Using a severity threshold to improve occupational injury surveillance: Assessment of a severe traumatic injury-based occupational health indicator across the International Classification of Diseases lexicon transition.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury is a leading cause of death and disability among US workers. Severe injuries are less subject to systematic ascertainment bias related to factors such as reporting barriers, inpatient admission criteria, and workers' compensation coverage. A state-based occupational health indicator (OHI #22) was initiated in 2012 to track work-related severe traumatic injury hospitalizations. After 2015, OHI #22 was reformulated to account for the transition from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to ICD-10-CM. This study describes rates and trends in OHI #22, alongside corresponding metrics for all work-related hospitalizations. METHODS: Seventeen states used hospital discharge data to calculate estimates for calendar years 2012-2019. State-panel fixed-effects regression was used to model linear trends in annual work-related hospitalization rates, OHI #22 rates, and the proportion of work-related hospitalizations resulting from severe injuries. Models included calendar year and pre- to post-ICD-10-CM transition. RESULTS: Work-related hospitalization rates showed a decreasing monotonic trend, with no significant change associated with the ICD-10-CM transition. In contrast, OHI #22 rates showed a monotonic increasing trend from 2012 to 2014, then a significant 50% drop, returning to a near-monotonic increasing trend from 2016 to 2019. On average, OHI #22 accounted for 12.9% of work-related hospitalizations before the ICD-10-CM transition, versus 9.1% post-transition. CONCLUSIONS: Although hospital discharge data suggest decreasing work-related hospitalizations over time, work-related severe traumatic injury hospitalizations are apparently increasing. OHI #22 contributes meaningfully to state occupational health surveillance efforts by reducing the impact of factors that differentially obscure minor injuries; however, OHI #22 trend estimates must account for the ICD-10-CM transition-associated structural break in 2015.

Elder child or young adult? Adolescent trauma mortality amongst pediatric and adult facilities.

BACKGROUND: While it is assumed adolescents receive comparable trauma care at pediatric trauma centers (PTC), adult trauma centers (ATC), and combined facilities (MTC), this remains understudied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study through the NTDB evaluating patients 14-18 years of age who presented to an ACS-verified level 1 or 2 trauma facility between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2019. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to compare mortality risk among trauma facility verification types. RESULTS: 91,881 adolescents presented after trauma over the four-years. Hypotension, severe TBI, firearm mechanism, and ISS >15 were associated with increased mortality. Compared to PTCs, the odds of trauma-related mortality were statistically higher at MTCs (OR 1.82, p = 0.004) and ATCs (OR 1.89-2.05, p = 0.001-0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Injured adolescents receiving care at ATCs and MTCs have higher mortality risk than those cared for at PTCs. Further evaluation of factors associated with this observed difference is warranted and may help identify opportunities to improve outcomes in injured adolescents.

Long-term sustainability of Washington State's quality improvement initiative for the management of pediatric spleen injuries.

BACKGROUND: Initial results of Washington State's quality improvement initiative addressing the management of blunt traumatic pediatric spleen injuries were published in 2008. In this update, we evaluated whether these effects were sustained over time. METHODS: Data from the Washington Trauma Registry for years 1999-2001 (pre-intervention), 2003-2005 (post-intervention), and 2012-2014 (follow-up) were used in a retrospective cohort study. Children between ages 0 to 14 years who were hospitalized with a traumatic blunt spleen injury were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to account for patient, injury, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, splenectomies continued to be less common with 8.3% of pediatric patients receiving splenectomies in the follow-up period compared with 14.3% and 7.2% in the preintervention and post-intervention periods (p = 0.034). After adjustment, splenectomies remained less likely to be performed in both post-intervention (OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.16-0.90) and follow-up periods (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.12-0.70) compared to pre-intervention. Children were much more likely to be cared for at pediatric trauma hospitals in the follow-up period (OR = 5.13; 95% CI = 2.79-9.43) after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of this statewide quality improvement initiative showed that positive changes in management practices persist. This evidence suggests that statewide quality improvement initiatives can be sustainable with minimal ongoing effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Impact of a statewide trauma system on the triage, transfer, and inpatient mortality of injured patients.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, Arkansas implemented a statewide trauma system to address the high rates of mortality and morbidity due to trauma. The principal objective of the Arkansas Trauma System is to transport patients to the appropriate facility based on the injuries of the patients. This study evaluated four metrics that were crucial to system health. These measures included: treatment location, scene triage, admission to nondesignated facilities, and inpatient mortality. Furthermore, the authors sought to quantify how the system is selective toward the severely injured regarding triage and treatment location. The authors hypothesized that system implementation should increase the proportion of patients, particularly the severely injured, treated at Level I/II facilities. The system should increase the proportion of patients, especially the severely injured, admitted to Level I/II facilities directly from the scene. The system should result in fewer patients admitted to nondesignated facilities. Lastly, system implementation should result in fewer inpatient deaths. METHODS: A pre-post study design was used for this evaluation. Data from the Arkansas Hospital Discharge data set (2007 through 2012) identified patients who were admitted as a result of their injuries. The ICD-MAP software was used to categorize those with and without severe injuries based on an Injury Severity Score of 16 or greater or head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or greater. RESULTS: The results indicate that while there was an overall increase in odds of patients being admitted to Level I/II facilities, those with severe injuries were associated with an even greater odds of admission to Level I/II facilities (p < 0.0001). System implementation was also associated with more severely injured patients admitted to Level I/II facilities from the scene. There were also fewer patients admitted to nondesignated hospitals after system implementation (p < 0.0001). System implementation was associated with fewer inpatient deaths (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Two years after implementation, the trauma system showed significant progress. The measures evaluated in this study are believed to support the effectiveness of the trauma system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Effects of registered nurse staffing level on hospital-acquired conditions in cardiac surgery patients: A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ramifications of inadequate nurse staffing may have serious consequences due to reimbursement policies. PURPOSE: To determine the effects of registered nurse staffing on hospital-acquired conditions in cardiac surgery patients. METHOD: Data from the 2009 to 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to construct a propensity score-matched cohort. Multivariate regressions were performed to compare the probability, length of stay, mortality, and costs of three common hospital-acquired conditions between low- and high-staffing hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 439,365 patients in low-staffing hospitals were 1:1 matched to patients in high-staffing hospitals. High-staffing hospitals had 10% to 25% fewer cases (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.75-0.90, p < .0001), 5% to 20% lower mortality (AOR 0.80-0.95, p < .0001), and 4% to 6% shorter length of stay (coefficient -0.06 to -0.04, p < .0001). The costs for patients with hospital-acquired conditions were 13% to 17% greater in high-staffing hospitals (coefficient 0.13-0.17, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Alternatives to the current staffing and reimbursement policies should be considered to reduce hospital-acquired conditions.

Trends in pediatric spleen management: Do hospital type and ownership still matter?

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of traumatic blunt splenic injury is preferred over splenectomy because of improved outcomes and reduced complications. However, variability in treatment is previously reported with respect to hospital profit types and ownership. METHODS: Our study objectives were to investigate the past decade's trends in pediatric splenic injury management and to determine whether previously reported disparities by hospital type have changed. We analyzed data from the Kid's Inpatient Database from Healthcare Cost and Utility Project for Years 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the likelihood of receiving splenectomy in different hospital profit and ownership types. Patients 18 years and younger admitted with blunt splenic injury (DRG International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev.-Clinical Modification code 865) were included. Treatment was dichotomized into nonoperative management, defined as initial attempt at nonoperative management, and operative management, defined as splenectomy within 1 day of admission. RESULTS: Of 17,044 patient records, 11,893 participants were studied. Not-for-profit hospitals demonstrated a higher rate of nonoperative management than for-profit hospitals in 2000 (83.8% vs. 71.0 %). Both not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals increased the use of nonoperative management, with a narrower disparity observed by 2009 (87.5% vs. 84.6%). The use of splenectomy was reduced significantly between 2000 and 2003 (odds ratio, 0.66; weighted 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.81). The rate of nonoperative management in children's hospitals remained very high across the study period (98.6% in 2009) and continued to be the benchmark for pediatric spleen injury management. CONCLUSION: Improvement was observed in nonoperative management rates for pediatric spleen injuries in both not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals. However, general hospitals still fail to reach the target of 90% nonoperative management. Further investigations are needed to facilitate optimal management of such children in general hospitals. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic and prognostic study, level III.

Do prehospital criteria optimally assign injured children to the appropriate level of trauma team activation and emergency department disposition at a level I pediatric trauma center?

PURPOSE: To examine the association of prehospital criteria with the appropriate level of trauma team activation (TTA) and emergency department (ED) disposition among injured children at a level I pediatric trauma center. METHODS: Injured children younger than 15 years and transported by emergency medical services (EMS) from the scene of injury between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011 were identified using the institution's trauma registry. Logistic regression was used to study the main outcomes of interest, full TTA (FTTA) and ED disposition. RESULTS: Out of 3,213 children, 1,991 were eligible and analyzed. Only 279 children initiated the FTTA and 73.9% were admitted. Having a chest injury, abnormal heart rate or Glasgow Coma Scale less than 9 (GCSLT9) in the field was associated with higher odds of initiating the FTTA (odds ratio [OR] = 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-7.20; OR = 2.59, CI 1.15-5.79 and OR = 2.67, CI 1.14-6.22, respectively). Children with the criteria above in addition to abdominal injury were more likely to be discharged to the ICU, OR or morgue compared to those without them. CONCLUSION: Children with GCSLT9, abnormal heart rate, chest and abdominal injury showed a strong association with FTTA and higher resource utilization.

The effectiveness of a statewide trauma call center in reducing time to definitive care for severely injured patients.

BACKGROUND: The state of Arkansas developed and implemented a comprehensive inclusive trauma system in July 2010. The Arkansas Trauma Communication Center (ATCC) is a central component in the system, designed to facilitate both scene transports and interfacility transfers within the state. The first 18 months of operations were examined to evaluate the relationship between ATCC use and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) at sending facilities for patients who require urgent care. METHODS: ATCC data were linked to the Arkansas Trauma Registry using unique identifiers. Patients younger than 15 years were excluded from the analysis. Patients older than 15 years with significant injury requiring interfacility transfer were the study population. Significant injury was defined as those with hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg) or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than 9 at the sending facility or Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or greater at the definitive care facility. This cohort was stratified by the use of the ATCC, and ED LOS was determined. RESULTS: The study population who met the inclusion criteria was 856; 632 (74%) of whom used the ATCC and 224 (26%) did not use the ATCC for interfacility transfers. There were no statistically significant differences noted between these two groups regarding ISS, systolic blood pressure, and GCS score. The ATCC was associated with a 21-minute reduction in the ED LOS at the sending facility when controlling for all other factors. (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: In the first 18 months following inception, the ATCC has been effective in expediting the transfer process and thus reducing the time to definitive care for severely injured patients. ATCC use has improved since inception and is now a contract deliverable for trauma hospitals based on these early results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.

Regional variations in cost of trauma care in the United States: who is paying more?

BACKGROUND: The study of regional variations in costs of care has been used to identify areas of savings for several diseases and conditions. This study investigates similar potential regional differences in the cost of adult trauma care using an all-payer, nationally representative sample. METHODS: Trauma patients aged 18 to 64 years in the 2006-2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Those with isolated diagnoses for five index conditions (ICs): blunt splenic injury, liver injury, tibia fracture, moderate traumatic brain injury, and pneumothorax/hemothorax were selected. Cost was estimated from charges using a cost-to-charge ratio. Generalized linear modeling was used to compare the mean cost for treating these ICs between US regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West), adjusting for hospital factors (size, teaching status, and location), patient demographics, injury severity, length of stay, Charlson comorbidity index, local wage index, and payer. Relative mean cost (RC) was calculated using Northeast as the reference, and sampling weights were applied to obtain regional estimates. Differences in adjusted mortality between regions were also assessed. RESULTS: Adjusted relative costs were estimated for 62,678 patients (South: 28,536; West: 12,975; Midwest: 11,450; and Northeast: 9,717). Mean costs for liver injury were 22%higher in the Midwest compared with the Northeast (RC: 1.22; 95%confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.35). Similarly higher costs were seen with other regions and ICs (RC for blunt splenic injury in the South: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07-1.31; RC for pneumothorax/hemothorax in the West: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.22-1.41). No differences in adjusted mortality by region were noted overall. CONCLUSION: Even after controlling for factors known to influence medical care cost, as well as controlling for geographic differences in pricing, significant regional differences exist in the cost of trauma care. Exploring these variations may assist in identifying potential areas for cost savings.

Variability in pediatric splenic injury care: results of a national survey of general surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Although nonoperative management is the standard of care for hemodynamically stable children with blunt splenic trauma, significant variation in practice exists. Little attention has been given to physician factors associated with management differences. DESIGN: Nationally representative mail survey conducted in June 2008. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Ten percent random sample of active, dues-paying fellows in the American College of Surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs toward pediatric splenic injury management, including the role of clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: Almost all of the 375 responding surgeons (97.4%) agreed that surgical intervention is not immediately necessary for hemodynamically stable children. However, surgeons reported significant disagreement regarding whether blood should be administered before operative intervention for hemodynamically unstable children and whether explorative surgery is needed for stable patients with evidence of contrast extravasation on computed tomography. Only 18.7% of surgeons reported being very familiar with the clinical practice guidelines for the management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma from either the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma or the American Pediatric Surgical Association. Surgeons who were very familiar with either guideline were significantly more likely to rate the guidelines as beneficial (90.0% vs 72.8%, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: General surgeons reported varying degrees of familiarity with and use of clinical practice guidelines for pediatric splenic injury management. Limited pediatric experience and lack of pediatric hospital resources may limit more widespread adoption of nonoperative management. Targeted educational interventions may help increase surgeon knowledge of guidelines and best practices.