The association between nutrition and behavioural health in a US Army population.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between nutrition and behavioural health (BH) outcomes has been established in the literature. However, the relationship between nutrition and anxiety is unclear. Furthermore, the relationship between nutrition and BH outcomes has not been examined in a US Army Soldier population. This study sought to understand the relationship between Soldiers' nutritional intake and anxiety as well as depression. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study utilised multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the relationship between nutritional intake and BH outcomes. SETTING: The study utilised data collected in 2018 during a BH epidemiological consultation conducted at one Army installation. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 7043 US Army Soldiers at one Army installation. RESULTS: Of the Soldiers completing the survey, 12 % (n 812) screened positive for anxiety and 11 % (n 774) for depression. The adjusted odds of anxiety were significantly higher among Soldiers who reported low fruit intake compared with Soldiers who reported high fruit intake (adjusted OR (AOR) 1·36; 95 % CI 1·04, 1·79). The adjusted odds of depression were higher for Soldiers who reported low fruit intake (AOR 1·35; 95 % CI 1·01, 1·79) and/or low green vegetable intake (AOR 1·37; 95 % CI 1·02, 1·83). Lastly, the adjusted odds of depression were lower for Soldiers who reported low sugary drink intake (AOR 0·62; 95 % CI 0·48, 0·81). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to examine the important connection between nutritional intake and anxiety and depression at a US military installation. The information learned from this study has implications for enhancing Soldiers' nutritional knowledge and BH, ultimately improving Soldiers' health and medical readiness.

Vaping, Smoking, and the Physical Fitness of Active Young Men.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse effects of cigarette smoking on physical performance are well studied. Because of the recent rise in popularity of vaping, it is important to evaluate its effect on fitness both independently and in conjunction with traditional cigarette use. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis performed in 2018 on data collected from U.S. Army Soldiers during 2016. All metrics were self-reported via an electronic questionnaire. Personal characteristics of current ENDS users, smokers, and dual users were compared with a reference group that reported no history of use. Adjusting for age and physical training habits, an ANCOVA was used to compare Army physical fitness test results. A Fisher's exact test determined specific mean differences between groups. RESULTS: This study population consisted of 2,854 men aged 24.6 years on average. Differences in physical training and fitness were shown between the groups. Never users averaged the most total physical training, followed by ENDS users, smokers, and then dual users. Compared with never users on the fitness tests, ENDS users had an adjusted mean difference of +27 seconds on the 2-mile run, -4.56 push-ups, and -2.01 sit-ups; smokers averaged +8 seconds, -2.15 push-ups, and -1.44 sit-ups; and dual users averaged +32 seconds, -5.17 push-ups, and -3.88 sit-ups. Dual users had significantly (p<0.05) lower scores than current smokers and never users on all 3 fitness events. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that individuals who use e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes average a lower level of fitness than individuals who abstain.

The Combined Effect of Cigarette Smoking and Fitness on Injury Risk in Men and Women.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have identified cigarette smoking and low fitness as independent risk factors for injury; however, no studies have evaluated the combined effect of cigarette smoking and fitness on injury risk. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combined effect of cigarette smoking and fitness on injury risk in men and women. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data collected from US Army recruits (n = 2000) during basic combat training within the United States in 2007. Physical training and fitness, cigarette smoking, and prior injury data were obtained from questionnaires, whereas demographic and injury data were obtained from medical and basic combat training unit records. Chi-squared tests were used to assess differences in injury risk by fitness level and cigarette smoking. Relative risk values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The primary findings showed that smokers experienced 20%-30% higher risk of injury than nonsmokers. In addition, higher aerobic and muscular fitness was generally not protective against injury between least fit and more fit smokers. However, higher fitness was protective against injury between least and more fit nonsmokers, with least fit nonsmokers being 30%-50% more likely to experience an injury than fit nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that higher aerobic and muscular fitness was not protective against injury among smokers; however, it was protective against injury among nonsmokers. Further implementation of smoking cessation programs may be beneficial for military and civilian personnel who are required to be physically fit in order to carry out their job responsibilities. IMPLICATIONS: Male and female smokers experienced significantly higher risk of injury than nonsmokers. Although higher fitness is protective against injury in nonsmokers, the protective effect of fitness is lost among smokers. In an attempt to reduce injury risk among military and emergency personnel, smoking cessation programs should be further implemented among both more fit and less fit smokers.