OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ZONE 3 AND ZONE 1 AORTIC OCCLUSION FOR THE TREATMENT OF BLUNT PELVIC INJURIES.

ABSTRACT: Background: A 2021 report of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery multicenter registry described the outcomes of patients treated with Zone 3 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA zone 3). Our study builds upon that report, testing the hypothesis that REBOA zone 3 is associated with better outcomes than REBOA Zone 1 in the immediate treatment of severe, blunt pelvic injuries. Methods: We included adults who underwent aortic occlusion (AO) via REBOA zone 1 or REBOA Zone 3 in the emergency department for severe, blunt pelvic injuries [Abbreviated Injury Score ≥ 3 or pelvic packing/embolization/first 24 hours] in institutions with >10 REBOAs. Adjustment for confounders was accomplished with a Cox proportional hazards model for survival, generalized estimating equations for intensive care unit (ICU)-free days (IFD) and ventilation-free days (VFD) > 0 days, and mixed linear models for continuous outcomes (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]), accounting for facility clustering. Results: Of 109 eligible patients, 66 (60.6%) underwent REBOA Zone 3 and 43 (39.4%) REBOA Zone 1. There were no differences in demographics, but compared with REBOA Zone 3, REBOA Zone 1 patients were more likely to be admitted to high volume centers and be more severely injured. These patients did not differ in systolic blood pressure (SBP), cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prehospital/hospital settings, SBP at the start of AO, time to AO start, likelihood of achieving hemodynamic stability or requirement of a second AO. After controlling for confounders, compared with REBOA Zone 3, REBOA Zone 1 was associated with a significantly higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.19), but there were no differences in VFD > 0 (adjusted relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.33-1.31), IFD > 0 (adjusted relative risk, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.39-1.57), discharge GCS (adjusted difference, -1.16; 95% CI, -4.2 to 1.90) or discharge GOS (adjusted difference, -0.67; 95% CI -1.9 to 0.63). Conclusions: This study suggests that compared with REBOA Zone 1, REBOA Zone 3 provides superior survival and is not inferior regarding other adverse outcomes in patients with severe blunt pelvic injuries.

Zone 1 Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta vs Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Patient Resuscitation After Severe Hemorrhagic Shock.

Importance: Aortic occlusion (AO) is a lifesaving therapy for the treatment of severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock; however, there remains controversy whether AO should be accomplished via resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) or via endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in zone 1. Objective: To compare outcomes of AO via RT vs REBOA zone 1. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a comparative effectiveness research study using a multicenter registry of postinjury AO from October 2013 to September 2021. AO via REBOA zone 1 (above celiac artery) was compared with RT performed in the emergency department of facilities experienced in both procedures and documented in the prospective multicenter Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry. Propensity score matching (PSM) with exact institution matching was used, in addition to subgroup multivariate analysis to control for confounders. The study setting included the ED, where AO via RT or REBOA was performed, and participants were adult trauma patients 16 years or older. Exposures: AO via REBOA zone 1 vs RT. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes were ventilation-free days (VFDs), intensive care unit (ICU)-free days, discharge Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). Results: A total of 991 patients (median [IQR] age, 32 [25-48] years; 808 male individuals [81.9%]) with a median (IQR) Injury Severity Score of 29 (18-50) were included. Of the total participants, 306 (30.9%) had AO via REBOA zone 1, and 685 (69.1%) had AO via RT. PSM selected 112 comparable patients (56 pairs). REBOA zone 1 was associated with a statistically significant lower mortality compared with RT (78.6% [44] vs 92.9% [52]; P = .03). There were no significant differences in VFD greater than 0 (REBOA, 18.5% [10] vs RT, 7.1% [4]; P = .07), ICU-free days greater than 0 (REBOA, 18.2% [10] vs RT, 7.1% [4]; P = .08), or discharge GOS of 5 or more (REBOA, 7.5% [4] vs RT, 3.6% [2]; P = .38). Multivariate analysis confirmed the survival benefit of REBOA zone 1 after adjustment for significant confounders (relative risk [RR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.36). In all subgroup analyses (cardiopulmonary resuscitation on arrival, traumatic brain injury, chest injury, pelvic injury, blunt/penetrating mechanism, systolic blood pressure ≤60 mm Hg on AO initiation), REBOA zone 1 offered an either similar or superior survival. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this comparative effectiveness research suggest that REBOA zone 1 provided better or similar survival than RT for patients requiring AO postinjury. These findings provide the ethically necessary equipoise between these therapeutic approaches to allow the planning of a randomized controlled trial to establish the safety and effectiveness of REBOA zone 1 for AO in trauma resuscitation.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for temporization of hemorrhage in adolescent trauma patients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as an alternative technique for traumatic hemorrhage control in the adult population. The purpose of this study is to describe the details of REBOA placement in adolescent trauma patients. METHODS: Patients 18 years of age or less who received REBOA for aortic occlusion (AO) from August 2013 to February 2017 at 2 urban tertiary care centers were included. RESULTS: 7 adolescent trauma patients received REBOA by trauma surgeons for both blunt (n = 4) and penetrating mechanisms (n = 3); mean age was 17 + 1.5 years, mean admission lactate 13.0 + 4.85 mmol/L, and mean Hgb 10.7 + 2.7 g/dL. 3 patients received REBOA through a 12Fr sheath and 4 through a 7Fr sheath. AO occurred mostly at the distal thoracic aorta (Zone I) (85.7%) and also in the distal abdominal aorta (Zone III) (14.3%). 57% of patients were in arrest with ongoing CPR at the time of REBOA. In-hospital mortality was 57%; all of these patients were in arrest at the time of REBOA, had return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survived to the operating room. No complications from REBOA were identified. CONCLUSION: REBOA appears to be feasible for use in adolescents despite their smaller caliber vessels, even with use of a 12Fr sheath. REBOA results in improved physiology and can bridge adolescent trauma patients presenting in extremis to the operating room. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment/therapeutic study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

A Surgical Endovascular Trauma Service Increases Case Volume and Decreases Time to Hemostasis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a recently active endovascular trauma service (ETS) on case volume and time to hemostasis, as a complement to an existing interventional radiology (IR) service. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Endovascular techniques are vital for trauma care, but timely access can be a challenge. There is a paucity of data on the effect of a multispecialty team for delivery of endovascular hemorrhage control. METHODS: The electronic medical record of trauma patients undergoing endovascular procedures between 2013 and 2018 was queried for provider type (IR or ETS). Case volume and rates were expressed per 100 monthly admissions, normalizing for seasonal variation. Interrupted time series analysis was used to model the case rate pre- and post-introduction of the ETS. Admission-to-procedure-time data were collected for pelvic angioembolization as a marker of patients requiring emergency hemostasis. RESULTS: During 6 years, 1274 admission episodes required endovascular interventions. Overall case volume increased from 2.7 to 3.6 at a rate of 0.006 (P = 0.734) after introduction of the ETS. IR case volume decreased from 3.3 to 2.6 at a rate of 0.03 (P = 0.063). ETS case volume increased at a rate of 0.048 (P < 0.001), which was significantly different from the IR trend (P < 0.001). Median (interquartile range) time-to-procedure (hours) was significantly shorter for pelvic angioembolization [3.0 (4.4) vs 4.3 (3.6); P < 0.001] when ETS was compared to IR. CONCLUSION: A surgical ETS increases case volume and decreases time to hemostasis for trauma patients requiring time sensitive interventions. Further work is required to assess patient outcome following this change.

Aortic branch vessel flow during resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a torso hemorrhage control adjunct. Aortic branch vessel flow (BVF) during REBOA is poorly characterized and has implications for ischemia-reperfusion injury. The aim of this study is to quantify BVF in hypovolemic shock with and without REBOA. METHODS: Female swine (79-90 kg) underwent anesthesia, 40% controlled hemorrhage and sonographic flow monitoring of the carotid, hepatic, superior mesenteric, renal, and femoral arteries. Animals were randomized to REBOA (n = 5) or no-REBOA (n = 5) for 4 hours, followed by full resuscitation and balloon deflation for 1 hour. RESULTS: All animals were successfully induced into hemorrhagic shock with a mean decrease of flow in all vessels of 50% from baseline (p < 0.001). Deployment of REBOA resulted in a 200% to 400% increase in carotid flow, but near complete abolition of BVF distal to the balloon. The no-REBOA group saw recovery of BVF to 100% of baseline in all measured vessels, except the hepatic at 50% to 75%. two-way analysis of variance confirmed a significant difference between the groups throughout the protocol (p < 0.001). During resuscitation, the REBOA group saw BVF restore to between 25% and 50%, but never achieving baseline values. The lactate at 4 hours was significantly higher in the REBOA versus no-REBOA group (17.2 ± 0.1 vs. 4.9 ± 1.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: REBOA not only abolishing BVF during occlusion, but appears to have a post-REBOA effect, reducing visceral perfusion. This may be a source of REBOA associated ischemia-reperfusion injury and warrants further investigation in order to mitigate this effect.

Traumatic cardiac arrest and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): a preliminary analysis utilizing high fidelity invasive blood pressure recording and videography.

PURPOSE: Aortic occlusion (AO) increases proximal perfusion and may improve rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The objective of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and AO by REBOA on patients in traumatic cardiac arrest. METHODS: Patients admitted between February 2013 and May 2017 at a tertiary center who suffered traumatic arrest, had an arterial line placed during resuscitation, and received CPR and REBOA which were included. In-hospital CPR data were obtained from videography. Arterial waveforms were recorded at 240 Hz. RESULTS: 11 consecutive patients were included, 82% male; mean (± SD) age 37 ± 19 years. 55% suffered blunt trauma and the remaining penetrating injuries. 64% arrested out of hospital. During compressions with AO, the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 70 ± 22 mmHg, mean arterial pressure (MAP) 43 ± 19 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 26 ± 17 mmHg. Nine (82%) had ROSC, with eight having multiple periods of ROSC and arrest in the initial period. In-hospital mortality was 82%. Cardiac ultrasonography was used during arrest in 73%. In two patients with arterial line data before and after AO, SBP (mmHg) improved from 51 to 73 and 55 to 96 during arrest after AO. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality chest compressions coupled with aortic occlusion may generate adequate perfusion pressures to increase the rate of ROSC. New technology capable of transducing central arterial pressure may help us to understand the effectiveness of CPR with and without aortic occlusion. REBOA may be a useful adjunct to high-quality chest compressions during arrest.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: rupture risk and implications for blind inflation.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a torso hemorrhage control technique. To expedite deployment, inflation is frequently performed as a blind technique with minimal imaging, which carries a theoretical risk of aortic injury. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between balloon inflation, deformation and the risk of aortic rupture. METHODS: Compliant balloon catheters were incrementally inflated in segments of cadaveric swine aorta. Serial longitudinal and circumferential measurements were recorded, along with the incidence of aortic rupture. RESULTS: Fourteen cadaveric swine aorta segments were tested with mean (±SD) baseline aortic diameter (mm) of 14.2±3.4. Rupture occurred in three aortas. The mean baseline diameters (mm) of the aortic segments that were ruptured were significantly smaller than those that did not rupture (8.9±1.2 vs 15.6±1.9; P<0.001). The maximal circumferential stretch ratios were significantly higher in the aorta segments that ruptured compared with those that did not (1.9±0.1 vs 1.5±0.1; P<0.001). The maximal amount of balloon longitudinal deformation was 80 mm (116% longer than the intended working length). CONCLUSIONS: Inflation of aortic balloon catheters carries an inherent risk of aortic injury, which may be minimized through an understanding of the intrinsic characteristics of the aorta and compliant balloons. Smaller diameter aortic segments undergoing overinflation, particularly beyond a circumferential stretch ratio of 1.8, are at risk of aortic rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Bringing Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Closer to the Point of Injury.

BACKGROUND: The management of noncompressible torso hemorrhage remains a significant issue at the point of injury. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been used in the hospital to control bleeding and bridge patients to definitive surgery. Smaller delivery systems and wirefree devices may be used more easily at the point of injury by nonphysician providers. We investigated whether independent duty military medical technicians (IDMTs) could learn and perform REBOA correctly and rapidly as assessed by simulation. METHODS: US Air Force IDMTs without prior endovascular experience were included. All participants received didactic instruction and evaluation of technical skills. Procedural times and pretest/posttest examinations were administered after completion of all trials. The Likert scale was used to subjectively assess confidence before and after instruction. RESULTS: Eleven IDMTs were enrolled. There was a significant decrease in procedural times from trials 1 to 6. Overall procedural time (± standard deviation) decreased from 147.7 ± 27.4 seconds to 64 ± 8.9 seconds (ρ < .001). There was a mean improvement of 83.7 ± 24.6 seconds from the first to sixth trial (ρ < .001). All participants demonstrated correct placement of the sheath, measurement and placement of the catheter, and inflation of the balloon throughout all trials (100%). There was significant improvement in comprehension and knowledge between the pretest and posttest; average performance improved significantly from 36.4.6% ± 12.3% to 71.1% ± 8.5% (ρ < .001). Subjectively, all 11 participants noted significant improvement in confidence from 1.2 to 4.1 out of 5 on the Likert scale (ρ < .001). CONCLUSION: Technology for aortic occlusion has advanced to provide smaller, wirefree devices, making field deployment more feasible. IDMTs can learn the steps required for REBOA and perform the procedure accurately and rapidly, as assessed by simulation. Arterial access is a challenge in the ability to perform REBOA and should be a focus of further training to promote this procedure closer to the point of injury.

The pitfalls of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Risk factors and mitigation strategies.

Despite technological advancements, REBOA is associated with significant risks due to complications of vascular access and ischemia-reperfusion. The inherent morbidity and mortality of REBOA is often compounded by coexisting injury and hemorrhagic shock. Additionally, the potential for REBOA-related injuries is exaggerated due to the growing number of interventions being performed by providers who have limited experience in endovascular techniques, inadequate resources, minimal training in the technique, and who are performing this maneuver in emergency situations. In an effort to ultimately improve outcomes with REBOA, we sought to compile a list of complications that may be encountered during REBOA usage. To address the current knowledge gap, we assembled a list of anecdotal complications from high-volume REBOA users internationally. More importantly, through a consensus model, we identify contributory factors that may lead to complications and deliberate on how to recognize, mitigate, and manage such events. An understanding of the pitfalls of REBOA and strategies to mitigate their occurrence is of vital importance to optimize patient outcomes.

Assessment of Blood Flow Patterns Distal to Aortic Occlusion Using CT in Patients with Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to decrease hemorrhage below the level of aortic occlusion (AO); however, the amount of collateral blood flow below the level of occlusion is unknown. Our aim was to investigate blood flow patterns during complete AO in patients who underwent CT scan after REBOA. STUDY DESIGN: Between February 2013 and January 2017, patients who received REBOA and underwent CT scan with intravenous contrast during full AO were included. Patients were excluded if they had a CT scan performed with the balloon partially or fully deflated. RESULTS: Nine patients (8 men) were included; all had blunt trauma. Mean Injury Severity Score (±SD) was 48 ± 8 and mean age was 45 ± 19 years. Four had supra-celiac AO, and 5 had infra-renal AO. Arterial contrast enhancement was noted below the level of AO in all patients, and distal to REBOA sheath placement in 5. Collateralization from arteries above and below the AO was identified in all patients. Contrast extravasation distal to AO was identified in 4 patients, and hematomas in 8. Distal vascular enhancement patterns varied by level of AO and contrast administration site. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic occlusion appears to dramatically decrease, but does not completely impede, distal perfusion during REBOA due to multiple pathways of collateralization. Active extravasation and hematomas can still be detected in the setting of full AO, with purposefully timed contrast and image acquisition. Blood flow persists below the level of both the AO and in-dwelling sheath. Dynamic flow studies are needed to determine the contribution of AO and sheath placement to distal tissue ischemia.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: Pushing Care Forward.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), used to temporize noncompressible and junctional hemorrhage, may be deployable to the forward environment. Our hypothesis was that nonsurgeon physicians and high-level military medical technicians would be able to learn the theory and insertion of REBOA. METHODS: US Army Special Operations Command medical personnel without prior endovascular experience were included. All participants received didactic instruction of the Basic Endovascular Skills for Trauma Course™ together, with individual evaluation of technical skills. A pretest and a posttest were administered to assess comprehension. RESULTS: Four members of US Army Special Operations Command-two nonsurgeon physicians, one physician assistant, and one Special Operations Combat Medic-were included. REBOA procedural times moving from trial 1 to trial 6 decreased significantly from 186 ± 18.7 seconds to 83 ± 10.3 seconds (ρ < .0001). All participants demonstrated safe REBOA insertion and verbalized the indications for REBOA insertion and removal through all trials. All five procedural tasks were performed correctly by each participant. Comprehension and knowledge between the pretest and posttest improved significantly from 67.6 ± 7.3% to 81.3 ± 8.1% (ρ = .039). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that nonsurgeon and nonphysician providers can learn the steps required for REBOA after arterial access is established. Although insertion is relatively straightforward, the inability to gain arterial access percutaneously is prohibitive in providers without a surgical skillset and should be the focus of further training.

Angiographic embolization for hemorrhage following pelvic fracture: Is it "time" for a paradigm shift?

INTRODUCTION: Major pelvic disruption with hemorrhage has a high rate of lethality. Angiographic embolization remains the mainstay of treatment. Delays to angiography have been shown to worsen outcomes in part because time spent awaiting mobilization of resources needed to perform angiography allows ongoing hemorrhage. Alternative techniques like pelvic preperitoneal packing and aortic balloon occlusion now exist. We hypothesized that time to angiographic embolization at our Level 1 trauma center would be longer than 90 minutes. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with pelvic fracture who underwent pelvic angiography at our trauma center over a 10-year period. The trauma registry was queried for age, sex, injury severity score, hemodynamic instability (HI) on presentation, and transfusion requirements within 24 hours. Charts were reviewed for time to angiography, embolization, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4712 patients were admitted with pelvic fractures during the study period, 344 (7.3%) underwent pelvic angiography. Median injury severity score was 29. Median 24-hour transfusion requirements were five units of red blood cells and six units of fresh frozen plasma. One hundred fifty-one patients (43.9%) presented with HI and 104 (30%) received massive transfusion (MT). Median time to angiography was 286 minutes (interquartile range, 210-378). Times were significantly shorter when stratified for HI (HI, 264 vs stable 309 minutes; p = 0.003), and MT (MT, 230 vs non-MT, 317 minutes; p < 0.001), but still took nearly 4 hours. Overall mortality was 18%. Hemorrhage (35.5%) and sepsis/multiple-organ failure (43.5%) accounted for most deaths. CONCLUSION: Pelvic fracture hemorrhage remains a management challenge. In this series, the median time to embolization was more than 5 hours. Nearly 80% of deaths could be attributed to early uncontrolled hemorrhage and linked to delays in hemostasis. Earlier intervention by Acute Care Surgeons with techniques like preperitoneal packing, aortic balloon occlusion, and use of hybrid operative suites may improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level V.

Open chest cardiac massage offers no benefit over closed chest compressions in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Open chest cardiac massage (OCCM) is a commonly performed procedure after traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). OCCM has been reported to be superior to closed chest compressions (CCC) in animal models and in non-TCA. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare OCCM versus CCC in TCA using end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), the criterion standard for determining the effectiveness of chest compressions and detection of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), as the surrogate for cardiac output and marker for adequacy of resuscitation. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patients over a 9-month period directly presenting to a level 1 trauma center after TCA. Continuous high-resolution ETCO2 measurements were collected every 6 seconds for periods of CCC and OCCM, respectively. Patients receiving CCC only were compared with patients receiving CCC followed by OCCM. Student's t tests were used to compare ETCO2 within and between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled (16 OCCM, 17 CCC-only). Mean time of CCC before OCCM was 66 seconds. Within the OCCM group, final, peak, mean, and median ETCO2 levels significantly increased when comparing the initial CCC period to the OCCM interval. Using a time-matched comparison, significant increases were observed in the final and peak but not mean and median values when comparing the first minute of CCC to the remaining time in the CCC-only group. However, when periods of OCCM were compared with equivalent periods of CCC-only, there were no differences in the initial, final, peak, mean, or median ETCO2 values. Correspondingly, no difference in rates of ROSC was observed between groups (OCCM 23.5% vs. CCC 38.9%; p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: Although we could not control for confounders, we found no significant improvement in ETCO2 or ROSC with OCCM. With newer endovascular techniques for aortic occlusion, thoracotomy solely for performing OCCM provides no benefit over CCC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.

Smaller introducer sheaths for REBOA may be associated with fewer complications.

INTRODUCTION: Large arterial sheaths currently used for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may be associated with severe complications. Smaller diameter catheters compatible with 7Fr sheaths may improve the safety profile. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients receiving REBOA through a 7Fr sheath for refractory traumatic hemorrhagic shock was performed from January 2014 to June 2015 at five tertiary-care hospitals in Japan. Demographics were collected including method of arterial access; outcomes included mortality and REBOA-related access complications. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent REBOA at Zone 1 (level of the diaphragm). Most patients were male (70%), with a mean age (+SD) 50 ± 18 years, mean BMI 23 ± 4, and a median [IQR] ISS of 38 [34, 52]. Ninety-four percent of patients presented after sustaining injuries from blunt mechanisms. Twenty-four percent underwent CPR before arrival, and an additional 15% received CPR after admission. Percutaneous arterial access without ultrasound or fluoroscopy was achieved in all patients. Systolic blood pressure increased significantly following balloon occlusion (mean 62 ± 36 to 106 ± 40 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Median total duration of complete initial occlusion was 26 [range 10-35] minutes. Sixteen patients (49%) survived beyond 24 hours, and 14 patients (42%) survived beyond 30 days. Twenty-four-hour and 30-day survival were 48% and 42%, respectively. Of the patients surviving 24 hours (n = 16), median duration of sheath placement was 28 [range 18-45] hours with all removed using manual pressure to achieve hemostasis. Of 33 REBOAs, 20 were performed by Emergency Medicine practitioners, 10 by Emergency Medicine practitioners with endovascular training, and 3 by Interventional Radiologists. No complication related to sheath insertion or removal was identified during the follow-up period, including dissection, pseudoaneurysm, retroperitoneal hematoma, leg ischemia, or distal embolism. CONCLUSIONS: 7Fr REBOA catheters can significantly elevate systolic blood pressure with no access-related complications. Our results suggest that a 7Fr introducer device for REBOA may be a safe and effective alternative to large-bore sheaths, and may remain in place during the post-procedure resuscitative phase without sequelae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level V.

The use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta to control hemorrhagic shock during video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement or infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a technique that has been shown to provide central vascular control to support proximal aortic pressure and minimize hemorrhage in a wide variety of clinic settings, however the role of REBOA for emergency general surgery is less defined. CASE DESCRIPTION: This is a report of a 44 year old man who experienced hemorrhagic shock during video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) for necrotizing pancreatitis where REBOA was used to prevent ongoing hemorrhage and death. DISCUSSION: This is the first documented report REBOA being used during pancreatic debridement in the literature and one of the first times it has been used in emergency general surgery. The use of REBOA is an option for those in hemorrhagic shock whom conventional aortic cross-clamping or supra-celiac aortic exposure is either not possible or exceedingly dangerous. CONCLUSION: REBOA allows for adequate resuscitation and can be used as a bridge to definitive therapy in a range of surgical subspecialties with minimal morbidity and complications. The risks associated with insertion of wires, sheaths, and catheters into the arterial system, as well as the risk of visceral and spinal cord ischemia due to aortic occlusion mandate that the use of this technique be utilized in only appropriate clinical scenarios.

Blunt abdominal aortic injury: a Western Trauma Association multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is a rare injury. The objective of the current study was to examine the presentation and management of BAAI at a multi-institutional level. METHODS: The Western Trauma Association Multi-Center Trials conducted a study of BAAI from 1996 to 2011. Data collected included demographics, injury mechanism, associated injuries, interventions, and complications. RESULTS: Of 392,315 blunt trauma patients, 113 (0.03%) presented with BAAI at 12 major trauma centers (67% male; median age, 38 years; range, 6-88; median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 34; range, 16-75). The leading cause of injury was motor vehicle collisions (60%). Hypotension was documented in 47% of the cases. The most commonly associated injuries were spine fractures (44%) and pneumothorax/hemothorax (42%). Solid organ, small bowel, and large bowel injuries occurred in 38%, 35%, and 28% respectively. BAAI presented as free aortic rupture (32%), pseudoaneurysm (16%), and injuries without aortic external contour abnormality on computed tomography such as large intimal flaps (34%) or intimal tears (18%). Open and endovascular repairs were undertaken as first-choice therapy in 43% and 15% of cases, respectively. Choice of management varied by type of BAAI: 89% of intimal tears were managed nonoperatively, and 96% of aortic ruptures were treated with open repair. Overall mortality was 39%, the majority (68%) occurring in the first 24 hours because of hemorrhage or cardiac arrest. The highest mortality was associated with Zone II aortic ruptures (92%). Follow-up was documented in 38% of live discharges. CONCLUSION: This is the largest BAAI series reported to date. BAAI presents as a spectrum of injury ranging from minimal aortic injury to aortic rupture. Nonoperative management is successful in uncomplicated cases without external aortic contour abnormality on computed tomography. Highest mortality occurred in free aortic ruptures, suggesting that alternative measures of early noncompressible torso hemorrhage control are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Endovascular repair of an asymptomatic aortic pseudoaneurysm after penetrating injury.

Penetrating injuries to the aorta usually result in immediate life-threatening hemorrhage. Because these lesions are typically either fatal or identified and controlled surgically, chronic pseudoaneurysms after penetrating aortic trauma are rare. Most of these patients present with rupture or local complications, and management before the endovascular era has historically been open repair. As such, there are limited data to guide the modern management of an asymptomatic, posttraumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm. Here, we describe a 54-year-old man who was diagnosed with an incidental, supraceliac aortic pseudoaneurysm 14 years after an abdominal stab wound. He underwent successful and uncomplicated endovascular repair.

Management and outcomes of blunt common and external iliac arterial injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Blunt iliac arterial injuries (BIAI) require complex management but are rare and poorly studied. We investigated the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with blunt common or external iliac arterial injuries. METHODS: We identified and reviewed 112 patients with BIAI admitted between 2000 and 2011 at a Level I trauma center. Patients with common/external iliac artery injuries (CE group) were primarily analyzed, with patients with injuries of the internal iliac artery or its major branches (IB group) included for comparison of pelvic arterial trauma. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had CE and 88 had IB injuries. Mean ages (45 ± 19 years) and gender (86% male) were similar between groups. The mean injury severity score was 40 ± 14 (CE, 36 ± 15; IB, 40 ± 14; P = .19), indicating severe trauma. Twenty (83%) of the CE patients presented with signs of leg malperfusion. Admission factors associated with CE injury were crush mechanism of injury (37% vs 17%; P = .03) and pelvic soft tissue trauma (50% vs 15%; P < .01). The CE group had higher early mortality rates, both within 3 hours of admission (50% vs 19%; P = .04) and prior to iliac intervention (42% vs 3%; P < .01). Among those surviving to management, CE patients were more likely to undergo open repair or revascularization (68% vs 3%; P < .01) and had a higher rate of leg amputation (50% vs 6%; P < .01), with 8/12 (67%) culminating in hemipelvectomy. Risk factors for amputation included leg malperfusion, high-grade pelvic fractures, pelvic soft tissue trauma, and increasing leg injury severity. Overall mortality was 40%, and was similar between the injury groups. Among CE patients, need for amputation, pelvic fractures, and wounds were associated with inpatient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series to date of blunt CE injuries and demonstrates distinct clinical features and outcomes for these patients. They have high risk for early death and proximal leg amputation. CE injury is specifically associated with serious open pelvic soft tissue injury, which, along with high-grade pelvic fractures, is a risk factor for amputation and death. On-demand emergent endovascular intervention may play an important role in improving management of these complex injuries.

A clinical series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control and resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: A requirement for improved methods of hemorrhage control and resuscitation along with the translation of endovascular specialty skills has resulted in reappraisal of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for end-stage shock. The objective of this report was to describe implementation of REBOA in civilian trauma centers. METHODS: Descriptive case series of REBOA (December 2012 to March 2013) used in scenarios of end-stage hemorrhagic shock at the University of Maryland, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, and Herman Memorial Hospital, The Texas Trauma Institute, Houston, Texas. RESULTS: REBOA was performed by trauma and acute care surgeons for blunt (n = 4) and penetrating (n = 2) mechanisms. Three cases were REBOA in the descending thoracic aorta (Zone I) and three in the infrarenal aorta (Zone III). Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure at the time of REBOA was 59 (27) mm Hg, and mean (SD) base deficit was 13 (5). Arterial access was accomplished using both direct cutdown (n = 3) and percutaneous (n = 3) access to the common femoral artery. REBOA resulted in a mean (SD) increase in blood pressure of 55 (20) mm Hg, and the mean (SD) aortic occlusion time was 18 (34) minutes. There were no REBOA-related complications, and there was no hemorrhage-related mortality. CONCLUSION: REBOA is a feasible and effective means of proactive aortic control for patients in end-stage shock from blunt and penetrating mechanisms. With available technology, this method of resuscitation can be performed by trauma and acute care surgeons who have benefited from instruction on a limited endovascular skill set. Future work should be aimed at devices that allow easy, fluoroscopy-free access and studies to define patients most likely to benefit from this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level V.

Patterns and management of blunt abdominal aortic injury.

BACKGROUND: Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is historically associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Our institutional experience was analyzed to define current patterns of injury and to help guide management. METHODS: Adult patients with BAAI between January 2000 and July 2011 were identified from our trauma registry. Medical, radiographic, and autopsy records were reviewed for relevant clinical data. Management and outcomes were compared between patients with minimal aortic injury limited to the intima (MAI) compared to more significant aortic injury (SAI). RESULTS: Nine patients had MAI and 8 had SAI, including 2 dissections, 2 pseudoaneurysms, 2 branch avulsions, 1 thrombosis, and 1 transection. The MAI and SAI groups had similar demographics and patterns of injury, and all patients had significant polytrauma, with a mean injury severity score of 42. More MAI than SAI patients were managed nonoperatively (100% vs. 38%; P=0.01). All observed patients underwent repeat imaging during the index admission, 85% within 72 hours, and no observed lesions led to malperfusion, death, or progression during the index admission. One MAI progressed to a pseudoaneurysm within 8 months. Five SAI patients underwent aortic-related repairs, including 2 endovascular stent grafts, 2 open primary repairs, and 1 axillobifemoral bypass. Overall, 15 (88%) patients underwent procedures for any injury-9 required laparotomy (53%) and 2 underwent thoracotomy. There were 6 (35%) deaths, 2 attributable to aortic injury-1 from hemorrhage and 1 from hyperkalemic cardiac arrest after prolonged ischemia from infrarenal aortic occlusion. Among patients who survived the initial resuscitation, SAI was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate compared to MAI (50% vs. 0%; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MAI are at low risk of complications and may be considered for observation. Patients with SAI requiring intervention manifest clinically and/or radiographically at presentation. Those not associated with bleeding, malperfusion, or thromboembolism may be observed with interval imaging. For all observed patients, long-term surveillance is required to document complete resolution or stability, because even MAI can progress to a more complex lesion.