RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/epidemiologia , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidade , Aneurisma Ilíaco/patologia , Artéria Ilíaca/patologia , Artéria Ilíaca/cirurgia , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 65 years, for both the Netherlands and Norway. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life-years, net health benefits, lifetime costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for both screening and no screening for AAA. The best available evidence was retrieved from the literature and combined with primary data from the two countries separately, and analysed from a national perspective. A threshold willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 20,000 and 62,500 was used for data from the Netherlands and Norway respectively. RESULTS: The additional costs of the screening strategy compared with no screening were 421 (95 per cent confidence interval 33 to 806) per person in the Netherlands, and the additional life-years were 0·097 (-0·180 to 0·365), representing 4340 per life-year. For Norway, the values were 562 (59 to 1078), 0·057 (-0·135 to 0·253) life-years and 9860 per life-year respectively. In Norway the results were sensitive to a decrease in the prevalence of AAA in 65-year-old men to 1 per cent, or lower. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that AAA screening has a 70 per cent probability of being cost-effective in the Netherlands with a WTP threshold of 20,000, and 70 per cent in Norway with a threshold of 62,500. CONCLUSION: Using this model, screening for AAA in 65-year-old men would be highly cost-effective in both the Netherlands and Norway.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/prevenção & controle , Ruptura Aórtica/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/economia , Ruptura Aórtica/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Países Baixos , Noruega , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Ultrasound detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 65 years or older meets the WHO criteria for screening. Evidence shows a 50% reduction of AAA-related mortality and the costs per life-year gained are acceptable. AAA-screening is not only recommended in the USA and UK but in the Netherlands as well.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Fatores de Risco , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare long-term patency of Heparin-Bonded Dacron (HBD) and Human Umbilical Vein (HUV) vascular prostheses in above-knee femoro-popliteal bypass surgery. DESIGN: A prospective randomized multi-centre clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Femoro-popliteal bypasses were performed in 129 patients between 1996 and 2001. After randomization 70 patients received an HUV and 59 an HBD prosthesis. Patients were followed up every three months during the first postoperative year and yearly thereafter. The median follow-up was 60 months (range 3-96 months). Graft occlusions were detected by duplex scanning, angiography or surgical exploration. RESULTS: The cumulative primary patency rates were 79%, 66% and 58% at 1, 3 and 5 years postoperatively. Primary patency rates for HUV were 74%, 64% and 58% at 1, 3 and 5 years and 84%, 68% and 58% for HBD, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.745). Overall secondary patency rates were 82%, 72% and 61% at 1, 3 and 5 years postoperatively. The overall cumulative limb salvage at 5 years follow-up was 89% (CI 80%-91%) and was not dependent on graft type. Smoking (p=0.019), number of patent crural arteries (p=0.030) and previous cerebro-vascular events (p=0.030) were significant predictors of graft occlusion. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in long-term graft performance between HUV and HBD for above knee infrainguinal bypass.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Heparina , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/cirurgia , Polietilenotereftalatos , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Veias Umbilicais/transplante , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/fisiopatologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Salvamento de Membro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/mortalidade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/fisiopatologia , Artéria Poplítea/fisiopatologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To predict the costs and effects on life expectancy of an AAA screening programme. METHODS: A Markov model was designed to compare the effects of a single screening for a cohort of men 60-65 years with the current no screening strategy. The following health states were distinguished: no AAA, unknown small AAA, follow-up small AAA, unknown large AAA, repaired AAA, rejected large AAA and death. Transition rates between the health states were simulated using cycle times of one year. Transition probabilities were derived from literature and a previous feasibility study. Incremental costs per life year saved were calculated. Sensitivity analyses and discounting for future effects were performed. RESULTS: The expected individual AAA costs for non-screening and AAA screening were euro; 196 and euro; 530 respectively. A difference of 3.5 months life expectancy was found in favour of screening leading to euro; 1176/life-year gained. Costs increased as compliance fell. With a discount rate of 4% the costs are euro; 2021/life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS: One-time ultrasonographic screening for AAA in men aged 60-65 years appears to be cost-effective.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Expectativa de Vida , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/economia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ultrassonografia/economiaRESUMO
Mulliken and Glowacki's classification of peripheral blood- and lymph-vessel abnormalities is based on their clinical course and cellular characteristics, and is therefore clear to and readily usable by the practising physician. In order to make the diagnostic process more accessible, the Haemangiomas and Congenital Vascular Malformations Nijmegen working group has developed a system of diagnostic guidelines on the basis of this classification. The anamnesis should be directed at the following six distinguishing characteristics: presence of the anomaly at birth, growth, involution, change in volume, pain and outflow. The physical examination is directed at the following five characteristics: the possibility of emptying or pushing aside the anomaly, changes in volume during engorgement, murmur/'thrill'/pulsation, phleboliths, and hyper- or hypotrophy. If a diagnosis still cannot be made, then additional investigations may be carried out. Duplex scanning is usually sufficient for this purpose, after which the nature and extent of the malformation can be determined with MRI. On the basis of the results, the persons involved can be informed as to the prognosis of the malformation and a plan of treatment can be proposed.
Assuntos
Malformações Arteriovenosas/diagnóstico , Hemangioma/diagnóstico , Sistema Linfático/anormalidades , Malformações Arteriovenosas/classificação , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Hemangioma/classificação , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Linfangioma/classificação , Linfangioma/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The mortality rate associated with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains high. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of population screening for AAA. METHODS: In an area with a mixed rural and industrialized population of 60000 inhabitants, all 23 general practitioners (GPs) participated. The GPs selected from their patient lists men aged 60-80 years. Men whose condition was suitable for aortic surgery were invited for screening by a single postal letter. All men responding had aortic ultrasonography in or close to the GP surgery. Diagnosis of AAA was established when the aortic diameter was 30 mm or greater. Referral for surgery was advised for an aortic diameter of 50 mm or greater. RESULTS: Of 2914 invitations, 2419 men had ultrasonography, resulting in an attendance rate of 83.0 per cent. A total of 2416 aortic measurements were made; 196 aortic aneurysms were diagnosed (prevalence 8.1 per cent). In 40 men the aortic diameter was over 50 mm. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic screening for AAA is feasible in a primary care setting.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/patologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Saúde da População Rural , Ultrassonografia , Saúde da População UrbanaRESUMO
Bilateral acute lower limb ischaemia is rare. Usually the diagnosis is based on clinical findings. In four patients, three women aged 51, 48, and 72 and a man aged 64 years, bilateral acute ischaemia of the lower limbs was diagnosed, due to different causes: arterial cardiac myxoma embolism, arterial thrombosis probably due to paraneoplastic coagulopathy, aortic dissection, and arterial thrombosis due to cardiac insufficiency, respectively. The management of these conditions includes restoring the circulation as soon as possible. Reperfusion can be achieved by thromboembolectomy or thrombolysis. In patients with underlying atherosclerosis angiography is useful, but time loss must be avoided. The outcome in patients with bilateral ischaemia of the lower limbs depends on the preoperative ischaemia time and the cardiac situation. The mortality varies between 20 and 50%.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Isquemia/etiologia , Perna (Membro)/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndromes Paraneoplásicas/complicações , Reperfusão/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Calcâneo/lesões , Calcâneo/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Calcâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Feminino , Traumatismos do Pé/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , RadiografiaRESUMO
If organ donations concern not only the kidneys, but also the liver, pancreas and, sometimes, the heart and (or) lungs, several surgical removal teams, often from different (foreign) transplantation centres, may be involved. This has created organizatory problems resulting in loss of organs for transplantation. In the Nijmegen area since October 1994 a removal team has been active that in the regional donor hospital removes all abdominal organs from the donor on behalf of the various transplantation centres. This regional removal team performed 105 multi-organ explanations in the period from October 1994 to December 1997. The reports that came back from the transplantation centres that had received the organs showed that none of these organs had been lost for transplantation through organizatory problems or anatomical damage. Experiences of operating room staff involved were positive: it was especially the standard surgical techniques and the quiet in the operating room that were appreciated. Special removal teams may greatly improve the evolution of organ donation in the Netherlands.
Assuntos
Hospitais de Distrito/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Sobrevivência de Tecidos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Transplantes/economiaAssuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Ruptura Aórtica , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/etiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/prevenção & controle , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/terapia , Ruptura Aórtica/epidemiologia , Ruptura Aórtica/prevenção & controle , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To establish further insight into the relevance of intraoperative bacterial cultures of abdominal aortic aneurysm contents a study was performed of the rate of occurrence of prosthetic graft infection after aneurysm repair. METHODS: Bacterial cultures were obtained from 216 patients, who were followed up for more than 3.5 years after operation and studied retrospectively in a single center analysis. RESULTS: Thrombus cultures yielded bacteria in 55 of 216 (25.5%) cases, including 11 of 44 (25%) cases with ruptured aneurysms. Prosthetic infections (4 of 216; 1.9%) occurred more frequently (p < 0.02) in patients with positive thrombus cultures (3 of 55; 5.5%) than in patients with negative cultures (1 of 161; 0.6%). In two patients the species isolated from the thrombus was also cultured from the vascular prosthesis, although in one graft infection other organisms were also isolated. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of bacteria in the intraluminal thrombus does not appear to be an important factor in the development of graft infection after primary elective and urgent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Therefore routine intraoperative cultures are unnecessary unless clinical signs of infective aortitis are present.