RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wilms tumour (WT) is one of the cancer types targeted by the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC). The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of Wilms Africa Phase II in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Wilms Africa Phase II used a comprehensive WT treatment protocol in a multi-centre, prospective study conducted in eight hospitals in Ethiopia (2), Ghana (2), Malawi, Cameroon, Zimbabwe and Uganda. Eligibility criteria were: age younger than 16 years, unilateral WT, diagnosed between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022. RESULTS: We included 230 WT patients, median age 3 years, 53% male. Median maximum tumour diameter at diagnosis was 13.6 cm and 33% of patients had metastatic disease. Nephrectomy was performed in 71% of patients, of whom 21% had a tumour rupture. Two-year event-free survival (EFS) was 41.3% ± 3.9% after a median follow-up of 17 months (range: 1-33 months), with treatment abandonment considered an event. Treatment abandonment occurred in 26% and death during treatment in 14%. Disease relapse occurred in 10%. Two-year EFS of the 26 patients who received radiotherapy was 64.5% ± 9.7% with no reported disease relapse. CONCLUSION: Patients continue to present late with advanced WT in sub-Saharan Africa, and their survival is below the 60% GICC target. Prevention of treatment abandonment and treatment-related mortality remain important. Earlier diagnosis and access to radiotherapy are expected to decrease disease-related mortality.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Wilms Africa studies implemented an adapted Wilm's tumor (WT) treatment protocol in sub-Saharan Africa in two phases. Phase I began with four sites and provided out-of-pocket costs. Phase II expanded the number of sites, but lost funding provision. Objective is to describe the outcomes of Phase II and compare with Phase I. METHODS: Wilms Africa Phase I (n = 4 sites; 2014-2018) and Phase II (n = 8 sites; 2021-2022) used adapted treatment protocols. Funding for families' out-of-pocket costs was provided during Phase I but not Phase II. Eligibility criteria were age less than 16 years and newly diagnosed unilateral WT. We documented patients' outcome at the end of planned first-line treatment categorized as treatment abandonment, death during treatment, and disease-related events (death before treatment, persistent disease, relapse, or progressive disease). Sensitivity analysis compared outcomes in the same four sites. RESULTS: We included 431 patients in Phase I (n = 201) and Phase II (n = 230). The proportion alive without evidence of disease decreased from 69% in Phase I to 54% in Phase II at all sites (p = .002) and 58% at the original four sites (p = .04). Treatment abandonment increased overall from 12% to 26% (p < .001), and was 20% (p = .04) at the original four sites. Disease-related events (5% vs. 6% vs. 6%) and deaths during treatment (14% vs. 14% vs. 17%) were similar. CONCLUSION: Provision of out-of-pocket costs was important to improve patient outcomes at the end of planned first-line treatment in WT. Prevention of treatment abandonment remains an important challenge.