The effect of inhaled nitric oxide on maximal oxygen consumption during exercise in acute hypoxia: a randomized double-blind crossover trial.

In moderate hypoxia [partial pressure of inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]) = 85-111 mmHg], the reduction in maximal oxygen consumption (V̇o2max) has been attributed to arterial desaturation, whereas in severe hypoxia ([Formula: see text] < 85 mmHg), elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) is thought to impair peak cardiac output ([Formula: see text]) and therefore V̇o2max. The purpose of this study was to examine whether reducing PAP with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO, a selective pulmonary vasodilator) would increase V̇o2max in moderate and severe acute hypoxia. Twelve young, healthy participants (mean V̇o2max = 45.3 ± 12.2 mL/kg/min), with normal lung function completed the randomized double-blind crossover study over six sessions. Experimental cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) were completed on separate days with participants under the following conditions: 1) acute moderate hypoxia ([Formula: see text] = 89 mmHg), 2) acute severe hypoxia ([Formula: see text] = 79 mmHg), 3) acute moderate hypoxia with 40 ppm iNO, and 4) acute severe hypoxia with 40 ppm iNO (order randomized). On separate days, rest, and exercise (60 W), echocardiography was conducted to determine right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP/PAP) under conditions 1-4. Resting RVSP was reduced by 2.5 ± 0.8 mmHg with iNO in moderate hypoxia (P = 0.01) and 1.8 ± 0.2 mmHg in severe hypoxia (P = 0.05); however, iNO had no effect on peak [Formula: see text] or V̇o2max in either hypoxic condition. Despite reducing RVSP with iNO in hypoxia, peak [Formula: see text] and V̇o2max were unaffected, suggesting that iNO may not improve exercise tolerance in healthy participants during hypoxic exercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The elevation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) with hypoxia may impair peak cardiac output ([Formula: see text]) and therefore V̇o2max. Our novel findings show that despite reducing resting RVSP in acute moderate ([Formula: see text] = 89 mmHg) and severe hypoxia ([Formula: see text] = 79 mmHg) with inspired nitric oxide, peak [Formula: see text], and V̇o2max were unaffected.

Normative Reference Equations for Breathlessness Intensity during Incremental Cardiopulmonary Cycle Exercise Testing.

Rationale: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard to evaluate exertional breathlessness, a common and disabling symptom. However, the interpretation of breathlessness responses to CPET is limited by a scarcity of normative data. Objectives: We aimed to develop normative reference equations for breathlessness intensity (Borg 0-10 category ratio) response in men and women aged ⩾40 years during CPET, in relation to power output (watts), oxygen uptake, and minute ventilation. Methods: Analysis of ostensibly healthy people aged ⩾40 years undergoing symptom-limited incremental cycle CPET (10 W/min) in the CanCOLD (Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease) study. Participants had smoking histories <5 pack-years and normal lung function and exercise capacity. The probability of each Borg 0-10 category ratio breathlessness intensity rating by power output, oxygen uptake, and minute ventilation (as an absolute or a relative value [percentage of predicted maximum]) was predicted using ordinal multinomial logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated by fit, calibration, and discrimination (C statistic) and externally validated in an independent sample (n = 86) of healthy Canadian adults. Results: We included 156 participants (43% women) from CanCOLD; the mean age was 65 (range, 42-91) years, and the mean body mass index was 26.3 (standard deviation, 3.8) kg/m2. Reference equations were developed for women and men separately, accounting for age and/or body mass. Model performance was high across all equations, including in the validation sample (C statistic for men = 0.81-0.92, C statistic for women = 0.81-0.96). Conclusions: Normative reference equations are provided to compare exertional breathlessness intensity ratings among individuals or groups and to identify and quantify abnormal breathlessness responses (scores greater than the upper limit of normal) during CPET.

Impact of airway challenges on cardiovascular risk in asthma - a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: People experiencing asthma exacerbations are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. To better understand the relationship between asthma exacerbations and cardiovascular risk, this randomized case-control, cross-over controlled trial assessed the immediate systemic inflammatory and vascular responses to acutely induced pulmonary inflammation and bronchoconstriction in people with asthma and controls. METHODS: Twenty-six people with asthma and 25 controls underwent three airway challenges (placebo, mannitol, and methacholine) in random order. Markers of cardiovascular risk, including serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor, endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation), microvascular function (blood-flow following reactive hyperemia), and arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity) were evaluated at baseline and within one hour following each challenge. The systemic responses in a) asthma/control and b) positive airway challenges were analyzed. (ClinicalTrials.gov reg# NCT02630511). RESULTS: Both the mannitol and methacholine challenges resulted in clinically significant reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in asthma (-7.6% and -17.9%, respectively). Following positive challenges, reduction in FEV1 was -27.6% for methacholine and -14.2% for mannitol. No meaningful differences in predictors of cardiovascular risk were observed between airway challenges regardless of bronchoconstrictor response. CONCLUSION: Neither acutely induced bronchoconstriction nor pulmonary inflammation and bronchoconstriction resulted in meaningful changes in systemic inflammatory or vascular function. These findings question whether the increased cardiovascular risk associated with asthma exacerbations is secondary to acute bronchoconstriction or inflammation, and suggest that other factors need to be further evaluated such as the cardiovascular impacts of short-acting inhaled beta-agonists.