A neuropsychological profile for high-grade primary central nervous system neuroendocrine tumor (CNS NET): a single-case study.

Objective: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are neoplasms that primarily occur in the lungs, appendix, small intestine, pancreas, and rectum, and typically metastasize to the liver or lymph nodes. However, in rare cases NETs can originate in the central nervous system (CNS). Understanding primary CNS NET neuropsychological manifestations aids in recommendations for neurocognitive follow-up, treatment and lifestyle planning, and future research. Method: Given the dearth of neuropsychological research for CNS NETs, we present a case seen in a 43-year-old woman. Results: Initial and 8-month follow-up neuropsychological evaluations of the patient revealed a Major Neurocognitive Disorder where the pattern of findings was consistent with tumor location and additional treatment-related factors. Reliable change indices at her re-evaluation revealed declines in verbal and visual memory, with statistical, yet not clinical, improvements in different domains. Follow-up monitoring of comprehensive care continued to occur after neuropsychological evaluations. Conclusions: This case study assists in the characterization of initial and follow-up neuropsychological presentation of a primary CNS NET, where evaluations helped inform clinical care and functional recommendations. This case demonstrates the importance for neuropsychologists to have awareness of various conditions, even rare conditions, which can inform a systematic approach to research and clinical care with neuro-oncological populations.

Comparison of minimally invasive to standard temporal lobectomy approaches to epilepsy surgery: Seizure relief and visual confrontation naming outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to systematically examine three different surgical approaches in treating left medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) (viz., subtemporal selective amygdalohippocampectomy [subSAH], stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy [SLAH], and anterior temporal lobectomy [ATL]), to determine which procedures are most favorable in terms of visual confrontation naming and seizure relief outcome. This was a retrospective study of 33 adults with intractable mTLE who underwent left temporal lobe surgery at three different epilepsy surgery centers who also underwent pre-, and at least 6-month post-surgical neuropsychological testing. Measures included the Boston Naming Test (BNT) and the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale. Fisher's exact tests revealed a statistically significant decline in naming in ATLs compared to SLAHs, but no other significant group differences. 82% of ATL and 36% of subSAH patients showed a significant naming decline whereas no SLAH patient (0%) had a significant naming decline. Significant postoperative naming improvement was seen in 36% of SLAH patients in contrast to 9% improvement in subSAH patients and 0% improvement in ATLs. Finally, there were no statistically significant differences between surgical approaches with regard to seizure freedom outcome, although there was a trend towards better seizure relief outcome among the ATL patients. Results support a possible benefit of SLAH in preserving visual confrontation naming after left TLE surgery. While result interpretation is limited by the small sample size, findings suggest outcome is likely to differ by surgical approach, and that further research on cognitive and seizure freedom outcomes is needed to inform patients and providers of potential risks and benefits with each.

Psychiatric changes after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy for medial temporal lobe epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) that has comparable rates of seizure freedom to traditional open resective TLE surgery. The objective of this study was to determine psychiatric outcome (i.e., depression and anxiety changes, psychosis) after SLAH, to explore possible contributory factors to these changes, and to determine the prevalence of de novo psychopathology. METHODS: We explored mood and anxiety in 37 adult patients with TLE undergoing SLAH using the Beck psychiatric symptoms scales (i.e., Beck Depression Inventory-II [BDI-II] and Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) preoperatively and 6 months following surgery. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of worse depression or anxiety symptoms following SLAH. The prevalence of de novo psychopathology following SLAH was also determined. RESULTS: We found a significant decrease in BDI-II (mean decline from 16.3 to 10.9, p = 0.004) and BAI (mean decline from 13.3 to 9.0, p = 0.045) scores following SLAH at the group level. While the rate of resolution of depression (from 62% to 49%) did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.13, McNemar's), the rate of resolution of anxiety (from 57% to 35%) was statistically significant (p = 0.03, McNemar's). The de novo rate of psychopathology (i.e., new onset depression or anxiety) following SLAH was 1 of 7 (14%). Using a metric of meaningful change rather than complete symptom resolution, 16 of 37 (43%) patients experienced improvement in depression and 6 of 37 (16%) experienced worsening. For anxiety, 14 of 37 (38%) experienced meaningful improvement and 8 of 37 (22%) experienced worsening. Baseline performance on the Beck Scales was the only factor contributing to outcome status. DISCUSSION: In one of the first studies to evaluate psychiatric outcomes after SLAH, we found promising overall trends toward stability or significant improvement in symptom burden at the group level for both depression and anxiety. There was also a significant improvement in clinical anxiety, though the decrease in clinical depression was not significant, likely owing to the limitations of sample size. SLAH may improve overall psychiatric symptoms, similarly to traditional resective TLE surgery, but de novo psychopathology and postoperative psychiatric morbidity remain significant issues, and larger samples are necessary to determine causal contributory factors.

Patients with Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease Benefit from Deep Brain Stimulation: A Case-Control Study.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is generally contraindicated in persons with dementia but it is frequently performed in people with mild cognitive impairment or normal cognition, and current clinical guidelines are primarily based on these cohorts. Objectives: To determine if moderately cognitive impaired individuals including those with mild dementia could meaningfully benefit from DBS in terms of motor and non-motor outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, we identified a cohort of 40 patients with PD who exhibited moderate (two or more standard deviations below normative scores) cognitive impairment (CI) during presurgical workup and compared their 1-year clinical outcomes to a cohort of 40 matched patients with normal cognition (NC). The surgery targeted subthalamus, pallidus or motor thalamus, in a unilateral, bilateral or staged approach. Results: At preoperative baseline, the CI cohort had higher Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscores, but similar levodopa responsiveness compared to the NC cohort. The NC and CI cohorts demonstrated comparable degrees of postoperative improvement in the OFF-medication motor scores, motor fluctuations, and medication reduction. There was no difference in adverse event rates between the two cohorts. Outcomes in the CI cohort did not depend on the target, surgical staging, or impaired cognitive domain. Conclusions: Moderately cognitively impaired patients with PD can experience meaningful motor benefit and medication reduction with DBS.

Cognitive and Emotional Mapping With SEEG.

Mapping of cortical functions is critical for the best clinical care of patients undergoing epilepsy and tumor surgery, but also to better understand human brain function and connectivity. The purpose of this review is to explore existing and potential means of mapping higher cortical functions, including stimulation mapping, passive mapping, and connectivity analyses. We examine the history of mapping, differences between subdural and stereoelectroencephalographic approaches, and some risks and safety aspects, before examining different types of functional mapping. Much of this review explores the prospects for new mapping approaches to better understand other components of language, memory, spatial skills, executive, and socio-emotional functions. We also touch on brain-machine interfaces, philosophical aspects of aligning tasks to brain circuits, and the study of consciousness. We end by discussing multi-modal testing and virtual reality approaches to mapping higher cortical functions.

A Neuropsychological Profile for Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis: A Single-Case Study.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) belongs to a heterogeneous group of neurological disorders known as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias. Low awareness of CTX can result in misdiagnoses in the differential diagnostic process and may limit one's ability to offer suitable recommendations. While neurodegeneration is a recognized manifestation of CTX, there is scant literature to characterize the nature of cortical symptoms and even less detailing of its associated neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations. METHOD: Based on the lack of representation of CTX in neuropsychological literature, we sought to present a case seen in a 39-year-old patient within our own clinic. RESULTS: Evaluation of the patient's neurocognitive functioning revealed global impairment consistent with a CTX diagnosis and neuroimaging findings noting significant cerebellar involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychologists are increasingly called upon to make treatment recommendations and provide information that may be helpful in differential diagnosis as part of multidisciplinary teams. Referrals from neurology are common, and it is important for neuropsychologists to be aware of diseases that affect the central nervous system; CTX is one such example. The goal of this case study is to build awareness of this condition and increase interest in a more systematic approach to research and clinical care of this population.

Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical sequelae of chronic non-malignant pain and opioid analgesia.

BACKGROUND: The pervasive disease of chronic pain is a common challenge for the clinical rehabilitation professional. Concurrent with physical and emotional symptoms, pain-related cognitive impairment has been reported. Although opioid analgesics are frequently prescribed, concern exists that opioids possess adverse cognitive effects of their own. OBJECTIVES: To review the neuropsychological and neuroanatomical sequelae of chronic non-malignant pain and opioid therapy, to clarify roles and benefits of neuropsychological assessment in a chronic pain population, and to provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research. METHODS: This non-systematic review sought to provide a comprehensive synthesis of relevant neurobiology, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, and rehabilitation research literatures. We included citations from seminal and current texts as well as relevant original and review articles from 1980-2012 in PubMed and PubMedCentral online research databases. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: To date, evidence from opioid studies suggests only mild deficits in specific cognitive domains (e.g., memory, attention/concentration) and only under specific conditions (e.g., dose escalations). Additionally, neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence suggests that pain itself results in cognitive sequelae. Methodological improvements in future research will allow for better delineation of the contributing effects of pain and opioids, with an overall goal of improving evidence-based clinical treatment recommendations.