In adult patients with type 1 diabetes healthy lifestyle associates with a better cardiometabolic profile.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Little is known about lifestyle habits of adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their association with cardiometabolic risk (CMR) factors. The aims of the present study were to determine the prevalence of adults with T1D who adopted a healthy lifestyle and to explore the association between a healthy lifestyle and the cardiometabolic profile. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of 115 adults with T1D. Participants wore a motion sensor and completed a 3-day food record. The following CMR factors were assessed: body mass index, waist circumference, body composition (iDXA), glycated hemoglobin, lipids and blood pressure. Insulin resistance was estimated (estimated glucose disposal rate). Participants were classified according to the number of healthy lifestyle habits adopted (ranging from 0 to 3): regular physical activity (physical activity level ≥1.7), good diet quality (Canadian Healthy Eating Index score >80) and none-smoking status. The proportion of participants who adopted 3, 2, 1 or 0 lifestyle habits were 11%, 30%, 37%, and 23%, respectively. As the number of healthy lifestyle habits adopted increased, participants had significantly lower body mass index, waist circumference, body fat, total cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and systolic blood pressure (p < 0.05). In addition, a trend for lower estimated insulin resistance was observed (p = 0.06). For each increase of one healthy lifestyle habit, body mass index decreased by 1.9 kg/m(2), waist circumference by 4.0 cm for men and 4.8 cm for women and trunk fat by 3.6% for men and 4.1% for women. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the importance of a healthy lifestyle among adults with T1D in order to control CMR factors.

Clinical and biochemical features of seven adult adrenal ganglioneuromas.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal ganglioneuroma (GN) is seldom considered in the differential diagnosis of adrenal lesions, and its clinical presentation is not well known. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the clinical, biochemical, and radiological features of adrenal GNs in adults. METHODS: Seven adults underwent endocrine investigation for adrenal lesions that were confirmed to be adrenal GNs. RESULTS: Mean age of the seven patients was 49 yr (range, 23 to 71 yr). Average tumor diameter was 5.0 cm (range, 1.5 to 10.4 cm). In five patients, the adrenal lesions were found incidentally. A 49-yr-old female carried a germline mutation in MSH2 gene. A 57-yr-old female presented with mild virilization and increased testosterone levels. Bilateral adrenal venous sampling revealed testosterone production from her right adrenal lesion. All tumors showed nonenhanced attenuation between 25 and 40 Hounsfield units on computed tomography scan. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed low- to iso-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and high-signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging. [(18)F]-2-Fluoro-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography scan (n = 5) disclosed a mean standard uptake value of 2.4. Three tumors were composite pheochromocytoma-GN. Microsatellite instability study and immunohistochemical analysis of MSH2 protein in a patient carrying a MSH2 mutation showed normal MSH2 protein expression and low microsatellite instability, indicating that the adrenal GN was not related to the patient's MSH2 germline defect. CONCLUSIONS: We describe one of the largest series of adult adrenal GNs. Adrenal GNs may secrete testosterone or be part of a composite tumor with pheochromocytoma. The association of adrenal GN with MSH2 mutation seems to be a coincidental finding.

Plasma lipoprotein distribution and lipid transfer activities in patients with type IIb hyperlipidemia treated with simvastatin.

The aim of the present study was to search in type IIb hyperlipidemic patients for putative concomitant effects of simvastatin on the physicochemical characteristics of low density lipoproteins (LDL) and high density lipoproteins (HDL), as well as on the activities of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and the phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) that were determined in both endogenous lipoprotein-dependent and endogenous lipoprotein-independent assays. In a double-blind, randomized trial, patients received either placebo (one tablet/day; n = 12) or simvastatin (20 mg/day; n = 12) for a period of 8 weeks after a 5-week run-in period. Simvastatin, unlike placebo, reduced the lipid and apolipoprotein B contents of the most abundant LDL-1, LDL-2, and LDL-3 subfractions without inducing significant changes in the overall size distribution of LDL and HDL. Whereas simvastatin significantly increased PLTP activity in an endogenous lipoprotein-dependent assay (P < 0.01), no variation was observed in a lipoprotein-independent assay. Simvastatin significantly decreased plasma CETP activity in an endogenous lipoprotein-dependent assay (P < 0.01), and the reduction in plasma cholesteryl ester transfer rates was explained by a 16% drop in CETP mass concentration (P < 0.01). In contrast, the specific activity of CETP was unaffected by the simvastatin treatment reflecting at least in part the lack of significant alteration in plasma triglyceride-rich lipoprotein acceptors. The simvastatin-induced changes in plasma CETP mass levels correlated positively with changes in plasma CETP activity (r = 0.483, P = 0.0561), in total cholesterol levels (r = 0.769; P < 0.01), and in LDL-cholesterol levels (r = 0.736; P < 0.01). Whereas the observations suggest that simvastatin might exert concomitant beneficial effects on plasma CETP and LDL levels, neither plasma cholesteryl ester transfer activity nor plasma phospholipid transfer activity appeared as the main determinants of the LDL and HDL distribution profiles in type IIb hyperlipidemic patients.