Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reproduction ; 148(6): 593-606, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25246618

RESUMO

The risk of bacterial infection of the endometrium causing uterine disease in cattle is increased in the progesterone-dominated luteal phase of the ovarian cycle, while oestrogens or oestrus are therapeutic or protective against disease. The first line of defence against bacteria, such as Escherichia coli that cause inflammation of the endometrium, is the innate immune system, which recognises bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). This study tested the hypothesis that cyclic variation in ovarian hormone concentrations alters innate immune responses within the bovine endometrium. Ex vivo organ cultures of endometrium, and in vitro cultures of endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), all mounted inflammatory responses to E. coli or LPS, with secretion of inflammatory mediators interleukin 1ß (IL1ß), IL6 and IL8, and increased expression of mRNA encoding IL1B, IL6, CXCL8 (IL8) and CCL5. However, these inflammatory responses, typical of innate immunity, were not affected by the stage of ovarian cycle in which the endometrium was collected for organ culture, or by exogenous oestradiol or progesterone. Although a dexamethasone-positive control reduced inflammation stimulated by E. coli or LPS, treatment with oestradiol or progesterone, or inhibitors of oestradiol or progesterone nuclear receptors, did not affect endometrial cell or PBMC secretion of IL1ß, IL6 or IL8, or IL1B, IL6, CXCL8 and CCL5 gene expression. In conclusion, the stage of the oestrus cycle or ovarian steroids did not modulate the innate immune response in the bovine endometrium in vitro.


Assuntos
Bovinos/metabolismo , Quimiocinas/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Endométrio/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/fisiologia , Estradiol/farmacologia , Lipopolissacarídeos/farmacologia , Progesterona/farmacologia , Animais , Células Cultivadas , Dexametasona/farmacologia , Endométrio/efeitos dos fármacos , Endométrio/microbiologia , Estradiol/fisiologia , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/farmacologia , Ciclo Estral/fisiologia , Feminino , Antagonistas de Hormônios/farmacologia , Imunidade Inata/efeitos dos fármacos , Técnicas In Vitro , Leucócitos Mononucleares/efeitos dos fármacos , Leucócitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Leucócitos Mononucleares/microbiologia , Mifepristona/farmacologia , Técnicas de Cultura de Órgãos , Progesterona/fisiologia
2.
Pesqui. vet. bras ; 33(6): 759-764, June 2013. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-680792

RESUMO

Brucellosis is an important zoonosis of worldwide distribution. Reliable epidemiologic brucellosis data covering approximately 90% of the cattle population in Brazil have been recently published. Therefore, considering the scarcity of information regarding the economic impact of bovine brucellosis in Brazil, the goal of this study was to estimate economic impact of brucellosis on the Brazilian cattle industry. Several parameters including abortion and perinatal mortality rates, temporary infertility, replacement costs, mortality, veterinary costs, milk and meat losses were considered in the model. Bovine brucellosis in Brazil results in an estimated loss of R$ 420,12 or R$ 226,47 for each individual dairy or beef infected female above 24 months of age, respectively. The total estimated losses in Brazil attributed to bovine brucellosis were estimated to be approximately R$ 892 million (equivalent to about 448 million American dollars). Every 1% increase or decrease in prevalence is expected to increase or decrease the economic burden of brucellosis in approximately 155 million Reais.


A brucelose é uma zoonose de importância mundial. Recentes dados epidemiológicos dessa doença foram obtidos por meio de estudos que abrangeram em torno de 90% do rebanho bovino do Brasil. Observa-se escassez de informações sobre o impacto econômico causado pela brucelose bovina, portanto, o objetivo do presente estudo foi estimar as perdas econômicas na pecuária brasileira. Gastos relacionados com as ocorrências de abortos, natimortos, subfertilidade, descartes involuntários, mortalidade, intervenções veterinárias, diminuição da produção de leite e de carne, foram considerados nos cálculos. As perdas devidas à brucelose bovina no Brasil foram estimadas em R$ 420,12 ou R$ 226,47 para cada fêmea infectada acima de 24 meses de idade em rebanhos de leite ou corte, respectivamente. O prejuízo total estimado foi de, aproximadamente, R$ 892 milhões (equivalentes a $ 448 milhões de dólares americanos). A cada 1% de variação na prevalência, estima-se a variação de 155 milhões de reais no custo da brucelose bovina no Brasil.


Assuntos
Animais , Bovinos , Brucella abortus , Doenças dos Bovinos/economia , Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Zoonoses/epidemiologia
3.
Infect Immun ; 75(5): 2493-9, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17353292

RESUMO

The NRAMP1 gene encodes a divalent cation transporter, located in the phagolysosomal membrane of macrophages, that has been associated with resistance to intracellular pathogens. In cattle, natural resistance against brucellosis has been associated with polymorphisms at the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of the NRAMP1 gene, which are detectable by single-strand conformational analysis (SSCA). This study aimed to evaluate the association between NRAMP1 3'UTR polymorphisms and resistance against bovine brucellosis in experimental and natural infections. In experimentally infected pregnant cows, abortion occurred in 42.1% of cows with a resistant genotype (SSCA(r); n = 19) and in 43.1% of those with a susceptible genotype (SSCA(s); n = 23). Furthermore, no association between intensity of pathological changes and genotype was detected. In a farm with a very high prevalence of bovine brucellosis, the percentages of strains of the SSCA(r) genotype were 86 and 84% in serologically positive (n = 64) and negative (n = 36) cows, respectively. Therefore, no association was found between the NRAMP1-resistant allele and the resistant phenotype in either experimental or naturally occurring brucellosis. To further support these results, bacterial intracellular survival was assessed in bovine monocyte-derived macrophages from cattle with either the resistant or susceptible genotype. In agreement with our previous results, no difference was observed in the rates of intracellular survival of B. abortus within macrophages from cattle with susceptible or resistant genotypes. Taken together, these results indicate that these polymorphisms at the NRAMP1 3'UTR do not affect resistance against B. abortus in cattle and that they are therefore not suitable markers of natural resistance against bovine brucellosis.


Assuntos
Regiões 3' não Traduzidas/genética , Brucella abortus/classificação , Brucella abortus/patogenicidade , Brucelose Bovina/imunologia , Proteínas de Transporte de Cátions/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Aborto Animal/genética , Aborto Animal/imunologia , Aborto Animal/microbiologia , Animais , Brucella abortus/genética , Brucelose Bovina/genética , Brucelose Bovina/microbiologia , Bovinos , Células Cultivadas , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genótipo , Macrófagos/microbiologia , Masculino , Doenças Placentárias/genética , Doenças Placentárias/imunologia , Doenças Placentárias/microbiologia , Doenças Placentárias/veterinária , Polimorfismo Conformacional de Fita Simples , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA