RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adverse health impacts of cystic fibrosis (CF) can be present in children before respiratory complications are observed. Children with CF show progressive health decline, with increasing lung function decline in adolescence. This study aims to quantify the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs attributable to CF by comparing children with CF with the general pediatric population. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study compared HCRU and costs among children with CF in the US with demographically similar children without CF (comparison group) over a 12-month period using administrative claims data spanning 2010-2017. Analyses were conducted by insurance type (commercially insured [COM] and Medicaid insured [MED]) and stratified by age (<2 years, 2 to <6 years, 6 to <12 years, and 12-17 years). RESULTS: Children with CF (2831 COM and 1896 MED) were matched to children in the comparison group (8493 COM and 5688 MED). Higher prevalence of comorbidities was seen in children with CF versus the comparison group across all ages. Across all ages, HCRU attributable to CF was substantial (higher hospitalization rates, more outpatient and emergency room visits, and greater use of prescription medications), and there were higher associated costs (all p values < .05), in COM and MED populations. HCRU and costs attributable to CF were highest for children aged 12-17 years. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial HCRU and costs are evident among children with CF across all ages, starting as young as infancy, with highest HCRU and costs among adolescents. Effective treatments from an early age are needed for children with CF.
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Fibrose Cística/epidemiologia , Fibrose Cística/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Aim: To estimate direct and indirect costs of surgical treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) from a self-insured employer's perspective. Methods: Employer-sponsored insurance claims data were analyzed to estimate costs owing to absence and short-term disability 1 year following global endometrial ablation (GEA), outpatient hysterectomy (OPH) and inpatient hysterectomy (IPH). Results: Costs for women who had GEA are substantially less than costs for women who had either OPH or IPH, with the difference ranging from approximately $7700 to approximately $10,000 for direct costs and approximately $4200 to approximately $4600 for indirect costs. Women who had GEA missed 21.8-24.0 fewer works days. Conclusion: Study results suggest lower healthcare costs associated with GEA versus OPH or IPH from a self-insured employer perspective.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemorragia Uterina/cirurgia , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/economia , Feminino , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia/economia , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Seguro por Deficiência/economia , Seguro por Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study examined clinical and economic outcomes among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic agents by line of therapy. METHODS: Adults with ≥ 2 medical claims for primary diagnosed HCC (from January 1, 2008, through September 30, 2015) and ≥ 1 claim for systemic HCC-related therapy were identified in the IBM MarketScan® Research Databases. Continuous enrollment was required 6 months before and 1 month after diagnosis. Patients were categorized into first- (1L) and second-line (2L) treatment cohorts; those receiving sorafenib as 1L were evaluated. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, costs, and survival during 1L and 2L therapy were measured. Survival was assessed for patients linked to the Social Security Administration Master Death File. RESULTS: 1459 patients, 758 with death data, met the 1L cohort criteria; 163 patients, 87 with death data, later received 2L therapy. 77.1% had 1L sorafenib, alone or in combination. Median 1L treatment duration was 3.0 months; median survival time from start of 1L to death or censor was 6.8 months. There was no predominant 2L agent. Median 2L treatment duration was 3.0 months; median survival time from start of 2L was 9.3 months. Median total healthcare costs per patient per month were $13,297 for 1L (all), $13,471 for 1L (sorafenib), and $11,786 for 2L. CONCLUSIONS: Findings confirm high 1-year mortality for advanced HCC, suggesting a high cost burden. While no 2L therapy was available during this analysis, recently approved 2L agents have the potential to improve survival after sorafenib failure or intolerance.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Sorafenibe/economia , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sorafenibe/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite healthcare reforms mandating expanded insurance coverage and reduced out-of-pocket costs for preventive care, cancer screening rates remain relatively static. No study has measured cancer screening rates for multiple tests among non-Medicare patients. METHODS: This retrospective, population-based claims analysis, conducted in 2016-2017, of commercially insured and Medicaid-insured women aged 30-59 years enrolled in IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid Databases (containing approximately 90 and 17 million enrollees, respectively) during 2010-2015 describes screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Key outcomes were (1) proportion screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer among the age-eligible population compared with accepted age-based recommendations and (2) proportion with longer-than-recommended intervals between tests. RESULTS: One half (54.7%) of commercially insured women aged 40-59 years (n=1,538,444) were screened three or more times during the 6-year study period for breast cancer; for Medicaid-insured women (n=78,897), the rates were lower (23.7%). One third (43.4%) of commercially insured and two thirds (68.9%) of Medicaid-insured women had a >2.5-year gap between mammograms. Among women aged 30-59 years, 59.3% of commercially insured women and 31.4% of Medicaid-insured women received two or more Pap tests. The proportion of patients with a >3.5-year gap between Pap tests was 33.9% (commercially insured) and 57.1% (Medicaid-insured). Among women aged 50-59 years, 63.3% of commercially insured women and 47.2% of Medicaid-insured women were screened at least one time for colorectal cancer. Almost all women aged 30-59 years (commercially insured, 99.1%; Medicaid-insured, 98.9%) had at least one healthcare encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Breast and cervical cancer screenings remain underutilized among both commercially insured and Medicaid-insured populations, with lower rates among the Medicaid-insured population. However, almost all women had at least one healthcare encounter, suggesting opportunities for better coordinated care.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Planos de Seguro com Fins Lucrativos/economia , Planos de Seguro com Fins Lucrativos/legislação & jurisprudência , Planos de Seguro com Fins Lucrativos/normas , Planos de Seguro com Fins Lucrativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/normas , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economiaRESUMO
Aim: We evaluated treatment patterns and healthcare costs of initiating psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment with oral apremilast versus biologics. Methods: Claims data identified biologic-naive adults with PsA who initiated either apremilast or a biologic from 2013 to 2016. Results: Medication adherence was similar at 12 months (76.9 vs 73.4%; p = 0.175) between apremilast (n = 381) and matched biologic (n = 761) patients. Apremilast users had $12,715 lower total costs per-patient-per-month (p < 0.001), largely due to outpatient pharmacy and medical costs. Conclusion: Commercially insured patients with PsA initiating apremilast had adherence similar to those initiating biologics but lower total healthcare costs.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) or alternative mechanisms of action (MOAs), such as a T-cell co-stimulation modulator (abatacept), Janus kinase inhibitor (tofacitinib), or interleukin-6 inhibitor (tocilizumab). OBJECTIVE: To examine treatment persistence and healthcare costs in patients with RA who changed therapy by cycling therapy (ie, switching within the same drug class), or switching between, the TNF inhibitors and alternative MOA medication classes. METHODS: We analyzed medical and pharmacy claims for commercially insured patients who cycled or switched between targeted DMARD agents between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2014 (ie, the index date), to determine treatment patterns (ie, treatment switching, discontinuation, restarting after a gap ≥60 days, or persistence) and costs (plan- and patient-paid) for 1 year postindex. The cost per persistent patient was the total healthcare cost divided by the number of treatment-persistent patients. RESULTS: The analysis included 6203 patients who cycled between TNF inhibitors, 2640 patients who switched from TNF inhibitors to alternative MOA agents, 699 patients who cycled between alternative MOA agents, and 687 patients who switched from alternative MOA agents to TNF inhibitors. The 1-year treatment persistence rates (with P values vs TNF inhibitor cyclers) were 45.2% for TNF inhibitor cyclers, 50.3% for TNF inhibitor-alternative MOA switchers (P <.001), 51.4% for alternative MOA agent cyclers (P = .002), and 46.1% for alternative MOA-TNF inhibitor switchers (P = .63). Compared with TNF inhibitor cyclers, the cost per persistent patient was lower for TNF inhibitor-alternative MOA switchers (-$16,853 RA-related; -$19,280 targeted DMARDs), alternative MOA agent cyclers (-$21,662 RA-related; -$25,153 targeted DMARDs), and alternative MOA-TNF inhibitor cyclers (-$7206 RA-related; -$7919 targeted DMARDs). CONCLUSION: Among patients with RA, patients who switched from a TNF inhibitor to an alternative MOA agent and those who cycled between alternative MOA agents had significantly higher treatment persistence rates and a substantially lower cost per persistent patient than those who cycled between TNF inhibitors. These findings support the evaluation of switching medication classes for patients with RA when a targeted therapy fails.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To conduct an analysis describing clinical characteristics, pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) events, and health care resource utilization among Medicaid-insured patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Truven Health MarketScan® Medicaid Multi-State administrative claims database (2010-2014) was undertaken. Patients aged ≥6 years with a CF diagnosis, continuously enrolled for 12 months, were identified. Demographics, comorbidities, PEx events, and health care resource utilization and costs over a 12-month enrollment period were analyzed for all patients and by age groups. RESULTS: In total, 1196 patients with CF aged ≥6 years were identified from a sample size of approximately 10 million Medicaid patients. Mean (SD) age was 16.1 (8.8) years. A greater proportion of patients were in younger age groups (6-11 years: 35.5%, 12-17 years: 29.1%, 18-26 years: 25.6%, 27-34 years: 6.7%, ≥35 years: 3.2%). Across all age groups, approximately 90% of patients had at least 1 PEx event; 50.7% of those had a PEx event involving treatment with intravenous antibiotics, and 42.8% required hospitalization. PEx recurrence was frequent: 55.7% of all patients experienced ≥3 PEx events during 1 year. Mean (SD) health care expenditures during a PEx event rose with increasing age, ranging from US$44,589 (US$139,024) to US$116,169 (US$387,752). Overall health care resource utilization was high among patients with CF; 47.2% of the population required an inpatient admission, and 26.8% had subsequent hospitalizations totaling 29.1 days per year in hospital. CONCLUSION: High rates of PEx, hospitalizations, and time spent in hospital demonstrate the significant health care burden of CF among Medicaid beneficiaries.
RESUMO
The primary objective of this study was to describe surgical treatment patterns among women with newly diagnosed uterine fibroids (UF). A secondary objective was to estimate the medical costs associated with other common surgical interventions for UF. Claims-based commercial and Medicare data (2011-2016) were used to identify women aged ≥30 years with continuous enrollment for at least 12 months before and after a new diagnosis of UF. Receipt of a surgical or radiologic procedure (hysterectomy, myomectomy, endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, and curettage) was the primary outcome. Health care resource utilization and costs were calculated for women with at least 12 months of continuous enrollment following a UF surgical procedure. Among women who met selection criteria, 31.7% of patients underwent a surgical procedure; 20.9% of these underwent hysterectomy. An increase was observed over time in the percentage of women undergoing outpatient hysterectomy (from 27.0% to 40.2%) and hysteroscopic myomectomy (from 8.0% to 11.5%). The cost analysis revealed that total health care costs for hysteroscopic myomectomy ($17,324) were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those for women who underwent inpatient hysterectomy ($24,027) and those for women undergoing the 3 comparison procedures. Hysterectomy was the most common surgical intervention. Patients undergoing inpatient hysterectomy had the highest health care costs. Although less expensive, minimally invasive approaches are becoming more common; they are performed infrequently in patients with newly diagnosed UF. The results of this study may be useful in guiding decisions regarding the most appropriate and cost-effective surgical treatment for UF.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Leiomioma , Adulto , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/economia , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Leiomioma/economia , Leiomioma/epidemiologia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Embolização da Artéria Uterina/economia , Embolização da Artéria Uterina/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Every year, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) exacts a heavy toll on women's health and leads to high costs for the US health care system. The literature shows that endometrial ablation results in fewer complications, shorter recovery and lower costs than more commonly performed hysterectomy procedures. The objective of this study was to model clinical-economic outcomes, budget impact, and cost-effectiveness of global endometrial ablation (GEA) versus outpatient hysterectomy (OPH) and inpatient hysterectomy (IPH) procedures. A decision tree, state-transition (semi-Markov) economic model was developed to simulate 3 hypothetical cohorts of women who received surgical treatment for AUB (GEA, OPH, and IPH) over 1, 2, and 3 years to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes for GEA vs. OPH and GEA vs. IPH. Two versions of the model were created to reflect both commercial health care payer and US Medicaid perspectives, and analyses were conducted for both payer types. Total health care costs in the first year after GEA were substantially lower compared with those for IPH and OPH. Budget impact analysis results showed that increasing GEA utilization yields total annual cost savings of about $906,000 for a million-member commercial health plan and about $152,000 in cost savings for a typical-sized state Medicaid plan with 1.4 million members. Cost-effectiveness analysis results for both perspectives showed GEA as economically dominant (conferring greater benefit at lower cost) over both OPH and IPH in the 1-year commercial scenario. This study demonstrates that, for some patients, GEA may prove to be a safe, uterus-sparing, cost-effective alternative to OPH and IPH for the surgical treatment of AUB.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial , Hospitalização , Histerectomia , Hemorragia Uterina , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Árvores de Decisões , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/economia , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Hemorragia Uterina/economia , Hemorragia Uterina/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Uterina/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe prophylactic and acute medication treatment patterns, including timing, medication type, and duration of use in migraine patients initiating prophylaxis. BACKGROUND: Patients with migraine can be treated with acute and prophylactic therapies. Current treatment options for migraine prophylaxis are associated with poor tolerability and low adherence and persistence. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® Research Databases to identify adults in the United States with a migraine diagnosis who initiated migraine prophylactic medication (index event) between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2011. Prescribed prophylactic medications evaluated included topiramate, beta-blockers, and tricyclic antidepressants. Patients were required to have 12 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment. Patient characteristics, migraine-specific prescribed prophylactic treatment patterns (including gaps in therapy, treatment switches, and additions of index medications), and prescribed acute medication utilization were assessed. RESULTS: The study population comprised 107,122 patients, with 52,275 (49%) initiating topiramate, 22,658 (21%) initiating beta-blockers, and 32,189 (30%) initiating tricyclic antidepressants. Mean (SD) age was 41 (12) years and 83% were female. Persistence with migraine prophylactic medication was low; 81% of patients had gaps of >90 days in their migraine prophylaxis in the first year. The gap in therapy occurred early in treatment (mean, 95 days), and only 10% of patients restarted prophylactic therapy within that year. Switching from index medication to another prophylactic medication or adding prophylaxis was uncommon (13% and 5%, respectively). One year after initiating prophylaxis, 65% of patients were not receiving any prophylactic therapies. Most patients initiating migraine prophylaxis also utilized acute treatments (81%); opioid use was more frequent than triptan use (53% vs 48%) and was common (40%) among patients without other chronic pain conditions (eg, arthritis, fibromyalgia, and lower back pain). CONCLUSION: Patients with migraine who initiated prophylactic therapy had poor persistence with early gaps in therapy, were unlikely to switch prophylactic treatments, and most discontinued prophylaxis by the end of the first year.
Assuntos
Seguro Saúde/tendências , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Adolescente , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Esquema de Medicação , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Substituição de Medicamentos/métodos , Substituição de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Triptaminas/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Better understanding regarding the clinical-economic value of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for breast cancer screening for Medicaid enrollees is needed to help inform sound, value-based decision making. The objective of this study was to conduct a clinical-economic value analysis of DBT for breast cancer screening among women enrolled in Medicaid to assess the potential clinical benefits, associated expenditures, and net budget impact of DBT. METHODS: Two annual screening mammography scenarios were evaluated with an economic model: (1) full-field digital mammography and (2) combined full-field digital mammography and DBT. The model focused on two main drivers of DBT value: (1) capacity for DBT to reduce the number of women recalled for additional follow-up imaging and diagnostic services and (2) capacity of DBT to facilitate earlier diagnosis of cancer at earlier stages, when treatment costs are lower. RESULTS: Model analysis results showed that the use of DBT as a mammographic screening modality by Medicaid enrollees potentially reduces the need for follow-up diagnostic services and improves the detection of invasive cancers, allowing earlier, less costly treatment. With the modest incremental reimbursement of $37 for DBT expected for a typical Medicaid claim, annual cost savings from DBT predicted by the model amounts to $8.14 per patient, potentially translating into more than $12,000 savings per year for an average-sized Medicaid plan and as much as $207,000 savings per year for a typical state Medicaid program. CONCLUSIONS: Wider adoption of DBT presents an opportunity to deliver value-based care to Medicaid programs and to help address disparities and barriers to accessing preventive care by some of the nation's most vulnerable citizens.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Medicaid/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of subsequent serious infections in patients who received systemic drug therapy after an initial serious infection. METHODS: Patients with rheumatic conditions (rheumatoid arthritis [RA], psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis) or psoriasis who experienced a serious infection between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2011 were identified in a claims database. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled in the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Database for 12 months prior to and at least 60 days after the date of discharge or the end of intravenous antibiotic therapy for the index serious infection. Subsequent serious infection incidence rates per 100 patient-years with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for up to 18 months post-index, starting 60 days post-index. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment duration, and changes during followup. RESULTS: Among the 21,699 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the majority (84.3%) had RA. Patients who received tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy after their index infection had a lower rate of subsequent serious infections (18.1 per 100 patient-years for those treated with a TNF inhibitor alone and 17.3 per 100 patient-years for those treated with a TNF inhibitor plus a nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD]) compared with those treated with a nonbiologic DMARD alone (21.4 per 100 patient-years). Etanercept, either alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99) or in combination with a nonbiologic DMARD (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88), and infliximab (only in combination with a nonbiologic DMARD) (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.95) were associated with a significantly lower risk of subsequent serious infections compared with a nonbiologic DMARD alone. CONCLUSION: We did not observe an increased risk of subsequent infection in patients who received TNF inhibitor treatment following a serious infection. The risk of a subsequent serious infection was lower in patients treated with both a TNF inhibitor and a nonbiologic DMARD compared with that in patients treated with a nonbiologic DMARD alone.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções/epidemiologia , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Idoso , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/epidemiologia , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , Risco , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Espondilite Anquilosante/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study descriptively examined acute and longer term direct medical costs associated with a major cardiovascular (CV) event among high-risk coronary heart disease risk-equivalent (CHD-RE) patients. It also gives a firsthand look at fatal versus nonfatal CV events. METHODS: The MarketScan(®) Commercial Claims and Encounters Database was used to identify adults with a CV event in 2006-2012 with hyperlipidemia or lipid-lowering therapy use in the 18 months prior to one of the following inpatient CV events: myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, unstable angina, transient ischemic attack, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Patients were required to have a preindex diagnosis of at least one of the following: peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid artery disease, or diabetes. A subset analysis was conducted with patients with data linkable to the Social Security Administration Master Death File. Direct medical costs were reported for each quarter following a CV event, for up to 36 months after the first CV event. RESULTS: In total, 38,609 CHD-RE patients were included, mean age 57 years, 31% female. CABG, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous coronary intervention were the most frequent and most expensive first CV events, accounting for >75% of all first CV events with mean first quarter costs ranging from $17,454 (nonfatal transient ischemic attack) to $125,690 (fatal CABG). Overall, 15% of those with a first CV event went on to have a second event during the 36-month study period with mean first quarter nonfatal and fatal costs similar to first event levels. Third CV events were rare, happening in less than 3% of patients. CONCLUSION: CV events among CHD-RE patients were costly regardless of sequence, averaging $47,433 in the first 90 days following an event and remaining high, never returning to preevent levels. When fatal, first CV event costs were 1.2 to 2.9 times higher than when nonfatal.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to conduct a value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for breast cancer screening among women enrolled in US commercial health insurance plans to assess the potential budget impact associated with the clinical benefits of DBT. METHODS: An economic model was developed to estimate the system-wide financial impact of DBT as a breast cancer screening modality within a hypothetical US managed care plan with one million members. Two scenarios were considered for women in the health plan who undergo annual screening mammography, ie, full field digital mammography (FFDM) and combined FFDM + DBT. The model focused on two main drivers of DBT value, ie, the capacity for DBT to reduce the number of women recalled for additional follow-up imaging and diagnostic services and the capacity of DBT to facilitate earlier diagnosis of cancer at less invasive stages where treatment costs are lower. Model inputs were derived from published sources and from analyses of the Truven Health MarketScan(®) Research Databases (2010-2012). Comparative clinical and economic outcomes were simulated for one year following screening and compared on an incremental basis. RESULTS: Base-case analysis results show that 4,523 women in the hypothetical million member health plan who are screened using DBT avoid the use of follow-up services. The overall benefit of DBT was calculated at $78.53 per woman screened. Adjusting for a hypothetical $50 incremental cost of the DBT examination, this translates to $28.53 savings per woman screened, or $0.20 savings per member per month across the plan population and an overall cost savings to the plan of $2.4 million per year. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate clinical and economic favorability of DBT for breast cancer screening among commercially-insured US women. Wider adoption of DBT mammography presents an opportunity to deliver value-based care in the US health care system.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults and is associated with poor survival rates. Symptoms often include headaches; nausea and vomiting; and progressive memory, personality, or neurologic deficits. The treatment remains a challenge, and despite the approval of multiple new therapies in the past decade, survival has not improved. OBJECTIVE: To describe treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare costs of patients with incident glioblastoma in a large US population. METHODS: For this population-based study, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with incident malignant brain neoplasm who had undergone brain surgery between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010, were identified in the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Databases. The patients were stratified into 4 cohorts based on the use of temozolomide and/or external beam radiation therapy within 90 days after brain surgery (ie, the index event). Treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare costs were assessed until patient death, disenrollment, or the end-of-study period. RESULTS: A total of 2272 patients met the inclusion criteria; of these, 37% received temozolomide and radiation therapy, 13.8% received radiation alone, 3.9% received temozolomide alone, and 45.3% of patients received neither. The average patient age ranged from 55.3 years to 59.8 years across the study cohorts; between 29.8% and 44% of patients in each cohort were female. The duration of temozolomide use was similar between the temozolomide-only cohort and patients receiving temozolomide with external beam radiation; approximately 76% of patients received temozolomide at least 60 days, dropping to 48.1% and 23% at 180 days and 360 days of follow-up, respectively. The median survival was 456 days, ranging from 331 days in the temozolomide-only cohort to 529 days in the cohort that received neither temozolomide nor external beam radiation. The average total costs in the 6 months postindex were $106,896, from $79,099 for patients who received neither temozolomide nor radiation to $138,767 for those who received both therapies. CONCLUSION: The survival patterns of patients with glioblastoma seen in this real-world study of current treatments in a clinical setting is similar to the survival rate reported in clinical trials. However, further cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life analyses will be critical to better understand the role of temozolomide therapy in this patient population, considering its considerable cost burden and potential negative impact on survival seen in this study.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) whose disease activity is inadequately controlled with a platform therapy (interferon beta or glatiramer acetate [GA]) may switch to another platform therapy or escalate therapy to natalizumab or fingolimod, which were approved in the US in 2006 and 2010, respectively. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in the United States who were followed for 2 years after initiating a disease-modifying therapy (DMT). METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to examine treatment patterns of initial DMT use (on initial therapy for 2 years with and without gaps of ≥ 60 days, medication switching, and discontinuation) among patients with MS who initiated a platform therapy (interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate) or natalizumab between January 1, 2007, and September 30, 2009; the first DMT claim was the index. Eligible patients were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases based on continuous enrollment for 6 months before (preindex period) and 24 months after their index date, with a diagnosis of MS and no claim for a previous DMT in the 6-month preindex period. Demographics at index and clinical characteristics during the preindex period were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 6181 MS patients were included, with 5735 (92.8%) starting on platform therapy. Natalizumab initiators were more likely to stay on index therapy (32.3% vs 16.9%, P < 0.001) and have fewer treatment gaps of ≥ 60 days (44.8% vs 55.3%, P < 0.001) compared with platform initiators. In addition, natalizumab initiators were less likely to switch treatment (13.9% vs 19.1%, P = 0.007) and took longer to switch (400.9 days vs 330.7 days, P < 0.001) compared with platform initiators. Nearly 79% of platform initiators who switched went to another platform therapy. Approximately two thirds of patients who switched to a third DMT (n = 130) switched to another platform therapy. A total of 9% of natalizumab and platform initiators discontinued DMT within the 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Most MS patients initiating DMT started on platform therapy. Natalizumab initiators tended to stay on index therapy, have fewer treatment gaps, and switch less than platform initiators in the 2 years after treatment initiation. Switching between platform therapies is common despite evidence that MS patients on platform therapy may benefit from switching to natalizumab.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Interferon beta/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Substituição de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Natalizumab , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to estimate the annual cost of etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab per treated patient across adult indications using US-managed care drug use data. METHODS: Adult patients who used etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab were identified in the Thomson Reuters MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (Thomson Reuters Healthcare, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2009. The index event was the first use of etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab preceded by a diagnosis for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. Patients were defined as either newly initiating or continuing tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker treatment based on their use during the 6 months before the index event. Annual cost per treated patient was the sum of the etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab medication and administration costs during the 12 months following the index claim. Annual costs were calculated across all patients as well as within each indication group and patient type (new initiator or continuing). RESULTS: In total, 21,652 patients met the study criteria (etanercept n = 12,065; adalimumab n = 5,685; infliximab n = 3,902); 43% of patients were new initiators. Patient characteristics were similar across treatment groups in terms of age (mean = 49, SD = 10) and gender (66% female). Across indications, the mean annual TNF-blocker cost per treated patient was $15,345 for etanercept, $18,046 for adalimumab, and $24,018 for infliximab. In new initiators, the TNF-blocker cost per treated patient across indications was $14,543 for etanercept, $16,978 for adalimumab, and $21,086 for infliximab; among patients continuing therapy, annual costs were $15,836 for etanercept, $19,457 for adalimumab, and $25,748 for infliximab. CONCLUSION: Patients on etanercept had the lowest TNF-blocker cost per treated patient for adult indications when applying actual drug use from a US-managed care population. TNF-blocker costs per treated patient on adalimumab and infliximab were approximately 18% and 57% higher than etanercept, respectively, using real-world drug use data.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Antirreumáticos/economia , Imunoglobulina G/economia , Adalimumab , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/economia , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/economia , Etanercepte , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Infliximab , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/economia , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Espondilite Anquilosante/economia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study uses real-world US managed-care claims data to estimate dose escalation rates over the first and second years of therapy among biologic naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker therapy with etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab. METHODS: Non-elderly adult (age 18-65 years) RA patients initiating etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab from July 1, 2005 to April 30, 2009, were identified using the MarketScan Commercial Database. National and regional dose-escalation patterns were evaluated 12 and 24 months after initiation. In the single-instance method, dose escalation was defined as having one average weekly dose 115%, 130%, or 150% greater than the initial average weekly dose. By the two-instances method, dose escalation was defined as having two consecutive claims with an average weekly dose 115% or 130% greater than the initial average weekly dose. RESULTS: A total of 2747 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 50 years [SD=10]; 74% female). More patients initiated etanercept (44%) than adalimumab (37%) or infliximab (20%). Using the single-instance method, dose escalation at 12 months ranges were 0.8-1.5% for etanercept, 10.8-12.5% for adalimumab, and 16.4-42.5% for infliximab; ranges at 24 months were 0.8-2.1% for etanercept, 14.3-17.5% for adalimumab, and 26.4-57.6% for infliximab. The two-instances method showed a similar relationship among the treatment cohorts at both 12 and 24 months, with lower dose-escalation rates for etanercept (0.8%, 0.8%) than adalimumab (8.7%, 13.3%) or infliximab (22.9%, 37.6%) at the 130% threshold (p<0.001). Dose-escalation rates for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab were consistent across US geographic regions. CONCLUSION: Patients initiating etanercept had lower rates of dose escalation than patients initiating adalimumab or infliximab in the first and second year following therapy initiation, as well as across US geographic regions. These results may not be generalizable to the entire US RA population.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adalimumab , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Etanercepte , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/administração & dosagem , Infliximab , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to characterize insulin use and examine factors associated with persistence to mealtime insulin among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on stable basal insulin therapy initiating mealtime insulin therapy. METHODS: Insulin use among patients with T2D initiating mealtime insulin was investigated using Thomson Reuters MarketScan® research databases from July 2001 through September 2006. The first mealtime insulin claim preceded by 6 months with 2 claims for basal insulin was used as the index event. A total of 21 months of continuous health plan enrollment was required. Patients were required to have a second mealtime insulin claim during the 12-month follow-up period. Persistence measure 1 defined non-persistence as the presence of a 90-day gap in mealtime insulin claims, effective the date of the last claim prior to the gap. Persistence measure 2 required 1 claim per quarter to be persistent. Risk factors for non-persistence were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients initiating mealtime insulin (n = 4752; 51% male, mean age = 60.3 years) primarily used vial/syringe (87%) and insulin analogs (60%). Patients filled a median of 2, 3, and 4 mealtime insulin claims at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, with a median time of 76 days between refills. According to measure 1, persistence to mealtime insulin was 40.7%, 30.2%, and 19.1% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Results for measure 2 were considerably higher: 74.3%, 55.3%, and 42.2% of patients were persistent at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Initiating mealtime insulin with human insulin was a risk factor for non-persistence by both measures (OR < 0.80, p < 0.01). Additional predictors of non-persistence at 12 months included elderly age, increased insulin copayment, mental health comorbidity, and polypharmacy (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Mealtime insulin use and persistence were both considerably lower than expected, and were significantly lower for human insulin compared to analogs.