Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare corneal thickness measurements made by ultrasonic and slit-scanning techniques in normal eyes and in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Corneal Diseases and Excimer Laser Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland. METHODS: Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured in 101 eyes of 59 normal subjects and in 30 eyes of 21 post-LASIK patients. Measurements were made with an Orbscan slit-scanning elevation topographer and immediately afterward with an ultrasound pachymeter. RESULTS: The difference in mean CCT between ultrasound (538.0 microm +/- 36.7 [SD]) and Orbscan (566.6 +/- 40.7 microm) pachymetry was statistically significant (P <.001) in the normal eyes; the Orbscan measurement was approximately 28 microm higher than that of the ultrasound pachymeter. The difference in mean CCT between the ultrasound and the slit-scanning techniques was also statistically significant in the post-LASIK eyes (mean values 475.3 +/- 50.3 microm and 461.9 +/- 74.2 microm, respectively; P <.0001). Differences in CCT in individual subjects were much more variable in the post-LASIK eyes than in the normal eyes. The Bland and Altman method for assessing clinical agreement between 2 instruments showed that in 95% of cases, the CCT measurements with both instruments would be within 65 microm in normal eyes and 150 microm in post-LASIK eyes. CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness measurements were, on average, 28 microm higher with the Orbscan than with the ultrasound pachymeter in normal eyes and 13 microm lower in post-LASIK eyes. The degree of variability within each group indicated that these 2 techniques are not clinically comparable, precluding interchangeable use of their data in planning or assessing corneal surgery.

Safety and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement by flap reelevation in high myopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment following primary procedures for high myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Corneal Diseases and Excimer Laser Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. METHODS: This prospective observational study of retreatment comprised a cohort of 109 eyes having primary LASIK for high myopia and astigmatism with a spherical equivalent (SE) of -9.70 diopters (D) +/- 4.06 (SD). Twenty-four eyes (22%) with an initial myopic SE of -9.83 +/- 3.50 D, a comparable subset of the entire group (P < .05), had retreatment for residual myopia (-3.02 +/- 2.17 D) to improve uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) by reelevating the corneal flap and ablating the stromal bed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after retreatment was 12.8 +/- 5.1 months (range 1.5 to 24 months; 19 eyes >/=6 months, 13 eyes > or = 12 months). The mean myopic SE was reduced to +0.53 +/- 0.62 D at 1 week, +0.05 +/- 0.50 D at 1 month, +0.30 +/- 0.50 D at 6 months, and +0.18 +/- 0.42 D at the latest follow-up, 12.8 months. At the latest review, 62% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia and 100% were within +/-1.00 D. The mean refraction did not alter statistically between 1 week and subsequent times. The mean UCVA improved from 6/30 prior to retreatment to 6/9 at the latest follow-up. Uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better, 6/9 or better, and 6/12 or better was achieved by 33.0%, 75.0%, and 95.8% of eyes, respectively. No significant complications that led to a loss of best corrected visual acuity were encountered, although retreatment procedures were more uncomfortable than primary procedures and self-limiting; epithelial ingrowth that did not threaten vision was common, and 2 patients complained of nighttime visual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment of residual myopia by reelevating the flap was relatively safe and predictable, with a low risk of sight-threatening complications. However, longer term studies may be required to detect late complications.

Management of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration.

PURPOSE: A retrospective study to ascertain the management of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration (PMCD). METHOD AND RESULTS: Sixteen patients (average age 42.6 years) presented with PMCD. PMCD was bilateral in 13 and unilateral in 3 patients. Eight eyes underwent surgery. Nineteen eyes were managed non-surgically. Surgery involved corneal wedge excision (WE) (6 eyes), penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (3 eyes) and lamellar thermo-keratoplasty (LTK) (1 eye). Immediate pre-operative average visual acuity (VA) was 6/24, 6/10 and 6/60 with an average pre-operative astigmatism of 11.40 D, 9.75 D and 20.5 D for WE, PK and LTK respectively. After an average post-operative follow-up of 57 months, 66 months and 1 year, the average astigmatism was 8.90 D, 4.63 D and 6.00 D with an average final VA of 6/19, 6/15 and 6/6 for WE, PK and LTK respectively. In the nonsurgical group, at presentation, 40% of eyes had a VA of 6/12 or better. After an average follow-up period of 32.3 months, 80% of eyes had a visual acuity of 6/12 or better. Optical correction was achieved with spectacles and or contact lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction for PMCD provides poor long-term reduction of astigmatism. Patients with PMCD may be adequately corrected in the long term by the use of scleral fitted gas-permeable contact lenses.

Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation.

AIMS: To evaluate visual function and vision specific health status in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study measuring logMAR visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, disability glare, binocular visual field, stereoacuity, and subjective visual function (VF-14) was conducted on 18 patients with keratoconus undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK), including six patients who had already had PK in the fellow eye. Data were collected preoperatively and at 3, 9, and 18 months after surgery. RESULTS: Within 3 months of surgery there was significant improvement in aided visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereoacuity (p<0.05); disability glare (p<0.05) no longer had a significant detrimental effect on these variables. VF-14 score improved significantly throughout the postoperative period (p<0.05). There was significant correlation of the VF-14 score with aided visual acuity, binocular visual field, and stereoacuity. Postoperative astigmatism (<4D v >4D) did not affect the VF-14 score significantly. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial and rapid improvement in visual function and vision specific health status in keratoconic patients as a result of uncomplicated penetrating keratoplasty.

Lateral canthotomy and inferior cantholysis: an effective method of urgent orbital decompression for sight threatening acute retrobulbar haemorrhage.

Retrobulbar haemorrhage (RBH) occurs in a variety of situations. It can complicate facial fractures, orbital surgery and retrobulbar injections and can occur spontaneously. It is relatively uncommon and sight-threatening RBH is even less common. If not detected early enough it can lead to devastating loss of vision. We have collected five cases of acute RBH, following trauma, associated with a profound reduction in vision. In each case a permanent loss of vision was avoided using a lateral canthotomy and inferior cantholysis approach to obtain urgent orbital decompression.

Objective morphological assessment of macular hole surgery by scanning laser tomography.

AIM: To assess the morphological change in retinal topography using a scanning laser tomographer following macular hole surgery. To compare the results of scanning laser tomography with clinical evaluation and visual function assessment. METHODS: The sample for this pilot study comprised four eyes exhibiting different stages of macular hole formation preoperatively. Subjects were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Each assessment included visual acuity, letter contrast sensitivity, clinical examination (including automated static perimetry), and scanning laser tomography. The Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) was used to acquire digitised scanning laser tomography images of the macula (10 degrees and 20 degrees fields). Surgery essentially comprised vitrectomy, peeling of the posterior hyaloid face, if still attached, and intraocular gas tamponade. The magnitude and significance of topographic change were determined postoperatively using the HRT topographic difference facility. RESULTS: Topographic difference analysis of the right and left eyes of case 1 showed a significant reduction in the height of the retina postoperatively. Topographic difference analysis of case 2 showed no significant change in topography. Topographic difference analysis of case 3 showed a significant increase in the height of the retina postoperatively. Scanning laser tomography agreed with clinical assessment based upon fundus biomicroscopy in three of the four eyes studied; the postoperative closure of the stage 2 macular hole (as noted by clinical assessment) proved to be too small to reach statistical significance. Scanning laser tomography agreed with the assessment of visual function in two eyes; the agreement between scanning laser tomography and visual function depends, in part, on the stage of development of the macular hole. CONCLUSION: Scanning laser tomography provides an objective evaluation of the outcome of macular hole surgery. Studies employing larger sample sizes are required to fully determine the clinical worth of the technique.

Single medial injection peribulbar anaesthesia using prilocaine.

A prospective randomised study is reported comparing a single peribulbar injection into the medial compartment of the orbit and the standard two injection peribulbar technique. One hundred and seven patients undergoing elective intra-ocular surgery were randomly allocated to receive either a single medial injection, or two injections, using prilocaine 3% with felypressin. Akinesia and pain during surgery were assessed following the injection(s). There was no significant difference in pain during surgery and globe akinesia between the two groups. The single medial peribulbar injection is as effective as two injections using prilocaine 3%.