Kidney stones in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Lithiasis in renal graft recipients might be a dangerous condition with a potential risk of organ function impairment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was conducted through February 2023. The primary objective was to assess the incidence of lithiasis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. The secondary objective was to assess the timing of stone formation, localization and composition of stones, possible treatment options, and the incidence of graft loss. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 41 non-randomized studies comprising 699 patients met our inclusion criteria. The age at lithiasis diagnosis ranged between 29-53 years. Incidence of urolithiasis ranged from 0.1-6.3%, usually diagnosed after 12 months from KT. Most of the stones were diagnosed in the calyces or in the pelvis. Calcium oxalate composition was the most frequent. Different treatment strategies were considered, namely active surveillance, ureteroscopy, percutaneous/combined approach, or open surgery. 15.73% of patients were submitted to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), while 26.75% underwent endoscopic lithotripsy or stone extraction. 18.03% of patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy whilst 3.14% to a combined approach. Surgical lithotomy was performed in 5.01% of the cases. Global stone-free rate was around 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Lithiasis in kidney transplant is a rare condition usually diagnosed after one year after surgery and mostly located in the calyces and renal pelvis, more frequently of calcium oxalate composition. Each of the active treatments is associated with good results in terms of stone-free rate, thus the surgical technique should be chosen according to the patient's characteristics and surgeon preferences.

[Bladder augmentation in the era of botulinum toxin: Indications and results]. / L'entérocystoplastie d'agrandissement à l'ère de la toxine botulique : indications et résultats.

AIM: To determine the surgical indication and results of bladder augmentation (BA) during the last decade in a neurourology center in the era of intradetrusor botulinum toxin injection. MATERIAL: We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with BA between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2022 in our centre. We collected pre-operative demographic, clinical, and urodynamic data, BA indication, and associated procedures. We analyzed early and late complications as well as continence and postoperative voiding mode in patients with first BA in a neurological pathology context. RESULTS: We performed 77 BA over the study period. The main indication was neurogenic overactive bladder, which was secondarily resistant to botulinum toxin. The main associated procedure was continent cutaneous diversion (n=31, 57.4%). Among patients who had a first BA for neurogenic bladder, 34 patients had early complications (50%) including 12 patients with≥Clavien 3 complications (17.6%). After a median follow-up of 33 [14; 55] months, 23 patients had late complications (33.8%) and 59 patients had complete continence (86.8%). CONCLUSION: In the era of botulinum toxin, the main indication of BA is the secondary failure of botulinum toxin for overactive neurogenic bladder. The BA provided continence in 86.8% of patients. It remains however an intervention with a significant rate of severe complications whose indication must be discussed by a multidisciplinary team. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Weak.

How to manage renal masses in kidney transplant recipients? A collaborative review by the EAU-YAU kidney transplantation and renal cancer working groups.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have a four-times higher risk of renal malignancies compared to general population. As these patients frequently harbor bilateral or multifocal tumors, the management of renal masses is still under debate. OBJECTIVE: To explore the current management of the native kidney masses in KT patients. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: We performed a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed database. A number of 34 studies were included in the present review. SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE: In frail patients with renal masses below 3 cm, active surveillance is a feasible alternative. Nephron-sparing surgery is not justified for masses in the native kidney. Radical nephrectomy is the standard treatment for post-transplant renal tumors of the native kidneys in KT recipients, with laparoscopic techniques leading to significantly less perioperative complication rates as compared to the open approach. Concurrent bilateral native nephrectomy at the time of transplantation can be considered in patients with renal mass and polycystic kidney disease, especially if no residual urinary output is present. Patients with localized disease and successful radical nephrectomy do not require immunosuppression adjustment. In metastatic cases, mTOR agents can ensure efficient antitumoral response, while maintaining proper immunosuppression in order to protect the graft. CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant renal cancer of the native kidneys is a frequent occurrence. Radical nephrectomy is most frequently performed for localized renal masses. A standardized and widely-approved screening strategy for malignancies of native renal units is yet to be implemented.

Open versus robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: A systematic review by the European Association of Urology (EAU) - Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Kidney Transplant Working Group.

INTRODUCTION: In the last 20 years, robotic assisted procedures were evaluated in the field of kidney transplantation to provide a mini-invasive approach for this particularly fragile population. As a relatively new issue, few studies compared open kidney transplantation (OKT) and robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT), mostly in small cohorts. To improve current knowledge, we wanted here to gather comparative data of OKT vs RAKT in a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all studies reporting post-operative outcomes of RAKT versus OKT. RESULTS: A total of 2136 patients in 13 studies were included. Median recipient age was 42.6 years (OKT: 43.5 years and RAKT: 40.3 years). Median preemptive kidney transplantation rate was 27.1 % (OKT: 23.3 % and RAKT: 33.2 %). Median total operative time and rewarming were respectively: 235 and 49 min in OKT population; 250 and 60 min in RAKT population. Post-operative complications rates were: 26.2 % in OKT population and 17.8 % in RAKT population. Delayed graft function rates were: 4.9 % in OKT population and 2.3 in RAKT population. Mid-term functional outcomes, patient and graft survival were similar in OKT and RAKT population. CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed that RAKT may be associated with a lower incidence of delayed graft function and post-operative surgical complications and similar mid-term functional outcomes, patient and graft survival, compared to OKT for end-stage renal disease patients.

Saline bladder infusion vs standard catheter removal in patients with acute urinary retention related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: The BLAPERF Study.

PURPOSE: Bladder infusion, which involves filling the bladder with saline prior to catheter removal, has been associated with reduced time-to-discharge and increased success rates in trials without catheter (TWOCs) in perioperative setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of this protocol in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study comparing bladder infusion with at least 150mL of warm saline vs. standard catheter removal during TWOC in patients with BPH-related AUR between January and December 2021. The primary outcome was time to discharge. Secondary outcomes included: TWOC success, and early recurrence of urinary retention defined as recurrence within three months of successful TWOC. RESULTS: A total of 75 men were included: 35 in the bladder infusion protocol and 40 in the standard protocol. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Overall, 35 patients (46.7%) had a successful TWOC without statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.10). Bladder infusion protocol was associated with a shorter median time to discharge (200 vs. 240min, P=0.003). However, patients in the bladder infusion group were associated with a higher risk of early recurrence of urinary retention (30% vs. 0%, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with BPH-related AUR, the saline bladder infusion method reduced time-to-discharge with similar TWOC success rates. Larger studies are needed to properly analyze the risk of early recurrence of urinary retention before any clinical application. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

[Evaluation of the results and feasibility of vibration, diuresis and inversion therapy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones]. / Évaluation des résultats et de la faisabilité de la posturothérapie (hydratation, inversion, vibration) dans le traitement des calculs des voies urinaires supérieures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and predictive factors of therapeutic success of Vibration, Diuresis and Inversion (VDI) therapy for the removal of upper urinary tract stones. METHODS: It is a retrospective, single-center study at the CHU - La Conception, Marseille, France including all patients treated with VDI from 2013 to 2018. VDI was indicated for stones <6mm in first-line treatment or for residual fragments <6mm after ureteroscopy, PCNL, microPCNL. The protocol included 4 sessions in outpatient care from 2013 to 2015 then 6 sessions from 2015 to 2018 and a final radiological evaluation. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients or 489 sessions are reported: median age was 55 years [14-84], median BMI 25kg/m2 [15-37], average cumulative size of kidney stones 3mm ±4. VDI was performed after flexible ureteroscopy (62%), SWL (20%), percutaneous treatment (9%) or as a first-line treatment (9%). Compliance was 87 %. The median VAS during the session was 0[0-8]. The incidence of post-session renal colic was 4% (all Clavien I). The postoperative fragment-free and microfragment rates were respectively 39% and 21%, i.e. an overall success of 60% for kidney stones, and 43% and 21%, i.e. an overall success of 64% for lower pole kidney stones. CONCLUSION: VDI is a simple, non invasive and well tolerated technique for the elimination of small renal lithiasis after SWL, ureteroscopy, PCNL or as a first-line treatment.

Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study).

We compared the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using contemporary data to respond to unmet clinical needs. Data from patients included in the registry who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2017 within 20 centres of the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer UroCCR were collected (NCT03293563). Statistical methods included adjusted multivariable analyses. Rates of peri- and post-operative transfusion, and of surgical revision, were lower in the RPN (n = 1434) than the OPN (n = 571) group (2.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0012; 3.8% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001; 2.4% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariable analyses, RPN was independently associated with fewer early post-operative complications than OPN (overall: odds-ratio [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.48 [0.35-0.66]; severe: 0.29 [0.16-0.54], p < 0.0001 for both) and shorter hospital stays (34% [30%; 37%], p < 0.0001). RPN was also a significantly associated with a decresedrisk of post-operative acute renal failure, and new-onset chronic kidney disease at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. There were no between-group differences in oncological outcomes. In comparison with OPN, RPN was associated with improved peri- and post-operative morbidity, better functional outcomes, and shorter hospital stays. Our results support the use of RPN, even for large and complex tumours.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: management of kidney cancer.

AIM: To update the recommendations for the management of kidney cancers. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 2015 to 2022. The most relevant articles on the diagnosis, classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment and follow-up of kidney cancer were selected and incorporated into the recommendations. Therefore, the recommendations were updated while specifying the level of evidence (high or low). RESULTS: The gold standard for the diagnosis and evaluation of kidney cancer is contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT. MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are indicated in special cases. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended in situations where the results will influence the therapeutic decision. Renal tumours should be classified according to the pTNM 2017 classification, the WHO 2022 classification and the ISUP nucleolar grade. Metastatic kidney cancer should be classified according to the IMDC criteria. Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for T1a tumours and can be performed by an open approach, by laparoscopy or by robot-guidance. Active surveillance of tumours less than 2cm in size can be considered regardless of the patient's age. Ablative therapies and active surveillance are options in elderly patients with comorbidity. T1b tumours should be treated by partial or radical nephrectomy depending on the complexity of the tumour. Radical nephrectomy is the first-line treatment for locally advanced cancers. Adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab should be considered in patients at intermediate and high risk for recurrence after nephrectomy. In metastatic patients: Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to oligometastatic patients in combination with local treatment of metastases if this can be complete and delayed cytoreductive nephrectomy can be proposed for patients with a complete response or a significant partial response. Medical treatment should be proposed as first-line therapy for patients with a poor or intermediate prognosis. Surgical or local treatment of metastases can be proposed in case of single or oligo-metastases. The recommended first-line drugs for metastatic patients with clear cell renal carcinoma are the combinations axitinib/pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipililumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab. Cabozantinib is the recommended first-line treatment for patients with metastatic papillary carcinoma. Cystic tumours should be classified according to the Bosniak classification. Surgical removal should be proposed as a priority for Bosniak III and IV lesions. It is recommended that patient monitoring be adapted to the aggressiveness of the tumour. CONCLUSION: These updated recommendations are a reference that will allow French and French-speaking practitioners to improve kidney cancer management.

A multi-institutional experience of Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MicroPERC) for renal stones: Results and feasibility of day case surgery.

PURPOSE: To report the multi-institutional outcomes of Microperc for nephrolithiasis and to assess its feasibility in outpatient care. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all adult patients who underwent Microperc for renal stones at three centres between May 2015 and March 2021. Interventions were performed by three Surgeons. One Surgeon adopted a "one-way" strategy and all Microperc were performed on an outpatient basis, while the other two Surgeons provided inpatient monitoring for at least one day after surgery. The primary endpoint was same-day discharge after Microperc without emergency department visits or unplanned readmission within 30 days of the procedure. The secondary endpoints included treatment outcomes and the 30-day complication rate. RESULTS: Out of 72 consecutive patients included, 32 patients (44.4%) had same-day discharge. Median Charlson score (1 [0-2]) and cumulative stone size (15 [12-20] mm) were comparable between both groups. At one month post procedure, 32 patients (44.4%) were stone free and 23 patients (32%) had residual micro-fragments<3mm, conferring an overall success rate of 76.4% (inpatient Microperc group: 77.5% vs outpatient Microperc group: 75%, P=1). Analysis of the 30-day complication rate showed similar results between the two groups (Clavien I-II: 18.1%, Clavien≥III: 4.1%). After outpatient care, the rate of immediate admission and unplanned readmission was 12.5% (n=4), mainly due to urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional study, we report that outpatient Microperc is feasible in selected patients with no significant impact on postoperative outcome.

Comparison of water vapor thermal therapy and prostate artery embolization for fragile patients with indwelling urinary catheters: Preliminary results from a multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE: To report our preliminary experience with water vapor thermal therapy with the Rezum™ System and Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for treatment of medically refractory, complete urinary retention to achieve successful cessation of catheter dependency in frail-patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional study was conducted including all patients who underwent Rezum™ procedure and PAE between October 2017 and June 2020. The included population focused on frail-patients unsuitable for conventional surgery with complete urinary retention. Rezum™ patients were identified and matched (1:1) with patients who underwent PAE. The matching criteria were age, Charlson score, prostate volume and duration of follow-up. The primary outcome was catheter-free survival, defined as spontaneous voiding and release from catheter dependence. RESULTS: Eleven patients from the Rezum™ group were matched to 11 embolized patients. PAE and Rezum™ patients were comparable in age (median: 77 vs. 75 years), Charlson score (median: 6 vs. 6) and prostate volume (74 vs. 60 cc). Procedures were significantly longer in the PAE group compared to the Rezum™ procedures (median: 148 vs. 8min, P<0.001). After a median follow-up of 12 months, spontaneous voiding was conserved in all cases (100%) after the Rezum™ procedure and in 5 cases (45.4%) after PAE (P=0.01). In catheter-free patients, the rate of benign prostatic hyperplasia medication use after procedure was 40% for PAE and 18.2% for Rezum™ patients (P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience for treatment of complete urinary retention in frail-patients shows the feasibility of PAE and Rezum™ to restore spontaneous urination without being associated with the occurrence of major complications. Early data suggests that Rezum™ may provide superior results in terms of cessation of catheter dependence. Future studies are needed to definitively assess which treatment would be best suited for each patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

History of urological malignancies before kidney transplantation, oncological outcome on the long term.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to report the oncological outcomes of ESRD patients with histories of urological malignancies who were subsequently submitted to kidney transplantation (KT). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study lead in the Puigvert Foundation (Barcelona) registry of 1,200 KT performed from 1988 to 2018. Eighty-five urological malignancies that were treated before KT in 81 patients were identified: 15 (18%) prostate cancers, 49 (58%) RCC, 19 (22%) urothelial carcinomas and 2 (2%) testicular cancers. Baseline characteristics, cancer staging, treatment and follow-up were registered as well as the chronology of the start of dialysis, inscription on the waiting list and kidney transplantation. Endpoints included were cancer recurrence, metastatic progression, cancer-specific death and overall survival. RESULTS: In a median follow-up of 13.1 years (2.2-32), 16/85 (19%) cancer recurrences were reported, with 3 (4%) who progressed to metastasis and died of cancer. Median overall survival after cancer treatment was 25.3 years and cancer-specific survival was 95% at 25 years. Median time from cancer treatment to kidney transplantation was 4.8 years: 3.7 years in prostate cancer, 3.9 years in RCC and 8.8 years in bladder cancer. The median time from start of dialysis to kidney transplantation was 1.8 years in patients with histories of urological malignancy versus 0.5 year in the total cohort of 1,200 renal transplanted over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Well-selected patients with histories of urological malignancies greatly benefit from kidney transplantation with infrequent and late cancer recurrence. Waiting time could be optimized in low-risk prostate cancer and RCC, but more robust data are needed.

[Renal Parenchyma Trauma and General Trauma Recommandations]. / Traumatismes du parenchyme rénal et recommandations générales de traumatologie.

INTRODUCTION: Among trauma emergencies, kidney damage is uncommon. The urologist is frequently on the second line in the management of patients with multiple traumatic lesions. Knowledge of treatment is necessary to be able to integrate the different teams involved in an approach that is both vital in the context of damage control and functional with a concern for parenchymal preservation. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out using the Medline database in order to identify the most relevant articles in English and French. RESULTS: Kidney trauma occurs either by direct shock or by a deceleration mechanism. They are classified by severity according to the AAST classification. Management is mostly conservative by avoiding surgery and controlling bleeding by arterial embolization. Surveillance checks for complications occurrence in high-grade trauma. Traumatic dissection of the renal artery, with a poor functional prognosis requires a short delay before treatment. CONCLUSION: The prognosis for trauma to the kidney, regardless of the grade, is currently good, with improvements of effective resuscitation and embolization in the event of bleeding.

[Management of complications of upper urinary tract trauma (kidney and ureter)]. / Prise en charge des complications des traumatismes du haut appareil urinaire (rein et uretère).

INTRODUCTION: Complications of kidney and ureter trauma are directly in the field of the urologist. If they have a second place in the vital prognosis, a good knowledge of these pathologies is essential. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out using the Medline database in order to identify the most relevant articles in English and French. RESULTS: Urinary extravasation in the context of blunt kidney trauma has a good functional prognosis. Impaired function of the traumatized kidney is linked to vascular damage associated with grade IV and V. Non operative management is the treatment of choice with deferred management in the event of septic or painful deterioration. The lesions of the ureter are predominantly iatrogenic. While incomplete lesions can be treated endoscopically, complete lesions (stenosis or wound) require surgery. The most frequent lesions, in the distal ureter are easily treated by ureterovesical reimplantation. Large losses of substance may require ileal replacement. CONCLUSION: Blunt kidney trauma causing urinary extravasation, with an excellent prognosis, are treated conservatively. Conversely, lesions of the ureter require in the majority of cases an intervention to restore continuity.

[The urologist confronted with a mass killing]. / Le chirurgien urologue face à une tuerie de masse.

INTRODUCTION: Following the Paris attacks in 2015, the French hospital system has had to organize itself in mass casualties of serious injuries, especially hemorrhagic shock. Recent experience shows that the first flow of casualties is spontaneously directed to the structure closest to the events, whether it is suitable or not. Any surgeon can face such a crisis regardless of their practice structure, because terrorist attacks are unpredictable. The urologist must anticipate the responsibilities that they might be forced to shoulder in such a situation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A systematic literature review based on PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar was conducted between January 2000 and June 2021. RESULTS: In addition to a coordinator role, reserved for the most experienced, his visceral surgical expertise would allow a urologist to apply damage control (DC) at each stage. We describe here the principles of DC, in particular the DC laparotomy including its strategy concerning genitourinary lesions. DISCUSSION: Whatever his role (sorter, organizer, technician) in the management of a mass casualties of hemorrhagic injuries, an urologist has to know the principles of DC. A damage control laparotomy (stage 1 of DC) requires the urologist surgeon to never seek to perform a primary reconstruction procedure but to favor speed and efficiency (both on the hemostatic and urostatic side) to lead the injured patient stabilized to faster in intensive care unit (stage 2). Revision surgery called "definitive surgical management" (stage 3) will be performed anyway at the end of this period.

[Renal colic: How to calm and optimize the stone expulsion? Which treatment for pregnant women and children?] / Colique néphrétique : comment calmer et optimiser l'expulsion ? Quelle prise en charge chez la femme enceinte et l'enfant ?

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this narrative review was to report on the contemporary data of renal colic (RC) in terms of epidemiology and pressure on emergency structures and also to describe the latest therapeutic developments about uncomplicated RC, depending on the pediatric, adult and pregnancy population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A request to the health surveillance network for emergencies and deaths (SurSaUD®, Santé Publique France) revealed original data on the contemporary epidemiology of renal colic. A narrative synthesis of the articles (French, English) available on the Pubmed database was produced in June 2021. RESULTS: Renal colic represents 1.1% of the annual total of emergency room visits. The mean age at admission was 45 years and 62% of patients were men. NSAIDs and Paracetamol are the most effective analgesic treatments and should be given priority over opioids. Non-drug analgesic treatments by tactile stimulation probably have a place in the CN management, particularly in case of contraindications. Among the validated treatments, alphablockers allow better expulsion when the stone is located in the pelvic ureter and if its size is between 5 and 10mm in diameter. In pregnant women, the predominant problem is to confirm the diagnostic. If there is a strong suspicion, MRI or a low-dose CT scan is possible. Ureteroscopy is feasible in particular in the first part of pregnancy to avoid iterative ureteral catheter changes. The care for children is now based on that of adults. CONCLUSION: The renal colic care pathway in 2021 can benefit from various optimizations in the field of expulsion and analgesic treatments. Good knowledge of the specific situations in pregnant women and children allowing to improve the quality of care.

[Epidemiology of urological emergencies in France]. / Épidémiologie des urgences urologiques en France.

INTRODUCTION: To report the epidemiology and the care pathway for urological emergencies in France for the official report of the 115th Congres Francais d'Urologie. METHODS: We made a request to the Institut de Veille Sanitaire and its network Surveillance Sanitaire des Urgences et des Décès (SurSaUD®). Within this system, the OSCOUR® network (Organisation de la surveillance coordonnée des urgences) centralizes in real time the data of emergency visits from more than 720 emergency departments throughout the national territory (>93% of the national territory covered by the OSCOUR® network). For each emergency defined by its CIM-10 code, the following data were collected from 2014 to 2019: age, gender, length of stay and post-emergency status (hospitalization vs. return home). RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, urological emergencies represented on average 4.2% of all emergencies, with an average 591,080±66,782 passages/year including 25% that resulted in hospitalization. Infectious disease represented 35% of all urological emergencies. The 3 most common urologic emergencies were: renal colic, acute urine retention and hematuria for men; acute cystitis, pyelonephritis and renal colic for women. CONCLUSION: In an analysis of the OSCOUR® (Organisation de la surveillance coordonnée des urgences) registry, we determined the epidemiological profiles of the main urological emergencies with contemporary data.

[Single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: Technical and medico-economic aspects]. / Urétéroscope souple à usage unique versus réutilisable : aspects techniques et médico-économiques.

INTRODUCTION: Sate of the art on the indications, methods of implementation and medico-economic considerations of reusable flexible ureteroscopes (URSr) vs single use (URSuu)? METHOD: Review of the literature (Pubmed) on reusable and single-use ureteroscopes, as well as on the expertise of our center. A PubMed search and narrative review of the data was performed in July 2021. Only articles in French or English were selected. RESULTS: The URSr and URSuu have similar technical characteristics and are suitable for the exploration of the upper urinary excretory tract: treatment of stones of the kidney <2cm or of the ureter. The URSr is the most common type of ureteroscope. URSuu are newer and associated with many advantages: no sterilization procedure, immediate availability of equipment in the operating room, reduced waste production at the institutional level. A hybrid use of URSr and URSuu currently seems to be the best compromise from a medico-economic point of view for high volume centers. In the case of a smaller activity or a secondary site, URSuu are more advantageous and the reduction in purchasing costs should accentuate this benefit. CONCLUSION: URSr and URSuu are technically similar and allow identical treatment of upper urinary tract pathologies. Their complementary use optimizes the care of urology patients. The barrier to the exclusive use of URSuu remains their cost.

[Learning of self-catheterization: For whom? Why? How?] / Éducations aux auto-sondages : pour quels patients ? Pourquoi ? Comment ?

Since the 1970s, self-catheterization is the preferred method of urine drainage in case of urinary retention of neurological etiology (paraplegia, multiple sclerosis…) and non-neurological cause (benign prostatic hypertrophy, acontractile bladder of the elderly subject…). The main objective is to allow the physiological alternation of filling and complete emptying phases, in order to preserve the renal function and prevent urinary infections. The learning of self-catheterization is simple but requires a therapeutic education session with trained personnel, at home or in a specialized center. Cognitive disorders, poor vision, lack of dexterity or lack of knowledge of urogenital anatomy are the main limitations to their implementation. Their success depends on the frequency of catheterization (every 4h), which is performed in a clean but non-sterile manner. The benefit/risk ratio is largely in favor of using them to replace the indwelling probe whenever possible.