RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: When antegrade recanalization of femoro- and/or infrapopliteal occlusions fails, retrograde access has become an established option. To evaluate the results of combined antegrade and retrograde recanalization of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal occlusions, patients undergoing secondary retrograde recanalization attempts were analyzed retrospectively. METHODS: Primary endpoint was the success of the procedure (successful occlusion crossing using the ante-/retrograde technique). Secondary endpoints include complication rate, primary patency and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, amputation rate, changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI), and Rutherford-Becker class (RBC). Predictors for procedure failure and TLR were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 888 patients: 362 with femoropopliteal (group 1), 353 with infrapopliteal (group 2), and 173 with multi-level (group 3) recanalization. Critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) was present in group 1, 2, and 3 in 36%, 62%, and 76%, respectively. The intervention was successful in 92.5%, 93.8%, 90.8% of respective cases (p=0.455). The overall peri-interventional complication rate was 7.2%. At 6, 12 and 24 months, primary patency was highest in group 1 (63.9%, 45.8%, 33.3%), followed by group 3 (59.8%, 46.1%, 33.3%), and group 2 (58.5%, 43.1%, 30.4%), p=0.537). The risk of undergoing repeated TLR within 24 months was 31.4% for group 1, 39.1% for group 2, and 45.7% for group 3. At 24 months, the survival rate in groups 1, 2, 3 was 93.8%, 79.4% and 87.5%, respectively. During 24 months, 75 patients (8.4%) had to undergo amputation. Significant improvements in both ABI and RBC were present at discharge as well as at 6, 12 and 24 months (p<0.001). Dialysis dependency was a predictor of unsuccessful ante/retrograde recanalization (p=0.048). Lesion length (p=0.0043), dialysis (p=0.033) and recanalization level (p=0.013) increase the risk of TLR. CONCLUSION: Using a combined antegrade/retrograde access, recanalization of occluded femoropopliteal and/or infrapopliteal arteries can be achieved in a large number of cases. Due to the high rate of repeated TLR across all lesion localizations, the indication for ante- and retrograde recanalization may be limited to patients with CLTI.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential differences in characteristics of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) stratified by stent design with a focus on the swirling flow-inducing BioMimics 3D helical centerline stent. METHODS: Patients with ISR of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries undergoing reintervention were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the angiographic localization and extent of restenosis or reocclusion with the following five different stent systems: SMART Control stent, Supera peripheral stent, GORE® VIABAHN® endoprosthesis, BioMimics 3D stent, and Zilver® PTX® stent. RESULTS: 414 ISR lesions were analyzed, affecting 236 Supera stents, 67 BioMimics 3D stents, 48 Zilver® PTX® stents, 38 SMART Control stents, and 25 VIABAHN® endoprostheses. The mean stent diameter and length were 5.7 ± 0.77 mm and 121.4 ± 94.8 mm, respectively. ISR included 310 (74.9%) lesions with 1 stent, 89 (21.5%) lesions with 2 stents, 14 (3.4%) lesions with 3 stents, and 1 lesion (0.2%) with 4 stents. Most lesions presented as reocclusions (67.4%) rather than focal (13.3%) or diffuse restenoses (19.3%). No significant differences in ISR lesion morphology were found. By trend, BioMimics 3D stent lesion extension was more focal (16.4% versus 12.7%, p = 0.258), with the highest proportion of lesions in which only the proximal stent third was affected (9.0% versus 5.8%, p = 0.230), as compared to the average of the other four devices. The occlusion rate was the second lowest for the BioMimics 3D stent (64.2 vs. 68.0%, p = 0.316). Risk factors for restenosis or occlusion were active smoking, pre-interventional occlusion, and popliteal intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the helical centerline stent design of the BioMimics 3D stent, which results in a swirling flow with increased wall shear stress, may offer protective properties over straight stent designs, including DES and endoprosthesis, regarding localization and extension of restenosis. Prospective, randomized studies are warranted.