RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care cardiovascular left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification is established, but automatic tablet-based stroke volume (SV) quantification with handheld ultrasound (HAND) devices is unexplored. We evaluated a tablet-based monoplane LVEF and LV volume quantification tool (AutoEF) against a computer-based tool (Tomtec) for LVEF and SV quantification. METHODS: Patients underwent HAND scans, and LVEF and SV were quantified using AutoEF and computer-based software that utilized either apical four-chamber views (Auto Strain-monoplane [AS-mono]) or both apical four-chamber and apical two-chamber views (Auto Strain-biplane [AS-bi]). Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare AutoEF with AS-mono and AS-bi. RESULTS: Out of 43 participants, eight were excluded. AutoEF showed a correlation of .83 [.69:.91] with AS-mono for LVEF and .68 [.44:.82] for SV. The correlation with AS-bi was .79 [.62:.89] for LVEF and .66 [.42:.81] for SV. The bias between AutoEF and AS-mono was 4.88% [3.15:6.61] for LVEF and 17.46 mL [12.99:21.92] for SV. The limits of agreement (LOA) were [-5.50:15.26]% for LVEF and [-8.02:42.94] mL for SV. The bias between AutoEF and AS-bi was 6.63% [5.31:7.94] for LVEF and 20.62 mL [16.18:25.05] for SV, with LOA of [-1.20:14.47]% for LVEF and [-4.71:45.94] mL for SV. CONCLUSION: LVEF quantification with AutoEF software was accurate and reliable, but SV quantification showed limitations, indicating non-interchangeability with neither AS-mono nor AS-bi. Further refinement of AutoEF is needed for reliable SV quantification at the point of care.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia , Volume Sistólico , Humanos , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Idoso , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Computadores de Mão , Software , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao LeitoRESUMO
Bedside quantification of stroke volume (SV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is valuable in hemodynamically compromised patients. Miniaturized handheld ultrasound (HAND) devices are now available for clinical use. However, the performance level of HAND devices for quantified cardiac assessment is yet unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the validity of HAND measurements with standard echocardiography (SE) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Thirty-six patients were scanned with HAND, SE and 3DE. LVEF and SV quantification was done with automated software for the HAND, SE and 3DE dataset. The image quality of HAND and SE was evaluated by scoring segmental endocardial border delineation (2 = good, 1 = poor, 0 = invisible). LVEF and SV of HAND was evaluated against SE and 3DE using correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. The correlation, bias, and limits of agreement (LOA) between HAND and SE were 0.68 [0.46:0.83], 1.60% [- 2.18:5.38], and 8.84% [- 9.79:12.99] for LVEF, and 0.91 [0.84:0.96], 1.32 ml [- 0.36:4.01], 15.54 ml [- 18.70:21.35] for SV, respectively. Correlation, bias, and LOA between HAND and 3DE were 0.55 [0.6:0.74], - 0.56% [- 2.27:1.1], and 9.88% [- 13.29:12.17] for LVEF, and 0.79 [0.62:0.89], 6.78 ml [2.34:11.21], 12.14 ml [- 26.32:39.87] for SV, respectively. The image quality scores were 9.42 ± 2.0 for the apical four chamber views of the HAND dataset and 10.49 ± 1.7 for the SE dataset and (P < 0.001). Clinically acceptable accuracy, precision, and image quality was demonstrated for HAND measurements compared to SE. In comparison to 3DE, HAND showed a clinically acceptable accuracy and precision for LVEF quantification.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Tridimensional , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Humanos , Volume Sistólico , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ecocardiografia , Ecocardiografia Tridimensional/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
PURPOSE: The corrected carotid flow time (ccFT) is derived from a pulsed-wave Doppler signal at the common carotid artery. Several equations are currently used to calculate ccFT. Its ability to assess the intravascular volume status non-invasively has recently been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation and trending ability of ccFT with invasive cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) measurements. METHODS: Eighteen cardiac surgery patients were included in this prospective observational study. ccFT measurements were obtained at three time points: after induction of anesthesia (T1), after a passive leg raise (T2), and post-bypass (T3). Simultaneously, CO and SV were measured by calibrated pulse contour analysis. Three different equations (Bazett, Chambers, and Wodey) were used to calculate ccFT. The correlation and percentage change in time (concordance) between ccFT and CO and between ccFT and SV were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean ccFT values differed significantly for the three equations (p < 0.001). The correlation between ccFT and CO and between ccFT and SV was highest for Bazett's (ρ = 0.43, p < 0.0001) and Wodey's (ρ = 0.33, p < 0.0001) equations, respectively. Concordance between ΔccFT and ΔCO and between ΔccFT and ΔSV was highest for Bazett's (100%) and Wodey's (82%) equations, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that correlation and concordance between SV and ccFT improved when assessed within limited heart rate (HR) ranges. CONCLUSION: The use of different ccFT equations leads to variable correlation and concordance rates between ccFT and CO/SV measurements. Bazett's equation acceptably tracked CO changes in time, while the trending capability of SV was poor.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Humanos , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Carotid Doppler ultrasound has been a topic of recent interest, as it may be a promising noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring tool. In this study, the relation between carotid artery blood flow and invasive cardiac output (CO) was evaluated. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: A single-institution, tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen elective cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: CO was measured by calibrated pulse contour analysis. Simultaneously, carotid artery pulsed-wave Doppler measurements were obtained in the operating room in three clinical settings: after induction of anesthesia (T1), after a passive leg raise maneuverer (T2), and at the end of surgery (T3). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Correlation and trending between carotid artery blood flow and invasive CO were evaluated. Furthermore, two Bland-Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the level of agreement between carotid artery-derived CO and invasive CO measurements. Carotid artery blood flow correlated moderately with invasive CO (ρ = 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.76, p < 0.05). Concordance between the percentage change of carotid artery blood flow and invasive CO from T1 to T3 was 72%. The level of agreement between carotid artery-derived CO and invasive CO was ±2.29; ±2.57 L/min, with a bias of 0.1; -0.54 L/min, and mean error of 50% and 48%, for the two Bland-Altman analyses, respectively. Intraexamination precision was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgery patients, carotid artery blood flow correlated moderately with invasive CO measurements. However, the trending ability of carotid artery blood flow was poor, and carotid artery-derived CO tended not to be interchangeable with invasive CO.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Termodiluição , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Humanos , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia is used for prolonged myocardial protection in complex cardiac surgery. Administration leads to acute hyponatremia in a majority of patients, because of its low sodium concentration (15 mmol/L). However, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution's osmolality is slightly hypertonic (310 mOsm/kg). Hypothesized was that acute isotonic hyponatremia will be induced, which does not need to be corrected with hypertonic saline. METHODS: Cardiac surgery patients who received histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia were included in this prospective single center study. Serial blood samples were taken from each patient at five different time points: after induction of anesthesia (T1) and 10 minutes (T2), 6 hours (T3), 12 hours (T4), and 18 hours (T5) after administration of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia, respectively. Blood samples were analyzed for sodium concentration, osmolality, and acid-base balance. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included. Median blood sodium levels decreased from 140 [138-141] at T1 to 128 [125-130] mmol/L at T2 (p < 0.001). At T3, T4, and T5, median blood sodium concentrations were 136 [134-138], 139 [137-140], and 140 [137-142] mmol/L, respectively. Median osmolality was 289 [286-293] at T1 and increased to 296 [291-299] mOsm/kg (p < 0.001) at T2. At T3, T4, and T5, osmolality was 298 [292-302], 298 [294-304], and 300 [297-306] mOsm/kg, respectively. Median pH decreased from 7.38 [7.36-7.40] at T1 to 7.30 [7.27-7.32] at T2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administration of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia during cardiac surgery leads to acute moderate to severe isotonic hyponatremia, which resolves spontaneously in the first 18 hours perioperatively. Correction with hypertonic saline is not necessary.
Assuntos
Histidina , Hiponatremia , Soluções Cardioplégicas/efeitos adversos , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hiponatremia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , TriptofanoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ensuring that lung-protective ventilation is achieved at scale is challenging in perioperative practice. Fully automated ventilation may be more effective in delivering lung-protective ventilation. Here, we compared automated lung-protective ventilation with conventional ventilation after elective cardiac surgery in haemodynamically stable patients. METHODS: In this single-centre investigator-led study, patients were randomly assigned at the end of cardiac surgery to receive either automated (adaptive support ventilation) or conventional ventilation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of postoperative ventilation time characterised by exposure to predefined optimal, acceptable, and critical (injurious) ventilatory parameters in the first three postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included severe hypoxaemia (Spo2 <85%) and resumption of spontaneous breathing. Data are presented as mean (95% confidence intervals [CIs]). RESULTS: We randomised 220 patients (30.4% females; age: 62-76 yr). Subjects randomised to automated ventilation (n=109) spent a 29.7% (95% CI: 22.1-37.4) higher mean proportion of postoperative ventilation time receiving optimal postoperative ventilation after surgery (P<0.001) compared with subjects receiving conventional postoperative ventilation (n=111). Automated ventilation also reduced the proportion of postoperative ventilation time that subjects were exposed to injurious ventilatory settings by 2.5% (95% CI: 1-4; P=0.003). Severe hypoxaemia was less likely in subjects randomised to automated ventilation (risk ratio: 0.26 [0.22-0.31]; P<0.01). Subjects resumed spontaneous breathing more rapidly when randomised to automated ventilation (hazard ratio: 1.38 [1.05-1.83]; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Fully automated ventilation in haemodynamically stable patients after cardiac surgery optimised lung-protective ventilation during postoperative ventilation, with fewer episodes of severe hypoxaemia and an accelerated resumption of spontaneous breathing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03180203.
Assuntos
Automação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/instrumentação , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/instrumentação , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Idoso , Determinação de Ponto Final , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Compared to healthy individuals, obese have significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output. The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular hemodynamic changes before and 3 months after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Patients scheduled for bariatric surgery between the 29th of September 2016 and 24th of March 2016 were included and compared with 24 healthy individuals. Hemodynamic measurements were performed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery, using the Nexfin® non-invasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring device (Edwards Lifesciences/BMEYE B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands). RESULTS: Eighty subjects were included in this study, respectively, 56 obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery and 24 healthy individuals. Baseline hemodynamic measurements showed significant differences in cardiac output (6.5 ± 1.6 versus 5.7 ± 1.6 l/min, p = 0.046), mean arterial pressure (107 ± 19 versus 89 ± 11 mmHg, p = 0.001), systolic (134 ± 24 versus 116 ± 18 mmHg, p = 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (89 ± 17 versus 74 ± 10 mmHg, p = 0.001), and heart rate (87 ± 12 versus 76 ± 14 bpm, p = 0.02) between obese and healthy subjects. Three months after surgery, significant changes occurred in mean arterial pressure (89 ± 17 mmHg, p = 0.001), systolic (117 ± 24 mmHg, p = 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (71 ± 15 mmHg, p = 0.001), stroke volume (82.2 ± 22.4 ml, p = 0.03), and heart rate (79 ± 17 bpm, p = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: Three months after bariatric surgery, significant improvements occur in hemodynamic variables except cardiac output and cardiac index, in the patient group.
Assuntos
Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Monitorização Fisiológica/instrumentação , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Redução de Peso/fisiologia , Adulto , Pressão Arterial/fisiologia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Ambulatorial/instrumentação , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Projetos Piloto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
Placement of a peripheral intravenous catheter is a routine procedure in clinical practice, but failure of intravenous cannulation regularly occurs. An accurate and reliable predictive scale for difficult venous access creates the possibility to use other techniques in an earlier time frame. We aimed to develop a predictive scale to identify adult patients with a difficult intravenous access prospectively: the A-DIVA scale. This prospective, observational, cross-sectional cohort study was conducted between January 2014 and January 2015, and performed at the department of anesthesiology of the Catharina Hospital (Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Patients 18 years or older were eligible if scheduled for any surgical procedure, regardless ASA classification, demographics, and medical history. Experienced and certified anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists routinely obtained peripheral intravenous access. Cannulation was performed regarding standards for care. A failed peripheral intravenous cannulation on the first attempt was the outcome of interest. A population-based sample of 1063 patients was included. Failure of intravenous cannulation was observed in 182/1063 patients (17%). Five variables were associated with a failed first attempt of peripheral intravenous cannulation: palpability of the target vein (ORâ=â4.94, 95% CI [2.85-8.56]; Pâ<â0.001), visibility of the target vein (ORâ=â3.63, 95% CI [2.09-6.32]; Pâ<â0.001), a history of difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation (ORâ=â3.86, 95% CI [2.39-6.25]; Pâ<â0.001), an unplanned indication for surgery (ORâ=â4.86, 95% CI [2.92-8.07]; Pâ<â0.001), and the vein diameter of at most 2 millimeters (ORâ=â3.37, 95% CI [2.12-5.36]; Pâ<â0.001). The scoring system was applied in 3 risk groups: 36/788 patients (5%) suffered from a failed first attempt in the low-risk group (A-DIVA score 0 or 1), whereas the medium (A-DIVA score 2 or 3) and high-risk group (A-DIVA score 4 plus), included 72/195 (37%) and 74/80 (93%) patients with a failed first attempt of inserting a peripheral intravenous catheter, respectively. The additive 5-variable A-DIVA scale is a reliable predictive rule that implies the probability to identify patients with a difficult intravenous access prospectively. Dutch Trial Register (ref: 4595).
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico/normas , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Emergências/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Fatores de Risco , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To provide an overview of current clinical results of irreversible electroporation (IRE), a novel, nonthermal tumor ablation technique that uses electric pulses to induce cell death, while preserving structural integrity of bile ducts and vessels. METHODS: All in-human literature on IRE reporting safety or efficacy or both was included. All adverse events were recorded. Tumor response on follow-up imaging from 3 months onward was evaluated. RESULTS: In 16 studies, 221 patients had 325 tumors treated in liver (n = 129), pancreas (n = 69), kidney (n = 14), lung (n = 6), lesser pelvis (n = 1), and lymph node (n = 2). No major adverse events during IRE were reported. IRE caused only minor complications in the liver; however, three major complications were reported in the pancreas (bile leak [n = 2], portal vein thrombosis [n = 1]). Complete response at 3 months was 67%-100% for hepatic tumors (93%-100% for tumors o 3 cm). Pancreatic IRE combined with surgery led to prolonged survival compared with control patients (20 mo vs 13 mo) and significant pain reduction. CONCLUSIONS: In cases where other techniques are unsuitable, IRE is a promising modality for the ablation of tumors near bile ducts and blood vessels. This articles gives an extensive overview of the available evidence, which is limited in terms of quality and quantity. With the limitations of the evidence in mind, IRE of central liver tumors seems relatively safe without major complications, whereas complications after pancreatic IRE appear more severe. The available limited results for tumor control are generally good. Overall, the future of IRE for difficult-to-reach tumors appears promising.