Consensus of experts from the Spanish Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Society and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology for the genotyping of DPYD in cancer patients who are candidates for treatment with fluoropyrimidines.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and oral fluoropyrimidines, such as capecitabine, are widely used in the treatment of cancer, especially gastrointestinal tumors and breast cancer, but their administration can produce serious and even lethal toxicity. This toxicity is often related to the partial or complete deficiency of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme, which causes a reduction in clearance and a longer half-life of 5-FU. It is advisable to determine if a DPD deficiency exists before administering these drugs by genotyping DPYD gene polymorphisms. The objective of this consensus of experts, in which representatives from the Spanish Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Society and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology participated, is to establish clear recommendations for the implementation of genotype and/or phenotype testing for DPD deficiency in patients who are candidates to receive fluoropyrimidines. The genotyping of DPYD previous to treatment classifies individuals as normal, intermediate, or poor metabolizers. Normal metabolizers do not require changes in the initial dose, intermediate metabolizers should start treatment with fluoropyrimidines at doses reduced to 50%, and poor metabolizers are contraindicated for fluoropyrimidines.

A phase I/II dose-escalation multi-center study to evaluate the safety of infusion of natural killer cells or memory T cells as adoptive therapy in coronavirus pneumonia and/or lymphopenia: RELEASE study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Moderate/severe cases of COVID-19 present a dysregulated immune system with T cell lymphopenia and a hyper-inflammatory state. This is a study protocol of an open-label, multi-center, double-arm, randomized, dose-finding phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, alloreactivity, and efficacy of the administration of allogeneic memory T cells and natural killer (NK) cells in COVID-19 patients with lymphopenia and/or pneumonia. The aim of the study is to determine the safety and the efficacy of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of this treatment for patients with moderate/severe COVID-19. METHODS: In the phase I trial, 18 patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia and/or lymphopenia with no oxygen requirement or with an oxygen need of ≤ 2.5 liters per minute (lpm) in nasal cannula will be assigned to two arms, based on the biology of the donor and the patient. Treatment of arm A consists of the administration of escalating doses of memory T cells, plus standard of care (SoC). Treatment of arm B consists of the administration of escalating doses of NK cells, plus SoC. In the phase II trial, a total of 182 patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia and/or lymphopenia requiring or not oxygen supplementation but without mechanical ventilation will be allocated to arm A or B, considering HLA typing. Within each arm, they will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. In arm A, patients will receive SoC or RP2D for memory T cells plus the SoC. In arm B, patients will receive SoC or RP2D for NK cells plus the SoC. DISCUSSION: We hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T-lymphocytes obtained from convalescent donors recovered from COVID-19 can be used as a passive cell immunotherapy to treat pneumonia and lymphopenia in moderate/severe patients. The lymphopenia induced by COVID-19 constitutes a therapeutic window that may facilitate donor engraftment and viral protection until recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04578210 . First Posted : October 8, 2020.

Phase I dose-escalation single centre clinical trial to evaluate the safety of infusion of memory T cells as adoptive therapy in COVID-19 (RELEASE).

BACKGROUND: Effective treatments are still needed to reduce the severity of symptoms, time of hospitalization, and mortality of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 specific memory T-lymphocytes obtained from convalescent donors recovered can be used as passive cell immunotherapy. METHODS: Between September and November 2020 a phase 1, dose-escalation, single centre clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the infusion of CD45RA- memory T cells containing SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells as adoptive cell therapy against moderate/severe cases of COVID-19. Nine participants with pneumonia and/or lymphopenia and with at least one human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match with the donor were infused. The first three subjects received the lowest dose (1 × 105 cells/kg), the next three received the intermediate dose (5 × 105 cells/kg) and the last three received the highest dose (1 × 106 cells/kg) of CD45RA- memory T cells. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT04578210. FINDINGS: All participants' clinical status measured by National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and 7-category point ordinal scales showed improvement six days after infusion. No serious adverse events were reported. Inflammatory parameters were stabilised post-infusion and the participants showed lymphocyte recovery two weeks after the procedure. Donor microchimerism was observed at least for three weeks after infusion in all patients. INTERPRETATION: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the idea that treatment of COVID-19 patients with moderate/severe symptoms using convalescent CD45RA- memory T cells is feasible and safe. FUNDING: Clinical Trial supported by Spanish Clinical Research Network PT17/0017/0013. Co-funded by European Regional Development Fund/European Social Fund. CRIS CANCER Foundation Grant to AP-M and Agencia Valenciana de Innovación Grant AVI-GVA COVID-19-68 to BS.

Cross-cutting view of current challenges in paediatric solid organ and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe: the European Reference Network TransplantChild.

The low prevalence of European paediatric transplanted patients and scarcity of resources and expertise led to the need for a multidisciplinary network able to improve the quality of life of paediatric patients and families requiring a solid organ or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The European Reference Network (ERN) TransplantChild is one of the 24 ERNs established in a European legal framework to improve the care of patients with rare diseases. ERN TransplantChild is the only ERN focused on both solid organ and haematopoietic stem cell paediatric transplantation, based on the understanding of paediatric transplantation as a complex and highly specialised process where specific complications appear regardless the organ involved, thus linking the skills and knowledge of different organ disciplines. Gathering European centres of expertise in paediatric transplantation will give access to a correct and timely diagnosis, share expertise and knowledge and collect a critical mass of patients and data that increases the speed and value of clinical research outcomes. Therefore, the ERN TransplantChild aims for a paediatric Pan-European, Pan-transplant approach.

Use of antifungal agents in pediatric and adult high-risk areas.

The purpose of this investigation was to describe the characteristics of the use of systemic antifungal agents (AFAs) and to evaluate their appropriateness of use. A prospective drug-utilisation study was conducted in intensive-care areas: haematology-oncology services and transplant units. Data were collected in three periods over 9 months. The required sample size was determined to be 113 patients (margin of error ±7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]), assuming a variability of 50%. Two different investigator groups evaluated the appropriateness of use separately; Cohen's Kappa index was used to calculate the degree of agreement between groups. A total of 114 patients we included, of which 62 (54.4%) were children. A total of 150 prescriptions were administered; fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed (38%), followed by liposomal amphotericin B (22.7%) and caspofungin (18.7%). The indications were: (1) pre-emptive treatment of Candida in non-neutropaenic critically ill patients (35.1%), (2) treatment of systemic fungal infection (24.6%), (3) prophylaxis for systemic fungal infection (SFI) in immunocompromised patients (16.7%), (4) prophylaxis of SFI in transplant recipients (12.3%), (5) prophylaxis of SFI in preterm infants (5.3%), (6) treatment of SFI in neonates (6.1%). The Kappa index showed a substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.73). The indications were considered to be inappropriate in 71 (47.3%) episodes. The indications or dosages were inappropriate in 79 cases (52.7%). The indications, dosages or duration of treatment were inappropriate in 83 cases (55.3%). We conclude that AFAs are prescribed for a significant number of inappropriate indications.

[Risk of thromboembolic events and evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients and after discharge]. / Riesgo de enfermedad tromboembólica y estudio de utilización de tromboprofilaxis en pacientes médicos hospitalizados y al alta hospitalaria.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to establish the risk of thromboembolic events and evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients and after discharge, and their concordance with protocols used in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional with prospective follow-up until hospital discharge. It included all medical patients in Internal Medicine, Pneumology and Oncology Departments. The patient's thromboembolic risk and type of thromboembolism prophylaxis indication during hospitalization and after discharge were determined. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (52 in Internal Medicine Department, 35 in Pneumology Department and 29 in Oncology Department), with a mean age of 67 +/- 17 years (35 females; 81 males) were included. During hospitalization, 62.9% of the patients had a high risk of thromboembolic events, 3.4% a moderate risk, 23.3% low risk, and 10.3% had no risk. After discharge, these proportions were 35.6%, 3.8%, 24% and 34.6%, respectively. A total of 49.1% of the patients had an adequate indication of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during the hospitalization and after discharge.