Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia IGHV Somatic Hypermutation Detection by Targeted Capture Next-Generation Sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Somatic hypermutation (SHM) status of the immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) gene plays a crucial role in determining the prognosis and treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A common approach for determining SHM status is multiplex polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing of the immunoglobin heavy locus; however, this technique is low throughput, is vulnerable to failure, and does not allow multiplexing with other diagnostic assays. METHODS: Here we designed and validated a DNA targeted capture approach to detect immunoglobulin heavy variable somatic hypermutation (IGHV SHM) status as a submodule of a larger next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel that also includes probes for ATM, BIRC3, CHD2, KLHL6, MYD88, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, POT1, SF3B1, TP53, and XPO1. The assay takes as input FASTQ files and outputs a report containing IGHV SHM status and V allele usage following European Research Initiative on CLL guidelines. RESULTS: We validated the approach on 35 CLL patient samples, 34 of which were characterized using Sanger sequencing. The NGS panel identified the IGHV SHM status of 34 of 35 CLL patients. We showed 100% sensitivity and specificity among the 33 CLL samples with both NGS and Sanger sequencing calls. Furthermore, we demonstrated that this panel can be combined with additional targeted capture panels to detect prognostically important CLL single nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions, and copy number variants (TP53 copy number loss). CONCLUSIONS: A targeted capture approach to IGHV SHM detection can be integrated into broader sequencing panels, allowing broad CLL prognostication in a single molecular assay.

Multisite clinical cross-validation and variant interpretation of a next generation sequencing panel for lymphoid cancer prognostication.

AIMS: Genomic sequencing of lymphomas is under-represented in routine clinical testing despite having prognostic and predictive value. Clinical implementation is challenging due to a lack of consensus on reportable targets and a paucity of reference samples. We organised a cross-validation study of a lymphoma-tailored next-generation sequencing panel between two College of American Pathologists (CAP)-accredited clinical laboratories to mitigate these challenges. METHODS: A consensus for the genomic targets was discussed between the two institutes based on recurrence in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and T-cell lymphomas. Using the same genomic targets, each laboratory ordered libraries independently and a cross-validation study was designed to exchange samples (8 cell lines and 22 clinical samples) and their FASTQ files. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the panel when comparing different library preparation and bioinformatic workflows was between 97% and 99% and specificity was 100% when a 5% limit of detection cut-off was applied. To evaluate how the current standards for variant classification of tumours apply to lymphomas, the Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/CAP and OncoKB classification systems were applied to the panel. The majority of variants were assigned a possibly actionable class or likely pathogenic due to more limited evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-validation study highlights the benefits of sample and data exchange for clinical validation and provided a framework for reporting the findings in lymphoid malignancies.