Recurrent Focal myositis: a rare inflammatory myopathy.

Focal myositis is an acute and localized muscle inflammation of unknown aetiology. The clinical diagnosis is often difficult to obtain, since it can be confused with infections, vascular thrombosis or muscle tumours such as sarcomas. This leads to a significant delay in the diagnosis, resulting in the administration of inappropriate and potentially harmful treatments.  We report here a case of recurrent focal myositis in a woman where the diagnosis was only obtained after 6 years, despite multiple hospital admissions. This case reinforces the importance of clinical knowledge and experience to tackle challenging medical scenarios.

Biologic therapy and pregnancy. A systematic literature review.

AIM: To review available data regarding the safety of biological therapies during pregnancy, focusing on agents used in rheumatology. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out to identify all studies with human data on fetal and/or child outcomes following exposure to biologic agents during pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 65 publications out of 745 identified references were included in the review. CONCLUSIONS: Experience with pregnancy exposure to anti-TNF agents has been slowly accumulating. Although the numbers are small and with few controlled studies the reviewed data suggest that the overall risk of TNF antagonists is relatively low and benefits may outweigh the risks of drug exposure to the fetus. Information on other biologic agents is still very limited. Large controlled studies with longer follow-up periods will be necessary before firm conclusions about the safety of biologics du-ring conception and pregnancy can be drawn.

[Portuguese recommendations on "How to diagnose, monitor, and treat undifferentiated peripheral arthritis": systematic review of the literature and the experts' opinion]. / Recomendações portuguesas "Como diagnosticar, monitorizar e tratar a artrite periférica indiferenciada": revisão sistematizada da literatura e opinião de peritos.

OBJECTIVE: The 3E (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative is a multinational effort of rheumatologists aimed at developing evidence-based recommendations addressing specific questions relevant to clinical practice. The objective of the Portuguese contribution for the 3E Initiative was to develop evidence-based recommendations on how to investigate, follow-up and treat undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis (UPIA) adapted to local reality and develop additional recommendations considered relevant in the national context. METHODS: An international scientific committee from 17 countries selected a set of questions concerning the diagnosis and monitoring of UPIA using a Delphi procedure. Evidence-based answers to each question were sought by a systematic literature search, performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ACR/EULAR 2007-2009 meeting abstracts. Relevant articles were reviewed for quality assessment, data extraction and synthesis. In a national meeting, a panel of 63 Portuguese rheumatologists used the evidence which was gathered to develop recommendations, and filled the gaps in the evidence with their expert opinion. Finally, national recommendations were formulated and agreement among the participants was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 54754 references were identified, of which 267 were systematically reviewed. Thirteen national key recommendations about the investigation, follow-up and treatment of UPIA were formulated. One recommendation addressed differential diagnosis and investigations prior to the established operational diagnosis of UPIA, eight recommendations were related to the diagnostic and prognostic value of clinical and laboratory assessments in established UPIA (history and physical examination, acute phase reactants, serologies, autoantibodies, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, genetic markers and synovial biopsy), one recommendation highlighted predictors of persistence (chronicity), one addressed monitoring of clinical disease activity in UPIA, one aimed to find an useful method/score to predict a definitive diagnosis and the last one was related to treatment. CONCLUSION: Portuguese evidence-based recommendations for the management of UPIA in everyday practice were developed. Their dissemination and implementation in daily clinical practice should help to improve practice uniformity and optimize the management of UPIA patients.