Effects of opioid-free anesthesia on postoperative morphine consumption after bariatric surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether postoperative morphine requirement in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery was reduced by opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), as compared to an anesthetic strategy using opioids (opioid balanced anesthesia (OBA)) and to investigate the differences that may exist between the use of clonidine and dexmedetomidine in the context of OFA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center in Lyon, France. PATIENTS: 257 patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery between March 2017 and March 2019. 77 patients were included in the OBA group and 180 in the OFA group. The OFA group was subdivided in two: 90 patients received OFA with clonidine (OFAC) and 90 received OFA with dexmedetomidine (OFAD). MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients who did not receive morphine during the first 24 postoperative hours. MAIN RESULTS: During the first 24 postoperative hours, the proportion of patients who did not require morphine was significantly higher in the OFA (87%) than in the OBA (52%) group (OR: 6.31; 95% CI [3.38; 11.80], P < 0.001). This difference remained significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, sex, type and duration of surgery (OR: 7.99; 95% CI [4.05; 16.48], P < 0.001). A greater proportion of patients in the OFAD (93%) than in the OFAC group (81%, P = 0.026) did not receive morphine during the same period. CONCLUSIONS: OFA is associated with a lower morphine requirement than with OBA during the first 24 h after bariatric surgery. In addition, OFAD seems to be more effective than OFAC in order to reduce morphine consumption.

Digestive perforations related to endoscopy procedures: a local management charter based on local evidence and experts' opinion.

Background and study aims Perforations are a known adverse event of endoscopy procedures; a proposal for appropriate management should be available in each center as recommended by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The objective of this study was to establish a charter for the management of endoscopic perforations, based on local evidence. Patients and methods Patients were included if they experienced partial or complete perforation during an endoscopic procedure between 2008 and 2018 (retrospectively until 2016, then prospectively). Perforations (size, location, closure) and management (imagery, antibiotics, surgery) were analyzed. Using these results, a panel of experts was asked to propose a consensual management charter. Results A total of 105 patients were included. Perforations occurred mainly during therapeutic procedures (91, 86.7%). Of the perforations, 78 (74.3 %) were diagnosed immediately and managed during the procedure; 69 of 78 (88.5 %) were successfully closed. Closures were more effective during therapeutic procedures (60 of 66, 90.9 %) than during diagnostic procedures (9 of 12, 75.0 %, P  = 0.06). Endoscopic closure was effective for 37 of 38 perforations (97.4 %) < 0.5 cm, and for 26 of 34 perforations (76.5 %) ≥ 0.5 cm ( P  < 0.05). For perforations < 0.5 cm, systematic computed tomography (CT) scan, antibiotics, or surgical evaluation did not improve the outcome. Four of 105 deaths (3.8 %) occurred after perforation, one of which was attributable to the perforation itself. Conclusions Detection and closure of perforations during endoscopic procedure had a better outcome compared to delayed perforations; perforations < 0.5 cm had a very good prognosis and CT scan, surgeon evaluation, or antibiotics are probably not necessary when the endoscopic closure is confidently performed. This work led to proposal of a local management charter.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery Program after Surgery in Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy on Postoperative Outcomes: A Controlled before and after Study.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program after pancreatic surgery was associated with decreased length of stay (LOS). However, there were only retrospective uncontrolled before-after study, and care protocols were heterogeneous. We aimed to evaluate the impact of ERAS program on postoperative outcomes after pancreatectomy through a prospective controlled study. METHODS: A before/after study with a contemporary control group was undertaken in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. We compared 2 groups: the intervention hospital that implemented ERAS program and the control hospital that performed traditional care; and 2 periods: the preimplementation and the post-implementation period. A difference-in-differences approach was used to evaluate whether implementation of ERAS program was associated with improved LOS and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: About 97 and 75 patients were included in intervention and control hospital. In multivariate analysis, implementation of ERAS was associated with a significantly shorten LOS (hazard ratio 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.44) and higher compliance rate (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.18-1.53). Difference-in-differences analysis revealed that LOS, morbidity, and readmission did not differ after ERAS implementation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of ERAS program was safe and effective after pancreatectomy with high compliance rate. LOS was significantly reduced without compromising morbidity.

Serum Concentrations of Lidocaine During Bariatric Surgery.

Lidocaine has been shown to be clinically beneficial during bariatric surgery. However, information about lidocaine serum concentrations in this setting is scarce. This prospective clinical trial included 42 obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. They received lidocaine based on adjusted body weight. Administration began with a 1.5 mg·kg bolus of intravenous lidocaine followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg·kg·hour. After skin closure, administration was decreased to 1 mg·kg·hour until discharge from the recovery room. No serum concentrations of lidocaine were outside the usual accepted range (1.5-5 µg·mL).

Intraoperative carcinoid syndrome during small-bowel neuroendocrine tumour surgery.

Only few descriptions of intraoperative carcinoid syndrome (ioCS) have been reported. The primary objective of this study was to describe ioCS. A second aim was to identify risk factors of ioCS. We retrospectively analysed patients operated for small-bowel neuroendocrine tumour in our institution between 2007 and 2015, and receiving our preventive local regimen of octreotide continuous administration. ioCS was defined as highly probable in case of rapid (<5 min) arterial blood pressure changes ≥40%, not explained by surgical/anaesthetic management and regressive ≥20% after octreotide bolus injection. Probable cases were ioCS which did not meet all criteria of highly-probable ioCS. Suspected ioCS were detected on the anaesthesia record by an injection of octreotide due to a manifestation which did not meet the criteria for highly-probable or probable ioCS. A total of 81 patients (liver metastases: 59, prior carcinoid syndrome: 49, carcinoid heart disease: 7) were included; 139 ioCS occurred in 45 patients: 45 highly probable, 67 probable and 27 suspected. ioCs was hypertensive (91%) and/or hypotensive (29%). There was no factor, including the use of vasopressors, significantly associated with the occurrence of an ioCS. All surgeries were completed and one patient died from cardiac failure 4 days after surgery. After preoperative octreotide continuous infusion, ioCS were mainly hypertensive. No ioCS risk factors, including vasopressor use, were identified. No intraoperative carcinoid crisis occurred, suggesting the clinical relevance of a standardized octreotide prophylaxis protocol.

"First look" unsedated transnasal esogastroduodenoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding? A prospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With small diameter endoscopes, transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (t-EGD) is routinely performed. The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the role of t-EGD for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (mean age, 66±18.4 years) with suspicion of UGIB were classified a priori into 3 groups according to initial clinical presentation: (1) intensive care unit with EGD under sedation, (2) endoscopy unit with EGD under transient sedation and (3) unsedated t-EGD as "first look". Demographic, clinical and biological parameters, Rockall and Blatchford scores, endoscopic diagnosis and treatment, and outcome were analysed. RESULTS: Unsedated t-EGD was attempted in 89 patients, performed in 52 (5 failures, 28 contraindications) and the procedure was converted under sedation for 2 patients. Based on ASA classification, clinical (blood pressure, hemodynamical failure) and biological variables (hemoglobin, platelets, creatinine), these patients were less severe than in the other groups. Pre-endoscopic Rockall and Blatchford scores were significantly lower in this group. More patients in this group presented significant cardiovascular co-morbidity (47.2%), taking aspirin, clopidogrel and/or anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results strongly support that "first look" unsedated t-EGD can avoid unnecessary sedation in selected patients with UGIB, presenting a low probability for endoscopic haemostatic treatment and high sedation risks.

Severe portal hypertension secondary to arterio-portal fistula: salvage surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Arterio-portal fistulas (APFs) are rare vascular disorders of various origins that can lead to severe portal hypertension. Even if surgery was initially the treatment of choice, more recently, interventional radiological procedures have been considered as the first line therapeutic option. CASE REPORT: A man with no history of liver disease was admitted for abdominal pain and distension. Abdominal ultrasonography with Doppler, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) scan showed ascites, splenomegaly and a probable APF between the left branches of both the hepatic artery and portal vein, associated with hepatofugal portal flow. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed large oesophageal varices without bleeding. A celiac and mesenteric arteriography and a splenic arteriography were performed and confirmed the existence of multiple intrahepatic APFs. The initial treatment consisted of two sessions of percutaneous transcatheter endovascular embolization. Unfortunately, ascites worsened, and the patient did not respond to diuretic treatment. Therefore, a surgical treatment was considered to be the only suitable treatment because of the absence of improvement after embolization procedures. A left hepatectomy with hepatic artery ligation was performed. Clinical evolution was favourable; an improvement of ascites was obtained; control ultrasonography and CT scan disclosed no residual haemodynamic abnormality; and the portal vein was normal with a hepatopedal flow. Currently, 12 months after surgery, the clinical condition of the patient is good. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment of portal hypertension by embolizing multiple large APF has been described to be an effective method. Nevertheless, failure of such conservative treatment is possible and must lead to a salvage surgery.

Negative impact of de novo malignancies rather than alcohol relapse on survival after liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis: a retrospective analysis of 305 patients in a single center.

OBJECTIVES: Alcoholic liver disease is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results and survival prognostic factors of LT in this indication from a large cohort of patients. METHODS: From October 1990 to October 2005, 305 consecutive patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (from 594 patients presenting with cirrhosis, i.e., 51.3%) underwent LT in our center. There were 229 men and 76 women, with a median age of 50 yr (range 30-68). Clinical and biological variables with possible prognostic value were analyzed. RESULTS: Global survival rate was 92.6% at 1 yr, 88.5% at 3 yr, 84.3% at 5 yr, and 73.4% at 10 yr, and was similar (P=0.78, log-rank test) to that of patients transplanted for other cirrhosis (88.8% at 1 yr, 84.1% at 3 yr, 80.6% at 5 yr, and 74.7% at 10 yr). Recurrence of alcohol consumption was observed in 37 patients (12.1%). De novo cancer occurred in 35 patients after LT (11.5%). Univariate analysis disclosed that male gender, history of smoking, and de novo carcinoma were significant survival prognostic factors (P<0.05, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Our results strongly confirm that alcoholic liver disease is an excellent indication for LT, but long-term survival is reduced because of other target-organ damage of both alcohol and tobacco, especially aero-digestive malignancies, which are greater causes of morbidity and mortality than is recurrent alcohol liver disease.

Impact of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation on access to transplantation and patients' survival: an 8-year single-center experience.

While the number of candidates for liver transplantation has increased in the recent years, the pool of cadaveric donor organs has remained constant and the waiting time progressively increases. These facts led us to start a program of adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation in 1998. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of all patients put on the waiting list since 1998. Between January 1, 1998, and January 1, 2005, 505 patients were put on the waiting list in our center, and living donor liver transplantation was considered in 57 cases (11.3%). At the time of evaluation (April 1, 2006), liver transplantation was performed in 377 patients (46 living donor liver transplantations), and 89 patients died on waiting list. On an intention-to-treat basis, the 1-year survival rate from the time of listing was 87.5% in the "living donor" group vs. 76.2% in the "cadaveric donor" group (P < 0.05), whereas the 1-year survival after liver transplantation was similar (92.3% vs. 86.9%). Our living donor liver transplantation program was able to improve the access to liver transplantation by reducing waiting time and the number of deaths on waiting list, despite the fact that these patients were more critically ill (liver failure and/or liver cancer).