Impact of age on pre-procedural TIMI flow in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Advanced age is a major determinant of impaired prognosis among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the mechanisms associated with suboptimal reperfusion and enhanced complications are still largely undefined. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of age on the angiographic findings and the procedural results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with STEMI. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients admitted for STEMI treated with pPCI were included. Infarct-related artery (IRA) patency was defined for preprocedural TIMI flow 3. RESULTS: We included 520 patients, divided according to age tertiles (<61; 61-72; ≥73). Elderly patients were more often females, with hypertension, renal failure, prior myocardial infarction or PCI, with lower rates of smoking history, haemoglobin, leukocytes and cholesterol (P < 0.001), lower ejection fraction (P = 0.02), higher use of renin angiotensin system inhibitors, statins, ASA, calcium antagonists, diuretics and beta blockers. At angiography, for the IRA, percentage of thrombus (P = 0.02) and stenosis (P = 0.01), direct stenting (P = 0.02) and glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors (P = 0.04) inversely related with age, but for higher restenosis (P = 0.04). IRA patency was more common in patients aged ≥73 years (27.9% vs. 32.3% vs. 41.1%, P = 0.01). The impact of age on preprocedural TIMI flow was confirmed at multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 0.68 (0.47-0.98), P = 0.04]. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that among STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, more advanced age represents an independent predictor of preprocedural IRA patency. Future studies will define the implications on procedural results and long-term prognosis.

Impact of Sex on the Functional Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions by Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.

Sex differences in coronary physiology and in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD) have been previously described. Contrasting data have been reported, so far, about the impact of sex on the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses by fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). The present study aimed at assessing the sex differences in the results of iFR in a cohort of patients undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS: We included patients undergoing coronary angiography and the functional assessment of intermediate (40 to 70%) coronary lesions in 2 centers. iFR measurement was performed by pressure-recording guidewire and automatically calculated at the core laboratory using the manufacturers' dedicated software. Quantitative parameters of the coronary lesions were calculated by an automatic edge-detection system. Minimal luminal diameter (MLD), reference diameter (RD), percent diameter stenosis, and length of the lesion were measured. Positive iFR was considered for values < 0.90. RESULTS: We included 325 patients undergoing coronary angiography and iFR evaluation of 371 intermediate coronary stenoses, including 20.6% of women. Females were older, displayed lower body weight and hemoglobin, lower rate of active smoking (p < 0.001) and previous PCI (p = 0.04), lower platelet count (p = 0.001) and creatinine (p = 0.02). Systolic blood pressure and heart rate at admission were more elevated in women (p = 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively). At angiography, multivessel coronary artery disease was more uncommon (p = 0.001) and proximal lesions were more frequently assessed by iFR (p = 0.04). Mean values of iFR did not differ with sex and neither the percentage of positive iFR (19.1% vs 18.8%, p = 0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.51[0.18-1.48], p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions by instantaneous wave-free ratio, no impact of sex was observed on the absolute values or the rate of positivity of iFR.

Multisite artery disease: a common and challenging clinical condition calling for specific management.

'Multisite' artery disease is defined as the simultaneous presence of clinically significant atherosclerotic lesions in at least two major vascular territories. The management of patients with multisite artery disease represents a common challenge in clinical practice, since they are at increased risk for both vascular and coronary surgery. Preliminary experiences suggest that percutaneous treatment may represent a promising strategy for patients with multisite artery disease. In this review, the prevalence and management of multisite artery disease are discussed with particular attention to coronary and peripheral revascularization related issues.

Management and timing of access-site vascular complications occurring after trans-radial percutaneous coronary procedures.

BACKGROUND: Access-site vascular complications (ASVC) in patients undergoing trans-radial coronary procedures are rare but may have relevant clinical consequences. Data regarding the optimal management of radial-access-related ASVC are lacking. METHODS: During a period of 6 years we prospectively collected ASVC. ASVC were defined as any complication requiring ultrasound examination or upper limb angiography. ASVC were categorized according to the timing of diagnosis: "very early" (in the cath lab), "early" (after cath lab discharge, but during the hospital stay) and "late" (after hospital discharge). The need of surgery (primary end-point) and the development of neurological hand deficit (secondary end-point) were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven radial-artery related ASVC were collected. ASVC diagnosis was obtained by upper limb angiography in 25 patients (44%) and by Doppler in 32 patients (56%). Surgery was required in 6 cases (11%), the remaining patients receiving successful conservative management (which included prolonged local compression). Three patients (who received surgery) exhibited a mild neurological hand deficit in the follow-up. Need for surgery differed significantly according to timing of diagnosis as it occurred in 1 of 26 patients (3.8%) with "very early" diagnosis, in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) with "early" diagnosis, and in 4 of 10 patients (40%) with "late" diagnosis (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: ASVC are diagnosed with different timing after trans-radial procedures. Conservative management including local compression allows successful management in the majority of ASVC. Prompt recognition is pivotal as late diagnosis is associated to the need for surgery.

Outcome of non-cardiac surgery after stent implantation in the DES era: results of the Surgery After Stent (SAS) registry.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of patients needing non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting has not been established. Objective. To assess the perioperative outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after coronary bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (up to 2008) after coronary stenting in a single-center registry, prospectively registering clinical and procedural data about revascularization and retrospectively recording surgical details, perioperative therapy and in-hospital outcome after surgery. At our institution, we implant BMS for planned surgery at time of revascularization, and use antiplatelet therapy for surgery required within 1 month of BMS or within 12 months of DES implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as perioperative occurrence of major adverse events, both cardiovascular (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and repeated revascularization) and hemorrhagic (bleeding requiring transfusions or surgical hemostasis). RESULTS: We enrolled 101 patients: 70 treated with BMS (group 1) and 31 with DES (group 2). The mean interval between stenting and surgery was 288 days. The average number of antiplatelet drugs used during the operative period was higher in group 2 than group 1 (p = 0.02). Fifteen patients (15%) experienced major adverse events (5.9% had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, 12% received blood transfusions), without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.72). At multivariate analysis, the predictor of primary endpoint was time interval between stenting and surgery (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: We found similar outcomes for non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting when BMS were selected for planned surgery and dual antiplatelet therapy was used, if indicated, during the operative period.