A SEER analysis of survival and prognostic factors in merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck region.

While Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the head and neck is highly malignant, it remains poorly characterized due to its rarity. The purpose of this study was to examine prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with MCC of the head and neck region. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry was reviewed for patients diagnosed between 1984 and 2016 with histologically confirmed, primary MCC of the head and neck region. A total of 2818 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median age at diagnosis of 77 years. At five and 10 years, respectively, the OS was 42.4% and 25.1% and the DSS was 67.9% and 64.1%. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that predictors of decreased DSS included age at diagnosis ≥75 years, white race, increasing tumor spread, lymph node involvement and either the lip or the scalp/neck as a primary site. When adjusting for the aforementioned factors, tumor depth was not found to be a prognostic factor for DSS. We anticipate these results will help clinicians to counsel patients regarding expectations and potential prognosis.

Assessment of family cancer history collection and utilization in patient care.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine whether patients and accompanying persons visiting the Gynecologic Oncology Clinic were aware if a family cancer history was recorded and utilized in their medical care; whether they were aware of the importance of a family cancer history, and whether they would like to learn more about familial cancer. METHODS: Sixteen- and 17-item self-report questionnaires were administered to patients and their accompanying persons, respectively, who were visiting the Gynecologic Oncology Clinic. All responses were anonymous. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four patient questionnaires and 114 accompanying person questionnaires were completed. Seventy-eight percent of the patients and 70% of the accompanying persons replied that a physician had inquired about their family history of cancer. Only 40% of those patients and 70% of those accompanying persons (31 and 49% of total patients and accompanying persons, respectively) replied that the inquiry was by their family physician. Sixty-seven percent of these patients and 63% of these accompanying persons reported that a written record was made of the family history. Thirty-one percent of the patients and 28% of accompanying persons knew that their family cancer history information had been used to aid in their medical care. Eighty-eight percent of the patients and 83% of the accompanying persons reported the occurrence of at least one relative with cancer; however, only 44% of the patients and 35% of the accompanying persons replied that a health care provider had ever provided teaching about the importance of a family cancer history. Seventy-five percent of the patients and 73% of the accompanying persons indicated that they would like to learn more about hereditary cancer and cancer genetics. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients desire information about cancer genetics and hereditary cancer. Therefore, health care providers should provide better education and information to their patients as well as improve their family history-taking skills.