Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability Regardless of Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance and Patellar Height: Minimum 5-Year Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear which subset of patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability would benefit from a concomitant bony realignment procedure in addition to a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. PURPOSE: To provide midterm results for patients who underwent an isolated MPFL reconstruction as part of an ongoing prospective trial. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients with recurrent patellar instability were prospectively enrolled in an institutional registry beginning in March 2014. Exclusion criteria included history of a previous surgery for patellar instability, an off-loadable (inferior/lateral) chondral defect, anterior knee pain ≥50% of their chief complaint, and a "jumping J" sign. All patients underwent primary, unilateral, isolated MPFL reconstruction regardless of their bony anatomic characteristics. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), episodes of recurrent instability, and ability to return to sport were obtained annually. Radiographic measurements of baseline radiographs and MRI were obtained at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction between March 2014 and December 2019. The mean radiographic measurements were tibial tubercle-trochlear groove, 15.1 ± 4.9 mm; Caton-Deschamps index, 1.14 ± 0.16; patellar trochlear index, 46.9% ± 15.1%; trochlear depth index, 2.5 ± 1.2 mm; tibial tubercle to lateral trochlear ridge, -8.4 ± 5.7 mm; and patellar tendon to lateral trochlear ridge, 5.7 ± 6.2 mm. Trochlear dysplasia, defined as a trochlear depth index <3 mm, was present in 79/125 (63%) patients. A total of 50 patients reached ≥5 years, of whom 40 (80%) completed follow-up PROMs. A total of 119 patients reached ≥2 years, of whom 89 (75%) completed follow-up PROMs. Six patients (5%) reported recurrent instability with a mean time of 2.97 years after surgery. All PROMs improved over time except for the Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS), which had no change. At 2 years, the mean changes from baseline for Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life subscale (QOL), Pedi-FABS, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, KOOS Physical Function Short Form (PS), and Kujala score were 42.1, 0.6, 35.1, -23.5, and 32.3, respectively. All changes had P values <.001 except for Pedi-FABS, which showed no change and had P > .999. At 5 years, the mean changes from baseline for KOOS-QOL, Pedi-FABS, IKDC, KOOS-PS, and Kujala score were 42.6, -2.8, 32.6, -21.5, and 31.6, respectively. All changes had P values <.001 except for Pedi-FABS, which showed no change and had P > .453. In total, 89% of patients returned to sport with a mean of 9.1 months. CONCLUSION: Midterm outcomes for patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction were favorable and were maintained at 5 years. Outcomes for the expanded cohort of patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up support previously published results.

A Curricular Model for Simulation Within Orthopaedic Residency Training.

Introduction: American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery/American Council on GraduateMedical Education Residency Review Committee training requirements have necessitated the need for the adoption of simulation education into existing programmatic requirements. Current guidelines focus only on interns at a potentially significant cost to programs; both in total dollar amount and time. Methods: The authors aim to provide a model that can maximize utility for all resident levels, manage cost by maximizing the use of cadaveric material, and allow integration of varied industry support. Results: The Oregon Health & Science University Orthopaedic education program has developed a high-fidelity training curriculum that (1) is applicable to both junior and senior residents (2) has minimized the cost per resident with the reuse of cadaveric specimens and (3) has nurtured partnerships with industry stakeholders to reduce bias in training by collaborating with most major industry representatives. Conclusion: The simulation curriculum outlined in this manuscript may serve as a reference for other programs and institutions to develop their own residency educational curriculum models.

Resident Performance on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training (FAST) Workstation Does Not Predictably Improve With Postgraduate Year.

Purpose: To identify differences in performance on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training (FAST) workstation between residents across different postgraduate years and training sites. Methods: During the 2018-2019 academic year, 102 orthopaedic surgery residents from 4 training sites completed 6 FAST modules. Failure was defined as either completion time exceeding benchmark time or commission of task-specific errors. With the exception of knot tying, each module was completed by participants twice-once with each hand serving as the camera hand. Time to completion (except for knot tying) and errors were recorded for each of the modules. Completion times and failure rates were compared between postgraduate years, seniority groups, and training sites. Results: In all modules for which time was recorded, except for the suture-passage module, there was no significant difference in time to completion based on seniority (P < .01 for suture passage and P > .05 for all others). Significant differences in completion time were observed between sites for all modules except for the suture-passage module (P = .957 for suture passage and P < .05 for all others). Site predicted failure by at least 1 measure (time or technical error) for all modules (P < .05) except for number probing and suture passage. Failure rate across training years varied for each module. Conclusions: Time to completion and rate of failure did not predictably decrease with level of training. Training site proved to be a significant predictor of performance. Factors such as hand dominance and familiarity with the equipment proved to be important considerations for some modules. Clinical Relevance: Objective assessment of arthroscopic skills among orthopaedic trainees is difficult. Using reproducible methodology to assess trainees on specific skills at all postgraduate years and at multiple training sites may provide important information about orthopaedic training.