Age, Sex, Metabolic and Pharmacologic Factors May Predict Nonresponse Status to Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapies.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A real challenge for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rheumatologists is primary nonresponse status (PNRS) or secondary nonresponse status (SNRS) to various therapies. Despite their detrimental influence on patient life quality, PNRS and SNRS have no accurate definition and no early predictive criteria for their development exist. Patients with RA under 40 years of age are rare, hence PNRS and SNRS data for this age group are scarce. This study examined the PNRS and SNRS according to sex, age, BMI, therapy type, and duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, 115 patients with RA having PNRS and/or SNRS were stratified by age (22-39, 40-59, and 60-81). The association between body mass index (BMI), proinflammatory cytokines inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and TNF-alpha inhibitors, sex, age, and PNRS and SNRS was examined. RESULTS: All three proinflammatory cytokine inhibitors (rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept) were associated with PNRS and SNRS in women with a high BMI aged 40-59 years. Abatacept-related PNRS and SNRS was significant in women with normal BMI aged 60-81 years. Adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab affected SNRS differently in women with normal BMI aged 22-39 years and women with high BMI aged 60-81 years. Etanercept and infliximab were associated with SNRS status in men with high-BMI aged 40-59 years. CONCLUSION: PNRS and SNRS development in patients with RA is significantly influenced by age, sex, and BMI, but most importantly is closely and differentially related to therapy type and duration.

CLIC1 Expression in Skin Biopsies from Patients With Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis as a Potential Tool to Predict Therapy Response.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Chloride intracellular channel protein 1 (CLIC1) activates inflammasomes in rheumatoid (RA) and psoriatic (PsA) arthritis. We studied CLIC1 expression in RA and PsA patients' skin with vasculitis and its variability depending on the therapy used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CLIC1 immunoexpression was evaluated in the vascular (CLIC1-V) and stromal (CLIC1-S) compartments of the RA and PsA skin biopsies of patients treated with methotrexate (MTX), leflunomid (LFN), corticotherapy (CT), or biological therapies. RESULTS: MTX significantly reduced CLIC1-S expression (p=0.016), whereas LFN decreased CLIC1-V (p<0.001). LFN therapy duration also correlated with CLIC1-V (p<0.001). CT decreased CLIC1-S expression (p=0.006). CLIC1-S expression persisted in skin biopsies despite of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, p=0.018) and C reactive protein (CRP, p=0.0026) normalisation. For PsA, CLIC1-S expression significantly related to MTX (p<0.022). Both CLIC1-S (p<0.001) and CLIC1-V (p=0.007) decreased by biological therapies in RA. CONCLUSION: CLIC1 expression is strongly influenced by the therapy used. Our data strongly support the extensive evaluation of CLIC1 in RA as a potential marker of inflammation and tool to predict therapy response.