Cyclin A2 and Ki-67 proliferation markers could be used to identify tumors with poor prognosis in African American women with breast cancer.

Background: Diagnosed invasive breast carcinomas in African American patients are more aggressive compared with those in Caucasian patients and diagnosed at later stages of the disease with higher grade tumors. Despite advances in breast cancer systemic treatment, new prognostic and predictive biomarkers are still needed. Therefore, potential biomarkers were chosen to correlate with different subtypes, recurrence, and survival of invasive breast cancer in a cohort of African American women. Methods: Eight protein biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Cyclin A2, Cytokeratin 5, Vimentin, Bcl2, and Ki-67) were evaluated using tissue microarrays (TMAs) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The IHC results from TMAs were analyzed by both supervised and unsupervised clustering methods. The predictive clusters for the supervised and unsupervised methods were compared for agreement with the empirical classification. Kappa values were used to determine the overall percent correct clusters and agreement between specific clusters. Chi-square statistics was used to examine the association between hierarchical and multinomial logistic clustering methods. Results: Five subtypes of breast tumors with distinct protein expression patterns were identified among the studied 166 breast tumors. Luminal B tumors have been distinguished from luminal A tumors by staining for cell cycle proteins Cyclin A2 and Ki-67, which promote cell proliferation. Forty-nine percent were stained positive for Cyclin A2, 39.2% positive for Ki-67, and 37% positive for both Cyclin A2 and Ki-67. The age of patients did not show any significant effect whether five (p-value= 0.576) or eight (p-value= 0.605) biomarkers were used, which indicating that age did not have any influence on the classification of the subtypes. Ninety percent of the thirty triple negative tumors were positive for Cyclin A2 or Ki-67 or both. Six-year overall survival was better for luminal A tumors (76%) than luminal B tumors (71%). Likewise, six-year relapse-free survival was better for luminal A tumors (76%) than luminal B tumors (29%). Conclusion: Discovery of molecular markers such as Cyclin A2 and Ki-67, and subtypes that are most prevalent in African Americans could lead to a better understanding of the factors contributing to higher morbidity and mortality in this group and to aid in decision-making to offer earlier treatment.

Estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancers of young African-American women have a higher frequency of methylation of multiple genes than those of Caucasian women.

PURPOSE: To provide a molecular rationale for negative prognostic factors more prevalent in African-American (AA) than Caucasian (Cau) women, we investigated the frequency of promoter hypermethylation in invasive ductal breast cancers in the two races. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HIN-1, Twist, Cyclin D2, RAR-beta, and RASSF1A were analyzed in DNA from 67 AA and 44 Cau invasive ductal breast cancers, stratified by age and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status, by methylation-specific PCR. Hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to determine estimated probabilities of methylation. Expression of HIN-1 mRNA was analyzed by in situ hybridization and quantitative reverse transcribed PCR. RESULTS: Significant differences between races were observed in the ER-/PR-, age < 50 subgroup; AA tumors had higher frequency of methylation (P < 0.001) in four of five genes as compared with Cau and also a higher prevalence (80 versus 0%; P < 0.005) of three or more methylated genes per tumor. No differences in gene methylation patterns were observed across the two races for ER+/PR+ tumors in all ages and ER-/PR- tumors in age > 50. ER+/PR+ status was associated with higher frequency of methylation in Cau tumors of all ages but only with the age > 50 subgroup in AA. Frequent Cyclin D2 methylation was significantly associated (P = 0.01) with shorter survival time. CONCLUSION: ER-/PR-, age < 50 tumors in AA women, have a significantly higher frequency of hypermethylation than in those of Cau women. Comparative studies, such as these, could provide a molecular basis for differences in tumor progression and pathology seen in the two races.

Inherited BRCA2 mutations in African Americans with breast and/or ovarian cancer: a study of familial and early onset cases.

In order to identify the spectrum of BRCA2 mutations in African Americans, breast or ovarian cancer patients from 74 independent families at elevated risk of germline mutations were investigated. The entire coding regions and flanking introns of BRCA2 were screened for germline mutations by single-stranded conformation polymorphism, protein truncation test, or denaturing high performance liquid chromatography followed by DNA sequencing. Eight distinct protein-truncating mutations were detected in six female patients (average age of onset of breast cancer: 37.6 years) and two male patients, but not in 163 unrelated disease-free controls. Two (1993delAA, 8643delAT) of the eight pathogenic mutations observed in African Americans have not been previously described. The other six pathogenic mutations (1882delT, 1991delATAA, 2001delTTAT, 2816insA, 4075delGT, 4088delA) have been detected in Caucasians; only the 2816insA mutation has been reported previously in African Americans. There were no significant differences in the frequency of deleterious BRCA2 mutations in African Americans compared with Caucasians. Six rare variations, not previously reported, were identified in five breast cancer patients but not in 163 disease-free control subjects. Of 11 different polymorphisms identified in high-risk African-American breast cancer patients, four may be unique to African Americans. An intron 10 polymorphism observed in patients was not detected in 163 disease-free African-American control subjects; this difference is statistically significant. Since many different pathogenic mutations and variants of unknown significance are observed in African Americans, BRCA2 genetic testing in high-risk African-American families must include the entire coding and flanking non-coding regions of the gene.

Breast cancer genetics in African Americans.

BACKGROUND: An overview of the state of genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was presented at the Summit Meeting on Breast Cancer Among African American women. METHODS: An exhaustive literature search was performed using PubMed and abstracts published from meetings of the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Society of Human Genetics, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The Breast Cancer Information Core was also searched for information regarding sequence variants in which the ethnicity of the individual tested was known. RESULTS: Of the 26 distinct BRCA1 pathogenic mutations (protein-truncating, disease-associated missense, and splice variants) detected in Africans or African Americans, 15 (58%) have not been previously reported. In addition, 18 deleterious BRCA2 mutations have been identified and 10 (56%) of these are unique to the group. Only two pathogenic BRCA1 mutations (943ins10 and M1775R) have been detected in three or more unrelated families. However, seven additional BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutations have been reported in at least two unrelated families. Three of these recurrent BRCA1 mutations (943ins10, 1832del5, and 5296del4) have been characterized by haplotype studies and each likely arose from a common ancestor, including one ancestor that could be traced to the Ivory Coast in West Africa. Although only a few African-American families have been tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, the probability of finding a mutation is invariably dependent on the age of onset and the number of breast and/or ovarian cancer cases in the family. The psychosocial implications of genetic testing for African Americans have not been well studied, so that high-risk African Americans may underestimate their risks of breast and ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been identified in African-American and African families. A number of unique mutations have been described, but recurrent mutations are widely dispersed and are not readily identifiable in the few families that have been tested. Access to genetic counseling and testing in a culturally sensitive research setting must remain a high priority before genetic testing can be disseminated in the community.