Operative management of gouty tophi in the region of the olecranon: a case series.

Background: Tophaceous gout affecting the olecranon region can result in local discomfort, skin ulceration, secondary infection, and considerable disability if left untreated. However, there are limited reports of outcomes, including postoperative complications and recurrence after surgical excision of tophaceous gout deposits at the elbow. The aim of this study is to present our surgical technique and minimum one-year outcomes after surgical excision of tophaceous gout involving the elbow. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients from a single surgeon's practice who underwent surgical excision of gouty tophi of the elbow between January 2016 and December 2019. The indications for surgical excision of tophi included failure of medical management, presence of skin ulceration, and/or large gouty tophi. The relevant data pertaining to patient demographics, preoperative findings, intraoperative findings, surgical pathology reports, and short-term postoperative complications were collected through retrospective chart review. Patients were subsequently contacted for a follow-up telehealth visit to assess recurrence of gouty tophi, functional outcomes, and range of motion (ROM) measurements. Results: Six male patients underwent 7 total procedures (1 bilateral elbow) during the study period. The mean age of the cohort at the time of surgery was 56.0 ± 7.1 years (range: 45.3-63.5). The mean size of the swelling in 2 maximum dimensions was 5.8 × 3.4 cm. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative wound complications. There was no recurrence of gouty tophi at a mean follow-up time of 30.8 months (range: 14.0-43.5). Patients reported physiologic ROM (mean flexion-extension arc of 2°-134°) with no pain at final follow-up. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of tophaceous gout of the elbow is associated with a low risk of wound complication and recurrence.

The Latarjet-Patte Procedure Past, Present, and Future.

The Latarjet-Patte procedure has a long and storied history that predates shoulder arthroscopy, but its popularity has increased over the past two decades as a treatment for anterior glenohumeral instability with bone loss. Transfer of the coracoid process and conjoint tendon to the anteroinferior glenoid creates a triple-blocking effect that is both static and dynamic, lending it biomechanical superiority over alternative bone block techniques. Patients undergoing the Latarjet-Patte procedure have low rates of recurrent instability compared to arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization procedures, particularly in the setting of glenoid- and humeral-sided bone loss. A number of technical innovations have been developed in recent years to improve the efficacy of this procedure and to reduce its potential complications, although their associated learning curves and potential for widespread adoption remain unclear. In this article, we review the history, indications, outcomes, and future of this surgical technique.

A Preferred Vendor Model Reduces the Costs of Sports Medicine Surgery.

PURPOSE: To report on our institution's first year of experience with a preferred vendor program for implants and disposables for sports medicine surgery. METHODS: Cost and utilization data for implants and disposables were analyzed for knee and shoulder sports medicine surgeries performed during the 2-year period including the 12 months preceding the start of the contract (contract year 0 [CY0] and the first 12 months of the contract period (CY1). The costs of grafts and biological therapies were excluded. Utilization of the preferred vendor's products, operative time, and per-case costs were compared between the 2 time periods and adjusted for patient factors and case mix. RESULTS: Utilization of the preferred vendor's shavers (0% to 94%, P < .001) and radiofrequency ablation wands (0% to 91%, P < .001) increased significantly in CY1 (n = 5,068 cases) compared with CY0 (n = 5,409 cases), with a small but significant increase in use of the preferred vendor's implants (64% to 67%, P = .023). There was no significant difference in mean operative time between CY0 and CY1 (P = .485). Mean total per-case implant and disposable costs decreased by 12% (P < .001) in CY1 versus CY0. CONCLUSION: Our institution was able to reduce the costs of sports medicine surgery with the implementation of a preferred single-vendor program for implants and disposables. This program had widespread surgeon adoption and did not have any detrimental effect on operating room efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

Tibial Shaft Fractures in Workers Compensation and No-Fault Insurance Is There a Difference in Resource Utilization?

BACKGROUND: Workers Compensation claims have been previously associated with inferior clinical outcomes. However, variation in inpatient stays for orthopedic trauma injuries according to insurance type has not been previously examined. METHODS: We investigated the differences according to insurance for tibial shaft fractures in regard to length of stay and disposition. Using the New York SPARCS database, we identified 1,856 adult non-elderly patients with an isolated tibial shaft fracture who underwent surgery. Patients were stratified by insurance type, including private, Medicaid, Workers Compensation, and no-fault, which covers medical expenses related to automobile or pedestrian accidents. RESULTS: Compared to private insurance (mean: 2.7 days), length of stay was longer for no-fault (mean: 3.9 days; adjusted difference +33%, p < 0.001) and Medicaid (mean: 3.5 days; adjusted difference +22%, p < 0.001), but not significantly different for Workers Compensation (mean: 3.5 days; adjusted difference +4%, p = 0.474). Compared to private insurance (rate: 3.5%), disposition to a facility was significantly higher for no-fault (rate: 10.1%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.3, p < 0.001) and Medicaid (rate: 7.6%; OR = 2.2, p = 0.003), but was not significantly different for Workers Compensation (rate: 6.3%; OR = 1.8, p = 0.129). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with no-fault insurance, but not Workers Compensation, are subject to longer hospital stays and are more likely to be discharged to a facility following operative fixation of an isolated tibial shaft fracture. These findings suggest that financial, social, and legal factors influence medical care for patients involved in automobile accidents with no-fault insurance.

Preferred Single-Vendor Program for Total Joint Arthroplasty Implants: Surgeon Adoption, Outcomes, and Cost Savings.

BACKGROUND: In total joint arthroplasty, variation in implant use can be driven by vendor relationships, surgeon preference, and technological advancements. Our institution developed a preferred single-vendor program for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that this initiative would decrease implant costs without compromising performance on quality metrics. METHODS: The utilization of implants from the preferred vendor was evaluated for the first 12 months of the contract (September 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018; n = 4,246 cases) compared with the prior year (September 1, 2016, to August 31, 2017; n = 3,586 cases). Per-case implant costs were compared using means and independent-samples t tests. Performance on quality metrics, including 30-day readmission, 30-day surgical site infection (SSI), and length of stay (LOS), was compared using multivariable-adjusted regression models. RESULTS: The utilization of implants from the preferred vendor increased from 50% to 69% (p < 0.001), with greater use of knee implants than hip implants from the preferred vendor, although significant growth was seen for both (from 62% to 81% for knee, p < 0.001; and from 38% to 58% for hip, p < 0.001). Adoption of the preferred-vendor initiative was greatest among low-volume surgeons (from 22% to 87%; p < 0.001) and lowest among very high-volume surgeons (from 61% to 62%; p = 0.573). For cases in which implants from the preferred vendor were utilized, the mean cost per case decreased by 23% in the program's first year (p < 0.001), with an associated 11% decrease in the standard deviation. Among all cases, there were no significant changes with respect to 30-day readmission (p = 0.449) or SSI (p = 0.059), while mean LOS decreased in the program's first year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a preferred single-vendor model for hip and knee arthroplasty implants led to significant cost savings and decreased cost variability within the program's first year. Higher-volume surgeons were less likely to modify their implant choice than were lower-volume surgeons. Despite the potential learning curve associated with changes in surgical implants, there was no difference in short-term quality metrics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk factors associated with periprosthetic joint infection after total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), the present study aimed to investigate: (i) what risk factors are associated with periprosthetic elbow infection; (ii) what is the incidence of infection after TEA; and (iii) what is the acuity with which these infections present? METHODS: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was used to identify all patients who underwent TEA between 2003 and 2012 in New York State. Admissions for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) were identified using ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnosis code 996.66. Multivariate analysis was used to determine risk factors that were independently prognostic for PJI. RESULTS: Significant risk factors for PJI included hypothyroidism [odds ratio (OR) = 2.04; p = 0.045], tobacco use disorder (OR = 3.39; p = 0.003) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 3.31; p < 0.001). Among the 1452 patients in the study period who underwent TEA, 3.7% (n = 54) were admitted postoperatively for PJI. There were 30 (56%) early infections, 17 (31%) delayed infections and seven (13%) late infections. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative optimization of thyroid function, smoking cessation and management of rheumatoid disease may be considered in surgical candidates for TEA. The results of the present study add prognostic data to the literature that may be helpful with patient selection and risk profile analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: prognostic study.

Cost-Effectiveness of Preoperative Smoking Cessation Interventions in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is associated with adverse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Although preoperative smoking cessation interventions may help reduce the risk PJI, the short-term cost-effectiveness of these programs remains unclear. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative smoking cessation intervention over a 90-day TJA episode of care. Costs and probabilities were derived from literature review and published Medicare data. Thresholds for cost and efficacy of the intervention were determined using sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In our model, the average 90-day cost was $32 less for patients enrolled in a mandatory smoking cessation intervention ($23,457) compared with patients who were not ($23,489). In sensitivity analyses, the smoking cessation intervention was cost-saving vs no intervention when the short-term cost of PJI was greater than $95,410, the rate of PJI was reduced by at least 25% for former vs current smokers, the cost of the intervention was less than $219, or the success rate of the intervention was greater than 56%. CONCLUSION: Smoking cessation interventions prior to TJA can increase the value of care and are an important public health initiative. Routine referral to smoking cessation interventions should be considered for smokers indicated for TJA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, economic and decision analyses.

Day of Admission is Associated With Variation in Geriatric Hip Fracture Care.

INTRODUCTION: The transition to bundled payment reimbursement for geriatric hip fractures has incentivized the identification of avoidable inefficiencies in the cost and quality of care. Although a "weekend effect" has been described with regard to hip fracture mortality, measures of efficiency according to the day of hip fracture admission are currently unclear. METHODS: We identified 62,303 patients aged 65 years or older with a primary diagnosis of femoral neck or intertrochanteric hip fracture in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System between 2009 and 2014. Outcome measures included preoperative delay, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and cost of admission. RESULTS: Preoperative delay was longer for weekend admissions, but shorter for admissions on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. Postoperative LOS was longer for admissions on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Discharge rates varied considerably according to the day of admission, ranging from 12% to 43% by hospital day 4 and 53% to 72% by hospital day 6. No differences in cost according to day of admission were found once preoperative delay and postoperative LOS were accounted for. DISCUSSION: Notable variation exists in hospitalizations for geriatric hip fracture depending on the day of admission. Our data suggest the presence of a weekend effect, in which changes in staffing of surgical, medical, and ancillary services lead to increased waiting times for surgery for new admissions and delays in discharge of early- and mid-week admissions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective study.

Costs and complications of increased length of stay following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Accelerated discharge protocols for scoliosis surgery have recently been described in the literature. There are limited data describing the association of length of stay (LOS) during the index admission with postoperative outcomes. We sought to define the economic and clinical implications of an additional 1 day in the hospital for scoliosis surgery. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was used to identify patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion from 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2012 at high-volume institutions (>20 cases/year) in the state of New York. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race, insurance, comorbidity score, and perioperative complications during the index admission. Among the 1286 patients with AIS who underwent spinal fusion, the mean LOS was 4.90 days [95% confidence interval (CI)=4.84-4.97; SD=1.19]. In the perioperative period, 605 (47.05%) underwent transfusion and 202 (15.71%) had problems with pain control. An additional 1 day in the hospital was associated with $11 033 (95% CI=7162-14 904; P<0.001) in insurance charges, $5198 (95% CI=4144-6252; P<0.001) in hospital costs, 28% increased risk (odds ratio=1.28; 95% CI=1.01-1.63; P=0.041) of all-cause 90-day readmission, and a 57% increased risk (odds ratio=1.57; 95% CI=1.13-2.17; P=0.007) of returning to the operating room within 90 days. Increased LOS during the index admission scoliosis surgery is associated with higher costs and an increased risk of 90-day postoperative complications. Protocols to decrease LOS for this surgery have potential benefits to patients, hospitals, and insurers. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Risk Factors for Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Specifically, we evaluated: (1) demographic risk factors; (2) comorbid risk factors; (3) indications for surgery; and (4) lengths of stay. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CSF leak is a rare but serious complication of ACDF. Currently, there is a paucity of literature describing the risk factors for CSF leak following ACDF. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify all patients who underwent cervical fusion using the anterior approach with excision of intervertebral disc between 1998 and 2010. Patients who had a diagnosis of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical region were excluded. All patients who had a CSF leak were identified. Demographics and comorbidities were compared via χ analysis, and logistic regression to calculate the odds of having a CSF leak. RESULTS: Of the 1,261,140 patients identified, 3048 patients (0.24%) had a postoperative CSF leak. Patients who were between the ages of 55 and 69 years (P=0.038) and 70 years or older (P=0.001) were at an increased risk of CSF leak compared with patients who were aged 40-54 years. Non-white race (P=0.021), obesity, (P<0.001) and hypertension (P=0.025) were associated with an increased risk of CSF leak, but diabetes (P=0.966) and hyperlipidemia (P=0.226) were not. Herniated disc diagnosis was associated with decreased risk of CSF leak (P=0.032), but cervical spondylosis with myelopathy patients had an increased risk (P<0.001). Patients with CSF leak had a mean length of stay of 6.0 days compared with 2.1 days among controls. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical candidates who are older and non-white should be counseled of their increased risk for CSF leak in preoperative planning. Patients who are obese and have hypertension may benefit from medical optimization before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Are HCAHPS Scores Higher for Private vs Double-Occupancy Inpatient Rooms in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients?

BACKGROUND: Private hospital rooms have a number of potential advantages compared to shared rooms, including reduced noise and increased control over the hospital environment. However, the association of room type with patient experience metrics in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients is currently unclear. METHODS: For private versus shared rooms, we compared our institutional Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores in patients who underwent primary TJA over a 2-year period. Regression model odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for surgeon, date of surgery, and length of stay. RESULTS: Patients in private rooms were more likely to report a top-box score for overall hospital rating (85.6% vs 79.4%, OR = 1.53, P = .011), hospital recommendation (89.3% vs 83.0%, OR = 1.78, P = .002), call button help (76.0% vs 68.7%, OR = 1.40, P = .028), and quietness (70.4% vs 59.0%, OR = 1.78, P < .001). There were no significant differences on surgeon metrics including listening (P = .225), explanations (P = .066), or treatment with courtesy and respect (P = .396). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing TJA, private hospital rooms were associated with superior performance on patient experience metrics. This association appears specific for global and hospital-related metrics, with little impact on surgeon evaluations. With the utilization of HCAHPS data in value-based initiatives, placement of TJA patients in private rooms may lead to increased reimbursement and higher hospital rankings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort.

Mortality Following Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures Versus Native Hip Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The number of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures is expected to increase with the increasing prevalence of hip arthroplasties. While native hip fractures have a well-known association with mortality, there are currently limited data on this outcome among the subset of patients with periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. METHODS: Using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, we identified patients from 60 to 99 years old who were admitted to a hospital in the state with a periprosthetic proximal femoral fracture (n = 1,655) or a native hip (femoral neck or intertrochanteric) fracture (n = 97,231) between 2006 and 2014. Within the periprosthetic fracture cohort, the indication for the existing implant was not available in the data set. We used mixed-effects regression models to compare mortality at 1 and 6 months and 1 year for periprosthetic compared with native hip fractures. RESULTS: The risk of mortality for patients who sustained a periprosthetic proximal femoral fracture was no different from that for patients who sustained a native hip fracture at 1 month after injury (3.2% versus 4.6%; odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.19; p = 0.446), but was lower at 6 months (3.8% versus 6.5%; OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; p = 0.020) and 1 year (9.7% versus 15.9%; OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.85; p < 0.001). Among periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures, factors associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality at 1 year included advanced age, male sex, and higher Deyo comorbidity scores. CONCLUSIONS: In the acute phase, any type of hip fracture appears to confer a similar risk of death. Over the long term, however, periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures are associated with lower mortality rates than native hip fractures, even after accounting for age and comorbidities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patterns of Narcotic Prescribing by Orthopedic Surgeons for Medicare Patients.

In recent years, narcotics have been subject to increased regulation and monitoring because of their side effects and potential for misuse. Currently, variation in prescribing patterns of narcotics among orthopedic surgeons is unknown. The Medicare Part D claims database was used to identify orthopedic surgeons who prescribed at least one schedule II or III narcotic during 2014. The median duration of a narcotic prescription was 8.2 days. The median prescription duration was shortest for hand surgeons (5.6 days) and longest for spine surgeons (12.6 days). Orthopedic surgeons in New York (10.1 days) provided the most narcotics per prescription, with physicians in Vermont (6.2 days) providing the least. Substantial variation exists in narcotic prescribing patterns for orthopedic surgeons at the individual, subspecialty, and statewide levels. With public health focus on reducing narcotics abuse, physician stewardship of these medications will become increasingly relevant.

Is Patient Satisfaction Associated with Objective Measures of Geriatric Hip Fracture Care?

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is publicly reported and used as a subjective measure of quality of care in alternative payment reimbursement models. In this study, we evaluated the association between patient satisfaction scores and objective measures of geriatric hip fracture care. Therefore, according to patient satisfaction score, we investigated the differences for geriatric hip fracture admissions in regard to 1. surgical delay during the index admission and 2. mortality within 1 year. METHODS: We identified 65,974 patients between the ages of 60 and 99 years with a primary diagnosis of femoral neck fracture in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2009 to 2014. We evaluated patient satisfaction using annual hospital HCAHPS scores reported on Hospital Compare. Mixed effects regression models controlled for hospital and year of surgery as random effects variables and categorical age, sex, race, insurance, categorical Deyo score, fracture location, and surgical procedure as fixed effects variables. RESULTS: For high compared to low patient satisfaction hospitals, there were shorter surgical delays (ß: -60%, 95% CI: -66% to -52%, p < 0.001) and a lower risk of 1-year mortality (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.93, p < 0.001). For middle compared to low patient satisfaction hospitals, there were shorter surgical delays (ß: -37%, 95% CI: -46% to -26%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference in 1-year mortality (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.01; p = 0.091). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective quality, as measured by HCAHPS patient satisfaction scores, is associated with objective quality and clinical outcomes in geriatric hip fracture care. While these findings support the use of patient experience as a component of quality measurement, it remains unclear whether a superior patient experience in itself can increase the value of health care for patients in the form of superior clinical outcomes or if it will lead to increased strain on hospital resources and increase the cost of services, which would paradoxically decrease the value of care.

Does Total Ankle Arthroplasty Belong in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement?

The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model seeks to lower costs and improve quality for primary lower extremity joint replacements. This includes total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), which is performed far less frequently than total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. We used the SPARCS database to identify 537 TAA and 239,053 elective primary THA or TKA procedures from 2009 to 2014, excluding hip fractures. Compared with THA and TKA, TAA had a shorter mean length of stay (2.2 versus 3.2 days), greater mean cost ($20,817 versus $17,613), lower rate of disposition to nursing and rehabilitation facilities (17% versus 52%), and lower rate of 90-day readmission (4.9% versus 5.8%). In multivariable-adjusted regression models of TAA versus THA and TKA, length of stay was 30% shorter (p < .001), costs were 14% greater (p < .001), and risk of disposition to nursing and rehabilitation facilities was 86% lower (p < .001), with no significant difference in 90-day readmission (p = .957). Patients undergoing TAA had different patterns of short-term resource usage compared with patients undergoing THA and TKA, most notably higher short-term costs. The economic viability of TAA is threatened by alternative payment models that reimburse hospitals for TAA at the same rate as THA and TKA.

Atrial Septal Defect Increases the Risk for Stroke After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) are 2 of the most common congenital heart diseases in adults and pose important risks of perioperative acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from paradoxical emboli. We evaluated the following: (1) the prevalence of ASD/PFO in the total hip arthroplasty (THA) population; (2) the rate of perioperative AIS during index admissions; and (3) the risk for perioperative AIS after THA for patients with ASD/PFO vs matched controls. METHODS: We identified 393,652 patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample who underwent THA between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes were used to identify patients with ASD/PFO and perioperative AIS. Propensity scores matched 252 patients with ASD/PFO to 756 controls (3:1 ratio) without ASD/PFO according to age, gender, race, Deyo comorbidity score, year of surgery, and stroke risk factors. Logistic regression models assessed risk for perioperative AIS. RESULTS: The prevalence of ASD/PFO was 64 per 100,000 THA patients. The rate of perioperative AIS was 99 per 100,000 THA in the general THA population. The rate of perioperative AIS was 7.14% for ASD/PFO patients compared with 0.26% in matched controls (P < .001). Risk for perioperative AIS was 29 times greater for patients with ASD/PFO compared with matched controls (odds ratio, 29.00; 95% confidence interval, 6.68-125.89; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with ASD/PFO undergoing THA are at a significantly higher risk of perioperative AIS. Orthopedic surgeons should discuss this risk with patients before surgery. The efficacy of mechanical and pharmacologic thromboprophylactic measures to reduce perioperative AIS among ASD/PFO patients warrants further investigation.

Is Day of Surgery Associated With Adverse Clinical and Economic Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: As orthopedics transition to value-based purchasing, hospitals and providers are incentivized to identify inefficiencies of care delivery. In our experience, weekends are characterized by decreased staffing of ancillary services to coordinate patient discharges, which can lead to prolonged hospital stays for many of our primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) admissions. METHODS: We identified 115,053 patients who underwent primary TKA on a weekday between 2009 and 2013 in New York State. We used mixed effects regression models to compare length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmission, and cost according to the day of TKA. RESULTS: Mean LOS was significantly higher for surgeries performed on Wednesday (P < .001), Thursday (P < .001), and Friday (P < .001). There was no significant difference in 90-day readmission risk according to day of surgery. Mean cost was significantly higher for surgeries performed on Wednesday (P < .001), Thursday (P < .001), and Friday (P < .001). When LOS was held constant across every day of the week, the mean cost of TKA decreased by $247 for Wednesday, $627 for Thursday, and $394 for Friday. CONCLUSION: Primary TKA performed later in the week is associated with an increased LOS and increased costs of admission, but a similar risk of 90-day readmission. Preferential scheduling of primary TKA cases early in the week, as well as the development of standardized clinical care pathways with appropriate weekend staffing of social work and rehabilitation services, could help to decrease the daily variation in LOS and increase the value of TKA episodes.

Is Orthopedic Department Teaching Status Associated With Adverse Outcomes Of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Although resident physicians play a vital role in the US health care system, they are believed to create inefficiencies in the delivery of care. Under the regional component of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model, teaching hospitals are forced to compete on efficiency and outcomes with nonteaching hospitals. METHODS: We identified 86,021 patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty in New York State between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014. Outcomes included length and cost of the index admission, disposition, and 90-day readmission. Mixed-effects regression models compared teaching vs nonteaching orthopedic hospitals after adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital, surgeon, and year of surgery. RESULTS: Patients undergoing surgery at teaching hospitals had longer lengths of stay (ß = 3.2%; P < .001) and higher costs of admission (ß = 13.6%; P < .001). There were no differences in disposition status (odds ratio = 1.03; P = .779). The risk of 90-day readmission was lower for teaching hospitals (odds ratio = 0.89; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Primary total hip arthroplasty at teaching orthopedic hospitals is characterized by greater utilization of health care resources during the index admission. This suggests that teaching hospitals may be adversely affected by reimbursement tied to competition on economic and clinical metrics. Although a certain level of inefficiency is inherent during the learning process, these policies may hinder learning opportunities for residents in the clinical setting.

Have Periprosthetic Hip Infection Rates Plateaued?

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although the number of revision cases is increasing, the prevalence of PJI as an indication for revision surgery, and the variability of this indication among surgeons and hospitals, is unclear. METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was used to identify 33,582 patients undergoing revision THA between 2000 and 2013. PJI was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. Volume was defined using mean number of revision THAs performed annually by each hospital and surgeon. RESULTS: PJI was the indication for 13.0% of all revision THAs. The percentage of revision THAs for PJI increased between years 2000 and 2007 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05, P < .001), but decreased between years 2008 and 2013 (OR = 0.96, P = .001). Compared to medium-volume hospitals, the PJI burden at high-volume hospitals decreased during years 2000-2007 (OR = 0.58, P < .001) and 2008-2013 (OR = 0.57, P < .001). Compared to medium-volume surgeons, the PJI burden for high-volume surgeons increased during years 2000-2007 (OR = 1.39, P < .001), but did not differ during years 2008-2013 (P = .618). CONCLUSION: The burden of PJI as an indication for revision THA may be plateauing. High-volume institutions have seen decreases in the percentage of revisions performed for PJI over the complete study duration. Specific surgeon may be associated with the plateauing in PJI rates as high-volume surgeons in 2008-2013 were no longer found to be at increased risk of PJI as an indication for revision THA.

Is Orthopaedic Department Teaching Status Associated with Adverse Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Although resident physicians have a critical role in the daily management of patients, based on their limited experiences, they are thought to potentially create inefficiencies in the hospital. With changes set forth by the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, both teaching and non-teaching hospitals are directly compared on efficiency and outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the state of New York. Specifically, we compared: (1) duration of stay; (2) cost of admission; (3) disposition; and (4) 90-day readmission for elective primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database, 133,489 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2014 were identified. Outcomes assessed included lengths-of-stay and cost of the index admission, disposition, and 90-day readmission. To compare the above outcomes between the hospital systems, mixed effects regression models were used, which were adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital, surgeon, and year of surgery. RESULTS: Patients who underwent surgery at teaching hospitals were found to have longer lengths of stay (b=3.4%, p<0.001) and higher costs of admission (b=14.7%; p<0.001). Patients were also more likely to be readmitted within 90 days of discharge (OR=1.64; p<0.001). No differences were found in discharge disposition status for teaching versus non-teaching hospitals (OR=0.92; p=0.081. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that at teaching hospitals, a greater number of resources are needed for primary TKA than at non-teaching hospitals. Therefore, teaching hospitals might be inappropriately reimbursed when compensation is linked to competition on economic and clinical metrics. Furthermore, based on this, optimizing reimbursement might inadvertently come at the expense of resident training and education. While some inefficiencies exist as an inherent part of resident training, limiting learning opportunities to optimize compensation can potentially have greater future consequences.