Is Dysphagia After Cardiac Operations a "Preexisting Condition"?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the incidence of dysphagia after cardiac operations, and very little is known about the baseline risk in this patient population. This study evaluated the incidence of dysphagia both preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing cardiac operations. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac operations were screened for dysphagia preoperatively using a 90-mL water swallow challenge protocol, a mini cognitive/speech screen, and a modified oral mechanism screen. The tests were repeated after extubation once the patient was alert and oriented. Patient characteristics were analyzed in conjunction with the results of the swallow screens to identify risk factors for dysphagia. RESULTS: Of 176 patients tested, 15 (8.5%) failed the swallow screen preoperatively. Age, gender, and comorbidities were compared. Patients who failed the swallow study preoperatively were slightly older (76.1 vs 73.3 years, p = 0.047) and had a higher incidence of chronic renal failure (13.3% v. 0.6%, p = 0.017), but gender and other comorbidities were not significantly different. Postoperatively, 38 patients failed the swallow screen (21.6%). Those who failed the postoperative screen were also older (75.6 vs 72.9 years, p = 0.012), but other factors (including chronic renal failure) were not significantly different. All of the patients who failed the swallow screen preoperatively also failed postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized dysphagia in patients who need cardiac operations is a common problem and accounts for a substantial portion of that seen postoperatively. Older patients are at increased risk of dysphagia, but gender and medical comorbidities are not useful predictors of this risk.

Impact of the number of negative nodes on disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Between 1995 and 1999, we observed an increasing number of nodes being recovered from colorectal specimens. Patients with colorectal cancer were studied to determine whether increasing the number of negative nodes recovered would better stage the patient and more accurately predict disease-free survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing colorectal resection with curative intent between 1995 and 1999 at a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor stage, grade, number of nodes recovered, and the association of these factors with disease-free survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five patients with M0 disease undergoing surgical resection of carcinoma of the colon or rectum were studied. There was no statistically significant difference in tumor stage or grade during the study period. A statistically significant increase in the mean number of nodes recovered was observed during the study period. Node-positive patients did substantially worse than node-negative individuals. When compared with a national cancer registry (OncoPool), we observed a significantly greater number of nodes sampled in our study population and a statistically significant improved disease-free survival between our node-negative patients and that of the national cancer registry population. CONCLUSION: The extent of the pathologic assessment of the nodal status of colorectal cancer patients as determined by the number of nodes examined affects disease-free survival. The need for quality control for uniform pathologic assessments is critical.