Utility of KIT Mutations in Myeloid Neoplasms Without Documented Systemic Mastocytosis to Detect Hidden Mast Cells in Bone Marrow.

BACKGROUND: KIT p.D816 mutation is strongly associated with systemic mastocytosis (SM). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is now routinely performed in almost all bone marrow sample and KIT mutations are detected from patients who are not known or suspected to have SM. Therefore, we wanted to assess if KIT mutations in this patient population are associated with unsuspected SM. METHODS: We searched NGS result in our institution with positive result for KIT mutation from patients with known/suspected myeloid neoplasms. Patients with previously documented history of systemic mastocytosis were excluded. Bone marrow biopsies from patients with KIT mutation were assessed with immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and mast cell tryptase (MST). RESULTS: Bone marrow biopsies were assessed with immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and mast cell tryptase (n = 49). Most patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 38) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, n = 6). Immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and tryptase were performed in all 49 patients. A total of 4 patients (8.2%) showed mast cell nodules where spindled shaped mast cells were present, meeting the WHO criteria for SM. All four patients had KIT p.D816V mutation and had high mutant allelic frequency (∼ 50%) except one patient (1%). CONCLUSION: We discovered approximately 8% of patients who had myeloid neoplasms with unexpected KIT mutations fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis after additional immunohistochemical studies. Our data support that application of additional immunohistochemical studies is recommended to identify underrecognized SM when KIT mutations are found by molecular assays.

Proposals for revised International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet criteria for anemia response in myelofibrosis.

ABSTRACT: With emerging new drugs in myelofibrosis (MF), a robust and harmonized framework for defining the severity of anemia and response to treatment will enhance clinical investigation and facilitate interstudy comparisons. Accordingly, the lead authors on the 2013 edition of the International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet (IWG-ELN) response criteria in MF were summoned to revise their document with the intent to (1) account for gender-specific differences in determining hemoglobin levels for eligibility criteria; (2) revise the definition of transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA) based on current restrictive transfusion practices; and (3) provide a structurally simple and easy to apply response criteria that are sensitive enough to detect efficacy signals (minor response) and also account for major responses. The initial draft of the 2024 IWG-ELN proposed criteria was subsequently circulated around a wider group of international experts and their feedback incorporated. The proposed articles include new definitions for TDA (≥3 units in the 12 weeks before study enrollment) and hemoglobin thresholds for eligibility criteria (<10 g/dL for women and <11 g/dL for men). The revised document also provides separate (TDA vs non-TDA) and graded (major vs minor response) response criteria while preserving the requirement for a 12-week period of screening and observation on treatment.

SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Current and Emerging Therapies for Systemic Mastocytosis.

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous myeloid neoplasm, characterized by clonal proliferation of mast cells (MCs) in ≥ 1 extracutaneous organs, including the bone marrow (BM) and gastrointestinal tract. Aberrant MC proliferation is driven by mutation KIT D816V in ≈90-95% of SM patients. Indolent SM (ISM) is the most common SM subtype with various symptoms that can be severe. Advanced SM (AdvSM) has markedly poor prognosis. The advent of KIT inhibitors, targeting mutant KIT and neoplastic MCs, led to a paradigm shift in SM management and markedly improved outcomes. Midostaurin inaugurated the era of KIT inhibitors and was approved for AdvSM in 2017. Avapritinib is the first highly potent and selective inhibitor of KIT D816V that was approved to treat AdvSM and symptomatic ISM (platelets ≥ 50 × 109/L), in the US, in 2021 and 2023, respectively. Pooled analysis of the EXPLORER and PATHFINDER studies, assessing avapritinib in AdvSM, demonstrated rapid and profound reductions (≥ 50%) in markers of MC burden, high response rates (71-75%), and prolonged survival. In the PIONEER study, avapritinib significantly and rapidly improved symptoms/quality of life, and reduced markers of MC burden in ISM patients. The investigational agents bezuclastinib and elenestinib are highly potent and selective inhibitors of KIT D816V with minimal blood-brain barrier penetration. Bezuclastinib reduced markers of MC burden by ≥ 50% in ≈50% of AdvSM patients and ≈90-100% of nonAdvSM patients and reduced symptoms (≥ 50%) in the APEX and SUMMIT studies, respectively. Elenestinib demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy in reducing MC burden markers and improved symptoms in ISM patients in the HARBOR study.

Consistency of Spleen and Symptom Reduction Regardless of Cytopenia in Patients With Myelofibrosis Treated With Pacritinib.

BACKGROUND: Pacritinib is a JAK2/IRAK1/ACVR1 inhibitor that is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have a platelet count < 50 × 109/L. Phase 3 clinical studies of pacritinib included patients across a wide range of baseline platelet and hemoglobin levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to assess the impact of baseline blood counts on pacritinib efficacy, an analysis of efficacy outcomes by baseline platelet and hemoglobin levels was performed using data pooled from 2 Phase 3 studies of pacritinib in patients with MF (PERSIST-1 and PERSIST-2). RESULTS: Of 276 patients evaluable for spleen response, spleen volume reduction occurred consistently across platelet subgroups (< 100 × 109/L or ≥ 100 × 109/L) and hemoglobin subgroups (< 8 g/dL, ≥ 8 to < 10 g/dL, or > 10 g/dL), with no diminution in treatment effect in patients with severe thrombocytopenia or anemia. Among 159 patients evaluable for symptoms response, improvement in total symptom score (TTS) was similar across platelet subgroups. A ≥ 50% improvement of TSS occurred more frequently in patients with baseline hemoglobin < 8 g/dL compared with those with baseline hemoglobin ≥ 8 to < 10 g/dL or > 10 g/dL. Patients with baseline hemoglobin < 8 g/dL also experienced improved hemoglobin sustained over 24 weeks, whereas subgroups with less severe anemia had stable hemoglobin levels over time. Symptom improvement as assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Change instrument was generally consistent across platelet and hemoglobin subgroups. CONCLUSION: Pacritinib demonstrates consistent efficacy in patients with MF regardless of baseline platelet and hemoglobin counts.

Momelotinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis.

ABSTRACT: In September 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration approved momelotinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) with anemia, marking the fourth US regulatory approval of a Janus kinase inhibitor for MF. A positive opinion from the European Medicines Agency followed in November 2023. Momelotinib's ability to address splenomegaly, symptoms, and anemia, including in patients with thrombocytopenia (with platelet counts of ≥25 × 109/L), the ease of switching from ruxolitinib, and good tolerability uniquely position it to substantially impact the MF treatment landscape.

Advances with janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms: an update of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: The hallmark discovery of hyperactivation of the janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway was a sentinel moment in the history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). This finding paved the way for the development of JAK inhibitors, which now represent the foundation of myelofibrosis therapy. With four JAK inhibitors now approved for myelofibrosis, awareness of their clinical efficacy and safety data and recognition of their unique pharmacologic attributes are of critical importance. Additionally, ruxolitinib represents an integral part of the therapeutic arsenal for polycythemia vera. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a broad overview of the published literature supporting JAK inhibitor therapy for MPNs. Primarily focusing on myelofibrosis, each of the four available JAK inhibitors is reviewed in detail, including pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data. Failure of JAK inhibitors and future directions in JAK inhibitor therapy are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: JAK inhibitors revolutionized the treatment of MPNs and have dramatically improved patient outcomes. However, data informing selection between currently available JAK inhibitors is limited. These agents are not curative and eventually fail most patients with myelofibrosis. Combining JAK inhibitors with novel targeted agents appears to be the most promising path to further improve outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis.

ABSTRACT: The ACE-536-MF-001 trial enrolled patients with myelofibrosis (n = 95) into 4 cohorts: patients in cohorts 1 and 3A were non-transfusion dependent (NTD) and had anemia; patients in cohorts 2 and 3B were transfusion dependent (TD); and patients in cohort 3A/3B had stable ruxolitinib treatment before and during the study. All patients received luspatercept (1.0-1.75 mg/kg, 21-day cycles). Treatment was extended if clinical benefit was observed at day 169. The primary end point was anemia response rate (NTD, ≥1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increase from baseline; TD, transfusion-independence) over any 12-week period during the primary treatment period (weeks 1-24). Overall, 14% of patients in cohorts 1 and 3A, 10% in cohort 2, and 26% in cohort 3B met the primary end point. In cohorts 1 and 3A (NTD), 27% and 50% of patients, respectively, had mean hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL from baseline. Among TD patients, ∼50% had ≥50% reduction in transfusion burden. Reduction in total symptom score was observed in all cohorts, with the greatest response rate seen in cohort 3A. Overall, 94% of patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 47% had ≥1 treatment-related AE (TRAE; 11% grade ≥3), most frequently hypertension (18%), managed with medical intervention. One patient had a serious TRAE leading to luspatercept discontinuation. Nine patients died on treatment (unrelated to study drug). In most patients, ruxolitinib dose and spleen size remained stable. In patients with myelofibrosis, luspatercept improved anemia and transfusion burden across cohorts; the safety profile was consistent with previous studies. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03194542.

Disseminated Histoplasmosis in a Patient with Myelofibrosis on Ruxolitinib: A Case Report and Review of the Literature on Ruxolitinib-Associated Invasive Fungal Infections.

Ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinases, is a standard treatment for intermediate/high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) but is associated with a predisposition to opportunistic infections, especially herpes zoster. However, the incidence and characteristics of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in these patients remain uncertain. In this report, we present the case of a 59-year-old woman with MF who developed disseminated histoplasmosis after seven months of ruxolitinib use. The patient clinically improved after ten weeks of combined amphotericin B and azole therapy, and ruxolitinib was discontinued. Later, the patient received fedratinib, a relatively JAK2-selective inhibitor, without relapse of histoplasmosis. We also reviewed the literature on published cases of proven IFIs in patients with MF who received ruxolitinib. Including ours, we identified 28 such cases, most commonly due to Cryptococcus species (46%). IFIs were most commonly disseminated (39%), followed by localized lung (21%) infections. Although uncommon, a high index of suspicion for opportunistic IFIs is needed in patients receiving JAK inhibitors. Furthermore, the paucity of data regarding the optimal management of IFIs in patients treated with JAK inhibitors underscore the need for well-designed studies to evaluate the epidemiology, pathobiology, early diagnosis, and multimodal therapy of IFIs in patients with hematological malignancies receiving targeted therapies.

Reduced dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive or low-intensity induction: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia have high rates of relapse, especially if they are unable to complete standard consolidation strategies or allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001 study showed an overall survival benefit with oral azacitidine maintenance. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is highly active in acute myeloid leukaemia and synergistic with azacitidine. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia. METHODS: We performed a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a WHO 2016 diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia in complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery following intensive or low-intensity induction and not immediately eligible for HSCT. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had to be 3 or less. Patients were assigned to maintenance therapy with azacitidine 50 mg/m2 intravenously or subcutaneously for 5 days and venetoclax 400 mg orally for 7 days or 14 days. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival. The study was closed early due to slow accrual. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04062266). FINDINGS: Between Sept 26, 2019, and Oct 26, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, of whom 25 (71%) were assigned to cohort 1 following intensive induction and ten (29%) to cohort 2 following low-intensity induction. Of 35 patients, 18 (51%) were male and 17 (49%) were female. The median age was 55 years (IQR 41-62). The median number of cycles given was 9 (IQR 2-22) and median follow-up time was 23·3 months (IQR 9·0-30·0). The median relapse-free survival was not reached (95% CI 20·2 to not calculable) in the full cohort, not reached (29·1 to not calculable) in cohort 1, and 30·3 months (16·5 to not calculable) in cohort 2. The 2-year relapse-free survival was 65% (95% CI 50-85) in the full cohort, 71% (53-94) in cohort 1, and 52% (27-100) in cohort 2. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=6), lung infection (n=4), leukopenia (n=4), and neutropenia (n=3). No deaths occurred during maintenance therapy. INTERPRETATION: Low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax is a feasible maintenance strategy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive and low-intensity induction. FUNDING: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, MDS/AML Moon Shot, Genentech.

Management of Patients with Early Myelofibrosis: A Discussion of Best Practices.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Summarize best practices for management of patients with early myelofibrosis (MF). RECENT FINDINGS: Myelofibrosis is a progressive myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that generally produces burdensome symptoms and ultimately leads to worse overall survival than that observed in healthy controls or patients with other MPNs. Several Janus kinase inhibitors and various interferon formulations are now available for treatment of MF, with ruxolitinib notable for extending overall survival in addition to improving MF signs and symptoms. The chronic nature of the disease can lead some patients to avoid immediate treatment in favor of a watch-and-wait approach. This review summarizes the patient management approach taken in my practice, providing guidance and a discussion of best practices with an emphasis on the importance and clinical benefits of active treatment in early MF. In particular, a case is made to consider treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with intermediate-1 risk disease and to minimize delay between diagnosis and treatment initiation for patients with intermediate or high-risk disease.

Interferons in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Interferons are cytokines with immunomodulatory properties and disease-modifying effects that have been used to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) for more than 35 years. The initial use of interferons was limited due to difficulties with administration and a significant toxicity profile. Many of these shortcomings were addressed by covalently binding polyethylene glycol to the interferon structure, which increases the stability, prolongs activity, and reduces immunogenicity of the molecule. In the current therapeutic landscape, pegylated interferons are recommended for use in the treatment of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis. We review recent efficacy, molecular response, and safety data for the two available pegylated interferons, peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) and ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (BESREMi). The practical management of interferon-based therapies is discussed, along with our opinions on whether to and how to switch from hydroxyurea to one of these therapies. Key topics and questions related to use of interferons, such as their safety and tolerability, the significance of variant allele frequency, advantages of early treatment, and what the future of interferon therapy may look like, will be examined. Pegylated interferons represent an important therapeutic option for patients with MPNs; however, more research is still required to further refine interferon therapy.

A review of what interferons are and how they are used in the treatment of the myeloproliferative neoplasms polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis Why was this paper written? This paper was written to summarize the current clinical landscape of the use of interferons for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). What are interferons and how are they used in MPNs? Interferons are small proteins involved in cellular signaling that have been used to treat MPNs, polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), for more than 35 years. They can have modulatory effects on the immune system and on the fundamental causes of disease. The use of interferons as treatment was initially limited due to difficulties with their administration and the potential for significant adverse effects. Many of these shortcomings were addressed by chemically binding a biocompatible polymer, polyethylene glycol (PEG), to the structure of the interferon, which increases the stability of the protein, prolongs the time during which it is active, and reduces negative effects to the immune system. The combined chemical structure of PEG and interferon (pegylated interferon or peginterferon) is recommended for use in the treatment of PV, ET, and PMF. What topics are discussed in this paper? In this review paper we evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of two available pegylated interferons, peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) and ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (BESREMi) and discuss the practical clinical management of interferon-based therapies, along with the authors' opinions on whether to and how to switch therapy from hydroxyurea. Key topics and questions related to the use of interferons, such as their safety and tolerability, the significance of their effects on mutated cells, advantages of early treatment, and what the future of interferon therapy may look like, will be examined. What do the findings mean? Pegylated interferons represent an important therapeutic option for patients with MPNs; however, more research is still required to further refine interferon therapy.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Diagnosis, Outcomes, and Management of Prefibrotic Myelofibrosis.

Prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prefibrotic PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with distinct characteristics comprising histopathological and clinico-biological parameters. It is classified as a subtype of primary myelofibrosis. In clinical practice, it is essential to correctly distinguish prefibrotic PMF from essential thrombocythemia especially but also overt PMF besides other myeloid neoplasms. Risk stratification and survival outcomes for prefibrotic PMF are worse than that of ET but better than that of overt PMF. Rates of progression to overt PMF and blast phase disease are also higher for prefibrotic PMF than ET. In this review we first discuss the historical context to the evolution of prefibrotic PMF as an entity, its presenting features and diagnostic criteria. We emphasize the differences between prefibrotic PMF, ET, and overt PMF with regards to presenting features and disease outcomes including thrombohemorrhagic events and progression to fibrotic and blast phase disease. Next, we discuss the risk stratification models and contextualize these in the setting of clinical management. We share our view of personalizing treatment to address unique patient needs in the context of currently available management options. Lastly, we discuss areas of critical need in clinical research and speculate on the possibility of future disease course modifying therapies in prefibrotic PMF.

Multicolor flow cytometric immunophenotyping is highly sensitive and specific in identifying aberrant mast cells in the diagnostic workup of systemic mastocytosis.

OBJECTIVES: Flow cytometric immunophenotyping (FCI) is a fast and sensitive method for characterizing hematolymphoid neoplasms. It is not widely used in the workup of systemic mastocytosis (SM), in part because of the technical challenges and in part because the utility of FCI in assessing mast cells is not well understood. The objectives of this study were to assess the diagnostic utility of FCI in establishing a diagnosis of SM and distinguishing SM from nonneoplastic mast cells and to examine the immunophenotypic findings among SM subtypes. METHODS: We performed FCI on bone marrow samples suspicious for SM using a panel consisting of CD2, CD25, CD30, CD45, CD117, and HLA-DR. RESULTS: The cohort included 88 SM cases: 67 without an associated hematologic neoplasm (AHN) (PureSM) and 21 with an AHN (SM-AHN). We also assessed 40 normal/reactive controls. Overall, FCI was adequate for interpretation in 87 of 88 (99%) cases and detected at least 1 immunophenotypic aberrancy in 100% of SM cases. CD2, CD25, and CD30 were positive in 78%, 98%, and 90% of SM cases vs 0%, 13%, and 13% of cases with normal/reactive mast cells (P < .0001 for all). Two or 3 abnormalities were observed in 92% of SM cases but not in normal/reactive mast cells. Among SM cases, SM-AHN showed statistically significant less CD2 (38% vs 91%, P < .0001) and less co-expression of all 3 aberrant markers (CD2, CD25, and CD30 positive in 38% vs 86% of cases; P < .0001) than PureSM. Immunohistochemical analysis showed consistently weaker or focal expression of CD2, CD25, and CD30 than FCI, with CD2 and CD30 being falsely negative in 40% and 50% cases, respectively. A KIT D816V mutation was detected in 67% of PureSM cases and 76% of SM-AHN cases. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric immunophenotyping is a quick, sensitive, high-yield tool for evaluating the immunophenotype of mast cells. An abnormal FCI finding should prompt careful histologic evaluation and sensitive KIT D816V mutation testing to address the possibility of SM. CD2, CD25, and CD30 are important markers for the detection of immunophenotypic aberrancy of mast cells, and their frequencies of aberrancy differ across SM subtypes.

Moving toward disease modification in polycythemia vera.

Polycythemia vera (PV) belongs to the BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and is characterized by activating mutations in JAK2 and clinically presents with erythrocytosis, variable degrees of systemic and vasomotor symptoms, and an increased risk of both thromboembolic events and progression to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment selection is based on a patient's age and a history of thrombosis in patients with low-risk PV treated with therapeutic phlebotomy and aspirin alone, whereas cytoreductive therapy with either hydroxyurea or interferon alfa (IFN-α) is added for high-risk disease. However, other disease features such as significant disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly, concurrent thrombocytosis and leukocytosis, or intolerance of phlebotomy can constitute an indication for cytoreductive therapy in patients with otherwise low-risk disease. Additionally, recent studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy (ie, reduction in phlebotomy requirements and molecular responses) of ropegylated IFN-α2b support its use for patients with low-risk PV. Additionally, emerging data suggest that early treatment is associated with higher rates of molecular responses, which might eventually enable time-limited therapy. Nonetheless, longer follow-up is needed to assess whether molecular responses associate with clinically meaningful outcome measures such as thrombosis and progression to myelofibrosis or AML. In this article, we provide an overview of the current and evolving treatment landscape of PV and outline our vision for a patient-centered, phlebotomy-free, treatment approach using time-limited, disease-modifying treatment modalities early in the disease course, which could ultimately affect the natural history of the disease.

Relevant Clinical Factors in Patients with Myelofibrosis on Ruxolitinib for 5 or More Years.

INTRODUCTION: Median duration of therapy with the first JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) approved for patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) is about 3 years. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate clinical features, predictive factors, and outcome of patients presenting to our institution who were able to remain on RUX for ≥5 years (RUX ≥5y, n = 73). RESULTS: Comparing baseline demographics of patients who remained on RUX ≥5y (n = 73) with patients who were on RUX for 6 months to 3 years (n = 203), we confirmed that patients on RUX ≥5y lacked advanced clinical features at the start of therapy, such as anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, higher blasts or monocytes. Predictive independent factors for staying on RUX ≥5y were hemoglobin >10 g/dL, circulating blasts <1%, platelets >150 × 109/L, neutrophils >70%, and having primary MF. Age over 65 years remained significant for outcome in patients on RUX ≥5y. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we report on the relevance of absence of advanced clinical features for long RUX therapy and confirm the role of age on outcome despite therapy.