Quality of Preanesthesia Teleconsultation: The TELECAM Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Preanesthesia teleconsultation helps reduce availability constraints as well as direct and indirect expenses. The TELECAM trial was performed to assess the quality of preanesthesia teleconsultation in terms of clinical parameters evaluation, feasibility, patient satisfaction and preoperative anxiety, and anesthesiologist satisfaction. Methods: TELECAM was an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel group, evaluator-blinded, open-label study. Patients with a scheduled ambulatory surgery (orthopedic or hand surgery) were randomized into the in-person preanesthesia consultation group or the preanesthesia teleconsultation (conducted at the patient's home or workplace) group. The quality of the teleconsultation was evaluated through agreement on intubation difficulty, predictable mask ventilation difficulty, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores between the preanesthesia consultation and the preanesthesia in-person visit. Results: A total of 241 patients were included, and 208 were considered in the analyses. The feasibility of teleconsultation was high, with a feasibility ratio of 87.5%. The quality of the preanesthesia consultation regarding the evaluation of predictable intubation, mask ventilation difficulties, and ASA score, did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.23, 0.29, and 0.06, respectively). The preoperative satisfaction was higher for patients who had a preanesthesia teleconsultation (p = 0.04). Patients' preoperative anxiety did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.90). The median satisfaction of the anesthesiologists who performed the teleconsultation reached a maximum of 10 (IQR: 8.0; 10.0). Conclusion: This study showed positive results for the quality of preanesthesia teleconsultation on the evaluation of clinical parameters, with high feasibility and satisfaction of the patients and anesthesiologists. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials (NCT03470896).

Effects of pupillary reflex dilation-guided opioid administration on remifentanil and morphine consumption during laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of pupillary reflex dilation (PRD) assesses the balance of nociception--antinociception. Laparoscopic surgery induces haemodynamic variations that are misleading. During laparoscopy, PRD guidance helps differentiate haemodynamic changes because of excess nociception from secondary changes related to the reflex release of endocrine factors. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the effect of PRD-guided antinociception on the administration of intra-operative remifentanil and immediate postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery. DESIGN: The study was a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: The study took place at two sites at the University Hospital of Nancy from March 2014 to November 2017. PATIENTS: A total of 100 patients who underwent scheduled laparoscopic surgery were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly given remifentanil guided by PRD (PRD-guided) or standard anaesthesia care (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was intra-operative remifentanil consumption. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption in the immediate postoperative period and the number of intra-operative haemodynamic events. RESULTS: Data from 95 patients were analysed. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was lower in the PRD-guided group than in the control group: median [IQR], 0.09 [0.07 to 0.11] vs. 0.14 [0.12 to 0.16] µg kg-1 min-1, with a mean difference (95% confidence Interval, CI) of 0.048 (0.035 to 0.060) µg kg-1 min-1; P < 0.0001. Morphine consumption was 0.13 [0.1 to 0.5] vs. 0.15 [0.11 to 0.4] mg kg-1 (P  = 0.52) in the PRD-guided and control groups, respectively. The number of hypertensive and tachycardia events was greater in the PRD-guided group than in the control group: Hypertensive events 60.4% vs. 32.6%, relative risk 1.85 (95% CI, 1.24 to 2.84), P = 0.004; tachycardia events 31.6% vs. 4.3%, relative risk 2.09 (95% CI, 1.45 to 2.84), P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: When PRD is used to differentiate between haemodynamic events arising from noxious stimuli and those events because of other nonsurgical stimuli, then intra-operative remifentanil administration is reduced intra-operatively during laparoscopic surgery but there was no change in postoperative morphine consumption. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02116868.

A national healthcare response to intensive care bed requirements during the COVID-19 outbreak in France.

BACKGROUND: Whereas 5415 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds were initially available, 7148 COVID-19 patients were hospitalised in the ICU at the peak of the outbreak. The present study reports how the French Health Care system created temporary ICU beds to avoid being overwhelmed. METHODS: All French ICUs were contacted for answering a questionnaire focusing on the available beds and health care providers before and during the outbreak. RESULTS: Among 336 institutions with ICUs before the outbreak, 315 (94%) participated, covering 5054/5531 (91%) ICU beds. During the outbreak, 4806 new ICU beds (+95% increase) were created from Acute Care Unit (ACU, 2283), Post Anaesthetic Care Unit and Operating Theatre (PACU & OT, 1522), other units (374) or real build-up of new ICU beds (627), respectively. At the peak of the outbreak, 9860, 1982 and 3089 ICU, ACU and PACU beds were made available. Before the outbreak, 3548 physicians (2224 critical care anaesthesiologists, 898 intensivists and 275 from other specialties, 151 paediatrics), 1785 residents, 11,023 nurses and 6763 nursing auxiliaries worked in established ICUs. During the outbreak, 2524 physicians, 715 residents, 7722 nurses and 3043 nursing auxiliaries supplemented the usual staff in all ICUs. A total number of 3212 new ventilators were added to the 5997 initially available in ICU. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 outbreak, the French Health Care system created 4806 ICU beds (+95% increase from baseline), essentially by transforming beds from ACUs and PACUs. Collaboration between intensivists, critical care anaesthesiologists, emergency physicians as well as the mobilisation of nursing staff were primordial in this context.

Impact of Chloroprocaine on the Eligibility for Hospital Discharge in Patients Requiring Ambulatory Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: An Observational Multicenter Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: This observational study was designed to assess the use of spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine in the context of ambulatory surgery. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational study was carried out among 33 private or public centers between May 2014 and January 2015 and adult patients, scheduled for a short ambulatory surgery under spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine. The primary outcomes were anesthetic effectiveness, defined as performance of the whole surgical procedure without any additional anesthetic agent, and the time to achieve eligibility for hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were the effect of chloroprocaine on motor and sensory blocks, patients' satisfaction, and the use of analgesics in the first 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 615 enrolled patients, 56% were male, the mean age was 47.2 ± 15.2 years, and most patients had an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) status of 1 (63.7%). Main surgical procedures performed were orthopedic (62.6%) and gynecologic (16.1%), and the mean duration of surgery was 26.7 ± 16.7 min. The overall anesthetic success rate was 93.8% (95% CI [91.5%; 95.6%]) for the 580 patients with available data for primary criteria. The failure rate was lower than 7% for all surgical procedures, except for gynecologic surgery (14.8%; 95% CI [8.1%; 23.9%]). The average times of eligibility for hospital discharge and effective discharge were 252.7 ± 82.7 min and 313.8 ± 109.9 min, respectively. The time of eligibility for hospital discharge is defined as the recovery of the patient's normal clinical parameters and the time of effective discharge is defined as the time for the patient to leave the hospital after surgery. Eligibility for patient's discharge was achieved more rapidly in private than public hospitals (236.3 ± 77.2 min vs. 280.9 ± 80.7 min, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed positive results on the effectiveness of chloroprocaine as a short-duration anesthetic and could be used to reduce the time to achieve eligibility for hospital discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02152293. Registered on May 6, 2014. Date of enrollment of the first participant in the trial May 7, 2014.

Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Available short-acting intrathecal anesthetic agents (chloroprocaine and prilocaine) offer an alternative to general anesthesia for short-duration surgical procedures, especially ambulatory surgeries. Factors determining the choice of anesthesia for short-duration procedures have not been previously identified. METHODS: This observational, prospective, multicenter, cohort study was conducted between July 2015 and July 2016, in 33 private or public hospitals performing ambulatory surgery. The primary objective was to determine the factors influencing the choice of anesthetic technique (spinal or general anesthesia). Secondary outcomes included efficacy of the anesthesia, time to hospital discharge, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Among 592 patients enrolled, 309 received spinal anesthesia and 283 underwent general anesthesia. In both study arms, the most frequently performed surgical procedures were orthopedic and urologic (43.3% and 30.7%, respectively); 66.1% of patients were free to choose their type of anesthesia, 21.8% chose one of the techniques because they were afraid of the other, 16.8% based their choice on the expected ease of recovery, 19.2% considered their degree of anxiety/stress, and 16.9% chose the technique on the basis of its efficacy. The median times to micturition and to unassisted ambulation were significantly shorter in the general anesthesia arm compared with the spinal anesthesia arm (225.5 [98; 560] min vs. 259.0 [109; 789] min; p = 0.0011 and 215.0 [30; 545] min vs. 240.0 [40; 1420]; p = 0.0115, respectively). The median time to hospital discharge was equivalent in both study arms. In the spinal anesthesia arm, patients who received chloroprocaine and prilocaine recovered faster than patients who received bupivacaine. The time to ambulation and the time to hospital discharge were shorter (p < 0.001). The overall success rate of spinal anesthesia was 91.6%, and no significant difference was observed between chloroprocaine, prilocaine, and bupivacaine. The patients' global satisfaction with anesthesia and surgery was over 90% in both study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Patient's choice, patient fear of the alternative technique, patient stress/anxiety, the expected ease of recovery, and the efficacy of the technique were identified as the main factors influencing patient choice of short-acting local anesthesia or general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia with short-acting local anesthetics was preferred to general anesthesia in ambulatory surgeries and was associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02529501. Registered on June 23, 2015. Date of enrollment of the first participant July 21, 2015.

Ultrasound-Guided Selective Versus Conventional Block of the Medial Brachial Cutaneous and the Intercostobrachial Nerves: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For superficial surgery of anteromedial and posteromedial surfaces of the upper arm, the medial brachial cutaneous nerve (MBCN) and the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) must be selectively blocked, in addition to an axillary brachial plexus block. We compared efficacy of ultrasound-guided (USG) versus conventional block of the MBCN and the ICBN. METHODS: Eighty-four patients, undergoing upper limb surgery, were randomized to receive either USG (n = 42) or conventional (n = 42) block of the MBCN and the ICBN with 1% mepivacaine. Sensory block was evaluated using light-touch on the upper and lower half of the anteromedial and posteromedial surfaces of the upper arm at 5, 10, 15, 20 minutes after nerve blocks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had no sensation in all 4 regions innervated by the MBCN and the ICBN at 20 minutes. Secondary outcomes were onset time of complete anesthesia, volume of local anesthetic, tourniquet tolerance, and quality of ultrasound images. RESULTS: In the USG group, 37 patients (88%) had no sensation at 20 minutes in any of the 4 areas tested versus 8 patients (19%) in the conventional group (P < 0.001). When complete anesthesia was obtained, it occurred within 10 minutes in more than 90% of patients, in both groups. Mean total volumes of local anesthetic used for blocking the MBCN and the ICBN were similar in the 2 groups. Ultrasound images were of good quality in only 20 (47.6%) of 42 patients. Forty-one patients (97.6%) who received USG block were comfortable with the tourniquet versus 16 patients (38.1%) in the conventional group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance improved the efficacy of the MBCN and ICBN blocks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02940847.

Spinal anaesthesia in outpatient and conventional surgery: A point of view from experienced French anaesthetists.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the practice of spinal anaesthesia among French anaesthetists in inpatient and outpatient settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire was sent to members of the French Association of Anaesthetists involved in regional anaesthesia during the first 4months of 2015. The questionnaire included items on the practice of spinal anaesthesia (type of needle, local anaesthetic available, puncture and disinfection techniques, etc.) and on the anaesthetic techniques usually used in 5 surgical situations eligible for outpatient surgery (knee arthroscopy, inguinal hernia, transobturator tape, haemorrhoids, varicose veins in the lower limbs). RESULTS: Responses from 703 anaesthesiologists were analysed. Spinal anaesthesia was usually performed in a sitting position (76%) using a Whitacre needle (60%) with a 25 G (57%) diameter. Ultrasound before puncture was reported in 26% of cases due to obesity or spinal abnormalities. Among the 5 surgical situations eligible for outpatient spinal anaesthesia, the technique was typically proposed in 29-49% of cases. Bupivacaine was the most used local anaesthetic. Concerns over delays in attaining readiness for hospital discharge, urine retention, operation length, and surgeon's preference were the main reasons for choosing another anaesthetic technique in these situations. DISCUSSION: New local anaesthetics are beginning to be used for outpatient spinal anaesthesia due to their interesting pharmacodynamic profile in this context. This study will provide a basis for evaluating future changes in practice.

Guidelines on smoking management during the perioperative period.

Smoking is a public health problem of particular importance during the perioperative period, since it exposes patients scheduled for surgery to risk increases of 20% in hospital mortality and 40% in major postoperative complications. In addition, current smoking increases almost all specific surgical complications. The perioperative period offers a genuine opportunity for smoking cessation. The rate of preoperative smoking cessation can be increased significantly by offering behavior management and the prescription of a nicotine substitute before any scheduled surgical intervention. Preoperative smoking cessation should be routinely recommended independently of the timing of the intervention, even though the benefits increase in proportion with the length of cessation. All professionals of the care pathway (general practitioners, surgeons, anesthetists-intensivists, caregivers) must inform smokers of the positive effects of smoking cessation and offer them dedicated management and personalized follow-up. In children, cessation of parental smoking or removal of the child from environmental tobacco smoke as long before surgery as possible is indispensable.

Plantar pressure displacement after anesthetic motor block and tibial nerve neurotomy in spastic equinovarus foot.

The aim of this study was to analyze the displacements of center of pressure (COP) using an in-shoe recording system (F-Scan) before and after motor nerve block and neurotomy of the tibial nerve in spastic equinovarus foot. Thirty-nine patients (age 45 ± 15 yr) underwent a motor nerve block; 16 (age 38 ± 15.2 yr) had tibial neurotomy, combined with tendinous surgery (n = 9). The displacement of the COP (anteroposterior [AP], lateral deviation [LD], posterior margin [PM]) was compared between paretic and nonparetic limbs before and after block and surgery. At baseline, the nonparetic limb had a higher AP (17.3 vs 12.3 cm, p < 0.001) and LD (4.0 vs 3.3 cm, p = 0.001) and a smaller PM (2.9 vs 4.7 cm, p = 0.001). For the paretic limb, a significant increase of AP was observed after block (13.5 vs 12.3 cm, p = 0.02) and after surgery (13.7 vs 12.3 cm, p = 0.03). A significant decrease of PM was observed after surgery (4.5 vs 3.3 cm, p < 0.001) with no more difference between two limbs (2.8 vs 3.3 cm; p = 0.44). This study shows that the F-Scan system can be used to quantify impairments and be useful to evaluate the effects of treatment for spastic foot. It suggests that changes in AP displacement following block may predict the effects of neurotomy.

[Evaluating the learning curve for the transversus abdominal plane block: a prospective observational study]. / Évaluation de la courbe d'apprentissage du bloc du plan transverse abdominal: étude prospective observationnelle.

PURPOSE: Anesthesia is a medical specialty where a large number of technical skills need to be mastered with the learning curve for these skills depending on both the technique and the individual involved. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has demonstrated its effectiveness especially in postoperative analgesia following midline laparotomy. It is usually described as a simple technique even though little is known about the learning curve for this block. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve for ultrasound-guided TAP block in anesthesiologists who had no prior experience performing the block. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed in gynecological and general surgery patients at the University Hospital Center of Nancy (France) between November 2011 and June 2012. After a short theoretical training, sixresidents were asked to perform, 20 TAP blocks under the supervision of a senior staff physician. The success of the procedure involved the visualization and identification of the different muscle planes, the peritoneum, the tip of the needle, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the block (sensory block), the absence of intervention from the supervisor, the absence of complications, less than three attempts, and a satisfaction score by the supervisor > 7 on a 0-10 rating scale. A learning curve/cummulative summation (LC-CUSUM) was generated. RESULTS: The six residents performed all 20 TAP blocks. All residents had already performed ultrasound-guided procedures. The procedure was considered mastered after performing 16 blocks on average for a 90% success rate. The average time (SD) to complete the block decreased from 6.8 (4.1 min) at the beginning to 2.8 (1.3) min at the end of the study. There was a decrease in the number of repositionings of the needle and in the number of interventions by the supervisor throughout the study. The LC-CUSUM analysis revealed that all residents had acquired the TAP block technique within 20 procedures. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the TAP block can be rapidly mastered even if the learning curve varies due to inter-individual differences in dexterity and in the ease of obtaining the ultrasound images.

Case report: pudendal nerve injury after a sciatic nerve block by the posterior approach.

We report a pudendal nerve injury that developed after a posterior approach to the sciatic nerve. A classical Labat's posterior sciatic nerve block on the right side was performed using an insulated needle and a nerve stimulator set at an initial current of 2 mA, 2 Hz frequency, and 0.1 ms duration. Painful paresthesia radiating to the right side of the patient's penis and right leg was experienced shortly after needle insertion. The needle was immediately withdrawn and redirected laterally. Motor responses for the common peroneal and tibial components of the sciatic nerve were elicited at 0.48 mA in both cases and a 10-mL bolus of mepivacaine 1.5% was injected onto each component. The sciatic nerve block was combined with a femoral nerve block to facilitate a knee arthroscopy. The trauma resulted in erectile dysfunction and partial loss of penile sensation as well as evidence of injury to the sciatic nerve itself. Symptoms and clinical signs of pudendal nerve injury lasted 7 months. This is the first time that sexual dysfunction as a result of a unilateral pudendal nerve injury that occurred after a posterior sciatic nerve block has been reported.

The efficacy of skin temperature for block assessment after infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND: Although it has been reported that an increase in skin temperature indicates block success with higher specificity and sensibility than skin sensitivity to pinprick and cold, the methodology previously used computer-assisted infrared thermography, a technique that is expensive and requires substantial personnel training. In this prospective observational study, we evaluated whether a simple infrared thermometer can reliably predict block effectiveness after infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients undergoing upper limb surgery under infraclavicular block were enrolled. From the end of the local anesthetic injection, skin temperature was measured in all four major nerve distribution areas, and the sensory block onset (using cold and pinprick with 0 = no sensation to 2 = normal) were evaluated every 5 min for 30 min. A successful block was defined as the absence of sensation to cold (swab soaked with alcohol) and pinprick (needle) with a score of "0" within 30 min after the injection in the 4 major nerve distribution areas (radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous). Skin temperature measurements were performed using a noncontact temperature probe. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty nerves (30 patients, 4 nerves per patient) were anesthetized. Twenty-five patients had a successful block. Four patients required supplementation for block failure. General anesthesia was performed in one patient. Skin temperature variation was not different among different nerves. There was a statistically significant increase in cutaneous temperature after nerve block compared to the same skin area before the procedure (P < 0.0001 from T5 to T30). Average temperature variations in blocked versus unblocked nerves at the same time were significantly different (P < 0.05 at T5 then P < 0.0001 from T10 to T30). When temperature in a specific sensory territory increased 1 degree C or more, at 5 and 10 min, the specific nerve was blocked (the score was "0"). Thus, when temperature changes in all 4 nerves were noted at 5 and 10 min, the block was successful at 30 min. No change in temperature in the contralateral arm or in the core temperature was observed. CONCLUSION: Skin temperature assessment with an infrared thermometer is a reliable, simple and early indicator of a successful nerve block.

The optimal motor response for infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective study we compared the success of the infraclavicular brachial plexus block using double-stimulation in regard to the second nerve response elicited with neurostimulation. METHODS: Six-hundred-twenty-eight patients undergoing emergency upper limb surgery using infraclavicular brachial plexus block were included in this study. The musculocutaneous nerve was initially blocked and the groups were then evaluated according to the second nerve located, which was radial in 54%, median in 35%, and ulnar in 11% of patients. Blocks were performed using lidocaine 1.5% with 1/400,000 epinephrine 40 mL in all cases. The block was assessed every 5 min for 30 min after completion of the block. RESULTS: The success rate was 96% for the radial response group, 89% for the median response group, and 90% for the ulnar response group (P < 0.05). Time to perform the block and the onset time were not significantly different among groups. No serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: We conclude that having initially located and blocked the musculocutaneous nerve, subsequent injection on a radial response resulted in a slightly more reliable success rate than injection with an ulnar or median response.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in hospital wards after orthopedic surgery: a multicenter prospective analysis of the quality of postoperative analgesia and complications in 1,416 patients.

BACKGROUND: Continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) is the technique of choice for postoperative analgesia after painful orthopedic surgery. However, the incidence of neurologic and infectious adverse events in the postoperative period are not well established. This issue was the aim of the study. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo orthopedic surgery performed with a CPNB were prospectively included during 1 yr in a multicenter study. Efficacy of postoperative analgesia, bacteriologic cultures of the catheter, and acute neurologic and infectious adverse events were evaluated after surgery in 1,416 patients at arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, at hour 1, and every 24 h up to day 5. Risk factors for adverse events were determined using logistic regression. RESULTS: The median duration of CPNB was 56 h. Both general anesthesia and CPNB were performed in 73.6% of the patients. Postoperative analgesia was effective in 96.3%, but an increase in pain scores was noted at hour 24 (P = 0.01). Hypoesthesia or numbness occurred in 3% and 2.2%, respectively, and paresthesia occurred in 1.5%. Three neural lesions (0.21%) were noted after continuous femoral nerve block. Two of these patients were anesthetized during block procedure. Nerve damage completely resolved 36 h to 10 weeks later. Cultures from 28.7% of the catheters were positive. Three percent of patients had local inflammatory signs. The bacterial species most frequently found were coagulase-negative staphylococcus (61%) and gram-negative bacillus (21.6%). A Staphylococcus aureus psoas abscess (0.07%) was reported in one diabetic woman. Independent risk factors for paresthesia/dysesthesia were postoperative monitoring in intensive care, age less than 40 yr, and use of bupivacaine. Risk factors for local inflammation/infection were postoperative monitoring in intensive care, catheter duration greater than 48 h, male sex, and absence of antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: CPNB is an effective technique for postoperative analgesia. Minor incidents and bacterial colonization of catheters are frequent, with no adverse clinical consequences in the large majority of cases. Major neurologic and infectious adverse events are rare.

The effects of clonidine added to mepivacaine for paronychia surgery under axillary brachial plexus block.

We hypothesized that onset of sensory block is delayed in infected versus healthy tissues within the same nerve distribution after axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) and that clonidine added to mepivacaine would enhance anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Forty-one outpatients undergoing thumb/index paronychia surgery under ABPB were randomly assigned to receive in a double-blind fashion 400 mg mepivacaine plus either 100 microg clonidine (clonidine group, n = 21) or 2 mL saline (placebo group, n = 20). Onset of sensory block in the infected area was delayed compared with healthy areas of the same nerve distribution (24.7 +/- 5.5 min versus 21.3 +/- 7.2; P = 0.02 for median and 21.6 +/- 7.8 min; P = 0.04 for radial) within the placebo group. In the clonidine group, when compared to placebo i) onset of sensory block in both the median and radial nerve territories was accelerated (11.1 +/- 5.6 and 10.5 +/- 5.2 versus 21.3 +/- 7.2 and 21.6 +/- 7.8 min, respectively; P < 0.001), ii) onset of sensory block in the region of infection was accelerated (9.1 +/- 1.9 versus 24.7 +/- 5.5 min; P < 0.001), iii) duration of anesthesia (275 +/- 75 versus 163 +/- 57; P = 0.04) and time to first analgesic requirement (279 +/- 87 versus 197 +/- 84 min; P = 0.002) were prolonged with decreased visual analog scale scores at this time (30 +/- 18 versus 70 +/- 24; P < 0.001), and iv) verbal numeric rating scores were decreased at 24 h (1.7 +/- 2.2 versus 4.1 +/- 3.0; P = 0.002) and 48 h (0.1 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 2.4; P = 0.01) postoperatively. Our findings suggest that in the setting of distal infected tissue surgery under ABPB infected tissues are resistant to anesthesia compared with healthy areas within the same nerve distribution and clonidine added to mepivacaine enhances both anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

Adding a selective obturator nerve block to the parasacral sciatic nerve block: an evaluation.

Our aim was to objectively evaluate the efficacy of obturator nerve anesthesia after a parasacral block. Patients scheduled for knee surgery had a baseline adductor strength evaluation. After a parasacral block with 30 mL 0.75% ropivacaine, sensory deficit in the sciatic distribution (temperature discrimination) and adductor strength were assessed at 5-min intervals. Patients with an incomplete sensory block (defined as a temperature discrimination score of less than 2 in the 3 cutaneous distributions of the sciatic nerve tested) 30 min after the parasacral block were excluded from the study. Subsequently, a selective obturator block was performed with 7 mL 0.75% ropivacaine and adductor strength was reassessed at 5 min intervals for 15 min. Finally, a femoral block was performed using 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine. Patient discomfort level during each block was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Thirty-one patients completed the study. Five patients were excluded as a result of inadequate sensory block in the sciatic distribution 30 min after the parasacral block (success rate of 89%). Thirty min after the parasacral block, adductor strength decreased by 11.3% +/- 7% compared with baseline (85 +/- 24 versus 97 +/- 28 mm Hg, P = 0.002). Fifteen min after the obturator nerve block, adductor muscle strength decreased by an additional 69% +/- 7% (16.6 +/- 15 versus 85 +/- 24 mm Hg, P < 0.0001). VAS scores were similar for all blocks (26 +/- 19, 28 +/- 24, and 27 +/- 19 mm for parasacral, obturator, and femoral respectively). Four parasacral blocks were simulated in 2 fresh cadavers using 30 mL of colored latex solution. The spread of the die in relation to the obturator nerve was assessed. Injection of 30 mL colored latex into cadavers resulted in spread of the injectate restricted to the sacral plexus. These findings demonstrate the unreliability of parasacral block to achieve anesthesia of the obturator nerve. A selective obturator block should be considered in the clinical setting when this is desirable.

Tramadol added to 1.5% mepivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block improves postoperative analgesia dose-dependently.

UNLABELLED: Adjuncts to local anesthetics for peripheral plexus blockade may enhance the quality and duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. The analgesic, tramadol, has a unique mechanism of action that suggests efficacy as such an adjunct. It displays a central analgesic and peripheral local anesthetic effect. We designed a prospective, randomized, controlled and double-blind clinical trial to assess the effect of tramadol added to brachial plexus anesthesia. One-hundred patients scheduled for carpal tunnel release surgery under brachial plexus anesthesia were randomized into four groups. All patients received 1.5% mepivacaine 40 mL plus a study solution containing either isotonic sodium chloride (Group P, n = 17), tramadol 40 mg (Group T(40), n = 22), tramadol 100 mg (Group T(100), n = 20) or tramadol 200 mg (Group T(200), n = 20). We evaluated the time of onset of anesthesia, duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration and quality of postoperative analgesia, and occurrence of adverse effects. Onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks were not different among groups. The number of patients requesting analgesia in the postoperative period was significantly less in the 3 tramadol groups compared with the placebo group (P = 0.02); this was also noted with the placebo and T(40) groups compared with the T(200) group. No statistical significance was demonstrated between the placebo and the T(40) group or the T(100) group and the T(200) group. Furthermore, there was a significant trend effect among groups applying the Cochran-Armitage tendency test (P = 0.003), suggesting a dose-dependent decrease for additional postoperative analgesia requirements when tramadol was added. Side effects did not differ among groups, although they were more frequently recorded in the T groups. Our study suggests that tramadol added to 1.5% mepivacaine for brachial plexus block enhances in a dose-dependent manner the duration of analgesia with acceptable side effects. However, the safety of tramadol has to be investigated before allowing its use in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS: Tramadol's unique mechanism of action suggests efficacy as a local anesthetic adjunct for peripheral plexus blockade. Our study demonstrates that tramadol, added to mepivacaine for brachial plexus anesthesia, extends the duration and improves the quality of postoperative analgesia in a dose dependent fashion with acceptable side effects.

An evaluation of the cutaneous distribution after obturator nerve block.

UNLABELLED: In 1973, Winnie et al. introduced the inguinal paravascular three-in-one block, which allegedly provides anesthesia of three nerves--the femoral, lateral cutaneous femoral, and obturator nerves--with a single injection. This concept was undisputed until the success of the obturator nerve block was reassessed by using evidence of adductor weakness rather than cutaneous sensory blockade, the latter being variable in its distribution and often absent. We performed this study, therefore, to evaluate the area of sensory loss produced by direct injection of local anesthetic around the obturator nerve. A selective obturator nerve block with 7 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine was performed in 30 patients scheduled for knee surgery. Sensory deficit and adductor strength were evaluated for 30 min by using sensory tests (cold and light-touch perception) and the pressure generated by the patient's squeezing a blood pressure cuff placed between the knees. Subsequently, a three-in-one block was performed, and the sensory deficit was reassessed. The obturator nerve block was successful in 100% of cases. The strength of adductors decreased by 77% +/- 17% (mean +/- SD). In 17 patients (57%), there was no cutaneous contribution of the obturator nerve. The remaining 7 patients (23%) had an area of hypoesthesia (cold sensation was blunt but still present) on the superior part of the popliteal fossa, and the other 6 (20%) had sensory deficit located at the medial aspect of the thigh. The three-in-one block resulted in blockade of the lateral aspect of the thigh in 87% of cases, whereas the anteromedial aspect was always anesthetized. By use of magnetic resonance imaging in eight volunteers, we demonstrated that the obturator nerve has already divided into its two branches at the site of local anesthetic injection. However, the injection of blue dye after having simulated the technique in five cadavers showed that the fluid regularly spread to both branches. We conclude that after three-in-one block, a femoral nerve block may have been assessed as an obturator nerve block in 100% of cases when testing the cutaneous distribution of the obturator nerve on the medial aspect of the thigh. IMPLICATIONS: Previous studies reporting an incidence of obturator nerve block after three-in-one block may have mistaken a femoral nerve block for an obturator nerve block in 100% of cases when the cutaneous distribution of the obturator nerve was assessed on the medial aspect of the thigh. The only way to effectively evaluate obturator nerve function is to assess adductor strength.