Impact of anti-VEGF treatment on development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment on proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) development among patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in US real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (Vestrum Health; January 2013 to June 2019) of eyes with baseline NPDR, without DME, and naïve to anti-VEGF treatment at index DR diagnosis. Eyes that received anti-VEGF and/or laser treatment over the course of study before development of PDR constituted the treated cohort while the remaining including those treated with laser constituted the anti-VEGF naïve cohort. Survival analysis via Kaplan-Meier method evaluated time to DME and PDR development by baseline NPDR severity, with anti-VEGF treatment as censoring variable. Baseline factors affecting PDR development were analyzed using Cox multivariable regression, censoring for anti-VEGF treatment. RESULTS: Among anti-VEGF-naive eyes, cumulative incidence of DME in eyes with mild (n = 70,050), moderate (n = 39,116), and severe NPDR (n = 10,692) at baseline was 27.1%, 51.2%, and 60.6%. Multivariable regression analysis identified baseline NPDR severity as the most significant predictor of PDR development over 48 months (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] of 2.69 (2.65-2.72) for moderate vs mild NPDR and 6.51 (6.47-6.55) for severe vs mild NPDR). Cumulative incidence (95% CI) of PDR was 7.9% (7.4%-8.3%), 20.9%, (20.0%-21.7%) and 46.8% (44.4%-49.2%) over 48 months in eyes with mild, moderate, and severe NPDR at baseline, respectively. Among treated eyes with baseline severe NPDR, cumulative incidence of PDR at 48 months was 50.1% in eyes treated with laser (n = 546; HR [95% CI] vs no treatment: 0.8 [0.7-1.0]), 27.4% in eyes treated with anti-VEGF (n = 923; HR [95% CI]: 0.4 [0.4-0.5]), and 25.6% in eyes treated with anti-VEGF plus laser (n = 293; HR [95% CI]: 0.5 [0.4-0.7]) compared with 49.9% in eyes with no treatment (n = 8930). CONCLUSIONS: DME and PDR development rates increased with increasing baseline NPDR severity. Approximately half of anti-VEGF‒naive eyes with severe NPDR progressed to PDR within 4 years in US clinical practice. The progression rate from severe NPDR to PDR was approximately halved with anti-VEGF versus no treatment.

Maintenance of Vision Needed to Drive after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and visual acuity (VA)/driving vision maintenance over 4 years in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, clinical practice cohort study using data from the Vestrum Health database. PARTICIPANTS: Initial diagnosis (January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019) of nAMD or DME and ≥ 1 year of treatment/follow-up history. The VA analysis required 4 years of treatment/follow-up history. For the driving vision maintenance analysis, patients required Snellen VA of 20/40 or better at baseline and for ≥ 6 months during year 1 after index intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in the better-seeing eye. METHODS: A loss-of-driving event was the first clinic visit with VA worse than 20/40 sustained for ≥ 6 consecutive months. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated the probability of maintaining driving vision over 4 years stratified by year-1 injection number. Cox proportional hazard models examined associations between baseline clinical characteristics and year-1 injection frequency and the risk of losing driving vision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change in VA over time and by baseline VA, driving vision maintenance probability over time and stratified by anti-VEGF injection frequency, and baseline factors predictive of driving vision maintenance. RESULTS: In year 1, the nAMD and DME cohorts gained 8.5 and 9.5 ETDRS letters, respectively. Between years 1 and 4, patients with nAMD and DME lost 6.6 and 2.7 ETDRS letters, respectively. The probability of maintaining driving vision over 4 years was 56% (nAMD) and 72% (DME); among patients who received 1 to 5, 6 to 7, and ≥ 8 anti-VEGF injections in year 1, corresponding probabilities were 50%, 56%, and 65% (nAMD; P < 0.001) and 63%, 72%, and 77% (DME; P < 0.001). Baseline factors associated with driving vision loss included older age, worse index VA, geographic atrophy (nAMD), and worsening baseline diabetic retinopathy (DME). CONCLUSIONS: Older age and worse index VA were risk factors for driving vision loss, whereas a greater year-1 injection number was associated with driving vision maintenance through year 4, supporting early initiation and frequent anti-VEGF injections for maintaining driving vision in nAMD or DME. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Opportunity Cost of Vitreoretinal Surgeries.

Purpose: To compare physician reimbursements for vitreoretinal surgeries with office-based patient care. Methods: A theoretical model was performed comparing physician work reimbursements for the 10 most common vitreoretinal surgeries with office-based work relative value units (wRVUs) that could have been generated during the same global time period. The reference physician was modeled at 40 patients per 8-hour workday. A lower volume physician and higher volume physician were modeled at 30 patients/day and 50 patients/day, respectively. The reimbursement rates and allocated times for surgery were based on the 2021 values set by Medicare, and the average wRVU per office visit was based on 2021 real-world data from the Vestrum Retinal Healthcare Database. Results: In the reference case, performing any of the 10 most common vitreoretinal surgeries was associated with an opportunity cost with a weighted mean of 49% (range, 40%-68%) relative to lost office productivity. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) allocated a weighted mean intraservice time of 73 minutes; however, the reference physician would have to complete the surgery with a weighted average of 5 minutes (range, -31-12 minutes) for surgical wRVUs to equal office-based reimbursements. Performing these 10 surgeries was associated with a 25% opportunity cost even for the lower volume physician and 61% for the higher volume physician. Probability sensitivity analysis with a range of conditions identified opportunity costs from surgery in over 99% of simulated scenarios. Conclusions: Medicare reimbursements for the physician work component of vitreoretinal surgeries represented a significant opportunity cost for the physician relative to office-based patient care of equivalent time, especially for busier physicians. The model did not explore practice overhead and professional liability insurance, which are factored separately by CMS and may influence the opportunity cost depending on utilization. The average threshold surgery times for surgical reimbursements to equal office-based reimbursements may be difficult to achieve.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor dosing frequency and visual outcomes in macular oedema following branch retinal vein occlusion.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between treatment frequency with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in eyes with macular oedema (MO) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in US clinical practice. METHODS: Study eyes that initiated anti-VEGF injections between January 2012 and May 2016 were followed for ≥1 year in a retrospective analysis of medical records (Vestrum Health database). Eyes were analysed in 2 cohorts by treatment duration (years 1 and 2) and then in 2 subcohorts by injection frequency (≤6 or ≥7 injections/year). RESULTS: Among 3099 eyes with MO secondary to BRVO, 1197 (38.6%) received ≤6 injections (mean injections, 4.6; baseline mean VA, 53 letters) and 1902 (61.4%) received ≥7 injections through 1 year (mean injections, 8.8; baseline mean VA, 52 letters). At year 1, mean VA gain from baseline was 10.4 versus 13.9 letters in eyes receiving ≤6 versus ≥7 injections (p < 0.001). At year 2, mean VA in eyes receiving ≤6 (n = 42) versus ≥7 injections (n = 227) was 64 versus 68 letters, respectively (p = 0.19). Mean VA change between the start and end of year 2 in eyes receiving ≥7 injections in year 1 and ≤6 in year 2 differed significantly from that of eyes receiving ≥7 injections in both years (-3.0 vs 0.7 letters, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, more frequent dosing with anti-VEGF agents was associated with greater visual benefits in eyes with MO secondary to BRVO.

Evaluating the Effect of Hypoglycemic Agents on Diabetic Retinopathy Progression.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Newer hypoglycemics such as dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been increasingly used in diabetes. This study aimed to assess the relationship between usage of these hypoglycemic agents and effect on diabetic retinopathy (DR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Vestrum Health Retina Database, patients with DR with 1 year follow-up after use of a hypoglycemic agent were included and stratified by agent, including no pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Of 60,649 eyes, in 1 year after hypoglycemic agent usage, progression rates from severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were the following: DPP-4 (17%), SGLT-2 (12%), GLP-1 (21%), metformin (18%), and none (20%). Progression rates from moderate NPDR to severe NPDR or PDR were the following: DPP-4 (11%), SGLT-2 (10%), GLP-1 (11%), metformin (10%), none (13%). Progression rates from mild NPDR to moderate/severe NPDR or PDR were the following: DPP-4 (6%), SGLT-2 (9%), GLP-1 (9%), metformin (7%), and none (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Within a large real-world database, patients prescribed GLP-1 agonists were found to have DR progression rates comparable to those of patients receiving no hypoglycemic agents. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023; 54(3):158-165.].

Incidence of Retinal Artery and Vein Occlusions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To examine whether new cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) increased during the coronavirus 209 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients visiting retina clinics with a new diagnosis in two time periods: between January 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020 (the pre-COVID-19 period), and between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020 (the COVID-19 period). The key outcome was the percentage of newly diagnosed central RAO (CRAO), branch RAO (BRAO), central RVO (CRVO), and branch RVO (BRVO) seen in each period. RESULTS: The study population included 285,759 new patients in the pre-COVID-19 period and 156,427 new patients in the COVID-19 period. The overall number of new patients dropped dramatically during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic (24%, 66%, and 51% less new patients in March, April, and May 2020 than in the same months in 2019; P < .0001 for all 3 months). However, the decrease in the number of newly diagnosed patients with CRAO, CRVO, and BRAO during these months was less dramatic. As most states reopened in June and the number of patients in retina clinics started to increase, the newly diagnosed patients with these conditions as a percentage of all new diagnoses returned to similar trends as seen in the pre-COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of new cases of RAO and RVO with respect to all new diagnoses in retina clinics remained stable for the majority of the COVID-19 period. There was an increase in these percentages during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for CRAO, CRVO, and BRAO, which may have led to the presumption that more patients presented with these conditions during the COVID-19 period evaluated in this study. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:22-30.

Opportunity Cost of Retinal Detachment Surgery vs Office-Based Patient Care.

Purpose: This work compares physician reimbursements for retinal detachment (RD) surgery with office-based patient care. Methods: A theoretical model was constructed from the physician's perspective for performing a 90-minute uncomplicated RD surgery with its associated perioperative work in the global period (Current Procedural Terminology code 67108) compared with managing 40 patients per 8-hour clinic day in the equivalent time period. The reimbursement rates were based on the 2019 values set by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Sensitivity analyses were performed varying the perioperative times, clinical productivity, and postoperative visits. Results: The CMS physician reimbursement rate for 67108 surgery was 17.13 work relative value units (wRVUs); meanwhile, the physician in the reference case could have generated 40.89 wRVUs in the office. CMS reimbursement therefore represented a 58% opportunity cost relative to lost office productivity for the physician. A significant disparity was still present even when modeling 30 patients per day. In sensitivity analyses, clinical productivity exceeded surgical compensation in 99% of modeled scenarios. In threshold analyses, the surgeon in the reference case would have to complete the surgery and all immediate perioperative care within 18 minutes to equal the total CMS valuation. Conclusions: CMS reimbursement for RD surgery resulted in a significant opportunity cost for the physician relative to office-based patient care, which was more pronounced for more efficient clinicians in the office. The sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the model. Reductions in surgery reimbursements relative to office-based patient care might disincentivize busy clinicians.

Rates of Suspected Endophthalmitis Following Intravitreal Injections in Clinical Practices in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of suspected endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections of aflibercept, bevacizumab, ranibizumab (vial and pre-filled), dexamethasone implant, and triamcinolone in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of aggregated electronic medical records from the Vestrum Health Database. Eyes with a diagnosis of suspected endophthalmitis based on billing codes between January 2013 and June 2019 were included. RESULTS: Total number of injections, suspected endophthalmitis cases, and medication rate, respectively, were: aflibercept (1,412,699; 687; 0.049%); bevacizumab (1,467,722; 379; 0.026%); ranibizumab vial (884,061; 233; 0.026%), ranibizumab pre-filled (427,763; 96; 0.022%); dexamethasone implant (49,464; 53; 0.107%); and triamcinolone (75,038; 110; 0.147%). Rates were lower for bevacizumab and ranibizumab (vial and pre-filled) compared to aflibercept, dexamethasone implant, and triamcinolone (P < .05). Triamcinolone had a higher rate compared to all of the other medications (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Suspected endophthalmitis rates following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice were similar to reported rates in clinical trials. Rates of suspected endophthalmitis following steroid injections trended higher with significantly higher rates with triamcinolone. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:312-318.].

Increasing Incidence and Prevalence of Common Retinal Diseases in Retina Practices Across the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated estimate of incidence and prevalence of the foremost retinal diseases in the U.S. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of the Vestrum Health Database evaluating eyes with diagnoses of wet or dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), diabetic retinopathy (DR), branch or central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO; CRVO) from January 2014 to December 2019 across 58 retina practices. RESULTS: Of the 3,086,791 eyes examined, 490,881 (15.9%) had dry AMD, 294,041 (9.5%) wet AMD, 270,703 (8.8%) DME, 254,690 (8.3%) DR without DME, 73,617 (2.4%) BRVO, and 50,670 (1.6%) CRVO. Dry AMD had the highest incidence. These diseases comprised 61.0% of total prevalence and 54.3% of incidence among patients at the retina practices analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a diverse database, these diseases comprised the majority of U.S. retina practice cases, with increasing annual incidences. AMD is the most common diagnosis, then diabetic eye disease. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:29-36.].