (significantly higher than 35%, p = 0.02) and 61% (p = 0.004). Median overall survival durations were 11.9 months and 22.9 months (p = 0.02) and PFS 8.0 vs. 11.5 months (ns). Grade 3 events were 64% and 46% (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Both LV/Na and LV/Ca disclosed an ORR > 35% with comparable safety.

Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: sequential use of the risk of malignancy index and HistoScanning, a novel computer-aided diagnostic tool.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of ovarian Histo-Scanning(™) , a novel computerized technique for interpreting ultrasound data, in combination with the risk of malignancy index (RMI) in improving triage for women with adnexal masses. METHODS: RMI indices were assessed in 199 women enrolled in a prospective study to investigate the use of HistoScanning. Ultrasound scores were obtained by blinded analysis of archived images. The following sequential test was developed: HistoScanning was modeled as a second-line test for RMI between a lower cut-off and an upper cut-off. The optimal combination of these cut-offs that together maximized the Youden index (Sensitivity + Specificity - 1) was determined. RESULTS: Using RMI at the standard cut-off value of 250 resulted in a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 86%. When RMI was combined with HistoScanning, the highest accuracy was achieved by using HistoScanning as a sequential second-line test for patients with RMI values between 105 and 2100. At these cut-off values, sequential use of RMI and HistoScanning resulted in mean sensitivity and specificity estimates of 88% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that HistoScanning may have the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of RMI, which could result in better triage for women with adnexal masses. Further prospective validation is warranted.

Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EORTC study 40015.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA), in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and the benefit of adding celecoxib (C) to irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine regimens compared with placebo (P). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI: irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 15 and 22); FA (200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 2, 15, 16, 29 and 30); 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus, then 22-h, 600 mg/m(2) infusion) or CAPIRI: irinotecan (250 mg/m(2) i.v. infusion on days 1 and 22); capecitabine p.o. (1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-15 and 22-36). Patients were additionally randomly assigned to receive either placebo or celecoxib (800 mg: 2 x 200 mg b.i.d.). RESULTS: The trial was closed following eight deaths unrelated to disease progression in the 85 enrolled (629 planned) patients. Response rates were 22% for CAPIRI + C, 48% for CAPIRI + P, 32% for FOLFIRI + C and 46% for FOLFIRI + P. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were shorter for CAPIRI versus FOLFIRI (PFS 5.9 versus 9.6 months and OS 14.8 versus 19.9 months) and celecoxib versus placebo (PFS 6.9 versus 7.8 months and OS 18.3 versus 19.9 months). CONCLUSION: Due to the small sample size following early termination, no definitive conclusions can be drawn in relation to the noninferiority of CAPIRI compared with FOLFIRI.

Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan compared with current care in metastatic colorectal cancer after failure on irinotecan--a Belgian analysis.

This analysis compared the cost-effectiveness in Belgium of cetuximab plus irinotecan with current current care in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has failed irinotecan-containing therapy. Treatment outcomes and medical resource use data for patients receiving cetuximab plus irinotecan from the BOND study were compared with those from a matched group of patients (current care) (n = 66). Two scenarios were considered in which cetuximab was discontinued either at 6 weeks or at 12 weeks if there was no tumour response at those time points. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in Euros as the additional cost per additional life year gained (LYG) (referred to as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)). For the 6-week rule, the ICERs were Euro 17000 compared with current care. For the 12-week rule, the ICER was Euro 40000 /LYG. Sensitivity analyses revealed that, in the worst case, considering all assumptions against the cetuximab combination, the maximum ICER is Euro 30000 or Euro 59000. In conclusion, cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic CRC, after failure on irinotecan-containing chemotherapy, is rather cost-effective compared with current care in both scenarios tested.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using sigmoidoscopy followed by colonoscopy: a feasibility and efficacy study on a cancer institute based population.

BACKGROUND: Advanced distal neoplasia found at sigmoidoscopy could be the marker for more proximal lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the setting of a screening clinic, subjects underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy. If no significant lesion was found, sigmoidoscopy was planned after 5 years. If an advanced neoplasia was found, colonoscopy was performed just after the first sigmoidoscopy and at 1, 3 and 5 years. If a non-advanced neoplasia was found, sigmoidoscopy was performed at 1, 3 and 5 years and followed by colonoscopy if advanced lesion was found. RESULTS: At first screening 1704/1912 (88%) subjects had a negative sigmoidoscopy, 104 (5.4%) had an advanced neoplasia, 96 (6%) had a non-advanced neoplasia and eight (0.4%) had invasive colorectal cancer (CRC). At follow-up examinations at 1, 3 and 5 years, among 170 subjects with advanced and non-advanced neoplasia, one developed invasive CRC and 47 (31.6%), advanced neoplasia. At 5 years, among 718 first negative sigmoidoscopies, 572 (80%) were confirmed negative and 97 (14%) had advanced neoplasia. Colorectal cancer status at 5 years could be checked for interval cancers in 97% of subjects and no CRC was diagnosed in subjects who did not attend sigmoidoscopy at 5 years. Comparison of the incidence of invasive CRC to the data of registries of the Netherlands and Luxembourg suggested that the incidence of CRC was decreased by 36%-46%. Seven of the nine CRCs were Duke's A and the two others were Duke's B and C. CONCLUSIONS: Screening with sigmoidoscopy followed by colonoscopy in case of positive sigmoidoscopy leads to substantial decreases in the incidence of CRC. Most CRCs found are at an early, curable stage of their development.

Optimisation of irinotecan dose in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after 5-FU failure: results from a multinational, randomised phase II study.

Although irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) is a standard option for relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer, there is some evidence that suggests that a higher dose may be more effective, with acceptable tolerability, following 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This study assessed the optimal dosing strategy for irinotecan, along with treatment efficacy and safety. A total of 164 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after failure on 5-FU or raltitrexed received either 350 mg m(-2) irinotecan (Group A; n=36) or 250, 350 or 500 mg m(-2), according to individual patient tolerance (Group B; n=62) or based on risk factor optimisation (Group C; n=66). There were no complete responses. There was a trend towards a higher overall response rate in Group B (13%) than in Groups A (8%) and C (9%). Tumour control growth rate was high in all three groups: 58% in group A, 60% in Group B and 50% in Group C. A total of 34% of patients in Group B and 9% in Group C were able to receive a dose of 500 mg m(-2). Median duration of response and time to progression were significantly longer in Groups A and B compared with Group C. No significant between-group differences for any adverse events were seen, although there was a small trend towards better tolerability in Group B. Individual dose escalation based on patient tolerance may allow more patients to receive a higher irinotecan dose without causing additional toxicity and can be an appropriate patient management strategy.

[Colorectal cancer: from shadows to light]. / Le cancer colorectal: de l'ombre vers la lumière.

Colorectal cancer often starts as an adenoma, which may, after many years, evolve into an invasive cancer. During the process, many medical interventions are possible that may modify the natural history of the disease with, as a consequence, a decrease in incidence and mortality. The main progress in the treatment of colorectal cancer is the discovery of agents that target pathways involved in the process of cancerization and invasion. These new approaches could dramatically improve the prognosis of our patients.

Treatment of advanced digestive non-colon cancer with a weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil modulated by folinic acid and cisplatin: an easy-to-use and well-tolerated combination.

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by folinic acid (FA) and cisplatin is commonly used in advanced digestive non-colon cancers (ADNCC). In order to simplify treatment administration by avoiding cisplatin-related hydration, we investigated a weekly regimen of 5-FU/FA/cisplatin. Patients with ADNCC were treated with 5-FU 2.0 g/m2, FA 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 day 1, for 6 weeks with a 2-week rest, and were assessed for toxicity, tumor response and disease-free survival. Forty-three patients with measurable ADNCC were treated with this weekly regimen. Primary tumor sites were mainly esophagus (n = 17), stomach (n = 12) and pancreas (n = 9). Results were as follows. Toxicity was mostly hematological, with 16% grade 3/4 neutropenia (seven of 43) and 4% febrile neutropenia (two of 43). Objective response (OR) was observed in 19 of 43 (44%) patients including four complete responses (9%) and 15 partial responses (35%). Another 18 patients (42%) experienced stable disease. Time to progression was 6.5 months. The median response and stable disease durations were 4.3 (range 3-34) and 5 (range 2-16) months, respectively. We conclude that weekly administration of 5-FU/FA/cisplatin is an active and well-tolerated regimen. Toxicity is manageable and allows chemotherapy on an outpatient basis without hydration program as required when cisplatin is used at the dose of 50 mg/m2.

Is overall survival a realistic primary end point in advanced colorectal cancer studies? A critical assessment based on four clinical trials comparing fluorouracil plus leucovorin with the same treatment combined either with oxaliplatin or with CPT-11.

BACKGROUND: The adequacy of overall survival (OS) as study end point in phase III trials for advanced solid tumors is questionable. The present review highlights the limits of OS as study end point to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs. METHODS: Four phase III clinical trials comparing a fluorouracil-based regimen with the same regimen plus either CPT-11 or oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer patients were reviewed. The primary aim of the critical assessment was to explain the lack of OS advantage observed in two of the four trials, despite the presence of increased response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP). Four possible reasons for the lack of OS benefit (i.e. statistical power, cross-over, magnitude of the effect on RR and TTP, non-tumor-related deaths) were systematically reviewed in the trials, and the detectable 1-year OS difference, assuming a statistical power of 80%, was calculated for each. RESULTS: None of these reasons for the lack of OS advantage in presence of RR and TTP benefits convincingly explained the results of the evaluated trials. Three of the four trials had roughly the same statistical power to detect 1-year OS differences, while the fourth trial was underpowered to detect realistic OS differences. The lack of OS advantage observed in the two oxaliplatin trials is therefore likely fortuitous, and due to lack of statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Although increase in OS remains the ultimate goal of many clinical trials, the choice of OS benefit as a mandatory requirement to register new compounds can lead to a serious underestimation of a drug's real efficacy.

Oral fluoropyrimidines in colorectal cancer: a door open to the future?

Since its first use 40 years ago, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has become an unquestionable component of colorectal cancer treatment. It is also now well established that infusional 5-FU administration, in combination with leucovorin, is associated with better tolerance and at least equal efficacy than bolus administration. However, requiring catheter and infusion pumps, infusional 5-FU administration is costly, rather inconvenient for patients and potentially associated with morbidity, initiating subsequent oral chemotherapy development. To address intravenous 5-FU related issues, oral fluoropyrimidines have been developed such as capecitabine, preferentially converted to 5-FU into tumour cells, and UFT, able of bypassing intestinal dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. We discuss in this article current oral fluoropyrimidines achievements in colorectal cancer management.

Second-line treatment in advanced colon cancer: are multiple phase II trials informative enough to guide clinical practice?

This article reviews the available data regarding the activity of second-line chemotherapy following 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan (CPT-11) or oxaliplatin (OXA) alone or in combination. Studies undertaken in this setting, published both as full papers and in abstract form, were critically analyzed. The main conclusion is that clinical research for second and subsequent lines of treatment in advanced colon cancer (ACC) clearly needs to be optimized. A large number of small, non-randomized phase II trials have been reported without definitive conclusions. Efficient conduct of a limited number of high-quality randomized phase II trials with validation of promising regimens via phase III studies seems a preferable approach. This would not only accelerate the evaluation of new therapeutic options, but also, and more importantly, limit the number of patients receiving suboptimal treatments. The responsibility of this indispensable and urgent task lies with all researchers in this field and their partners in the pharmaceutical industry. One means to implement this approach is through strict selection of studies to be both presented and published, encouraging the spread of information provided by statistically well-designed and well-conducted trials that will eventually lead to the definition of the best standard of care for ACC patients. The conduct of repetitive phase II trials that test minor variations in dose and schedule, while commonplace, does little to advance the field.

Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: what has been learnt?

Accurate assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is essential to improve our understanding of how cancer and chemotherapy influence patients' life and to adapt treatment strategies. Specific questionnaires have descriptive and predictive value and can be used to evaluate new therapies. Results from HRQoL assessments in randomised trials help patients and physicians to choose between treatment options. More than half of the patients treated with palliative chemotherapy have an improvement or at least a preservation of their HRQoL. However, several trials have found small differences in HRQoL between treatment groups. This may be due to the insufficient sensitivity of tools, low numbers of patients or missing data. An international consensus on the methods of measurement of HRQoL in oncology is warranted to enhance compliance, to better interpret results and to optimise the publication of precise HRQoL data.

High-dose 5-fluorouracil plus low dose methotrexate plus or minus low-dose PALA in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised phase II-III trial of the EORTC Gastrointestinal Group.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid (PALA) can enhance the activity of low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) modulated infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. 198 patients were randomised either to (i) 5-FU 60 mg/kg as a continuous infusion over 48 h, to be given weekly four times and thereafter every 2 weeks, with methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) administered just before 5-FU (control regimen) or to (ii) PALA 250 mg/m(2) as a 15 min infusion administered 24 h before 5-FU and methotrexate which was given as described in the control regimen. The response rate was 13% in the patients randomised to the control arm and 7% in the patients randomised to the experimental arm. If stabilisation of the disease was also considered as a positive response, these figures become 54 and 46%, respectively. All these differences did not reach statistical significance. The median durations of progression-free survival (PFS) in the two treatment groups were not significantly different. The median duration of survival was 13.1 months in the control arm and 11.9 months in the experimental arm (P=0.31). No benefit was obtained by adding PALA to LD-MTX+infusional FU. Taking into account data from US trials, the modulating effect of PALA, although 'promising' in phase II, could not be substantiated in randomised studies.

Clinical phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S 16020, a new olivacine derivative: report on three infusion schedules.

S 16020, a new 9-OH olivacine derivative, is a novel topoisomerase II inhibitor with activity in cell lines presenting the classical multidrug resistance phenotype. This report summarizes, in addition to pharmacokinetic data, the whole phase I clinical experience of S 16020 using three different infusion schedules. Asthenia and skin toxicity were the main side effects. In an attempt to understand the skin toxicity mechanism, experiments in animals were performed, the results of which are reported. S 16020 showed rapid tumor necrotizing activity in some patients, with soft tissue metastases of epidermoïd tumors and pain at the tumor site. To document the side effects of S 16020 and tumor site reactions (pain, edema, inflammatory signs), inflammatory parameters and some cytokines were measured. In our patients there was no hemolysis and no detection of anti-S 16020 antibodies, confirming the absence of immunogenicity of the compound. Based on the overall data of the three infusion schedules of S 16020, the dose of 100 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 3 weeks was selected for phase II studies.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the oral farnesyltransferase inhibitor SCH 66336 given once daily to patients with advanced solid tumours.

A single-agent dose-escalating phase I study on the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 was performed to determine the safety profile and recommended dose for phase II studies. Plasma pharmacokinetics were determined as well as the SCH 66336-induced inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase in vivo. SCH 66336 was given orally once daily (OD) without interruption to patients with histologically-confirmed solid tumours. Routine antiemetics were not prescribed. 12 patients were enrolled into the study. Dose levels studied were 300 mg (6 patients) and 400 mg (6 patients) OD. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 and 15. Although at 400 mg OD only 1 patient had a grade 3 diarrhoea, 3 out of 6 patients interrupted treatment early due to a combination of various grade 1-3 toxicities (diarrhoea, uremiacreatinine, asthenia, vomiting, weight loss) indicating that this dose was not tolerable for a prolonged period of time. At 300 mg OD, the same pattern of toxicities was observed, but all were grade 1-2. Therefore, this dose can be recommended for phase II studies. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that peak plasma concentrations as well as the AUCs were dose-related, with increased parameters at day 15 compared with day 1, indicating some accumulation upon multiple dosing. Plasma half-life ranged from 5 to 9 h and appeared to increase with increasing dose. Steady state plasma concentrations were attained by day 14. A large volume of distribution at steady state suggested extensive distribution outside the plasma compartment. There is evidence of inhibition of protein prenylation in some patients after OD oral administration of SCH 66336. SCH 66336 can be safely administered using a continuous oral OD dosing regimen. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this regimen is 300 mg OD.

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.