Inhibition of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway for the treatment of patients with metastatic metaplastic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal/metaplastic breast cancers (MpBCs) are often triple-negative (TNBC), and chemo-refractory, and can harbor phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3kinase) alterations; thus, therapy with mTor inhibitors may demonstrate activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mesenchymal/MpBC treated with temsirolimus-based regimens were evaluated. Mutational analyses [polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA sequencing method, mass spectrometric detection (Sequenom MassARRAY), or next-generation sequencing] as well as loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) (immunohistochemistry) were performed (archived tissue when available). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (one of whom was on two separate trials) were treated using temsirolimus-containing regimens: temsirolimus alone (n = 1 patient) or combined with the following: liposomal doxorubicin and bevacizumab (DAT, n = 18); liposomal doxorubicin (DT, n = 1); paclitaxel and bevacizumab (TAT, n = 2); paclitaxel (TT, n = 1); carboplatin and bevacizumab (CAT, n = 1). Response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] was 25% across all regimens; 32% in the anthracycline-based regimens [DAT and DT (CR = 2, PR = 4; N = 19)]. An additional two patients achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 months [total SD ≥6 months/CR/PR = 8 (33%)]. Molecular aberrations in the PI3K pathway were common: PIK3CA mutation = 6/15 (40%), PTEN mutation = 3/11 (27%), and PTEN loss = 2/11 (18%). A point mutation in the NF2 gene (K159fs*16; NF2 alterations can activate mTor) was found in one patient who attained CR (3+ years). Of the eight patients who achieved SD ≥6 months/CR/PR, all 4 patients with available tissue had a molecular aberration that activate the PIK3CA/Akt/mTOR axis: PIK3CA mutation = 2; PTEN loss = 1; NF2 aberration = 1. CONCLUSIONS: DAT has activity in MpBCs including complete CRs. Molecular aberrations that can activate the PI3 K/Akt/mTOR axis are common in MpBC.

Outcome of metastatic breast cancer in selected women with or without deleterious BRCA mutations.

The aim of this study was to compare the time-to progression and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with and without deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. 195 women with MBC who were referred for BRCA genetic testing between 1997 and 2011 were included in the study. Logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine the associations between clinical variables and outcomes. Of 195 women with MBC, 21 % (n = 41) were positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. The number of metastatic sites at the time of metastatic disease was not different between BRCA1 versus BRCA2 carriers versus non-carriers (P = 0.77). The site of first metastasis was visceral-only in 70 % of BRCA1 carriers compared to 9 % in BRCA2 carriers and 37 % in non-carriers (P = 0.001). Median follow-up was 2.8 years. BRCA non-carriers and BRCA2 carriers had a longer time-to progression and OS compared to BRCA1 carriers (median time-to progression = 1.3 vs. 0.9 vs. 0.7 years; P = 0.31, and median OS = 4.88 vs. 4.94 vs. 1.34 years; P = 0.0065). In a multivariate model, no association was identified between BRCA positivity and time-to-event outcomes (P > 0.28). In addition, patients with triple-negative MBC carried a poorer prognosis irrespective of their BRCA status (P = 0.058 and P = 0.15 for the interaction term of BRCA status and triple-negative for time-to progression and OS, respectively). Our data indicate that BRCA1 carriers diagnosed with MBC have worse outcomes compared to BRCA2 carriers and non-carriers. However, the differences in outcome did not reach statistical significance likely due to small sample sizes.

Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) in advanced breast cancer-expressing C-Kit or PDGFR-beta: clinical activity and biological correlations.

BACKGROUND: Novel molecular therapies for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are necessary to improve the dismal prognosis of this condition. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) inhibits several protein tyrosine kinases, including platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and c-kit, which are preferentially expressed in tumor cells. We tested the activity of imatinib mesylate in MBC with overexpression of PDGFR or c-kit. Additionally, we sought to determine the biological correlates and immunomodulatory effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were treated with Imatinib administered orally at 400 mg p.o. b.i.d. (800 mg/day), until disease progression. All patients demonstrated PDGFR-beta overexpression and none showed c-kit expression. RESULTS: No objective responses were observed among the 13 patients treated in an intention-to-treat analysis. All patients experienced disease progression, with a median time to progression of 1.2 months. Twelve patients have died, and the median overall survival was 7.7 months. No patient had a serious adverse event. Imatinib therapy had no effect on the plasma levels of the angiogenesis-related cytokines, vascular endothelial growth factor, PDGF, b-fibroblast growth factor, and E-selectin. Immune studies showed imatinib inhibits interferon-gamma production by TCR-activated CD4(+) T cells. CONCLUSION: Imatinib as a single agent has no clinical activity in PDGFR-overexpressing MBC and has potential immunosuppressive effects.

Bortezomib (VELCADE) in metastatic breast cancer: pharmacodynamics, biological effects, and prediction of clinical benefits.

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib (VELCADE) is a potent inhibitor of the 26S proteasome with broad antitumor activity. We performed a phase II study of bortezomib to evaluate its clinical effects in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with bortezomib (VELCADE) at a dosage of 1.5 mg/m(2) administered biweekly for 2 weeks with 1 week of rest in a 21-day cycle. The primary objective was clinical response rate. Toxicity and pharmacodynamics data were also obtained. RESULTS: No objective responses were observed. One patient had stable disease, and 11 others experienced disease progression. The median survival time was 4.3 months (range, 0.9-37 months). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities included fatigue (58%; n = 7) and skin rash (33%; n = 4). The mean inhibition of specific chymotryptic activity was 53.1% (+/- 13.33%). A statistically significant reduction in the plasma interleukin-6 level was seen (P = 0.0354). CONCLUSION: Bortezomib was well tolerated but showed limited clinical activity against metastatic breast cancer when used as a single agent. The future development of this agent for the treatment of breast cancer should be guided by in vivo models that optimize activity in combination with other antitumor agents.

Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility of developing a multigene predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) to sequential weekly paclitaxel and fluorouracil + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (T/FAC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients underwent one-time pretreatment fine-needle aspiration to obtain RNA from the cancer for transcriptional profiling using cDNA arrays containing 30721 human sequence clones. Analysis was performed after profiling, and 42 patients' clinical results were available, 24 of which were used for predictive marker discovery; 18 patients' results were used as an independent validation set. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of patients had pCR (six discovery and seven validation), defined as disappearance of all invasive cancer in the breast after completion of chemotherapy. We could identify no single marker that was sufficiently associated with pCR to be used as an individual predictor. A multigene model with 74 markers (P

Canalicular stenosis secondary to weekly docetaxel: a potentially preventable side effect.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe canalicular stenosis as a mechanism for epiphora (excessive tearing) secondary to weekly docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with metastatic breast cancer who developed epiphora during weekly docetaxel therapy underwent an ophthalmologic examination, and probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal ducts. The total duration of docetaxel therapy, the duration of treatment at the time of onset of epiphora, the number of infusions, the cumulative dose of docetaxel and the severity of canalicular stenosis were recorded. RESULTS: All 14 patients had anatomic narrowing of the canaliculi as the underlying mechanism for epiphora. Bicanalicular silicone intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) was recommended for all 14 patients. Eleven patients underwent surgery and experienced resolution of their symptoms. The three patients who declined surgery continue to have epiphora at the time of this report. CONCLUSIONS: Canalicular stenosis is an underlying mechanism for epiphora in patients receiving weekly docetaxel. Bicanalicular silicone intubation should be considered early in the course of weekly docetaxel therapy to prevent complete closure of the canaliculi. Once complete or near complete stenosis of the canaliculi occurs, DCR with a permanent pyrex glass tube placement may become necessary to overcome the blockage of tear outflow.

Paclitaxel in the multimodality treatment for inflammatory breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of breast carcinoma. Anthracycline-based regimens represent the standard of treatment for IBC. Reports of significant clinical activity of paclitaxel in metastatic breast carcinoma led the authors to investigate the role of this drug in the management of IBC. METHODS: Forty-four patients with IBC were enrolled between February 1994 and January 1998. The treatment plan consisted of induction chemotherapy (IC), mastectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Forty-two patients received IC with four cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. If the clinical response was less than partial, patients were "crossed over" to paclitaxel before mastectomy. All patients received adjuvant paclitaxel. Patients unresectable after paclitaxel were offered high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (81%) achieved an objective clinical remission; 3 patients (7%) achieved a clinical complete remission, 31 (74%) a partial remission. Six patients (14%) achieved pathologic complete remission. Sixteen patients were treated with paclitaxel, 7 of them (44%) were able to undergo mastectomy. Median time to progression (TTP) was 22 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 46 months. Concordance between clinical and pathologic response was documented in only 8 patients (24%). No differences in TTP and OS compared with a historical group of 178 IBC patients treated with anthracycline-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel improves tumor resectability in anthracycline-refractory IBC. The impact of paclitaxel on the prognosis of IBC needs to be better evaluated in future trials using more dose-intensive schedules of administration. New imaging modalities may contribute to improve assessment of response to IC.

Phase I-II vinorelbine (Navelbine) by continuous infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cumulative toxicities limit dose escalation.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine) has significant activity against breast carcinoma and is less neurotoxic than vinblastine. Because vinblastine has improved activity when administered by continuous infusion, we conducted a Phase I-II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine when given by continuous infusion and the response rates to it in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Between April 1994 and August 1997, 87 patients were entered in the study. All were female and had proven metastatic breast cancer. Ninety-five percent of them had received prior doxorubicin treatment, and 74% had received prior paclitaxel treatment. In Phase I of the study, all patients received 8 mg of vinorelbine by intravenous (i.v.) bolus followed by a continuous infusion of vinorelbine over 96 hr. When the MTD was determined, patients were entered in the Phase II arm to assess treatment responses and cumulative toxic reactions. In the Phase I arm (43 patients, 182 cycles), we determined the MTD of vinorelbine to be 8 mg by i.v. bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 11 mg/m2/day over 4 days. The dose-limiting toxic reaction was grade 3-4 granulocytopenia in 35% of the cycles and neutropenic fever in 15% of the cycles. Forty-four patients (193 cycles) were treated at the MTD. Seven (16%) of them had a response (2 complete responses, 5 partial responses). The median durations of response and survival were 4.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. However, cumulative toxic reactions (neutropenic fever and stomatitis) in 22 patients (50%) required dose reductions. A continuous infusion of vinorelbine can be safely administered but with a narrow therapeutic index because of cumulative toxic reactions. We recommend a modified MTD of vinorelbine: 8 mg by i.v. bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/m2/day over 4 days. However, this treatment schedule offers no apparent advantage over the commonly used weekly vinorelbine schedule.

Phase I study of a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator, LY353381.HCL, in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted this phase I trial to determine the safety and toxicity profile of LY353381.HCl-a novel, potent, third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM)-because this benzothiophene derivative demonstrated an SERM profile in preclinical studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 32 patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated in four cohorts with oral daily doses of 10, 20, 50, and 100 mg. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed during the first 72 hours following the first dose on day 1 and during the 24 hours after the day 57 dose. Eligibility criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2; no significant major organ dysfunction; and at least 3 weeks elapsed since most recent hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and estrogen replacement therapy. RESULTS: The median patient age was 56 years (range, 30 years to 76 years). The median number of prior chemotherapies for metastatic disease was one (range, zero to four), while the median number of prior hormone regimens for metastatic disease was two (range, zero to five). Receptor status was estrogen receptor (ER) positive and progesterone receptor (PR) positive, 19 patients; ER positive and PR negative, eight patients; ER positive and PR unknown, two patients; and ER and PR unknown, three patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Treatment was well tolerated with mild to moderate hot flashes in 18 of 32 patients (56%) at all dose levels. Transvaginal ultrasound performed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment showed no endometrial thickening. Of the 32 patients evaluable for response, six patients had stable disease for at least 6 months with a median duration of 7.7 months (range, 6.2 months to 33.8 months). The pharmacokinetics of LY353381.HCl were generally linear with respect to time and studied dose range. CONCLUSION: As predicted in preclinical testing, daily oral LY353381.HCl is safe, is well tolerated at all tested dose levels, and may be clinically beneficial in patients with extensively pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Further studies with LY353381 to evaluate the efficacy in patients with or without prior exposure to tamoxifen and fewer overall prior regimens are under way.

Canalicular stenosis secondary to docetaxel (taxotere): a newly recognized side effect.

OBJECTIVE: To report a newly recognized side effect of a commonly used antineoplastic agent, docetaxel, in three patients with metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN: Observational case reports. PARTICIPANTS: Three patients with metastatic breast cancer who received weekly docetaxel chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of epiphora and severity of punctal and canalicular fibrosis secondary to docetaxel. RESULTS: In three patients receiving weekly docetaxel, canalicular stenosis and resultant epiphora developed shortly after start of their treatment. Discontinuation of drug several months after initiation of therapy did not lead to resolution of symptoms in two of the three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Epiphora is a newly recognized side effect of docetaxel and may occur more frequently with weekly cycles of this drug. The mechanism for epiphora seems to be punctal and canalicular stenosis. This side effect, in advanced cases, is not reversible with discontinuation of the drug. Patients being administered weekly cycles of docetaxel should be screened for epiphora and canalicular stenosis, and treatment in the form of silicone intubation or punctoplasty should be considered in early stages to prevent the need for conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy.

Phase I study of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a single-institution phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and define the toxic effects of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had disease progression with no limit on prior number of chemotherapy regimens. Prior treatment with liposomal doxorubicin and/or gemcitabine was not allowed. The starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin was 20 mg/m(2) on day 1 only with a 20% dose escalation of the previous mg/m(2) dose until MTD was reached. Gemcitabine was given as a fixed dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: We treated 27 patients of whom six had never received chemotherapy for their disease. Most had had visceral involvement as their dominant site of disease. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. However, neither neutropenic fever nor episodes of bleeding were major occurrences. Significant antitumor activity was also observed with a total of two complete and seven partial responses. The recommended phase II dose is liposomal doxorubicin 24 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. CONCLUSION: The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine is an active and well tolerated regimen when administered on a 21-day schedule. Myelosuppression limited further dose escalation, however, it did not increase the incidence of neutropenic fever. Significant antitumor activity seen in heavily and minimally pretreated patients warrants further evaluation of this combination.

Long-term results of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced breast cancer with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes in local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who present with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases and who are treated with combined-modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with regional stage IV LABC, which is defined by our institution as LABC with ipsilateral supraclavicular adenopathy without evidence of distant disease, received treatment on three prospective trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Patients then received local therapy that consisted of either total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or segmental mastectomy and ALND before or after irradiation. Patients with no response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. After completion of local therapy, chemotherapy was continued for four to 15 cycles, followed by radiotherapy. Patients older than 50 years who had estrogen receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 11.6 years (range, 4.8 to 22.6 years). Disease-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 34% and 32%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was 1.9 years. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 41% and 31%, respectively. The median overall survival was 3.5 years. The overall response rate (partial and complete responses) to induction chemotherapy was 89%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases but no other evidence of distant metastases warrant therapy administered with curative intent, ie, combined-modality therapy consisting of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases should be included in the stage IIIB category of the tumor-node-metastasis classification because their clinical course and prognosis are similar to those of patients with stage IIIB LABC.

Phase I study of liposomal annamycin.

Annamycin is a highly lipophilic anthracycline with the ability to bypass the MDR-1 mechanism of cellular drug resistance. In this phase I study, annamycin entrapped in liposomes was administered by a 1- to 2-h intravenous infusion at 3-week intervals. Thirty-six patients with relapsed solid tumors were treated and 109 courses were administered at doses ranging from 3 to 240 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. Five patients had a probable allergic reaction, requiring discontinuation of treatment in one. Treatment was well tolerated otherwise. No cardiac toxicity was seen on endomyocardial biopsy of four patients studied. There was limited gastrointestinal toxicity and no alopecia. No objective tumor responses were observed. Pharmacokinetic studies at 24, 120 and 240 mg/m2 showed a biexponential plasma concentration-versus-time profile. There was a linear relationship between the dose and the maximal plasma concentration with relatively constant plasma clearance values. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for liposomal annamycin defined in this study is 210 mg/m2. Because of a subsequent change in the formulation of the drug, future studies will use 190 mg/m2 as the MTD.

Combined modality treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma in elderly patients or patients with severe comorbid conditions using tamoxifen as the primary therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the objective response rate and possibility of breast-conserving surgery using neoadjuvant tamoxifen in the multimodality treatment, including surgery and radiotherapy, of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-seven patients age > 75 years or age < 75 years with comorbid conditions and locally advanced breast carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant tamoxifen (20 mg/day) for 3-6 months. This was followed by surgery and radiotherapy when feasible and adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 years or until disease recurrence. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 72 years (range, 48-86 years). Approximately 22% had T3 lesions, 57% had T4 lesions, 22% were Stage II (AJCC Manual for Staging Cancer, 3rd edition), and 78% were Stage III. Eighty percent were estrogen receptor positive. After 6 months of treatment with neoadjuvant tamoxifen, a response rate of 47% was observed, including a complete response rate of 6%. Twenty-nine patients (62%) were rendered free of disease by surgery, including 5 with breast-conserving procedures. After a median follow-up of 40 months, 23 patients (49%) remained disease free. The median survival time had not been reached at the time of last follow-up. No major toxicity was observed, with the exception of one patient who developed a possible tamoxifen-related Stage I endometrial carcinoma. The estimated 2-year and 5-year progression free and overall survival rates were 50% and 41%, and 83% and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study show that neoadjuvant tamoxifen was effective in the treatment of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with estrogen receptor positive tumors, and resulted in a reasonable response rate, including complete responses and good overall survival.

Phase I study of vinorelbine by 96-hour infusion in advanced metastatic breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose and the toxicity profile of vinorelbine administered by continuous infusion for 96 hours to patients who had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Forty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with vinorelbine 8 mg intravenously for 10 minutes (day 1) followed by continuous infusion of vinorelbine for 96 hours. Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. Eighty-eight percent of the patients had had two or more prior chemotherapeutic regimens: 91% had prior doxorubicin therapy and 77% had prior paclitaxel therapy. All 43 patients were evaluable for toxicity. The median age was 49 years. All patients had a performance status less than or equal to 2 and a life expectancy more than 12 weeks. Eight dose levels were evaluated, and a total of 182 cycles were given. National Cancer Institute grade III or IV granulocytopenia was observed in 64 (35%) cycles, neutropenic fever in 27 (15%) cycles, fatigue (National Cancer Institute grade III or IV) in 18 (10%) cycles, and hand-foot syndrome in 8 (4%) cycles. In 17 (9%) cycles, patients were hospitalized. The maximum tolerated dose of this regimen was determined to be vinorelbine 8 mg intravenously for 10 minutes (day 1) followed by continuous vinorelbine infusion 11 mg/m2 for 96 hours. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever and stomatitis.

Continuous-infusion high-dose leucovorin with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for relapsed metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study.

Twelve women with metastatic breast cancer were treated with continuous infusion high dose leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Toxicity was severe although the dose was lower than previously described for the treatment of other cancers, and there was little anti-tumor activity. Many other regimens are more effective and less toxic.

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell autografts for high-risk primary breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies have reported encouraging outcomes for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare standard-dose chemotherapy with the same therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes after primary breast surgery or patients with four or more positive lymph nodes after four cycles of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive eight cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Patients were stratified by stage and randomly assigned to receive two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support or no additional chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was planned for postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors and chest wall radiotherapy was planned for all. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (48 after primary surgery and 30 after primary chemotherapy) were registered. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned to FAC and 39 to FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there have been 41 relapses. In intention-to-treat analyses, estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 62% and 48% for FAC and FAC/high-dose chemotherapy, respectively (P =.35), and 3-year survival rates were 77% and 58%, respectively (P =.23). Overall, there was greater and more frequent morbidity associated with high-dose chemotherapy than with FAC; there was one septic death associated with high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: No relapse-free or overall survival advantage was associated with the use of high-dose chemotherapy, and morbidity was increased with its use. Thus, high-dose chemotherapy is not indicated outside a clinical trial.

Phase II study of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma refractory to standard chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a single institution Phase II clinical trial to determine whether paclitaxel had antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma that was refractory to standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were eligible for the study if they had disease progression after at least 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients who had received three prior regimens were treated in a separate cohort. All patients were required to have received doxorubicin in the past and were not eligible if they had received prior therapy with paclitaxel. The starting dose of paclitaxel for low risk patients was 175 mg/m2, administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion; the starting dose of paclitaxel was 150 mg/m2 for patients who had received > or = 3 prior regimens. Therapy was given every 3 weeks and continued for at least 2 courses unless there was evidence of rapidly progressing disease, for at least 3 courses if there was no change in disease and Grade 3 or 4 (based on National Cancer Institute toxicity criteria) toxicity was not noted, and for 6 courses beyond the maximum response in patients who demonstrated complete or partial responses and showed no evidence of disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 69 patients entered in the study were evaluable for response: 35 patients who had received 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for Stage IV disease and 33 patients who had received > or =3 prior regimens. A partial response was observed in 7 patients who had received 2 prior regimens, for an objective response rate of 20% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 14-26%). In the group who had received > or = 3 prior regimens, a total of 6 partial responses were observed, for an objective response rate of 18% (95% CI, 12-23%). The median response duration was 8.2 months (range, 2.7-10.1 months) for the group who had received 2 prior regimens and 5.8 months (range, 2.1-9.5 months) for patients who received > or = 3 prior regimens. Responses were noted in patients with anthracycline-resistant tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel was active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, including anthracycline-resistant breast carcinoma.

Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the antitumor activity of single-agent paclitaxel to the three-drug combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-3N0-1M0 disease were randomized to receive either paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) as 24-hour infusion or FAC in standard doses at every-3-week intervals. Each patient was treated with four cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Clinical response and extent of residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes was assessed after four cycles of induction chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were registered, and 87 were randomized to each arm of the study. Clinical response, ie, complete and partial responses, was similar in both arms of the study. Three patients in the FAC arm and one patient in the paclitaxel subgroup had progressive disease. The extent of residual disease by intent-to-treat analysis at the time of surgery was similar between the two arms of the study. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective study demonstrated that single-agent paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy has significant antitumor activity, and this was clinically comparable to FAC. Similar fractions of patients had clinical complete and partial responses, and very few patients had no response to either therapy. The value of alternate non-cross-resistant therapies as used in this protocol on the clinical course of this disease would require longer follow-up.

Paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion with doxorubicin by 48-hour infusion as initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer: phase I results.

PURPOSE: We and others have demonstrated the antineoplastic efficacy of paclitaxel as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer. We performed this phase I trial to evaluate the combination of paclitaxel with doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer for which this was the initial cytotoxic treatment. They may have received adjuvant chemotherapy with other drugs. The study had four parts. In part 1, the patients received paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion followed by doxorubicin by 48-hour infusion. The paclitaxel dose was to be escalated from a starting dose of 125 mg/m2, and the doxorubicin dose was to remain constant at 60 mg/m2 with treatment repeated every three weeks. The results of part 1 prompted part 2 which was a study of the reverse sequence. Part 3 was a formal study of pharmacology and has been reported (J Clin Oncol 14: 2713-21, 1996). In part 4, patients received doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 by bolus followed by paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion for courses 1 and 2. In all subsequent courses doxorubicin was administered by 48-hour infusion. All patients in all four parts of the study had baseline cardiac scans. All patients received standard premedication for paclitaxel. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were treated in all four parts of the study. In part 1 (10 patients), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/24 hours followed by doxorubicin 48 mg/m2/48 hours as defined by dose-limiting mucositis and neutropenic fever which occurred at the starting dose. For part 2 (21 patients), the MTD was doxorubicin 60 mg/m2/48 hours followed by paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/24 hours. In part 4 (seven patients), the MTD was doxorubicin 50 mg/m2/bolus followed by paclitaxel 135 mg/m2/24 hours. In parts 2 and 4, the dose-limiting toxic effect was neutropenia. Of the entire cohort of 48 patients, seven (15%) had a complete response (one persists at five years without intervening therapy), 26 (54%) had a partial response for an objective response rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 54%-81%). The median follow-up of all living patients is 38+ months (range 20+ to 62+); the median response duration is seven months (range 2-33.7+); the median overall survival is 20.5 months (range 5-54+). The median time to progression is 9.6 months (range 1-33.7+ months). Two patients developed congestive heart failure, one at 24 months after her final dose of doxorubicin which amounted to a cumulative lifetime total doxorubicin dose of 870 mg/m2, one after a total of 660 mg/m2. In both, cardiac symptoms were controlled with medications. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel/24 hours with doxorubicin/48 hours is an effective antineoplastic treatment for metastatic breast cancer. However, the incidence of complete response, the median overall survival, and time to progression were not greater than for standard doxorubicin-based combinations. Additionally, a sequence-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and doxorubicin, given in the schedule described here, was defined. Other strategies and schedules should be evaluated to maximize the antineoplastic efficacy of these two potent agents.